Skip to main content
Download PDF

Epidemiology and outcomes of multidrug-resistant bacterial infection in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis

Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials volume 23, Article number: 15 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

Multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria impose a considerable health-care burden and are associated with bronchiectasis exacerbation. This study investigated the clinical outcomes of adult patients with bronchiectasis following MDR bacterial infection.

Methods

From the Chang Gung Research Database, we identified patients with bronchiectasis and MDR bacterial infection from 2008 to 2017. The control group comprised patients with bronchiectasis who did not have MDR bacterial infection and were propensity-score matched at a 1:2 ratio. The main outcomes were in-hospital and 3-year mortality.

Results

In total, 554 patients with both bronchiectasis and MDR bacterial infection were identified. The types of MDR bacteria that most commonly affected the patients were MDR- Acinetobacter baumannii (38.6%) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (18.4%), Extended-spectrum-beta-lactamases (ESBL)- Klebsiella pneumoniae (17.8%), MDR-Pseudomonas (14.8%), and ESBL-E. coli (7.5%). Compared with the control group, the MDR group exhibited lower body mass index scores, higher rate of chronic bacterial colonization, a higher rate of previous exacerbations, and an increased use of antibiotics. Furthermore, the MDR group exhibited a higher rate of respiratory failure during hospitalization (MDR vs. control, 41.3% vs. 12.4%; p < 0.001). The MDR and control groups exhibited in-hospital mortality rates of 26.7% and 7.6%, respectively (p < 0.001); 3-year respiratory failure rates of 33.5% and 13.5%, respectively (p < 0.001); and 3-year mortality rates of 73.3% and 41.5%, respectively (p < 0.001). After adjustments were made for confounding factors, the infection with MDR and MDR bacteria species were determined to be independent risk factors affecting in-hospital and 3-year mortality.

Conclusions

MDR bacteria were discovered in patients with more severe bronchiectasis and were independently associated with an increased risk of in-hospital and 3-year mortality. Given our findings, we recommend that clinicians identify patients at risk of MDR bacterial infection and follow the principle of antimicrobial stewardship to prevent the emergence of resistant bacteria among patients with bronchiectasis.

Introduction

Bronchiectasis is characterized by the permanent dilation of bronchi, recurrent respiratory infections and exacerbations [1]. Frequent exacerbations are associated with worse outcomes [2]. The main pathogens that cause exacerbations include bacteria, fungi, nontuberculous mycobacteria and viruses [3,4,5]. Bacterial infections can also occur during stable periods. Because bacterial colonization increases the risk of mortality in patients with bronchiectasis, it is included in bronchiectasis severity index (BSI) as a clinical prediction tool [6].

The incidence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria is increasing worldwide and becomes a threat to public health [7, 8]. Hospitalized patients, especially patients with critical illnesses and multimorbidity, are more likely to develop MDR bacterial infections because they undergo extensive antibiotic therapy [9]. Approximately 10–38% of hospitalized patients develop MDR bacterial infections during their hospital stay, and MDR bacterial infection is associated with increased hospital expenses, prolonged hospital stays, and higher mortality rates [9, 10].

Patients with bronchiectasis often receive antibiotics during exacerbations. The risk of acquiring MDR infection increases after several courses of broad-spectrum antibiotics treatment [11, 12]. In bronchiectasis, several risk factors for MDR infection were identified during exacerbations, including previous hospitalization, chronic kidney disease, and previous MDR isolation [11]. Increased risk of mortality has been implicated in patients with bronchiectasis and MDR infection but remain less well investigated [12]. In the international multicenter study which derives and validates BSI, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection and Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection exhibited the highest mortality rates (MRSA, 62.5%; P. aeruginosa, 21.2%) [6]. Because previous studies have had limited numbers of patients with both bronchiectasis and MDR bacterial infection, these studies have not analyzed the impact of each MDR bacterial species on clinical outcomes.

Few clinical studies have investigated the clinical outcomes of or identified the independent prognostic factors associated with MDR bacterial infection in patients with bronchiectasis. Even fewer studies have explored whether MDR bacterial species, patient characteristics, prior use of antibiotics, or comorbidities affect the clinical outcomes of bronchiectasis. To address this research gap, the present study investigated the risk factors associated with MDR bacterial infection in bronchiectasis and their effects on clinical outcomes in an Asian cohort.

Methods

Bronchiectasis cohort

This study analyzed data of Chang Gung Research Database (CGRD) from the electronic medical records of three medical centers and four regional hospitals that operate under in the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (CGMH) system [13]. The multi-institutional bronchiectasis cohort comprised adult patients (aged ≥ 18 years) with at least two bronchiectasis diagnoses (International Classification of Diseases, 9th Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) 494.0 or 494.1) from outpatient visits or from hospitalization records from January 2008 to December 2017 [14,15,16]. The diagnosis of bronchiectasis was made by radiologist and pulmonary specialist based on the high-resolution computed tomography results and clinical symptoms. The exclusion criteria included patients without sputum culture, duration of follow up less than 6 months and cystic fibrosis.

Definition of MDR infection

MDR bacteria were classified according to the international guideline [17]. For Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii (AB), MDR was defined as resistance to at least three antimicrobial classes. For S. aureus, MRSA was defined as resistance to oxacillin. For Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP), extended-spectrum-beta-lactamases (ESBL) was defined as resistance to at least three classes of β -lactam antibiotics, including penicillin, cephalosporins, and aztreonam. At least one culture of MDR pathogen was needed to define an individual as having MDR bacteria. The laboratory in CGMH used disc diffusion method (BD BBL Sensi-Disc, USA) to determine the susceptibility/resistance of antibiotics during the study period. The standard criteria of antibiotics sensitivity by disc diffusion method are added in the supplement Table S1. Chronic bacterial colonization which is defined as isolation of the same bacteria in two or more sputum cultures, at least 3 months apart within one year [18]. Bacterial infection in bronchiectasis was defined as an exacerbation related to bacteria with the use of antibiotics and worsening respiratory symptoms (increasing cough, sputum, or dyspnea) [19]. Convert to non-MDR status was defined as no growth of MDR bacteria in all sputum culture within one year. Because this study was based on a database of real-world practice, we did not set a minimum number of samples to define convert to non-MDR status.

Main outcomes

The primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and 3-year overall mortality after the index date, which was defined as the date of sputum culture collection prescribed by clinicians for suspicion of bronchiectasis exacerbation. Acute respiratory failure was defined according to ICD-9-CM code 518.81 or 518.82 or ICD-10-CM code J96.0 with mechanical ventilator use [20].

Clinical parameters

Demographic data, CT reports, laboratory and microbiology data and pulmonary function reports were retrieved from the CGRD. The Bronchiectasis Aetiology Comorbidity Index (BACI) scores of the bronchiectasis cohort were calculated on the basis of their documented diagnoses (ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM) of comorbidities from CGRD [21]. The etiology of bronchiectasis was determined on the basis of the definition in another study [14]. Age was calculated from the birth date to the index date. The clinical details (body mass index (BMI) and lung function) were retrieved from the medical records within one year before index date. Comorbidities were retrieved from the medical records within three years before index date. We retrieved sputum microbiology reports including bacteria species and antibiotics sensitivity. Shock was defined according to diagnoses (ICD-9-CM code 785 or ICD-10-CM code R57) involving the use of systemic inotropic agents or vasopressors [22]. The medical treatments considered in the present study included systemic antibiotics, inhalation antibiotics, systemic corticosteroids, and inhalation steroids. Acute kidney injury during hospital admission was defined on the basis of serum creatinine level (an increase of 0.3 mg/dL or of 50% above baseline) [23].

Statistical analysis

Because an imbalance was identified in the distribution of clinical characteristics between the MDR and control groups, propensity score matching was performed to address potential confounding factors. The predicted probability of identifying positive MDR isolates was calculated through logistic regression and served as the propensity score, which incorporated several covariates related to outcomes, namely age, sex, comorbidities, and BACI score (Table 1). The MDR and control groups were matched at a 1:2 ratio.

Table 1 Demographics and clinical characteristics of patients
Full size table

For dichotomous variables, we used chi-square tests and two-sided Fisher exact tests for analysis. Unpaired t-tests were used for normally distributed continuous variables. For non-normally distributed continuous data, Mann-Whitney U tests were used for analysis. P-values (two-sided) < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Risk factors for mortality were identified through univariate descriptive analysis. For the variables with significant results (p < 0.05, as revealed through univariate descriptive analysis), multivariate Cox proportional-hazards regression was performed to identify independent risk factors. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS software, version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA).

Results

From the CGRD, 8,063 patients with bronchiectasis and sputum culture were identified between 2008 and 2017. A total of 554 bronchiectasis patients having MDR infection were confirmed. After propensity score matching was performed, the MDR and control groups exhibited similar distributions for age, sex, and comorbidities (supplementary Table S2). In the MDR group, 214 (38.6%) were MDR-AB, 102 (18.4%) were MRSA, 99 (17.8%) were ESBL-KP, 82 (14.8%) were MDR-Pseudomonas, and 47 (7.5%) were ESBL-E. coli. The distribution of patients with bronchiectasis in the CGMH-affiliated institutions is presented in Table 1, which reveals that the Linkou branch accounted for the largest proportion of the patients with MDR (42.6%), followed by the Chiayi branch (23.1%) and Keelung branch (21.3%). The bacteriological results were mainly from sputum culture (MDR:95.4%, control: 94.9%). Only a small portion of bacteriological results were from bronchial washing or bronchoalveolar larvage culture reports (MDR:4.6%, control: 5.1%).

The demographic and clinical characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Compared with the control group, the MDR group exhibited lower FEV1 levels and BMI scores, a higher rate of previous exacerbation, and an increased use of antibiotics. The MDR group had a significantly higher rate of chronic bacterial colonization than control group (90 (16.25%) vs. 17 (1.53%), p < 0.001). During treatment, the MDR group exhibited higher rates of acute kidney injury and hemodialysis than the control group. Relative to the patients in the control group, a higher proportion of the patients in the MDR group were administered antibiotics (MDR vs. control, 98.2% vs. 79.9%; p < 0.001) and systemic corticosteroids (MDR vs. control, 71.3% vs. 42.5%; p < 0.001) (Table 2). 130 patients (MDR group: 40) had non-tuberculous mycobacterium in sputum culture within one months of index date. 37 patients (MDR group: 21) had mycobacterium avium-intracellulare complex in sputum culture. 1164 patients (MDR group: 517) had blood culture and 240 patients (MDR group: 151) had positive pathogen results in blood culture. 28 patients had MDR bacteria in blood culture and were all in the MDR group. The MDR group exhibited a higher rate of respiratory failure during hospitalization (MDR vs. control, 41.3% vs. 12.4%; p < 0.001) (Table 3). The MDR and control groups had an in-hospital mortality rate of 26.7% and 7.6%, respectively (p < 0.001); a 3-year respiratory failure rate of 33.6% and 13.5%, respectively (p < 0.001); and a 3-year mortality rate of 73.3% and 41.5%, respectively (p < 0.001) (Table 3). Respiratory failure (MDR: 90(60.8%), control: 56(67.5%)) was the major cause of in-hospital mortality and other causes included cardiovascular deaths (MDR:14(9.4%), control: 10(12.0%)) and other deaths (MDR:44(29.7%), control: 17(20.5%)). Respiratory failure (MDR:255(62.8%), control: 271(58.9%)) was the major cause of 3-year mortality and other causes included cardiovascular deaths (MDR:35(8.6%), control: 70(15.2%)) and other deaths (MDR:116(28.6%), control: 119(25.9%)). In MDR group, 42.1% convert to non-MDR status during follow up. The mean number of negative sputum culture in convert to non-MDR patients were 4.95 ± 4.51 within one year and 83.2% of them had more than two times of negative sputum culture. Relative to the control group, the MDR group had a considerably higher cumulative incidence of mortality during a 3-year follow-up period (Fig. 1a). The mean duration of follow up was 2.1 ± 0.8 years for MDR group and 2.7 ± 1.3 years for control group (p < 0.01). Figure 2 presents the incidence of MDR infection stratified by year.

Table 2 Antibiotics exposure, clinical parameters and treatment during hospitalization
Full size table
Table 3 Main clinical outcomes of hospitalization
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Annual incident numbers of bronchiectasis with multidrug-resistant bacterial infection in CGRD since 2008–2017. CGRD: Chang Gung Research Database

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Kaplan–Meier survival curves for (A) 3-year mortality of the cohort (Control and MDR groups); (B) 3-year mortality of the cohort (Control and MDR subgroups) MDR, multidrug-resistant

Full size image

The characteristics of the MDR subgroups are presented in Table 1, which reveals that the MDR subgroups had similar distributions for sex, BMI score, lung function, and acute exacerbation rate in the preceding year. Among the MDR subgroups, the ESBL-KP subgroup had the highest mean age, and the MRSA subgroup had the highest BACI scores. Furthermore, the ESBL-KP and MRSA subgroups had higher proportions of patients with preexisting cerebrovascular disease and cardiovascular disease relative to the other subgroups.

The outcomes of the MDR subgroups are presented in Table 3. Among the MDR subgroups, the ESBL-E. coli subgroup exhibited the shortest time to MDR infection following a diagnosis of bronchiectasis, whereas the MRSA subgroup exhibited the longest time to MDR infection following a diagnosis of bronchiectasis. In addition, the MDR-AB subgroup had the highest rate of invasive ventilator use; the MDR-Pseudomonas subgroup had the highest number of days of ventilator use; the ESBL-KP subgroup had the highest incidence of shock (47% vs. 6%; p < 0.001); the ESBL-E. coli subgroup had the longest duration of hospital stay; the MDR-Pseudomonas subgroup had the highest 3-year respiratory failure rate; the ESBL-KP subgroup had the highest 3-year mortality rate; and the MDR-AB subgroup required the least time to convert from an MDR to a non-MDR status. For in-hospital mortality, the MDR subgroups did not exhibit significant differences. Figure 1b presents the survival curves of the MDR subgroups during a 3-year follow-up period.

Through multivariate analysis, several independent factors for in-hospital mortality were identified (Table 4), namely MDR bacteria (odds ratio [OR], 2.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.80–3.23; p < 0.001), age (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01–1.03; p = 0.001), hematological malignancy (OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.21–3.21; p = 0.006), and acute kidney injury (OR, 3.02; 95% CI, 2.28–4.00; p < 0.001). The analysis also revealed several independent risk factors for 3-year mortality (Table 5), namely MDR bacteria (OR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.65–2.19; p < 0.001), age (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.03–1.04; p < 0.001), male sex (OR, 7.66; 95% CI, 3.73–15.75; p < 0.001), per-unit decrease in BMI score (OR, 7.66; 95% CI, 3.73–15.75; p < 0.001), acute kidney injury (OR, 7.66; 95% CI, 3.73–15.75; p < 0.001), BACI score (OR, 7.66; 95% CI, 3.73–15.75; p < 0.001), and hemodialysis (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.99–0.99; p = 0.021). MDR conversion and MDR nonconversion were both independent risk factors for 3-year mortality after adjustments were made for confounding factors (Table 5). All MDR bacteria except ESBL-E. coli were independent risk factors for in-hospital and 3-year mortality in the bronchiectasis cohort after adjustments were made for confounding factors (Table 6).

Table 4 Univariate and multivariate analysis of in-hospital mortality
Full size table
Table 5 Univariate and multivariate analysis of 3-year mortality
Full size table
Table 6 Adjusted hazard ratio of in-hospital and 3-year mortality in MDR subgroups
Full size table

Discussion

This study revealed an association between MDR bacterial infection and poor outcomes in patients with bronchiectasis. In our bronchiectasis cohort, MDR-AB was the most frequently isolated MDR bacteria, followed by MRSA, ESBL-KP, MDR-Pseudomonas, and ESBL-E. coli. Relative to the control group, the MDR group exhibited significantly higher rates of in-hospital mortality, 3-year respiratory failure, and 3-year mortality. All MDR subgroups (stratified by MDR bacteria species) exhibited a higher risk of mortality relative to the control group.

The prevalence of MDR bacteria is increasing worldwide. In the Unites States, more than 2 million patients were infected with MDR pathogens annually [24]. In Asia, high rates of MDR bacterial isolation have been reported in patients in normal wards and intensive care units (ICU) [7]. The substantial burden of antimicrobial MDR bacteria poses a public health problem and leads to increased morbidity, mortality, and medical expenses [7,8,9]. The prevalence of MDR bacteria varies across different countries. In a European study that analyzed a cohort of patients with bronchiectasis, MDR bacteria were isolated in 20% of exacerbation cases, with the most frequently isolated bacteria being Pseudomonas, MRSA, and ESBL- Enterobacteriaceae [11]. Studies have reported significant geographic variations in the prevalence of pathogens during bronchiectasis exacerbations [25]. However, the literature on the prevalence of MDR bacterial infection among patients with bronchiectasis in Asia is limited. In the bronchiectasis cohort of the present study (retrieved), the most frequently identified MDR bacteria were MDR-AB (38.6%), MRSA (18.4%), ESBL-KP (17.8%), MDR-Pseudomonas (14.8%), and ESBL-E. coli (7.5%). In Asia, the emergence and spread of MDR bacterial infection among hospitalized patients is becoming a health-care concern. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to report on the characteristics and outcomes of MDR bacterial infection in patients with bronchiectasis in Asia.

The effects of MDR bacterial infection on outcomes is a key clinical topic that should be investigated. Nosocomial pneumonia due to MDR bacteria has been reported to be associated with poor clinical outcomes [9, 10]. MDR bacteria were independently associated with increased in-hospital, 1-month, and 6-month mortality in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation [9, 26]. MDR bacteria are commonly identified in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who experience severe acute exacerbations that require intubation and mechanical ventilation [27, 28]. A study reported MDR infection caused higher mortality rate than drug-sensitive patients in COPD exacerbation (12%, vs. 4.7%) [29]. The effects of MDR bacterial infection on the clinical outcomes of patients with bronchiectasis require further clarification. Our findings indicate that MDR bacterial infection is associated with worse clinical outcomes in patients with bronchiectasis, including a longer duration of mechanical ventilation, prolonged ICU and hospital stays, and increased mortality.

Bacteria colonization increase the risk of mortality in bronchiectasis and is incorporated into BSI as a clinical prediction tool [6]. The mortality rates associated with colonizing bacterial species varied significantly in an international multicenter study, which derives and validates BSI score and reported that P. aeruginosa (21.2%) and MRSA (62.5%) infections exhibited the highest mortality rates among MDR bacterial species [6]. Although the culture results of that study revealed that only 8 of 1,310 patients with bronchiectasis had MRSA infection, the high mortality rate was an alarming finding that warranted further exploration [6]. Studies have reported that MDR bacterial infections involving P. aeruginosa, ESBL Enterobacter, and MRSA were independently associated with an increased risk of 30-day mortality in the general population [9, 30]. However, the effects of MDR bacterial species on the outcomes of bronchiectasis remain unclear. The findings of the present study indicate that in-hospital mortality rates were not significantly different among the MDR subgroups. However, among these MDR subgroups, the MDR-Pseudomonas subgroup exhibited the highest 3-year respiratory failure rates, whereas the ESBL-KP subgroup exhibited the highest 3-year mortality rates.

Several risk factors have been reported to be associated with MDR infection in hospitalized patients, including previous exposure to antibiotics, use of invasive catheterization devices, mechanical ventilation, and hospital admission (particularly admission to an ICU) [31]. In patients with bronchiectasis, several risk factors for MDR bacterial infection during exacerbations have been identified, including hospitalization within the preceding year, chronic kidney disease, and previous MDR isolation [11]. In the present study, the MDR group exhibited lower FEV1 levels and BMI scores, higher BACI scores, a higher rate of previous exacerbation, and an increased use of antibiotics relative to the control group; these findings indicate the presence of more comorbid diseases and a higher disease severity. Age, hematological malignancy, and acute kidney injury were identified as risk factors for in-hospital mortality. Age, male sex, per-unit decrease in BMI score, acute kidney injury, hemodialysis, systemic steroid use, and BACI score were identified as risk factors for 3-year mortality. The risk factors for poor clinical outcomes due to MDR bacterial infection include inappropriate administration of initial antibiotic therapy, underlying comorbidities, and poor immunity [10]. Thus, clinicians should identify patients at risk of MDR bacterial infection from the onset of infection.

Decolonization of MDR bacteria has been proposed to reduce subsequent infection risk and improve clinical outcomes [32]. For carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae colonization in digestive tract, oral antibiotic decolonization has been reported to be effective in reducing mortality [33, 34]. However, the routine decolonization of other MDR bacteria (MDR-gram-negative bacteria, carbapenem-resistant AB, and third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae) is not recommended [32]. In the present study, MDR nonconversion contributed to a higher risk of 3-year mortality in the MDR group than in the control group. Although MDR conversion was associated with a lower risk of 3-year mortality relative to MDR nonconversion, MDR conversion was still an independent risk factor for 3-year mortality compared to the control group. The present study provides evidence of the risk of MDR nonconversion in patients with bronchiectasis. Nevertheless, further prospective clinical research is required to assess the effects of various interventions on patients with both bronchiectasis and MDR bacterial infection.

The prevalence of MDR bacterial infection varies across countries [7, 35]. In numerous countries, the trends in the prevalence of MDR bacterial infection may increase or remain stable, depending on the status of endemic infection or ongoing regional spread. In Asia, the prevalence of MDR bacterial infection is increasing in numerous countries, and the burden of antimicrobial drug resistance is greater in this region than in Western countries [7]. A decrease in the incidence of MDR bacterial infection has occasionally been observed after the implementation of surveillance programs and infection control interventions. In the United States, the incidence of MDR bacterial infection involving the P. aeruginosa, MRSA, and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter species decreased from 2012 to 2017 [24]. This study found that regional differences in MDR bacteria proportion of bronchiectasis existed in the institutes of CGMH and over ten years, the number of patients with bronchiectasis who developed MDR bacteria was increasing. The increasing trend of MDR bacterial infection highlights the crucial role that infection-control measures play in health-care settings in reducing the prevalence of resistant bacteria.

The present study has several limitations. First, although the data retrieved from the CGRD comprised data from medical centers and regional hospitals, such data may differ from those of other hospitals of Taiwan. Second, we could not retrieve several parameters from the CGRD, and BSI scores could not be calculated to stratify our results by disease severity. However, we demonstrated that BACI scores can be used to predict mortality in CGRD [15]. Third, previous exacerbation rates, lung function and BMI were not included in propensity score matching. We list age, gender, comorbidities and BACI score as basis for propensity score matching because BACI score has been validated to predict prognosis in bronchiectasis [21]. In a European study, the BACI predicted 5-year mortality rate, hospital admissions, exacerbations, and health-related quality of life [21]. Our previous study has provided evidence that BACI could be used to accurately stratified the risk of hospital and 1-year follow-up mortality in CGRD [15]. Although we did not include previous exacerbation rates in propensity score matching, exacerbation rates were adjusted in the univariate and multivariate analysis of 3-year mortality when evaluating the effect of MDR bacteria on the outcome. Because there were some missing data in lung function and BMI, we did not include these two parameters in propensity score matching. Fourth, the present study adopted a retrospective observation design and was based on a database of real-world practice. The clinicians may choose different regimens for the treatment of MDR bacteria. Therefore, treatment selection bias may exist when evaluating the outcomes of MDR infection and future prospective study with standard protocol is needed.

Conclusions

MDR bacteria were identified in a proportion of patients with bronchiectasis and were revealed to be independently associated with an increased risk of in-hospital and 3-year mortality. In the bronchiectasis cohort of the present study, MDR-AB was the most frequently isolated MDR bacteria, followed by MRSA, ESBL-KP, MDR-Pseudomonas, and ESBL-E. coli. In addition to MDR bacterial infection, we identified several independent risk factors for in-hospital and 3-year mortality. Given our findings, we recommend that clinicians identify patients at risk of MDR bacterial infection and follow the principle of antimicrobial stewardship to prevent the emergence of resistant bacteria among patients with bronchiectasis.

Data availability

The data are not publicly available due to ethical restrictions and regulations of the Institutional Review Board of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital.

Abbreviations

AB:

Acinetobacter baumannii

BACI:

Bronchiectasis Aetiology Comorbidity Index

BMI:

body mass index

BSI:

bronchiectasis severity index

CGMH:

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

CGRD:

Chang Gung Research Database

COPD:

chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

ICD-9-CM:

International Classification of Diseases, 9th Clinical Modification

ICU:

intensive care units

E. coli:

Escherichia coli

ESBL:

extended-spectrum-beta-lactamases

KP:

Klebsiella pneumoniae

MDR:

multidrug-resistant

MRSA:

methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

References

  1. Cole PJ. Inflammation: a two-edged sword–the model of bronchiectasis. Eur J Respir Dis Suppl. 1986;147:6–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chalmers JD, Aliberti S, Filonenko A, Shteinberg M, Goeminne PC, Hill AT, et al. Characterization of the frequent Exacerbator phenotype in Bronchiectasis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;197(11):1410–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Richardson H, Dicker AJ, Barclay H, Chalmers JD. The microbiome in bronchiectasis. Eur Respir Rev. 2019;28(153):190048.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Lin CY, Huang HY, Hsieh MH, Fang YF, Lo YL, Lin SM, et al. Impacts of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria isolates in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis: a 16-Year Cohort Study in Taiwan. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:868435.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Huang HY, Lo CY, Chung FT, Huang YT, Ko PC, Lin CW, et al. Risk factors for Influenza-Induced exacerbations and Mortality in Non-cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis. Viruses. 2023;15(2):537.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Chalmers JD, Goeminne P, Aliberti S, McDonnell MJ, Lonni S, Davidson J, et al. The bronchiectasis severity index. An international derivation and validation study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;189(5):576–85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Lai CC, Lee K, Xiao Y, Ahmad N, Veeraraghavan B, Thamlikitkul V, et al. High burden of antimicrobial drug resistance in Asia. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2014;2(3):141–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Paul M, Carrara E, Retamar P, Tangden T, Bitterman R, Bonomo RA, et al. European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious diseases (ESCMID) guidelines for the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (endorsed by European society of intensive care medicine). Clin Microbiol Infect. 2022;28(4):521–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rodrigo-Troyano A, Sibila O. The respiratory threat posed by multidrug resistant gram-negative bacteria. Respirology. 2017;22(7):1288–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cerceo E, Deitelzweig SB, Sherman BM, Amin AN. Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections in the hospital setting: overview, implications for clinical practice, and Emerging Treatment options. Microb Drug Resist. 2016;22(5):412–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Menendez R, Mendez R, Polverino E, Rosales-Mayor E, Amara-Elori I, Reyes S, et al. Risk factors for multidrug-resistant pathogens in bronchiectasis exacerbations. BMC Infect Dis. 2017;17(1):659.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Inchingolo R, Pierandrei C, Montemurro G, Smargiassi A, Lohmeyer FM, Rizzi A. Antimicrobial resistance in common respiratory pathogens of chronic bronchiectasis patients: a Literature Review. Antibiot (Basel). 2021;10(3):326.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tsai MS, Lin MH, Lee CP, Yang YH, Chen WC, Chang GH, et al. Chang Gung Research Database: a multi-institutional database consisting of original medical records. Biomed J. 2017;40(5):263–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang HY, Chung FT, Lo CY, Lin HC, Huang YT, Yeh CH, et al. Etiology and characteristics of patients with bronchiectasis in Taiwan: a cohort study from 2002 to 2016. BMC Pulm Med. 2020;20(1):45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang HY, Chung FT, Lin CY, Lo CY, Huang YT, Huang YC, et al. Influence of comorbidities and airway clearance on mortality and outcomes of patients with severe bronchiectasis exacerbations in Taiwan. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:812775.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lin HC, Huang HY, Lin CY, Fang YF, Lin CH, Huang YT, et al. Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of bronchiectasis rheumatoid overlap syndrome: a multi-institution cohort study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;9:1004550.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, Carmeli Y, Falagas ME, Giske CG, et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18(3):268–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Finch S, McDonnell MJ, Abo-Leyah H, Aliberti S, Chalmers JD. A comprehensive analysis of the impact of Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonization on prognosis in adult bronchiectasis. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015;12(11):1602–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hill AT, Haworth CS, Aliberti S, Barker A, Blasi F, Boersma W, et al. Pulmonary exacerbation in adults with bronchiectasis: a consensus definition for clinical research. Eur Respir J. 2017;49(6):1700051.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Phua J, Ang YL, See KC, Mukhopadhyay A, Santiago EA, Dela Pena EG, et al. Noninvasive and invasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure associated with bronchiectasis. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36(4):638–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. McDonnell MJ, Aliberti S, Goeminne PC, Restrepo MI, Finch S, Pesci A, et al. Comorbidities and the risk of mortality in patients with bronchiectasis: an international multicentre cohort study. Lancet Respir Med. 2016;4(12):969–79.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Levy MM, Dellinger RP, Townsend SR, Linde-Zwirble WT, Marshall JC, Bion J, et al. The surviving Sepsis campaign: results of an international guideline-based performance improvement program targeting severe sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(2):367–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ronco C, Levin A, Warnock DG, Mehta R, Kellum JA, Shah S, et al. Improving outcomes from acute kidney injury (AKI): report on an initiative. Int J Artif Organs. 2007;30(5):373–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jernigan JA, Hatfield KM, Wolford H, Nelson RE, Olubajo B, Reddy SC, et al. Multidrug-resistant bacterial infections in U.S. Hospitalized patients, 2012–2017. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(14):1309–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Chandrasekaran R, Mac Aogain M, Chalmers JD, Elborn SJ, Chotirmall SH. Geographic variation in the aetiology, epidemiology and microbiology of bronchiectasis. BMC Pulm Med. 2018;18(1):83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Tseng WP, Chen YC, Chen SY, Chen SY, Chang SC. Risk for subsequent infection and mortality after hospitalization among patients with multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria colonization or infection. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2018;7:93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Nseir S, Di Pompeo C, Cavestri B, Jozefowicz E, Nyunga M, Soubrier S, et al. Multiple-drug-resistant bacteria in patients with severe acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: prevalence, risk factors, and outcome. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(12):2959–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nseir S, Ader F. Prevalence and outcome of severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2008;14(2):95–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kaleem Ullah M, Malamardi S, Siddaiah JB, Prashant AT, Vishwanath A. Trends in the bacterial prevalence and antibiotic resistance patterns in the acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in hospitalized patients in South India. Antibiot (Basel). 2022;11(11):1577.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Miyakis S, Brentnall S, Masso M, Reynolds G, Byrne MK, Newton P, et al. Key predictors and burden of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in comparison with meticillin-susceptible S. aureus infection in an Australian hospital setting. J Hosp Infect. 2022;129:41–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Palacios-Baena ZR, Giannella M, Manissero D, Rodriguez-Bano J, Viale P, Lopes S, et al. Risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections: a systematic review. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021;27(2):228–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Tacconelli E, Mazzaferri F, de Smet AM, Bragantini D, Eggimann P, Huttner BD, et al. ESCMID-EUCIC clinical guidelines on decolonization of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria carriers. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019;25(7):807–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Oren I, Sprecher H, Finkelstein R, Hadad S, Neuberger A, Hussein K, et al. Eradication of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae gastrointestinal colonization with nonabsorbable oral antibiotic treatment: a prospective controlled trial. Am J Infect Control. 2013;41(12):1167–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Machuca I, Gutierrez-Gutierrez B, Perez Cortes S, Gracia-Ahufinger I, Serrano J, Madrigal MD, et al. Oral decontamination with aminoglycosides is associated with lower risk of mortality and infections in high-risk patients colonized with colistin-resistant, KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016;71(11):3242–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kohlenberg A, Schwab F, Meyer E, Behnke M, Geffers C, Gastmeier P. Regional trends in multidrug-resistant infections in German intensive care units: a real-time model for epidemiological monitoring and analysis. J Hosp Infect. 2009;73(3):239–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the statistical assistance and wish to acknowledge the support of the Center for Big Data Analytics and Statistics at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital for study design and monitor, data analysis and interpretation. The authors acknowledge the assisstance of Yu-hsiang Ou (Department of Laboratory Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Linkou, Taiwan) to provide the standard criteria of antibiotics sensitivity by disc diffusion method in CGMH.

Funding

Supported by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Research Project Grant (CMRPG3H0931; CMRPG3I0402, CMRPVVM0171, CGRPVVN0011, and CRRPVVN0011), and the Maintenance Project of the Center for Big Data Analytics and Statistics (Grant CLRPG3N0011) at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Thoracic Medicine, New Taipei City Municipal TuCheng Hospital, Chang Gung Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan

    Chih-Hao Chang, Shih-Hao Huang, Chung-Shu Lee, Fu-Tsai Chung & Hung-Yu Huang

  2. College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan

    Chih-Hao Chang, Chiung-Hsin Chang, Shih-Hao Huang, Chung-Shu Lee, Chun-Yu Lin, Meng-Heng Hsieh, Horng-Chyuan Lin, Li-Fu Li, Fu-Tsai Chung, Chun-Hua Wang & Hung-Yu Huang

  3. Department of Thoracic Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 199 Tun-Hwa North Road, Taipei, Taiwan

    Chih-Hao Chang, Chiung-Hsin Chang, Shih-Hao Huang, Chung-Shu Lee, Chun-Yu Lin, Meng-Heng Hsieh, Horng-Chyuan Lin, Li-Fu Li, Fu-Tsai Chung, Chun-Hua Wang & Hung-Yu Huang

  4. Center for Big Data Analytics and Statistics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan

    Po-Chuan Ko & Yu-Tung Huang

  5. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, Taiwan

    Li-Fu Li

Authors
  1. Chih-Hao Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chiung-Hsin Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shih-Hao Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chung-Shu Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Po-Chuan Ko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Chun-Yu Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Meng-Heng Hsieh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yu-Tung Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Horng-Chyuan Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Li-Fu Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Fu-Tsai Chung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Chun-Hua Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Hung-Yu Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, HY.H, CH.W; Investigation, FT.C, CH.C, SH.H and CH.C; Methodology, YT.H; Data Curation, PC.K, CY.L, CS.L, MH.H; Validation, HY.H, YT.H, HC.L; Writing – Original Draft Preparation, HY.H and LF.L; Writing – Review & Editing, CH.W. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hung-Yu Huang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Institutional Review Board of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital approved this study (IRB number: 202201306B0). Informed Consent Statement: Informed consent was not required for this database study according to the regulations of the Institutional Review Board of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital.

Consent for publication

All authors have read the manuscript and consent to publish.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1: sTable 1.

The standard criteria of antibiotics sensitivity by disc diffusion method in CGMH; sTable 2. Demographics and Clinical Characteristics before and after propensity score matching

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chang, CH., Chang, CH., Huang, SH. et al. Epidemiology and outcomes of multidrug-resistant bacterial infection in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 23, 15 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12941-024-00675-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12941-024-00675-6

Keywords

Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials

ISSN: 1476-0711

Contact us