Skip to main content
Download PDF

Nanopore targeted sequencing-based diagnosis of central nervous system infections in HIV-infected patients

Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials volume 23, Article number: 22 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Early and accurate etiological diagnosis is very important for improving the prognosis of central nervous system (CNS) infections in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients. The goal is not easily achieved by conventional microbiological tests. We developed a nanopore targeted sequencing (NTS) platform and evaluated the diagnostic performance for CNS infections in HIV-infected patients, with special focus on cryptococcal meningitis (CM). We compared the CM diagnostic performance of NTS with conventional methods and cryptococcal polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

Methods

This study included 57 hospitalized HIV-infected patients with suspected CNS infections from September 2018 to March 2022. The diagnosis established during hospitalization includes 27 cases of CM, 13 CNS tuberculosis, 5 toxoplasma encephalitis, 2 cytomegalovirus (CMV) encephalitis and 1 Varicella-zoster virus (VZV) encephalitis. The 2 cases of CMV encephalitis also have co-existing CM. Target-specific PCR amplification was used to enrich pathogen sequences before nanopore sequencing. NTS was performed on stored cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples and the results were compared with the diagnosis during hospitalization.

Results

53 (93.0%) of the patients were male. The median CD4 cell count was 25.0 (IQR: 14.0–63.0) cells/uL. The sensitivities of CSF culture, India ink staining, cryptococcal PCR and NTS for CM were 70.4% (95%CI: 51.5 − 84.1%), 76.0% (95%CI: 56.6 − 88.5%), 77.8% (59.2 − 89.4%) and 85.2% (95%CI: 67.5 − 94.1%), respectively. All those methods had 100% specificity for CM. Our NTS platform could identify Cryptococcus at species level. Moreover, NTS was also able to identify all the 5 cases of toxoplasma encephalitis, 2 cases of CMV encephalitis and 1 VZV encephalitis. However, only 1 of 13 CNS tuberculosis cases was diagnosed by NTS, and so did Xpert MTB/RIF assay.

Conclusions

NTS has a good diagnostic performance for CM in HIV-infected patients and may have the ability of simultaneously detecting other pathogens, including mixed infections. With continuing improving of the NTS platform, it may be a promising alterative microbiological test for assisting with the diagnosis of CNS infections.

Introduction

Central nervous system (CNS) infections contribute to substantial morbidity and mortality in Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected severely immunocompromised patients [1,2,3]. Early and accurate pathogen identification from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is very important for improving the prognosis of CNS infections. However, this goal is not easily achieved by using conventional microbiological tests, mainly involving morphological, serological, molecular, and culture methods. The CSF culture is time-consuming and many pathogens are not culturable by clinical labs. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays are predominantly targeting very few pathogens and require a prior knowledge of the causative agents. It is not possible to test all possible pathogens using conventional microbiologic tests due to CSF volume restriction and commercial kits availability.

Recently, metagenomic next-generation sequencing (NGS), an agnostic, unbiased, and comprehensive method for pathogen identification, has attracted much attention in infectious field [4, 5]. The clinical utility of this strategy in etiological diagnosing of infectious diseases has been widely evaluated. In most scenarios, metagenomic NGS has similar to or even better sensitivity for pathogen identification compared with conventional microbiological methods [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. However, metagenomic NGS predominantly using short-read sequencing platform also have limitations. Although metagenomic NGS can theoretically detect all the pathogens in a single run, the short-reading metagenomic sequencing platform is still relatively time-consuming with the overall turnover time of generally more than 24 h [14, 15]. Moreover, the sensitivity of metagenomic NGS is heavily influenced by background human genome material and contamination by environmental microorganisms usually complicates the clinical interpretating of the results [4].

Compared with short-reading NGS platform, long-reading NGS platform, for example Oxford Nanopore Technologies platform, has the advantages of portability, long read length, real-time analysis and short turn over time [5]. The overall sequencing process of Nanopore was optimized, with the detection cycle of 6 h, which met the clinical demand for rapid detection of pathogens in acute and critically ill patients to a greater extent [16, 17]. Recent studies have suggested that long-reading metagenomic nanopore sequencing may have similar performance as short-reading metagenomic NGS for diagnosing CNS or respiratory infections [18, 19]. Nevertheless, Nanopore sequencing is technically more difficult to detect pathogens with low nucleic acid load in the clinical samples, because there is no bridge PCR amplification process. Also, presence of massive host genome and contamination of environmental microorganisms are also great challenges impeding the clinical application of Nanopore sequencing [5].

Confronting the disadvantages of metagenomic NGS, we have developed a Nanopore targeted sequencing (NTS) platform where nucleic acid segments of common CNS pathogens in immunocompromised patients are enriched through pathogen-specific PCR before Nanopore sequencing. In the present study, we aimed to explore the diagnostic performance of NTS for CNS infections in HIV-infected patients with special focus on cryptococcal meningitis (CM). We also compared the CM diagnostic performance of NTS with conventional methods and cryptococcal PCR.

Patients and methods

Patients and study design

This study included 57 hospitalized HIV-infected patients who were admitted to the second hospital of Nanjing, China, from September 2018 to March 2022. The setting is a tertiary referral hospital and is a designated hospital that provides HIV care in Nanjing.

Since the study particularly focused on the diagnostic performance of NTS for cryptococcal meningitis in HIV-infected patients, HIV-infected patients tested positive for serum cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) assay with residuals CSF samples available (n = 32) during the aforementioned study period were included in this study. To investigate whether the NTS platform could simultaneously identified other CNS pathogens, we enrolled patients with the clinical diagnosis of CNS tuberculosis (n = 13) and toxoplasma encephalitis (n = 5) that had enough residual CSF samples. Other HIV patients (n = 7), deemed to be not having CM, CNS tuberculosis or toxoplasma encephalitis, were also included in this study.

Lumbar puncture was performed in 44 (77.2%) patients due to neurological symptoms suggested of CNS infections. For the 13 (22.8%) patients without obvious neurological symptoms, lumbar puncture was performed to screen for possible CNS involvement because the patients had positive serum CrAg assay, positive serum treponema pallidum hemagglutination test or disseminated tuberculosis. CSF samples were sent for conventional laboratory tests, and the remaining samples were stored at − 80 ℃ refrigerator for research purpose with informed consent obtained from the patients. The demographic, clinical and laboratory data of the patients were retrospectively collected from an electronic health record system. This study was approved by the ethics committee of the second hospital of Nanjing (reference number: 2020-LY-kt061).

Procedure

In our routine clinical care, all CSF samples were sent to clinical laboratory for cell count, biochemistry and culture. The treating physicians decided which pathogen-specific mycobacterial tests should be performed based on the clinical condition of the patients. For patients suspected of CM, fresh CSF samples were sent for India ink staining, CrAg lateral flow assay (LFA, IMMY, Norman, USA), and cryptococcal culture. The reference CM cases should meet at least one of the following criteria: (1) positive CSF India ink staining; (2) positive CSF CrAg assay; or (3) positive CSF cryptococcal culture [20, 21].

In the present study, nanopore targeted sequencing (Simceredx, Nanjing, China) was performed on stored CSF samples. Nucleic acid was extracted from 500 uL CSF samples using a Quick-DNA/RNA Viral Kit (D7021, Zymo Research) following the manufacturer’s instructions using 50 uL elution buffer. 30 uL nucleic acid was used for NTS. Before NTS, a preceding target-specific PCR amplification step was performed to enrich more than 30 common CNS pathogens (Supplemental Table 1) using target library kit (Jiangsu Simceredx Medical Equipment Co., Ltd.). The principles of designing PCR primers for the enrichment step included length of primer 18-21 bp, GC content of 40-60%, primer melting temperature of 50–70℃, preferable length of target fragment 1–2 kb, and covering conservative and variable intervals. Libraries were constructed for all samples using an SQK-PBK004 Kit (Oxford Nanopore Technologies). Library pools were then loaded onto an Gridion×5 (Oxford Nanopore Technologies) sequencer for 1 h (Fig. 1). Clean reads were obtained after removal of short reads (length less than 500 bp) and low-quality reads (mean q-score less than 8). Subsequently, reads for the host DNA were removed by aligning to the human reference genome (GRCh38) using minimap2 (Version 2.14-r883). The remaining reads were mapped using the Centrifuge software (version 1.0.4) for taxonomic classification. After the sequencing and analysis were completed, a Pubmed search was conducted to determine whether the detected species cause central nervous system infection. Before being applied to clinical samples, the designed NTS platformed had been evaluated for the limit of detection and analytical specificity in selected pathogens, including Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Cryptococcus neoformans, Human alphaherpesvirus 1, and Coxsackievirus A16. The results, provided in Supplemental Tables 2 and 3, suggests that this novel strategy was very sensitive and specific to identify pathogens.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Procedure of nanopore targeted sequencing. The clinical application of the nanopore targeted sequencing (NTS) workflow, which consists of five parts. (1) Sample collection: cerebrospinal fluid of suspected meningitis patients was collected. (2) Nucleic acid extraction: cerebrospinal fluid sample DNA and RNA nucleic acid extraction. (3) Targeted pathogen enrichment: specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) targeted enrichment of target pathogenic microorganisms. (4) Amplicon library preparation and mixed library: libraries were constructed for all samples using an SQK-PBK004 kit and library mixing was performed. (5) Sequencing and data analysis: library pools were loaded onto Gridion×5 sequencer for 1 h, and original data was analyzed

Full size image

With regarding to the evaluation of the performance of NTS on clinical samples, the positive results were verified by pathogen-specific qPCR. The detailed regents were provided in Supplemental Table 4. As for a positive detection of cryptococcal reads by NTS, it would be verified with a commercialized qPCR-based assay for cryptococcal DNA elements (Huayin Biotech, China). Clinical data and other test results were unavailable to those performing each NTS and cryptococcal PCR.

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables were shown as frequencies and proportions. Continuous variables were expressed as medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs). Comparisons between different groups were performed using the chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test, or Mann–Whitney U test, when appropriate. Diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values) of NTS for CM with the associated Wilson CIs were calculated. Sensitivities of different diagnostic methods were compared using McNemar’s test. All reported P values were 2-sided with the significance level of 0.05. R version 4.1.3.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing; www.r-project.org) was used for statistical analysis.

Results

Characteristics of the patients

Among 57 HIV-infected patients in the study, 53 (93.0%) were male and the median age was 33.0 (IQR: 29.0–46.0) years (Table 1). The median CD4 + T lymphocyte count was 25.0/ uL (IQR: 14.0–63.0), which was lower in patients with CM than in patients without it (p < 0.05). 47 (82.5%) patients had low CD4 + T cells count of < 100/ uL, which included all 27 patients with CM according to consensus definition. The majority of the patients were not on antiretroviral treatment (ART), and only 4 (7.4%, 4/54) patients achieved viral suppression (HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL). Serum CrAg assays were positive in 32 patients, of which 30 had semi-quantitative CrAg titers. Patients with CM (n = 25) had much higher serum CrAg titers than those without CM (n = 5) (p < 0.001). Of the 27 CM cases, 19 (70.4%) had a serum CrAg titer of ≥ 1:2560 and 12 (44.4%) were on anti-fungal therapy at the time of CSF collection, with a median duration of antifungal therapy of 4 (IQR:2–6) days. Other CNS infections of the participants were summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 Demographic and laboratory characteristics of the patients
Full size table

Diagnostic performance

Of the three widely used traditional microbiological tests, CSF CrAg was positive in all the 27 references CM cases. CSF culture and CSF India ink staining failed to detect 8 (29.6%) and 6 (24.0%, 6/25; India ink staining was not performed in 2 culture positive cases) CM cases, respectively (Fig. 2A). NTS was able to detect 23 (85.2%) CM cases, and 2 of those 23 cases could not be confirmed by cryptococcal PCR (Fig. 2B). When all the diagnostic tests were considered, 14 CM cases were tested positive by all of those tests (Fig. 2C). Consequently, the sensitivities of CSF CrAg, CSF culture, CSF India ink staining, CSF cryptococcal PCR and CSF NTS for diagnosing were 100% (95%CI: 87.5 − 100%), 70.4% (95%CI: 51.5 − 84.1%), 76.0% (95%CI: 56.6 − 88.5%), 77.8% (59.2 − 89.4%) and 85.2% (95%CI: 67.5 − 94.1%), respectively (Table 2). Patients with higher CSF CrAg titers seemed to have higher cryptococcal sequencing reads reported by CSF NTS (p = 0.089; Fig. 3), and there was moderated correlation between cryptococcal PCR Ct value and NTS cryptococcal sequencing reads (Spearman’s r = 0.57; p = 0.002; Fig. 3). The pairwise comparison of the sensitivities between different tests were shown in Supplemental Table 5. There was no statistical significance of the sensitivity between CSF CrAg and CSF NTS for diagnosing CM among HIV-infected patients (p = 0.134; Supplemental Table 5). All the tests had high specificity (100%) that a positive result could confirm a CM case (Table 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Venn diagrams of positive results of different methods. Positive results of different methods in 27 cryptococcal meningitis cases, including cryptococcal antigen (CrAg), culture, India ink staining, nanopore targeted sequencing (NTS), polymerase chain reaction (PCR). (A) CrAg, culture, India ink staining. (B) CrAg, NTS, PCR. (C) culture, India ink staining, NTS, PCR.

Full size image
Table 2 Diagnostic performance for cryptococcal meningitis
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

Associations of cryptococcal sequencing reads with CrAg and PCR. (A) The comparation of nanopore targeted sequencing (NTS) sequencing reads between groups of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) titer ≤1:640 and CSF CrAg titer > 1:640 of 27 patients with cryptococcal meningitis, and NTS sequencing reads of each case. (B) The relationship between NTS sequencing reads and cryptococcal PCR cycle threshold (Ct) value of 28 patients. Of 7 cases with negative PCR results, the Ct value was considered as maximum thermal cycles of 40. In both A and B, when NTS sequencing reads was 0, it was adjusted to 0.2 for the purpose of analysis

Full size image

Other pathogens reported by NTS

Among 27 patients diagnosed with CM, Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii were reported in 22 and 1 patients respectively. Aside from cryptococcal species, NTS detected sequences of cytomegalovirus (CMV) in 6 patients, Epstein-barr virus (EBV) in 12 patients, Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) in 1 patient, Toxoplasma gondii in 5 patients and Varicella-zoster virus (VZV) in 1 patient (Fig. 4A). The detections of those microorganisms were compared with specific real-time quantitative PCR and clinical composite diagnosis (summarized in Table 1) at the time of discharge (Fig. 4B). Of the 6 positive detections of CMV by NTS, 3 was positive for CMV-specific PCR. However, only 2 patients were considered as CMV encephalitis by clinical composite diagnosis and treated with anti-CMV treatment during hospitalization. Importantly, those two cases of CMV encephalitis were also diagnosed with CM (Table 1). Of the other 4 patients with positive CMV detections by NTS however not considered active CMV encephalitis, 1 was diagnosed with neurosyphilis (positive CSF rapid plasma reagin and Treponema pallidum particle agglutination tests) and 1 had history treated CMV encephalitis three months ago. The other 2 patients did not have obvious neurological symptoms and none of them were diagnosed as CMV encephalitis during hospitalization.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Other pathogens reported by nanopore targeted sequencing. (A) Pathogens except cryptococcus that detected by nanopore targeted sequencing (NTS), and the NTS sequencing reads of each case. Grouped by whether the detection was clinically important. (B) Comparations of clinically composite diagnosed cases, positive NTS and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) cases of each pathogen

Full size image

Of the 12 positive detections of EBV by NTS, 8 was positive for EBV-specific PCR. None of those 12 positive detections were considered clinical important because patients were clinically stable at the time of discharge and EBV-related diseases were not identified. There were 5 cases of TE by clinical composite diagnosis. For those 5 patients, serum anti-toxoplasma IgG antibody were positive and Toxoplasma gondii were detected by CSF metagenomic NGS. In our study, NTS were able to identify all those cases (Fig. 4B).

At the time of discharge, 13 patients were diagnosed with CNS tuberculosis (Table 1), of which only 2 were microbiological confirmed (positive CSF mycobacterial culture). The diagnosis of CNS tuberculosis in the remaining 11 patients were extensively investigated. Among those 11 patients, CNS tuberculosis were diagnosed in 10 patients based on the presence of abnormal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) changes consistent with CNS tuberculosis with or without neurological symptoms, the identification of MTB from other samples, the favorable response to anti-tuberculosis treatment and the exclusion of other CNS infections. Clinical diagnosis of CNS tuberculosis was very difficult in 1 patient with pulmonary tuberculosis (positive sputum Xpert MTB/RIF assay) and shingles. The neurological symptoms resolved with anti-tuberculosis and anti-VZV treatment, therefore the patient may be clinically diagnosed as CNS tuberculosis and/or VZV encephalitis. In our study, only 1 of the 13 CNS tuberculosis cases could be identified by NTS (Fig. 4B), and so did Xpert MTB/RIF assay.

Discussion

Recently, PCR amplification of conserved regions (16 S rRNA gene of the bacteria and internal transcribed spacer region of fungi) has been applied for enrichment of pathogen gene sequences in NTS process [22,23,24]. This strategy has been found to facilitate early diagnosing of bacterial or fungal infections and could guide optimization of antimicrobial therapy [22,23,24]. The merit of this strategy is that only a few PCR primers are required for bacterial or fungal sequences enrichment. Nevertheless, the afore-mentioned strategy is not suited for viral infections, because virus does not contain ribosome. Therefore, to enrich viral sequences, specific PCR primers are generally needed for each type of virus. In our study, we designed a NTS platform where each type of virus would be amplified through PCR with pathogen-specific primers. This platform also enriches DNA sequences of mycobacterium, aspergillus, cryptococci and Toxoplasma gondii through pathogen-specific PCR amplification (Supplemental Table 1). Consequently, the NTS panel covered common opportunistic CNS infections in HIV-infected patients as described in other and our studies [2, 7, 12, 25].

The present study was designed to preliminarily evaluate the performance of NTS for diagnosis of CNS infections in HIV-infected patients. Since CM is a common and well recognized opportunistic CNS infection in HIV-infected patients [2, 3], the primary goal of this study was to explore the diagnostic performance of NTS for CM. It is well recognized that CSF CrAg LFA is the most sensitive test for diagnosing CM, with sensitivity and specificity of almost 100% [26, 27]. What is not unexpected that NTS missed a few cases of CM which could be identified by CrAg LFA; however, it detected more CM cases than culture, India ink staining or cryptococcal PCR (Fig. 2; Table 2). The sensitivity and specificity of NTS for CM in HIV-infected patients were 85.2% (95%CI: 67.5 − 94.1%) and 100% (95% CI: 88.6 − 100.0%), respectively. Moreover, our NTS identified cryptococcus at species level and had the capability to simultaneously detect other pathogens. Although data on NTS’s role in diagnosing CM are limited, several studies have highlighted the effectiveness of metagenomic next-generation sequencing for CM diagnosis, with sensitivities ranging from 75 to 93.5% [28,29,30]. These studies, along with our own, indicate that molecular-based methods, despite their high diagnostic accuracy for CM, are not infallible. Factors such as the thick cryptococcal capsule, which may hinder DNA extraction, and low CSF cryptococcal DNA burden in some cases, could lead to false-negative results in cryptococcal molecular tests. Finally, the NTS panel used in this study was able to correctly identify all the 5 cases of toxoplasma encephalitis, 2 case of CMV encephalitis and 1 VZV encephalitis (Fig. 4B). Together, those results suggests that NTS may be a promising alternative for diagnosing CNS infections in HIV-infected patients.

CMV and EBV could establish life-long persistence and may be detected in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of the healthy blood donors [31,32,33]. It is not uncommon that those viruses are present in the CSF of HIV-infected patients and metagenomic NGS is likely to be more sensitive than specific PCR methods to identify those viruses [7, 12, 25]. However, identification of CMV and EBV is not always suggestive of active associated disease [7, 12, 25]. In our study, NTS also reported more CMV and EBV positive cases than specific PCR methods, although only two positive CMV detections were considered as clinically important. Taken together, our NTS platform is very sensitive for detecting CMV or EBV in the CSF samples. Nevertheless, caution is needed in interpreting the positive detections of CMV or EBV by NTS platform because most of the positive detections are not associated with active diseases.

Unlike the diagnosing of CM, the diagnosing of CNS tuberculosis remains challenging. Currently, Xpert MTB/RIF assay is the preferred initial test for extrapulmonary tuberculosis [34]. Previous studies have demonstrated that the sensitivity of CSF Xpert MTB/RIF assay for tuberculosis meningitis in HIV-infected patients ranges from 43 to 76.9% [35, 36]. The present study included 13 HIV-associated CNS tuberculosis, but only 1 CSF sample was tested positive for MTB by using NTS. Technical limitations are unlikely to be the sole cause of our NTS platform’s diagnostic shortcomings, as evidenced by the Xpert MTB/RIF assay also confirming only one case of CNS tuberculosis in this study. Perhaps, the CNS tuberculosis cases included in this study were in the early stage of CNS involvement with low mycobacterial burden in the CSF.

There are some limitations in our study. Since the inclusion of patients were largely influenced by the availability of the stored samples, the selection bias should not be overlooked. We used pathogen-specific PCR to enrich sequences of the pathogens before Nanopore sequencing, however, we were not able to evaluate the diagnostic performance of NTS for each CNS pathogen. Moreover, although pathogen-specific PCR primers are very suited for enrichment of viral sequences during NTS process, the number of pathogens that could be investigated by NTS is relatively small. At this point, our NTS panel could not be used for common bacterial meningitis. Future optimization of this NTS platform to facilitate diagnosing of bacterial meningitis may incorporate PCR amplification of conserved regions of bacterial 16 S rRNA before nanopore sequencing, as has been applied in previous studies [22, 24]. Alternatively, pathogen-specific PCR targeting the common bacteria involving in CNS infection could also be designed for nucleic acid enrichment. Nevertheless, which enrichment method is more suited for CNS infection has yet to be explored in future studies.

Conclusion

In summary, we have developed a NTS platform where enrichment of pathogen sequences is achieved through pathogen-specific PCR amplification. This NTS platform is able to detect common CNS pathogens in the CSF samples of HIV-infected patients. Since NTS requires less data than metagenomic sequencing, it would greatly save the cost of the test. With continuing improving of the NTS platform, it may be an important alterative microbiological test for assisting with the diagnosis of CNS infections.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CNS:

central nervous system

HIV:

human immunodeficiency virus

CSF:

cerebrospinal fluid

PCR:

polymerase chain reaction

NGS:

next-generation sequencing

NTS:

nanopore targeted sequencing

CM:

cryptococcal meningitis

CrAg:

cryptococcal antigen

LFA:

lateral flow assay

IQR:

interquartile ranges

ART:

antiretroviral treatment

CMV:

cytomegalovirus

EBV:

Epstein-barr virus

MTB:

Mycobacterium tuberculosis

VZV:

varicella-zoster virus

MRI:

magnetic resonance imaging

References

  1. Tan IL, Smith BR, von Geldern G, Mateen FJ, McArthur JC. HIV-associated opportunistic infections of the CNS. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11(7):605–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bowen LN, Smith B, Reich D, Quezado M, Nath A. HIV-associated opportunistic CNS infections: pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment. Nat Reviews Neurol. 2016;12(11):662–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Thakur KT. CNS infections in HIV. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2020;33(3):267–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gu W, Miller S, Chiu CY. Clinical metagenomic next-generation sequencing for pathogen detection. Annu Rev Pathol. 2019;14:319.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cao Y, Li J, Chu X, Liu H, Liu W, Liu D. Nanopore sequencing: a rapid solution for infectious disease epidemics. Sci China Life Sci. 2019;62(8):1101–3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Tan J, Liu Y, Ehnert S, et al. The effectiveness of Metagenomic Next-Generation sequencing in the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;12:875822.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhu Y, Zhao W, Yang X, et al. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing for identification of central nervous system pathogens in HIV-infected patients. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:1055996.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhu Y, Xu M, Ding C, et al. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing vs. traditional Microbiological tests for diagnosing varicella-zoster Virus Central Nervous System infection. Front Public Health. 2022;9:738412.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Chien JY, Yu CJ, Hsueh PR. Utility of Metagenomic Next-Generation sequencing for Etiological diagnosis of patients with Sepsis in Intensive Care Units. Microbiol Spectr. 2022;10(4):e0074622.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Liang M, Fan Y, Zhang D, et al. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing for accurate diagnosis and management of lower respiratory tract infections. Int J Infect Diseases: IJID: Official Publication Int Soc Infect Dis. 2022;122:921–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hogan CA, Yang S, Garner OB, et al. Clinical impact of Metagenomic Next-Generation sequencing of plasma cell-free DNA for the diagnosis of infectious diseases: a Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study. Clin Infect Diseases: Official Publication Infect Dis Soc Am. 2021;72(2):239–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen J, Zhang R, Liu L, et al. Clinical usefulness of metagenomic next-generation sequencing for the diagnosis of central nervous system infection in people living with HIV. Int J Infect Dis. 2021;107:139–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hu Z, Weng X, Xu C, et al. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing as a diagnostic tool for toxoplasmic encephalitis. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2018;17(1):45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Geng S, Mei Q, Zhu C, et al. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing technology for detection of pathogens in blood of critically ill patients. Int J Infect Diseases: IJID: Official Publication Int Soc Infect Dis. 2021;103:81–7.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chen H, Yin Y, Gao H, et al. Clinical utility of In-house Metagenomic Next-generation sequencing for the diagnosis of Lower Respiratory Tract Infections and analysis of the host Immune Response. Clin Infect Diseases: Official Publication Infect Dis Soc Am. 2020;71(Suppl 4):416–s426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Patel A, Belykh E, Miller EJ, et al. MinION rapid sequencing: review of potential applications in neurosurgery. Surg Neurol Int. 2018;9:157.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Li N, Cai Q, Miao Q, Song Z, Fang Y, Hu B. High-throughput metagenomics for identification of pathogens in the clinical settings. Small Methods. 2021;5(1):2000792.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang J, Gao L, Zhu C, et al. Clinical value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing by Illumina and Nanopore for the detection of pathogens in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in suspected community-acquired pneumonia patients. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;12:1021320.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Horiba K, Torii Y, Aizawa Y, et al. Performance of Nanopore and Illumina Metagenomic Sequencing for Pathogen Detection and Transcriptome Analysis in Infantile Central Nervous System infections. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022;9(10):ofac504.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Donnelly JP, Chen SC, Kauffman CA, et al. Revision and update of the Consensus definitions of Invasive Fungal Disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium. Clin Infect Diseases: Official Publication Infect Dis Soc Am. 2020;71(6):1367–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Perfect JR, Dismukes WE, Dromer F, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of cryptococcal disease: 2010 update by the infectious diseases society of America. Clin Infect Diseases: Official Publication Infect Dis Soc Am. 2010;50(3):291–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang Y, Lu X, Tang LV, Xia L, Hu Y. Nanopore-targeted sequencing improves the diagnosis and treatment of patients with serious infections. mBio. 2023;14(1):e0305522.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chan WS, Au CH, Leung SM, et al. Potential utility of targeted Nanopore sequencing for improving etiologic diagnosis of bacterial and fungal respiratory infection. Diagn Pathol. 2020;15(1):41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Fu Y, Chen Q, Xiong M, et al. Clinical performance of Nanopore targeted sequencing for diagnosing Infectious diseases. Microbiol Spectr. 2022;10(2):e0027022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Deng L, Li Q, Hu W, et al. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing versus traditional laboratory methods for the diagnosis of central nervous system opportunistic infections in HIV-infected Chinese adults. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):4921.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Temfack E, Rim JJB, Spijker R, et al. Cryptococcal Antigen in serum and cerebrospinal fluid for detecting cryptococcal meningitis in adults living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus: systematic review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy studies. Clin Infect Diseases: Official Publication Infect Dis Soc Am. 2021;72(7):1268–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kabanda T, Siedner MJ, Klausner JD, Muzoora C, Boulware DR. Point-of-care diagnosis and prognostication of cryptococcal meningitis with the cryptococcal antigen lateral flow assay on cerebrospinal fluid. Clin Infect Diseases: Official Publication Infect Dis Soc Am. 2014;58(1):113–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang X, Lin Y, Chen H, et al. Diagnostic performance of Metagenomic Next-Generation sequencing in Central Nervous System Cryptococcosis using Cerebrospinal Fluid. Infect drug Resist. 2023;16:6175–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Gan Z, Liu J, Wang Y, et al. Performance of Metagenomic Next-Generation sequencing for the diagnosis of cryptococcal meningitis in HIV-Negative patients. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;12:831959.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Xing XW, Zhang JT, Ma YB, Zheng N, Yang F, Yu SY. Apparent performance of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in the diagnosis of cryptococcal meningitis: a descriptive study. J Med Microbiol. 2019;68(8):1204–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Goodrum F. Human cytomegalovirus latency: approaching the Gordian knot. Annu Rev Virol. 2016;3(1):333–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Larsson S, Söderberg-Nauclér C, Wang FZ, Möller E. Cytomegalovirus DNA can be detected in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from all seropositive and most seronegative healthy blood donors over time. Transfusion. 1998;38(3):271–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kanakry JA, Hegde AM, Durand CM, et al. The clinical significance of EBV DNA in the plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with or without EBV diseases. Blood. 2016;127(16):2007–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Huynh J, Donovan J, Phu NH, Nghia HDT, Thuong NTT, Thwaites GE. Tuberculous meningitis: progress and remaining questions. Lancet Neurol. 2022;21(5):450–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Donovan J, Thu DDA, Phu NH, et al. Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra versus Xpert MTB/RIF for the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis: a prospective, randomised, diagnostic accuracy study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(3):299–307.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Bahr NC, Nuwagira E, Evans EE, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for tuberculous meningitis in HIV-infected adults: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(1):68–75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded in part by the Jiangsu provincial health commission medical research foundation (M2022030), the Nanjing medical science and technique development foundation (ZKX21037), and project funding from Jiangsu Provincial Association of Endemic Diseases (X202130). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Xihong Yang and Shuilian Zhou contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Infectious Disease, The Second Hospital of Nanjing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China

    Xihong Yang, Ziwei Chang, Jiahui Li, Yaling Chen & Zhiliang Hu

  2. State Key Laboratory of Neurology and Oncology Drug Development, Jiangsu Simcere Pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd, Jiangsu Simcere Diagnostics Co.,Ltd., Nanjing, China

    Shuilian Zhou, Xiaotong Xi & Ran Ding

  3. Nanjing Simcere Medical Laboratory Science Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China

    Shuilian Zhou, Xiaotong Xi & Ran Ding

  4. Center for Global Health, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China

    Mengjiao Miao & Zhiliang Hu

  5. Clinical Research Center, The Second Hospital of Nanjing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China

    Wei Chen

  6. Nanjing Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China

    Hongying Zhang

  7. Inovention Center for Infectious Disease of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing, China

    Zhiliang Hu

Authors
  1. Xihong Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shuilian Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ziwei Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiaotong Xi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jiahui Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mengjiao Miao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yaling Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Wei Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Hongying Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Ran Ding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Zhiliang Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

XY, ZC, JL and MM collected and analyzed the data. SZ, XX and RD performed the NTS laboratory tests and interpreted the NTS data. XY and SZ drafted the original manuscript. YC contributed to sample collection and data management. WC involved in results interpretation and reviewing the manuscript. HZ involved in data analysis and reviewing manuscript. HZ, RD and ZH designed the study. ZH conducted the study, and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hongying Zhang, Ran Ding or Zhiliang Hu.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the ethics committee of the second hospital of Nanjing (reference number: 2020-LY-kt061).

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all the participants.

Consent for publication

Informed consent was obtained from all the participants in this study as well as the co-authors.

Conflict of interest

All authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, X., Zhou, S., Chang, Z. et al. Nanopore targeted sequencing-based diagnosis of central nervous system infections in HIV-infected patients. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 23, 22 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12941-024-00682-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12941-024-00682-7

Keywords

Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials

ISSN: 1476-0711

Contact us