Skip to main content
Download PDF

Impact of inactivated COVID-19 vaccines on lung injury in B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant-infected patients

Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials volume 22, Article number: 22 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Chest computerized tomography (CT) scan is an important strategy that quantifies the severity of COVID-19 pneumonia. To what extent inactivated COVID-19 vaccines could impact the COVID-19 pneumonia on chest CT is not clear.

Methods

This study recruited 357 SARS-COV-2 B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant-infected patients admitted to the Second Hospital of Nanjing from July to August 2021. An artificial intelligence-assisted CT imaging system was used to quantify the severity of COVID-19 pneumonia. We compared the volume of infection (VOI), percentage of infection (POI) and chest CT scores among patients with different vaccination statuses.

Results

Of the 357 Delta variant-infected patients included for analysis, 105 were unvaccinated, 72 were partially vaccinated and 180 were fully vaccinated. Fully vaccination had the least lung injuries when quantified by VOI (median VOI of 222.4 cm3, 126.6 cm3 and 39.9 cm3 in unvaccinated, partially vaccinated and fully vaccinated, respectively; p < 0.001), POI (median POI of 7.60%, 3.55% and 1.20% in unvaccinated, partially vaccinated and fully vaccinated, respectively; p < 0.001) and chest CT scores (median CT score of 8.00, 6.00 and 4.00 in unvaccinated, partially vaccinated and fully vaccinated, respectively; p < 0.001). After adjustment for age, sex, comorbidity, time from illness onset to hospitalization and viral load, fully vaccination but not partial vaccination was significantly associated with less lung injuries quantified by VOI {adjust coefficient[95%CI] for “full vaccination”: − 106.10(− 167.30,44.89); p < 0.001}, POI {adjust coefficient[95%CI] for “full vaccination”: − 3.88(− 5.96, − 1.79); p = 0.001} and chest CT scores {adjust coefficient[95%CI] for “full vaccination”: − 1.81(− 2.72, − 0.91); p < 0.001}. The extent of reduction of pulmonary injuries was more profound in fully vaccinated patients with older age, having underlying diseases, and being female sex, as demonstrated by relatively larger absolute values of adjusted coefficients. Finally, even within the non-severe COVID-19 population, fully vaccinated patients were found to have less lung injuries.

Conclusion

Fully vaccination but not partially vaccination could significantly protect lung injury manifested on chest CT. Our study provides additional evidence to encourage a full course of vaccination.

Introduction

COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2 virus has become one of the most important public health problems worldwide [1]. COVID-19 vaccines have been proved to be effective against severe outcomes [2,3,4,5,6]. The categorized clinical outcomes (for examples, dichotomous outcomes of severe and non-severe diseases) in previous studies often do not encapsulate the complexity of the clinical status, and substantial heterogeneity of disease severity exists within each category of the clinical outcomes. When all patients fall into the same category, it is difficult to evaluate the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines since differences would not be expected between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients. A quantitative clinical outcome could maximally capture the variability of patients’ clinical status and this outcome parameter could also enable quantification of the protection exerted by vaccines. Studies have attempted to quantify the severity of COVID-19 through evaluation of the pneumonia on chest computerized tomography (CT) [7]. After assigning each lung lobe with a score based on the degree of pneumonia, the total chest CT score is calculated as the sum of 5 lobe scores [1, 8,9,10,11]. Studies have showed that semi-quantitative chest CT scores were associated with categorized COVID-19 outcomes, and higher chest CT score was predictive of adverse outcomes [12,13,14,15].

In the present study, using COVID-19 pneumonia on chest CT scan as a quantitative clinical outcome, we investigated the impact of inactivated COVID-19 vaccines on lung injury in B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant-infected patients. Since visual assessment of lesion extent even by experienced radiologists may be a source of variability [16], an artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted CT imaging system was used to quantify the severity of COVID-19 pneumonia. This system bases on a deep learning method for automatic segmentation and quantification of infection regions from chest CT scan [2]. The volume of infection (VOI) and the percentage of infection (POI) could be extracted from this system, and subsequently chest CT score could be calculated. Finally, in our study, lung injuries were quantified using three radiological parameters (VOI, POT and chest CT scores).

Methods

Study patients

We recruited 357 COVID-19 patients admitted to the Nanjing Public Health Medical Center (the Second Hospital of Nanjing) from July to August 2021. All the patients were linked to the transmission chain starting from Nanjing Lukou International Airport. The COVID-19 cases were confirmed by positive SARS-COV-2 nucleic acid tests. For the patients with SARS-COV-2 PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values less than 30, Delta variant infection was confirmed by sequencing. The patients were included if they: (1) fulfilled the definition of vaccination status in this study; (2) aged 18 years old or more; (3) have chest CT evaluation by artificial intelligence software. Since the study only focused on inactivated vaccines, patients that received other types of COVID-19 vaccines were excluded from analysis. The medical records, including demographic characteristics, vaccine status, laboratory parameters, comorbidities and clinical features, were collected from the electronic health record system. This study was approved by the ethics committee of the Second Hospital of Nanjing (2020-LS-ky003). Written informed consent was waived by the Ethics Commission.

Definition of vaccination status and disease severity

Patients were divided into three groups according to their vaccination status: unvaccinated group; partially vaccinated group and fully vaccinated group. Unvaccinated groups were never received any COVID-19 vaccine before infectious with SARS-COV-2. While partially vaccinated group means patients who had only received one dose of vaccine at least 14 days before the diagnosed of COVID-19. Fully vaccinated patients were received two shots vaccines while the time interval between the second shot and illness onset was at least 14 days. To avoid ambiguity in definition, the patients who received their first dose within 14 days or their second dose within 14 days before the disease onset were not included in our study.

The severity of COVID-19 was defined according to the “Guideline of COVID-19 Diagnosis and Treatment (trial version 8)” issued by the National Health Council of China. Severe COVID-19 should meet one of the following criteria: (1) respiratory rate ≥ 30 breaths/min, (2) at rest, the oxygen saturation of fingers while breathing air ≤ 93%, (3) arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2)/oxygen uptake concentration (FiO2) ≤ 300 mmHg. Critical COVID-19 cases were those who: (1) developed respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation; (2) had evidence of shock or other organ dysfunctions necessitating transferring to the intensive care unit (ICU) [3]. Other clinical conditions were grouped as non-severe COVID-19.

Laboratory tests for SARS-COV-2

Nasopharyngeal swab specimens were immersed in cell preservation solution (X1003, Sansure Biotech, Hunan, China). The total nucleic acids were extracted from 200 μL cell preservation solution using an automated nucleic acid extraction system (BioPerfectus technologies company, Jiangsu, China). SARS-COV-2 nucleic acid was measured by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) kits (Sansure Biotech, Hunan, China). The cycle threshold (Ct) value from qRT-PCR was used to relatively represent the viral load. The levels of SARS-COV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies were measured using 2019-nCOV IgM and IgG antibody detection kits (BiOSCiENCE, Tianjin, China) targeting SARS-COV-2 spike receptor-binding domain (RBD). Serum samples were analyzed by an automated chemiluminescent immunoassay system (Axceed 260, BiOSCiENCE, Tianjin, China). A signal/cut-off (S/CO) value ≥ 1 was considered positive.

Chest CT procedure

Chest computed tomography (CT) scans were generally performed every 3–5 days until resolution of clinical symptoms. Patients in the supine position were scanned with breath holding at the end of inhaling using a 64-CT scanner (Toshiba or Philips Healthcare). The scanning parameters were as follows: tube voltage 120 kV, tube current 110 mA, pitch 1.0, rotation time 0.5 s to 0.75 s, slice thickness 5 mm, and section thickness 1 mm or 1.5 mm for axial, coronal and sagittal reconstructions. During reading, the window width was 1200 HU and window level was − 600 HU.

Assessment of lung lesions

The segmentation and quantitative analysis of COVID-19-associated pulmonary lesions in chest CT images were performed by uAI Discover-NCP (Shanghai United Imaging Intelligence Healthcare Co., Ltd.) [2]. A deep learning model named VB-Net was designed to segment both lung and lung infected regions from chin-section chest CT images. The segmentations include infection areas, the whole lung, lung lobes, and all the bronchopulmonary segments. A quantitative analysis procedure was used to automatically compute features from these extracted regions. As a result, quantitative metrics were generated to characterize infection regions, including the VOI and the POI in the whole lung, lung lobes, and the bronchopulmonary segments [2]. The Dice similarity coefficient was reported to be 91.6% ± 10.0% for AI segmentations and manual delineations, respectively, and the mean POI estimation error was 0.3% for the whole lung [2]. For each patient, the maximal value of POI in the whole lung was used as the COVID-19 pneumonia severity index (PSI). All chest CT scans with high PSI score were selected and evaluated by one radiologist and one experienced physician in pulmonary radiology independently. The evaluation results confirmed that the aforementioned chest CT scans selected by AI software contained severe lung lesions. In the case of disagreement, consensus was achieved by discussion.

In the present study, VOI and POI in the whole lung were used to represent the severity of the COVID-19 pneumonia. In additional, data of POI in the lung lobes were used to calculate the chest CT scores, a semi-quantitative method relatively representing the severity of pulmonary lesions. Following the principle described in previous studies [4, 5], each lung lobe was scored from 0 to 5 based on degree of involvement. No involvement was assigned a score of 0. Values of POI in the lobe < 5%, 5–25%, 26–49%, 50–75%, and > 75% were given scores of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. The score of each chest CT scan was the sum of 5 lobe scores, therefore could be ranged from 0 to 25. Together, this study used 3 parameters (VOI, POI in the whole lung, and the chest CT scores) to represent the severity of lung injury.

Statistical analysis

Patients’ characteristics were assessed with standard descriptive statistics. Categorical values were presented by frequencies and percentages while medians and interquartile ranges (IQR) were used for continuous variables. As appropriate, comparisons were done using the Kruskal–Wallis test, Mann–Whitney U test, Pearson chi-square test, or Fisher’s exact test. Three continuous variables describing lung injury were selected as outcomes: VOI in the whole lung, POI in whole lung and the chest CT scores. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was used to measure correlation between two continuous variables. Univariate and multivariate generalized linear regression analysis between three outcomes and other variables which may influence them were included in this study, and the relationship was expressed with coefficients and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) due to the continuous outcomes. A subgroup analysis by stratifying age, sex, and comorbidity was performed. Two-tailed tests were performed, and a p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed using R software for Windows version 4.0.5 (https://www.r-project.org/).

Results

Characteristics of the patients

Of the 357 Delta COVID-19 patients included for analysis, 105 (29.4%), 72 (20.2%), and 180 (50.4%) were unvaccinated, partially vaccinated and fully vaccinated, respectively. The types of inactivated COVID-19 vaccines used were CoronaVac (Sinovac Biotech, Beijing, China), BBIBP-CorV (Sinopharm, Beijing, China), and KCONVAC (BioKangtai, Shenzhen, China), accounting for 73.3%, 26.5%, and 0.2% of the vaccination shots, respectively. The median age was 49 (IQR: 39–65) years old, and 108 (30.3%) of the patients were older than 60 years. There were no significant differences in sex, diabetes, asthma, autoimmune diseases, most clinical symptoms, and levels of C-reactive protein, lymphocytes, LDH, and D-dimer among patients with different vaccination status (Table 1) at the time of admission. Interleukin-6 level was significantly lower in fully vaccinated patients (P < 0.001, Table 1).

Table1 Characteristics of 357 Delta variant–infected patients with different vaccination statuses
Full size table

There were significant differences in the VOI and POI in whole lung and the chest CT scores in patients with different vaccination status (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001 for three outcomes, respectively, Table 2). For all of the outcomes, the fully vaccinated group had less lung injury than unvaccinated patients (Table 2). Besides, the time from illness onset to most serious lung lesion was shorter in fully vaccinated group compared with unvaccinated group (6.00 days in fully vaccinated Vs 10.00 days in unvaccinated, P < 0.001, Table 2; an unvaccinated patient’s most severe lung lesions was on the 11th day of hospitalization, Fig. 1). There were also significant differences in the distribution of severe/critical and non-severe patients among the three groups (P < 0.001; Table 2).

Table 2 Severity of COVID-19 pneumonia assessed by artificial intelligence-assisted CT imaging
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Illustration of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted CT imaging. Figures A to C were chest CT images of an unvaccinated patient during hospitalization. Chest CT of this patient was normal at admission, and on the third day of hospitalization showed traces of patchy ground-glass opacities on both lungs (A). A repeated chest CT on the 7th of hospitalization demonstrated substantial lesion progression. The most severe lung lesions were demonstrated by the chest CT scan obtained on the 11th day of hospitalization, with large patches of ground-glass opacities on both lungs (B). Follow-up chest CT scans performed on the 15th and 22nd day of hospitalization showed gradually improvement of the lung lesions. The last chest CT was completed on the 29th day of hospitalization, revealing a substantially resolution of lung lesions (C). Figures D–F demonstrated inflammatory areas on three CT scan images that were automatically demarcated by artificial intelligence (AI) software. The lung lesions demarcated by AI software were consistent with those delimited by visual inspection. The extent of lung injuries was presented as VOI and POI in the whole lung. For the three sequential chest CT scans of the patients, VOI (POI)in the whole lung was 47.1 cm3(1.3%); 523.6 cm3 (13.3%); 242.6 cm3 (6.2%), respectively.

Full size image

Impact of inactivated COVID-19 vaccines on lung injuries

In univariable analysis (Table 3), compared with the unvaccinated group, the fully vaccinated group had a significantly decreased risk of lung injury {Coef[95%CI] = − 6.71 (− 8.64, − 4.78)}, P < 0.001; Coef(95%CI) = − 190.56 (− 247.4, − 133.72), P < 0.001, and Coef(95%CI) = − 3.58 (− 4.47,− 2.7), P < 0.001 for the POI and VOI in the whole lung, and the chest CT scores, respectively). A trend of less severe lung injuries was also seen in partially vaccinated patients (Coef (95%CI) = − 1.17 (− 3.58,1.24), P = 0.341; Coef (95%CI) = − 9.74 (− 80.56,61.08), P = 0.788; Coef(95%CI) = − 0.84 (− 1.94,0.26), P = 0.136 for three outcomes, respectively), however this was not statistically significant. Other factors that were associated with more lung injuries were older age, with underlying diseases, cough, higher levels of CRP, IL-6 and LDH, and lower levels of Lymphocyte count, SARS-COV-2 antibodies.

Table 3 Univariable analysis for factors associated with lung injury in delta variant–infected patients
Full size table

In multivariable analysis, the effect of vaccination on pulmonary injuries was adjusted for age, sex, comorbidity, time from illness onset to hospitalization and SARS-COV-2 viral load base on clinical consideration. Since clinical parameters such as lymphocyte counts, CRP, IL-6 and LDH were more appropriate as an index of disease severity rather than risk factors, those variables not included in the multivariable regression analysis.

After adjusted for confounding factors, fully vaccination was still significantly associated with lower extent of lung injuries {Coefadj [95%CI] = − 3.88(− 5.96, − 1.79}, P < 0.001; Coefadj(95%CI) = − 106.10(− 167.30, − 44.89), P = 0.001; and Coefadj(95%CI) = − 1.81(− 2.72, − 0.91), P < 0.001 for the three outcomes, respectively; Table 4). Of note, SARS-COV-2 viral load was not associated with the severity of the COVID-19 pneumonia in our patients (P = 0.334, P = 0.161, P = 0.188 for the three outcomes, respectively; Table 4).

Table 4 Multivariable analysis for factors associated with lung injury in delta variant–infected patients
Full size table

Subgroup analysis

Subgroup analyses were performed for the three outcomes stratified by sex, age, and comorbidity status (Additional file 1: Tables S1, S2, S3). Likewise, partially vaccination was not associated with any reduction of pulmonary injuries in the subgroup analyses. In fully vaccinated patients, variation of protection could be found within subgroups. Generally, the extent of reduction of pulmonary injuries was more profound in fully vaccinated patients with older age, having underlying diseases, and being female sex, as demonstrated by relatively larger absolute values of adjusted coefficients (Additional file 1: Tables S1, S2, S3). Nevertheless, for patients with underlying diseases, the reduction of pulmonary injury in fully vaccinated patients was statistically significant only when pulmonary lesions were evaluated by chest CT scores {Coefadj[95%CI] = − 2.70(− 4.83, − 0.57), P = 0.015}. This suggested that chest CT scores may be more sensitive than POI and VOI in the whole lung, when evaluating different treatment strategies for COVID-19 pneumonia. Finally, when patients with severe/critical COVID-19 diseases were excluded from analysis, fully vaccination was still significantly associated with less pulmonary injuries {Coefadj[95%CI] = − 3.24(− 4.93, − 1.54)}, P < 0.001; Coefadj(95%CI) = − 97.44(− 147.33, − 47.55), P = 0.001; and Coefadj(95%CI) = − 1.65(− 2.51, − 0.79), P < 0.001 for the POI and VOI in the whole lung, and the chest CT scores, respectively; Additional file 1: Table S4).

Discussion

As a typical respiratory virus, SARS-COV-2 infection leads to viral pneumonia. Respiratory failure is the leading cause of death in COVID-19 patients [6]. Chest CT scan is not only a sensitive tool for diagnosing COVID-19 pneumonia but also a useful method for evaluating the severity and extent of disease [7,8,9]. Our present study found that fully vaccinated patients had the least lung impairments evaluated by any of the three radiological parameters. In addition, shorter duration from illness onset to peak lung injury was observed in fully vaccinated patients, suggesting that convalescent stage may come earlier in fully vaccinated patients. When adjusted for age, sex, comorbidity, time from illness onset to hospitalization and SARS-COV-2 viral load that may potentially influence the severity of the COVID-19 pneumonia, fully vaccination was still significantly associated with lower extent of lung injuries. However, protection against lung injury was not found in partially vaccinated patients. The results in our study are consistent with the findings in previous studies that fully vaccination with inactivated COVID-19 but not partially vaccination protect against severe COVID-19 [10, 11, 17,18,19].

In many infectious diseases, high burden of pathogens is generally associated with more advanced diseases and poorer prognosis [20,21,22,23]. However, in COVID-19 cases, this positive association is controversial [16, 24,25,26,27], probably because SARS-COV-2 may not be the only contributor to the disease progression. Host immune response may be an important regulator of the clinical course of COVID-19. Aberrant inflammation could lead to severe deterioration of COVID-19 pneumonia, whereas proper immune responses lead to immune clearance of infection while maintaining minimal lung injury [28, 29]. In our study, SARS-COV-2 viral load was neither associate with vaccination status nor associated with the severity of the COVID-19 pneumonia. The findings at least suggest that higher viral load at the early stage of Delta variant infection does not always predict more severe COVID-19.

Previous study suggested that vaccine efficacy may be influenced by the sex, age and comorbidities [30, 31]. Our study showed that fully vaccination results in more profound reduction of lung injury in elderly patients, patients with underlying diseases, and female patients. The finding implies that those groups of patients may benefit more from COVID-19 vaccine. Nevertheless, fully vaccination is required for those patients because there was no reduction of pulmonary injuries in partially vaccinated patients in the subgroup analysis. Of note, statistical differences were most likely to be observed when chest CT score was used to represent the severity of the COVID-19 pneumonia. More studies are needed to explore what is the best radiological parameter representing severity of lung injury. Finally, when only non-severe patients were included in the analysis, our study was still able to demonstrated that fully vaccination was associated with protection of lung injury.

Although the degree of COVID-19 pneumonia on chest CT scan could be a promising outcome parameter for evaluating the effect of COVID-19 vaccine, it would not be expected to replace the current method in vaccine studies. Frequent chest CT scans are required for accurately capturing the most severe COVID-19 pneumonia. In real world clinical practice, this is very difficult to be achieved, especially in patients with mild and stable diseases. In additional, radiological manifestations of COVID-19 pneumonia is not always correlated with the severity of the disease. Exacerbation of preexisting medical conditions by COVID-19 could also threaten the patient’ s life.

In conclusion, our study demonstrated that fully vaccination but not partially vaccination could significantly protect lung injury. Elderly patients, patients with underlying diseases, and female patients may benefit more from COVID-19 vaccines. Our study provides additional evidence to encourage a full course of vaccination.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Hu Z, Lv Y, Xu C, Sun W, Chen W, Peng Z, et al. Clinical use of short-course and low-dose corticosteroids in patients with non-severe COVID-19 during pneumonia progression. Front Publ Health. 2020;8:355. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shan F, Gao Y, Wang J, Shi W, Shi N, Han M, et al. Abnormal lung quantification in chest CT images of COVID-19 patients with deep learning and its application to severity prediction. Med Phys. 2021;48(4):1633–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.14609.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Joint Prevention and Control Mechanism of the State Council. Chinese interim guidance of novel coronavirus pneumonia (version 8.0). 2020. http://www.nhc.gov.cn/xcs/zhengcwj/202008/0a7bdf12bd4b46e5bd28ca7f9a7f5e5a/files/a449a3e2e2c94d9a856d5faea2ff0f94.pdf, Accessed 9 Aug 2020.

  4. Chen W, Zhang J, Qin X, Wang W, Xu M, Wang LF, et al. SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody levels are correlated with severity of COVID-19 pneumonia. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;130:110629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110629.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Pan F, Ye T, Sun P, Gui S, Liang B, Li L, et al. Time course of lung changes at chest ct during recovery from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Radiology. 2020;295(3):715–21. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020200370.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ruan Q, Yang K, Wang W, Jiang L, Song J. Clinical predictors of mortality due to COVID-19 based on an analysis of data of 150 patients from Wuhan. China Intensive Care Med. 2020;46(5):846–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-05991-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ai T, Yang Z, Hou H, Zhan C, Chen C, Lv W, et al. Correlation of chest ct and rt-pcr testing for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in china: a report of 1014 cases. Radiology. 2020;296(2):E32–40. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020200642.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lyu P, Liu X, Zhang R, Shi L, Gao J. The performance of chest ct in evaluating the clinical severity of COVID-19 pneumonia: identifying critical cases based on CT characteristics. Invest Radiol. 2020;55(7):412–21. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000689.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhao W, Zhong Z, Xie X, Yu Q, Liu J. Relation between chest ct findings and clinical conditions of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pneumonia: a multicenter study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020;214(5):1072–7. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.20.22976.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hu Z, Tao B, Li Z, Song Y, Yi C, Li J, et al. Effectiveness of inactivated COVID-19 vaccines against severe illness in B16172 (Delta) variant-infected patients in Jiangsu. China Int J Infect Dis. 2022;116:204–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2022.01.030.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Li XN, Huang Y, Wang W, Jing QL, Zhang CH, Qin PZ, et al. Effectiveness of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines against the delta variant infection in Guangzhou: a test-negative case-control real-world study. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2021;10(1):1751–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2021.1969291.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Li K, Fang Y, Li W, Pan C, Qin P, Zhong Y, et al. CT image visual quantitative evaluation and clinical classification of coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Eur Radiol. 2020;30(8):4407–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06817-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Inoue A, Takahashi H, Ibe T, Ishii H, Kurata Y, Ishizuka Y, et al. Comparison of semiquantitative chest CT scoring systems to estimate severity in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia. Eur Radiol. 2022;32(5):3513–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08435-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Elmokadem AH, Mounir AM, Ramadan ZA, Elsedeiq M, Saleh GA. Comparison of chest CT severity scoring systems for COVID-19. Eur Radiol. 2022;32(5):3501–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08432-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen W, Yao M, Hu L, Zhang Y, Zhou Q, Ren H, et al. Development and validation of a clinical prediction model to estimate the risk of critical patients with COVID-19. J Med Virol. 2022;94(3):1104–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.27428.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zheng S, Fan J, Yu F, Feng B, Lou B, Zou Q, et al. Viral load dynamics and disease severity in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Zhejiang province China, January-March retrospective cohort study. BMJ. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1443.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Zeng B, Gao L, Zhou Q, Yu K, Sun F. Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med. 2022;20(1):200. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02397-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Butt AA, Dargham SR, Chemaitelly H, Al Khal A, Tang P, Hasan MR, et al. Severity of illness in persons infected with the SARS-CoV-2 delta variant vs beta variant in qatar. JAMA Intern Med. 2022;182(2):197–205. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.7949.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zheng C, Shao W, Chen X, Zhang B, Wang G, Zhang W. Real-world effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines: a literature review and meta-analysis. Int J Infect Dis. 2022;114:252–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.11.009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Salazar-Austin N, Cohn S, Lala S, Waja Z, Dooley KE, Hoffmann CJ, et al. Isoniazid preventive therapy and pregnancy outcomes in women living with human immunodeficiency virus in the tshepiso cohort. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71(6):1419–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciz1024.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Houben ML, Coenjaerts FE, Rossen JW, Belderbos ME, Hofland RW, Kimpen JL, et al. Disease severity and viral load are correlated in infants with primary respiratory syncytial virus infection in the community. J Med Virol. 2010;82(7):1266–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.21771.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. El Saleeby CM, Bush AJ, Harrison LM, Aitken JA, Devincenzo JP. Respiratory syncytial virus load, viral dynamics, and disease severity in previously healthy naturally infected children. J Infect Dis. 2011;204(7):996–1002. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jir494.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Yoshikawa T, Fukushi S, Tani H, Fukuma A, Taniguchi S, Toda S, et al. Sensitive and specific PCR systems for detection of both Chinese and Japanese severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus strains and prediction of patient survival based on viral load. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52(9):3325–33. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00742-14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Fajnzylber J, Regan J, Coxen K, Corry H, Wong C, Rosenthal A, et al. Massachusetts consortium for pathogen readiness SARS-CoV-2 viral load is associated with increased disease severity and mortality. Nat Commun. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19057-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Argyropoulos KV, Serrano A, Hu J, Black M, Feng X, Shen G, et al. Association of initial viral load in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) patients with outcome and symptoms. Am J Pathol. 2020;190(9):1881–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2020.07.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Pawar RD, Balaji L, Mehta S, Cole A, Liu X, Peradze N, et al. Viral load and disease severity in COVID-19. Intern Emerg Med. 2022;17(2):359–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-021-02786-w.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Magleby R, Westblade LF, Trzebucki A, Simon MS, Rajan M, Park J, et al. impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 viral load on risk of intubation and mortality among hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;73(11):e4197–205. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa851.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ye Q, Wang B, Mao J. The pathogenesis and treatment of the `cytokine storm’ in COVID-19. J Infect. 2020;80(6):607–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.037.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Iwasaki M, Saito J, Zhao H, Sakamoto A, Hirota K, Ma D. Inflammation triggered by SARS-CoV-2 and ACE2 augment drives multiple organ failure of severe COVID-19: molecular mechanisms and implications. Inflammation. 2021;44(1):13–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10753-020-01337-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bignucolo A, Scarabel L, Mezzalira S, Polesel J, Cecchin E, Toffoli G. Sex disparities in efficacy in COVID-19 vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Vaccines. 2021;9(8):825. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9080825.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Yelin I, Katz R, Herzel E, Zilberstein TB, Ben-Tov A, Kuint J, et al. Associations of the BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness with patient age and comorbidities. medrxiv. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.16.21253686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the heroic people for their active participation in ending this COVID-19 outbreak and for taking care of the patients.

Funding

The work was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China. (No. 82073673), National S andT Major Project Foundation of China (No. 2018ZX10715002), the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD), Nanjing medical science and technique development foundation (ZKX21037). The funding body had no role in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data and writing the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Miao Lai, Kai Wang, Chengyuan Ding were contributed equally to this study.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, 101 Longmian Ave, Nanjing, 211166, China

    Miao Lai, Yi Yin & Zhihang Peng

  2. The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu, China

    Kai Wang

  3. Center for Global Health, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 211166, China

    Chengyuan Ding, Xiaoling lin & Zhiliang Hu

  4. Department of Radiology, The Second Hospital of Nanjing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, 210003, China

    Chuanjun Xu

  5. Department of Infectious Diseases, The Second Hospital of Nanjing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, 210003, China

    Zhiliang Hu

Authors
  1. Miao Lai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kai Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chengyuan Ding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yi Yin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiaoling lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Chuanjun Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Zhiliang Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Zhihang Peng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ML, KW and CD contributed equally to this work. ML, KW and CD curated and provided data. ML and KW screened the data. YY and XL performed laboratory tests. ML and YY performed data analysis. ML and KW drafted the manuscript. CD, ZH and CX provided guidance for epidemiological analysis throughout the study. ZP adjusted the research framework, provided financial support, and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chuanjun Xu, Zhiliang Hu or Zhihang Peng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the ethics committee of the Second Hospital of Nanjing (Reference Number: 2020-LS-ky003). Due to the anonymous processing of all patient private information in the article, the informed consent was waived with the approval of the Ethics Committee of Nanjing Medical University. Consent for publication was not applicable to this study. We wish to submit the manuscript for publication in Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials®, and the manuscript is not currently under consideration for publication in another journal.

Competing interests

All authors declare that they have no competing interests or financial conflicts to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Subgroup analysis of impact of inactivated COVID-19 vaccines on VOI in the whole lung. Table S2. Subgroup analysis of impact of inactivated COVID-19 vaccines on POI in the whole lung. Table S3. Subgroup analysis of impact of inactivated COVID-19 vaccines on the chest CT scores. Multivariable analysis for factors associated with lung injury in non-severe Delta variant–infected patients. Table S4. Multivariable analysis for factors associated with lung injury in non-severe Delta variant–infected patients.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lai, M., Wang, K., Ding, C. et al. Impact of inactivated COVID-19 vaccines on lung injury in B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant-infected patients. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 22, 22 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12941-023-00569-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12941-023-00569-z

Keywords

Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials

ISSN: 1476-0711

Contact us