Skip to main content

The epidemiology of gram-negative bacteremia in Lebanon: a study in four hospitals

Abstract

Introduction

Gram-negative bacteremia is a life-threatening infection with high morbidity and mortality. Its incidence is rising worldwide, and treatment has become more challenging due to emerging bacterial resistance. Little data is available on the burden and outcome of such infections in Lebanon.

Methods

We conducted this retrospective study in four Lebanese hospitals. Data on medical conditions and demographics of 2400 patients diagnosed with a bloodstream infection based on a positive blood culture were collected between January 2014 and December 2020.

Results

Most bacteremias were caused by Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii, with the more resistant organisms being hospital-acquired. Third-generation cephalosporin and quinolone resistance was steady throughout the study, but carbapenem resistance increased. Mortality with such infections is high, but carbapenem resistance or infection with Pseudomonas or Acinetobacter species were significant risk factors for poor outcomes.

Conclusion

This is the first multi-center study from Lebanon on gram-negative bacteremia, resistance patterns, and factors associated with a poor outcome. More surveillance is needed to provide data to guide empirical treatment for bacteremia in Lebanon.

Introduction

Bloodstream infections (BSIs) have recently become a pressing public health concern. BSIs strain patients, healthcare systems, and economies worldwide, especially with the increase in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) [1]. Sepsis-induced organ dysfunction can cause permanent and irreversible cognitive impairment and organ failure and is associated with markedly high mortality rates [2, 3]. In the last couple of decades, BSIs have increased substantially, driven mainly by a surge in gram-negative bacterial infections [4]. In many settings, the rates of these bacteremia cases have overtaken those caused by gram-positive pathogens [5]. BSIs exert a heavy toll on patients and healthcare systems alike and are a growing cause of morbidity and mortality across the world [6, 7]. In the United States of America alone, an estimated two million patients suffer from antibiotic-resistant gram-negative or gram-positive bacteremia, with an associated 23,000 deaths [8]. While primary bacteremia is expected, with no identified origin of infection, secondary bacteremia spreads from a preexisting source of infection, most commonly urinary tract infection (UTI) and pneumonia [9]. Gram-negative pathogens gain entry into the body via several routes and can take place in the hospital or be community-acquired. The environment, gastrointestinal colonization, and contaminated medical devices are also sources of infection which disseminate to the blood [9].

The global emergence of antimicrobial resistance compounds the mounting risk of gram-negative BSIs. There are several mechanisms by which resistance spreads, and there is a rapidly depleting pool of available treatments [8]. Gram-negative infections are the primary culprits in BSI mortality, mainly third-generation cephalosporin-resistant (3GCR)-Enterobacterales, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacter ales (CRE), multidrug-resistant (MDR), Acinetobacter baumannii, and MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa, all of which are acquired in the healthcare setting [8]. Similar trends regarding antimicrobial resistance are seen worldwide. Middle Eastern countries are especially vulnerable to rampant MDR pathogens stemming from unchecked dissemination and use of antibiotics, combined with years of political unrest and conflict causing the relocation of many immigrants and refugees. Lebanon exemplifies these conditions, having always been a hub of shuffling populations for touristic, religious and geo-political reasons [10]; this has increased in recent years. This has hampered monitoring shifts in gram-negative bacteria epidemiological and resistance trends and allowed for faster spread of resistance. Hence, the present study is the only large-scale study in recent years. The data from hundreds of patients diagnosed with bacteremia on admission or during hospitalization in four different centers in Lebanon has been compiled. Gram-negative epidemiology and resistance patterns have been carefully documented and grouped to better profile gram-negative BSIs in Lebanon.

Methods

This retrospective study was conducted between January 2014 and December 2020 in 4 Lebanese Hospitals. We reviewed 2400 charts of patients with BSIs. The data collected included demographics (age and sex), hospital admission and discharge dates, whether community-acquired or hospital-acquired infections, ICU-acquired infections, infection site, gram-negative pathogen isolated and its antibiotic resistance pattern (antibiogram), and status on discharge.

Definitions

Any patient with a positive blood culture that was not considered to be contaminated was included in this study. Contamination was defined as coagulase-negative staphylococci in 1 out of 2 blood culture specimens. A failure to respond to treatment was considered a clinically confirmed treatment failure in the patient charts, whether there was further deterioration or persistent fever.

Community-acquired bacteremia: Bacteremia documented outside of the hospital setting or within 48 h of hospitalization.

Hospital-acquired bacteremia: Bacteremia documented more than 48 h after hospitalization or bacteremia that can be linked to a prior hospitalization within 30 days, according to the primary physician.

Statistical analysis

Data were coded, validated and analyzed using SPSS (version 28.0. IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). Descriptive statistics were reported using frequencies and percentages for the categorical variables. The chi-square test (χ2) assessed the correlation between categorical variables. Post-hoc analysis using the Bonferroni correction test was performed to reduce the instances of false positive significance. We considered a p-value < 0.05 as statistically significant.

Ethics and funding

The Lebanese American University Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved the study. No funding was received for this study.

The work conducted was in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Results

Of the 2400 collected results, 1668 (69.5%) infections were attributed to gram-negative bacteria. Of these, 900 (54%) were Escherichia coli (Table 1), 192 (11.5%) were Klebsiella pneumoniae (Table 2), 160 (9.6%) were Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and 108 (6.5%) were Acinetobacter species.

Table 1 Resistance pattern for E. coli species
Table 2 Resistance pattern for all Klebsiella species

The most common source of bacteremia was urine tract infection (UTI), followed by pneumonia and intra-abdominal infection (Fig. 1). Of all E. coli bacteremia, third-generation cephalosporin resistance (3GCR) was documented in 42%, and carbapenem resistance in 4.6%; 3GCR and carbapenem resistance (CR) was detected in 33.5% and 3%, respectively, of community-acquired E. coli, vs 55.3% and 7%, of hospital-acquired E.coli. A similar pattern was observed with Klebsiella species and all other Enterobacteriaceae, where 3GCR and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) rates were higher in the hospital setting (Table 3). In the community, rates of 3GCR and CR were 29.87% and 6.5%, respectively, while 29.8% and 8.8% were in the hospital setting. Notably, the 3GCR production rates remained stable from 2013 to 2020, whereas CRE rates increased yearly, rising from 0.3% in 2013 to 13% in 2020. Figure 2 shows the bacterial species’ resistance trends during the study.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Bacteremia percentages according to the identified source

Table 3 Resistance pattern for all Enterobacterales species
Fig. 2
figure 2

Resistance pattern variations of different bacteria between 2013 and 2020

Regarding Pseudomonas species (Table 4), our data shows that the community-acquired infections were more sensitive to all antipseudomonal agents. In contrast, hospital-acquired infections showed up to 40% resistance rate to any drug, with quinolone resistance of 25.7%, ceftazidime and cefepime resistance of 20.2%, carbapenem resistance approaching 31.2% and extensive drug resistance (all mentioned antibiotics and colistin) around 1.2%. Conversely, infections of Acinetobacter species (Table 5) were more often hospital-acquired and much more resistant, particularly to carbapenems, approaching 80% resistance rates. For both Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter species, resistance rates were higher in the hospital than in the community setting. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia were generally sensitive to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) (79.3%) and resistant to cefepime (78.6%). Stenotrophomonas species showed only 15% resistance to fluoroquinolones.

Table 4 Resistance pattern for Pseudomonas species (aeruginosa and non-aeruginosa)
Table 5 Resistance pattern for Acinetobacter species

55.2% of 3GCR-producing GNB, 64.1% of CREs, 86.8% of Acinetobacter species, 79.2% of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas (CRPS) and 62.4% of carbapenem-sensitive Pseudomonas (CSPS) were hospital-acquired (p < 0.01).

Regarding the association of the infectious source and outcomes, community-acquired bacteremia was associated with an 80% clinical cure rate, 11.3% death rate and 8.8% treatment failure. At the same time, hospital-acquired bacteremia was associated with a 65.7% cure rate, 29.3% death rate and 4.9% no response, defined as persistence of blood culture positivity (p < 0.01). The rate ratio of death between hospital and community-acquired bacteremia was calculated to be 2.59. Therefore, the rate of death in gram-negative bacteremia in this study was 2.59 times higher in hospital-acquired infections.

Regarding the cultured organisms, our study showed that having a CRPS was associated with a 68.4% death rate, compared to CSPS, which had a 16% death rate (p < 0.01). The rate ratio of death between CRPS and CSPS bacteremia in this study was 4.25 times higher in CRPS. Similarly, post-hoc analysis showed a statistically significantly lower death rate with 3GC and carbapenem-sensitive gram-negative enterobacterales (12.4% vs 18.6% overall, p < 0.01). The odds ratio calculated was 0.2, a 20% lower death rate than 3GC-sensitive enterobacterales.

When the bacteremia source was the urinary system (UTI), E. coli showed a sensitivity of 96.1% to fosfomycin, 85.7% to nitrofurantoin, 52.7% to TMP-SMX, 42.3% to quinolones, and 22.7% to ampicillin. Figure 3 shows the mortality rates according to infection source. Figure 4 shows the difference regarding carbapenem resistance in the enterobacterales and Pseudomonas. Figure 5 shows the percentages of gram-negative bacteria species involved in BSIs, and Table 1 shows details of the most common agent, E. coli.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Mortality, failure and cure rates between hospital and community-acquired pathogens

Fig. 4
figure 4

Differences in mortality based on carbapenem resistance for Pseudomonas species and Enterobacterales

Fig. 5
figure 5

Pathogens involved in Gram-negative bloodstream infections

Discussion

The five most common gram-negative bacteria responsible for BSIs in the present study were E. coli, K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, A. baumannii and S. maltophilia. E. coli BSIs were more prevalent in the community setting. Whether community or hospital-acquired, they had a relatively high rate of 3GCR resistance, while carbapenem resistance was seen mainly in in-patients and was usually associated with higher mortality.

Our findings matched other BSI studies when comparing our data with the literature. Data on BSI organisms collected from over 200 medical centers in 45 nations showed the prevalent organisms were Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii between 1997 and 2016, with E. coli supplanting S. aureus as of 2005 [11]. Simultaneously, other gram-negative bacteria such as K. pneumonia, P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii also became prominent causative agents in BSI [12]. Similar results were seen in the Far East, Sub-Saharan Africa and Europe [13,14,15,16]. Acinetobacter bacteremia in Lebanon is far more prevalent than in Europe, China and Japan [17]. A similar trend is also seen in South Korea [18]. This is mainly related to outbreaks in specific regions, hospitals and specific intensive care units (ICUs), and they are usually related to less effective infection control measures, highlighting the importance of prevention in the control of Acinetobacter spread [19]. Regionally, a similar trend was seen in Qatar in 2019 [20], but the data from Saudi Arabia in 2015 shows a higher prevalence of Klebsiella (21%), Acinetobacter (15.6%), Stenotrophomonas, Proteus and Serratia [21]. Figure 6 shows the different organisms involved in gram-negative bacteremias across different countries.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Percentage of each organism’s involvement in total Gram-negative bacteremias across different countries

Most gram-negative pathogens, with the main exceptions of E. coli and Salmonella, were more prevalent in the hospital than in the community setting in the present study. Proportions vary among studies and regions; E. coli was the most common species isolated from community-acquired cases, and the healthcare-associated bacteremia in the SENTRY study was responsible for 26% and 15.6% of the cases, respectively [11]. K. pneumoniae was the second most prevalent gram-negative species for both community- and hospital-acquired bacteremia, followed by P. aeruginosa. A. baumannii was also a frequent cause of hospital-acquired bacteremia, accounting for 3.2% of cases [11]. In addition, a study of over one thousand hospitalized patients with BSIs at or during admission in northern Italy found that E. coliK. pneumoniae, and P. aeruginosa were the most prominent gram-negative BSIs, whether community or hospital-associated [1]. Older age and UTIs are known risk factors for E. coli BSIs, which could explain the predominance of E. coli BSIs in the community setting. In Lebanon, the prominent elderly population struggles with access to adequate healthcare and proper follow-up. There is also increasing antimicrobial resistance to commonly prescribed drugs and inconsistent infection control practices among healthcare centers [22].

As the most common gastrointestinal bacteria, E. coli and K. pneumoniae are the agents most commonly involved in UTIs, possibly explaining their high prevalence in Gram-Negative Bacilli Bacteremias (GNBBs) [23]. BSIs secondary to UTIs are a rising threat worldwide. In the UK, Lishman et al. found that urogenital infections accounted for over half of all E. coli bacteremia episodes. Other sources of infection included biliary (11–27%) and other intra-abdominal infections (4–48%) [24].

In Lebanon, similar to data from the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) [25], UTI remains one of the major driving forces of BSIs and antimicrobial resistance (particularly 3GCR and CRE). The increased prevalence of UTIs with poor access to proper prevention and treatment measures has exacerbated local bacterial resistance [26]. The proportion of BSIs attributed to UTIs in the present study (32%) points to the significant burden and rising threat of UTIs, whose treatment is an essential driver for resistance, and the presence of other significant causes behind bacteremia cases.

Collapsed, inadequate or non-maintained infrastructure and water piping and treatment are primary factors behind the spread of GNBs, especially in the developing Arab countries of the Middle East [27]. Water systems are essential in spreading Pseudomonas and enterobacterales in the community or hospital setting [28]. While the enterobacterales come primarily from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, Pseudomonas species are more water-related pathogens [9]. In a 2021 Canadian study, upper UTIs were the most common source of infection (40%), followed by bloodstream infections of unknown source (24%) and infection of the hepatobiliary tract (12%) [29]. Other causes of gram-negative organisms spread in hospitals include pillows, linen, dispensers, blood pressure cuffs, skin and ultra-filtrate bags [32].

Resistance trends vary worldwide based on a variety of factors, including antibiotic misuse, their use in plantations and livestock, injection drug use, poor infection control measures and inappropriate infrastructure [30, 31]. Natural or man-made disasters also play a role in antibiotic resistance spread [32]. Specific populations and their contemporary problems can majorly influence resistance trends [33]. For example, the ongoing crises in the Arab world, the ensuing economic and political issues, and poor hygiene may have caused a surge in gram-negative bacterial infections and facilitated the spread of resistance genes from nearby countries in the MENA region [27, 34]. Therefore, approaches such as the “One Health Approach” that emphasises the inter-species exchange of resistance and microbiota become important to mitigate these challenges [31]. Lebanon has been affected by such challenges since 2010, fueling the spread of resistant gram-negative bacteria across the Lebanese population [35].

Our data shows a stable pattern of E. coli resistance to fluoroquinolones and 3GCs over the years, maintained at around 60% and 40%, respectively, while there was a steady rise in CRE rates from 0.2 to 13%. This might be explained by the ease of access to over-the-counter antimicrobials maintained over the years and the increased use of carbapenems [36]. This is different to other areas of the world. A Korean study between 2019 and 2020 comparing resistance patterns of E. coli isolated from either the blood or urine of hospitalized patients found that ampicillin/sulbactam resistance was approximately 40% in blood and 45% in urine, whereas 20.0% of blood isolates and 27.5% of urine isolates showed 3GC resistance. The fluoroquinolone resistance rate was 33.8% [37]. In a Canadian study comparing different E. coli subtypes, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, aztreonam, and cefepime resistance rates (78.9%) of specific isolates (ST131) were higher than those of others (0–12% for non-ST131 isolates). Other significant antimicrobial resistance rates for blood vs urine isolates in Korea between 2020 and 2021 were Ciprofloxacin, 30.0% vs 37.5% and Tetracycline, 30.0% vs 35.0%, respectively [35]. In Lebanon, E. coli has a variety of ST genes, with ST131 being the most prevalent, followed by ST10 and ST69 [38]. In our study, the resistance rates for E. coli in urine are comparable to those in primary bacteremia. In addition, fluoroquinolone and 3GC resistance are similar to that in UTIs, whether in the community or hospital-acquired setting.

A Canadian study examining the epidemiology of extra-intestinal pathogenic E. coli between 2019 and 2020 found high resistance rates to most antibiotics, specifically detecting 3GC resistance in 14.3% of isolates and fluoroquinolone resistance in 28.6% of them [29]. There was an increase in E. coli BSI incidence rates in the population area studied from 2006 to 2016, which coincides with increased resistance rates to antimicrobials, most prominently ceftriaxone (4.2-fold increase) and ciprofloxacin (2.4-fold increase). This correlation could explain the rise of resistance in BSIs [29].

Our data regarding enterobacterales resistance is similar to worldwide trends, showing a growing resistance pattern to various antibiotic classes [39]. Of 103 g-negative isolates in a regional Saudi-Arabian study in 2019, 23.3% were 3GCR. Klebsiella pneumoniae and Ecoli were reported as major 3GCR bacteria in hospital settings within and outside Saudi Arabia, with varying rates from 20 to 70% [39]. The tendency of such resistance patterns to spread in some geographical regions and across different hospitals is concerning and warrants quick intervention and continuous surveillance to avoid outbreaks. In this study, over 70% of E. coli were resistant to 2nd to 4th generation cephalosporins. Fluoroquinolone resistance was also found to be highly elevated [39].

In the same study, E. coli resistance to carbapenems was below 10%; it was 18% to piperacillin/tazobactam, 5% to nitrofurantoin and 4.3% to amikacin [39]. These findings were similar in other studies in the same region and further afield [14, 40]. This can be explained by the overuse of antibiotics purchased over the counter in Saudi Arabia despite attempts to restrict their use. This highlights the need for more robust implementation of regulations to restrict the prescription of antibiotics in humans and animals [41]. The high CRE rates can also be attributed to outbreaks in a single institution from the studied region. These data are alarming and show the potential for the spread of drug resistance across the MENA region.

Our data are similar to those from Turkey, where, despite local efforts at antimicrobial stewardship [42], there are similar problems with the OTC dispensing of antibiotics and their availability in tablet forms.

Similar to E. coli, our data showed K. pneumoniae maintained a 36.6% resistance rate to 3GCs and a 34% resistance rate to quinolones throughout the study. These bacteria can spread and cause multiple infections, leading to sepsis [43]. In the Saudi-Arabian gram-negative BSI study, around 15% of isolates of Kpneumoniae were 3GCR. All of the CR K. pneumoniae in the study were taken from ICU patients. ICU Klebsiella isolates showed 80% resistance to 3GCs, 60% to carbapenems, 65% to fluoroquinolones and 22.6% to amikacin [39]. This sheds light on the frequent outbreaks of KPC K. pneumoniae in ICU settings, leading to high CR trends.

Our study further shows the steady increase in CRE rates in BSIs, highlighting the ease of transfer of resistance genes. Among the proposed mechanisms is the spread of these genes via plasmids by contact. This emphasizes the need for more robust antimicrobial stewardship and infection control measures [44]. This is especially important in the Arab world, where ineffective or non-antimicrobial stewardship programs continue to be a problem driving AMR [41]. For instance, CRE K. pneumoniae has been well-documented in Gulf countries and is a rising global threat [45]. A Chinese surveillance study spanning 20 years also showed an increase in CRE K. pneumoniae prevalence [14]. In contrast, a Brazilian study of BSIs showed K. pneumoniae as the most common pathogen among enterobacterales, with 3GC resistance rates of 95.6% and CRE rates of 13.6% [46]. Similar to the findings in our study in the ICU setting, antibiotic failure and higher disease severity translated to poorer outcomes in patients with CR Klebsiella pneumoniae [47].

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a gram-negative aerobic bacterium typically found in intestinal flora [48]. However, this pathogen is a dangerous opportunist that targets critically ill or immune-deficient patients [49]. It is consistently among the top four most common pathogens in hospital-acquired BSIs and the three most common pathogens detected in the ICU [50].

Our study shows that Pseudomonas species have a 74% resistance rate to fluoroquinolones in BSIs and a 68% resistance rate to carbapenems. Regarding global spread, P. aeruginosa resistant to carbapenems has been frequently reported from some of the Levant and North African Arab countries (> 50% resistance) [10]. Metallo-β-lactamase production has been its primary mechanism of carbapenem resistance in Lebanon [51]. The Asia Pacific (17–50%) and Latin America (64.6%) regions also exhibit high rates of carbapenem resistance compared with Europe (0–35.6%) and North America (10.3–19.4%) [52]. The Japan Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (JANIS) 2016 report, compiling data from 1653 facilities, found that the rates of imipenem and meropenem resistance according to CLSI 2012 breakpoints were 12.3% for P. aeruginosa [53]. In China, the average carbapenem resistance rates range between 9 and 24%, while Extended drug-resistant (XDR) P. aeruginosa proportions were between 1 and 8% [54, 55]. This shows that the resistance trends of Pseudomonas tend to be regional, dictating a possible spread of resistance patterns across countries nearby.

Carbapenemases, porin channel manipulation, and efflux pumps all contribute to the increasing challenges when treating P. aeruginosa [52, 56]. The different resistance mechanisms it possesses give it a versatile pattern of resistance [57]. Its natural reservoir being water makes it easy to infiltrate communities with poor water infrastructure. Its colonization of water supplies in hospitals makes it an exceptionally successful hospital-acquired pathogen [58]. Globally, different clones predominate in each region [59]. ST235, ST654 and ST233 are the most prevalent strains in the MENA region [60]. Genotypic analyses and genome-wide virulence profiling were done in Lebanon, where multiple drug-resistance genes were found, especially in ST235. Resistance mechanisms were mostly enzymatic, efflux pumps and biofilm-producing genes [61, 62]. Porin regulation seems to be slower than other resistance mechanisms, often taking more time to develop after prolonged periods of antibiotic exposure. This makes it a significant mechanism in chronic infections needing long courses of treatment, leading to a poorer response to treatment [63]. Thus, antimicrobial stewardship and adequately treated water systems are essential in controlling resistant Pseudomonas.

Acinetobacter baumannii is an increasingly concerning gram-negative bacterium mainly responsible for hospital-acquired BSIs [11]. Its non-motile characteristic makes it exceptionally resilient, able to recur several months after cleaning [64]. Its prevalence and resistance profiles depend highly on the regional and local institutional epidemiology. It can vary depending on differences in infection control measures [65]. Outbreaks of MDR A. baumannii have been reported in countries during economic crises, which might explain their increased burden in recent years in Lebanon [66]. In addition, MDR A. baumanii outbreaks have also been reported in war and conflict-affected areas. This possibly added to the burden in Lebanon, where ongoing conflicts were occurring during the study period [66]. Most A. baumannii infections (75%) and antimicrobial resistance (86%) are found in the healthcare setting [67]. Pneumonia and UTIs are common sources of A. baumannii infections in the community setting. At the same time, invasive medical procedures and more extended hospital stays are potential sources of infection in the hospital setting [68, 69]. Its nasal colonization rates were between 72 and 90% in Taiwan and 63% in the USA in long-term inpatients [70]. A. baumannii’s ability to create biofilms to survive on most hospital equipment and expanding resistance profile highlights the need for urgent infection control measures to control its spread [71].

XDR A. baumannii may arise through various mechanisms similar to those of P. aeruginosa. In the last few years, A. baumannii has also been labelled a difficult-to-treat (DTR) organism, resistant to all first-line antimicrobial drugs [72]. A 2016 US-based study from the Premier Healthcare Database showed that 44.8% of A. baumannii were carbapenem-resistant, compared with only 1% of Enterobacterales [73].

A nationwide Korean database study discovered that the two most common DTR organisms were Acinetobacter species (79.6%) and P. aeruginosa (17.7%) in 2020 [72]. Prior antibiotic consumption, healthcare contact, mechanical ventilation, and lower respiratory tract infections were all factors linked to DTR infections [72]. These infections are more associated with poor compliance with hospital infection control policies and procedures, leading to frequent outbreaks [74].

Our study shows a 70% rate of Acinetobacter resistance to carbapenems and only a 0.9% resistance rate to colistin. Most of the outbreaks of A. baumannii occurred in two hospitals, and the carbapenem resistance trends of Acinetobacter in Lebanon decreased from 88% in 2014 to 50% in 2020 [19]. Despite high CR rates, some European countries continue to have Acinetobacter outbreaks, ranging from 0% (Belgium) to 95% (Greece) [75]. The China Antimicrobial Surveillance Program noted a sharp increase in CR from 13% in 2004 to 70% in 2014, and that of XDR A. baumannii increased from 11% in 2004 to 60% in 2014 [55]. A Saudi-Arabian BSI study found A baumannii resistant to gentamicin, cephalosporins and carbapenems. A 70.6% resistance rate to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was observed; however, all isolates were sensitive to colistin [39]. In some hospitals, introducing more meticulous infection control and cleaning methods with robust staff training decreased MDR Acinetobacter incidence, as was the case with a Lebanese tertiary care hospital between 2017 and 2019, highlighting the importance of infection control in mitigating the burden of these MDR GNBs [19].

GNBBs have high mortality rates, reaching up to a 15% case fatality rate. GNBB with resistant organisms has an even higher mortality rate with fewer treatment options and a higher rate of treatment failure [76]. Our data shows that carbapenem resistance is usually associated with the highest mortality; CRE bacteremia had a 25.6% mortality rate, compared to 19.6% with 3GCR enterobacterales. In addition, Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas Aeruginosa (CRPSA) infections had the highest odds of death, with a statistically significant odds ratio of 4.25 compared to Carbapenem Sensitive Pseudomonas Aeruginosa (CSPSA), confirming its virulence in BSIs. Our data also shows that Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter were associated with higher mortality than enterobacterales and nosocomial infections, which have higher mortality than community-acquired infections.

Pseudomonas bacteremia is an independent risk factor for mortality, ranging from 18 to 61%, regardless of the resistance profile, mainly due to its ability to cause multi-site infection [77]. In addition, carbapenem resistance increases the risk of death (OR 4.485) recorded with CRPSA in comparison with CSPSA [77]. CRPSA and CRE organisms should be regarded as high-risk organisms for mortality, as reflected in multiple studies, and similar to what was found in our study [78, 79]. Therefore, carbapenem resistance should be considered an essential risk factor leading to mortality. Controlling these types of resistant bacteria should be prioritized through antimicrobial stewardship and infection control programs.

The literature corroborates these findings, where CRE infections have very high mortality risks in any infection, especially in BSIs [80]. Taye et al. showed that having a CRE bacteremia by itself had 2.47 times increased odds of death and 3.35 times increased odds of ICU admission compared with carbapenem-sensitive bacteria [81]. In addition, another study documented higher mortality rates with hospital-acquired CRE infections [82].

Failure to treat UTIs increases the likelihood of E. coli-related bacteremia, causing higher mortality [83]. A 2015 UK study looking at 30-day all-cause mortality in E. coli bacteremia found that while UTI-related bacteremia had a lower case fatality rate than other secondary bacteremia, the high numbers of untreated UTIs at the population level indicate that they still account for the highest crude number of deaths [84]. Our data shows that CR prevalence is rising, especially in E. coli, which is linked to higher mortality, probably because such infections are more complicated to treat.

Regarding Acinetobacter infections, especially carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAB), mortality is very high, approaching 33% [85]. An Acinetobacter BSI quadruples the odds of death [86]. In our study, the data demonstrated a 33% mortality with Acinetobacter. This is important in the setting of hard-to-control outbreaks reported in multiple hospitals in Lebanon in the past [17, 19]. These outbreaks had high levels of extensive drug resistance [87]. This has been further confirmed by plasmid gene analysis to reveal multiple beta-lactam genes, specifically carbapenems [88].

We ended in 2020, the year of the onset of the Coronavirus Infectious Disease (COVID-19) pandemic in Lebanon. During the pandemic, antibiotic prescriptions increased dramatically, which might have affected the patterns of antimicrobial resistance [89]. Future studies are needed.

Conclusions

GNBBs are community or hospital-acquired infections. They are usually severe and have a high mortality. While CRE are on the rise, the presence of a Pseudomonas or an Acinetobacter bacteremia is linked to higher mortality rates. Carbapenem resistance explicitly increases the mortality rate in almost all patients with GNBBs. While most GNBBs originate from inadequately treated UTIs, several other driving forces may exist in Lebanon, whether location-related or socioeconomic. The increasing prevalence of various primary infections leading to bacteremia with inadequate infection control and antimicrobial stewardship has led to bacterial resistance, translating to more difficult-to-treat bacteremia and higher mortality. This multicenter study provides a detailed view of the nature and resistance profiles of GNBBs and outcomes and may help guide the empirical treatment of such infections.

Availability of data and materials

Available upon reasonable request. No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. Santoro A, Franceschini E, Meschiari M, et al. Epidemiology and risk factors associated with mortality in consecutive patients with bacterial bloodstream infection: impact of MDR and XDR bacteria. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020;7(11):461. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kavanagh N, Ryan EJ, Widaa A, et al. Staphylococcal osteomyelitis: disease progression, treatment challenges, and future directions. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2018;31(2):e00084-e117. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00084-17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801–10. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.0287.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Douglas NM, Hennessy JN, Currie BJ, Baird RW. Trends in bacteremia over 2 decades in the top end of the northern territory of Australia. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020;7(11):472. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bonten M, Johnson JR, van den Biggelaar AHJ, et al. Epidemiology of Escherichia coli bacteremia: a systematic literature review. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;72(7):1211–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Islas-Muñoz B, Volkow-Fernández P, Ibanes-Gutiérrez C, Villamar-Ramírez A, Vilar-Compte D, Cornejo-Juárez P. Bloodstream infections in cancer patients. Risk factors associated with mortality. Int J Infect Dis IJID Off Publ Int Soc Infect Dis. 2018;71:59–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2018.03.022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Trecarichi EM, Pagano L, Candoni A, et al. Current epidemiology and antimicrobial resistance data for bacterial bloodstream infections in patients with hematologic malignancies: an Italian multicentre prospective survey. Clin Microbiol Infect Off Publ Eur Soc Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015;21(4):337–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2014.11.022.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaye KS, Pogue JM. Infections caused by resistant gram-negative bacteria: epidemiology and management. Pharmacother J Hum Pharmacol Drug Ther. 2015;35(10):949–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.1636.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Holmes CL, Anderson MT, Mobley HLT, Bachman MA. Pathogenesis of gram-negative bacteremia. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2021;34(2):e00234-e320. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00234-20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Moghnieh RA, Kanafani ZA, Tabaja HZ, Sharara SL, Awad LS, Kanj SS. Epidemiology of common resistant bacterial pathogens in the countries of the Arab League. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(12):e379–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30414-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Diekema DJ, Hsueh PR, Mendes RE, et al. The microbiology of bloodstream infection: 20-year trends from the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019;63(7):e00355-e419. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00355-19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Hu Y, Liu C, Shen Z, et al. Prevalence, risk factors and molecular epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in patients from Zhejiang, China, 2008–2018. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020;9(1):1771–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2020.1799721.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim D, Yoon EJ, Hong JS, et al. Major bloodstream infection-causing bacterial pathogens and their antimicrobial resistance in South Korea, 2017–2019: phase I report from Kor-GLASS. Front Microbiol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.799084.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Tian L, Zhang Z, Sun Z. Antimicrobial resistance trends in bloodstream infections at a large teaching hospital in China: a 20-year surveillance study (1998–2017). Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019;8(1):86. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-019-0545-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Kreidl P, Kirchner T, Fille M, Heller I, Lass-Flörl C, Orth-Höller D. Antibiotic resistance of blood cultures in regional and tertiary hospital settings of Tyrol, Austria (2006–2015): impacts & trends. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(10):e0223467. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223467.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Hattori H, Maeda M, Nagatomo Y, et al. Epidemiology and risk factors for mortality in bloodstream infections: a single-center retrospective study in Japan. Am J Infect Control. 2018;46(12):e75–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2018.06.019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kanafani ZA, Zahreddine N, Tayyar R, et al. Multi-drug resistant Acinetobacter species: a seven-year experience from a tertiary care center in Lebanon. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2018;7(1):9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-017-0297-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim D, Lee H, Sik CJ, et al. The changes in epidemiology of imipenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii bacteremia in a pediatric intensive care unit for 17 years. J Korean Med Sci. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e196.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Osman M, Halimeh BF, Rafei R, et al. Investigation of an XDR-Acinetobacter baumannii ST2 outbreak in an intensive care unit of a Lebanese tertiary care hospital. Future Microbiol. 2020;15:1535–42. https://doi.org/10.2217/fmb-2020-0079.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hadi HA, Dargham SR, Eltayeb F, et al. Epidemiology, clinical, and microbiological characteristics of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteremia in Qatar. Antibiotics. 2024;13(4):320–320. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13040320.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Faidah HS, Al-Said HM, Moustafa A, Ashgar SS, Johargy A. A twelve year retrospective study assessing the prevalence of bloodstream infections causing pathogens at a tertiary care hospital in holy Makkah, Saudi Arabia. Egypt J Med Microbiol. 2019;28(1):31–9. https://doi.org/10.2160/ejmm.2019.282381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Haddad S, Jabbour JF, Hindy JR, et al. Bacterial bloodstream infections and patterns of resistance in patients with haematological malignancies at a tertiary centre in Lebanon over 10 years. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2021;27:228–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hyun M, Lee JY, Ah KH, Ryu SY. Comparison of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae acute pyelonephritis in Korean patients. Infect Chemother. 2019;51(2):130–41. https://doi.org/10.3947/ic.2019.51.2.130.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Lishman H, Costelloe C, Hopkins S, et al. Exploring the relationship between primary care antibiotic prescribing for urinary tract infections, Escherichia coli bacteraemia incidence and antimicrobial resistance: an ecological study. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2018;52(6):790–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.08.013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang X, Chen H, Zheng Y, Qu S, Wang H, Yi F. Disease burden and long-term trends of urinary tract infections: a worldwide report. Front Public Health. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.888205.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Chardavoyne PC, Kasmire KE. Appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions for urinary tract infections. West J Emerg Med. 2020;21(3):633–9. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2020.1.45944.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Al Salman J, Al Dabal L, Bassetti M, et al. Management of infections caused by WHO critical priority gram-negative pathogens in Arab countries of the Middle East: a consensus paper. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020;56(4):106104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chia PY, Sengupta S, Kukreja A, Ponnampalavanar SSL, Ng OT, Marimuthu K. The role of hospital environment in transmissions of multidrug-resistant gram-negative organisms. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2020;9(1):29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-020-0685-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Holland MS, Nobrega D, Peirano G, Naugler C, Church DL, Pitout JDD. Molecular epidemiology of Escherichia coli causing bloodstream infections in a centralized Canadian region: a population-based surveillance study. Clin Microbiol Infect Off Publ Eur Soc Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020;26(11):1554.e1-1554.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2020.02.019.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Arsène MMJ, Davares AKL, Viktorovna PI, et al. The public health issue of antibiotic residues in food and feed: causes, consequences, and potential solutions. Vet World. 2022;15(3):662–71. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2022.662-671.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Larsson DGJ, Flach CF. Antibiotic resistance in the environment. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2022;20(5):257–69. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-021-00649-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Antimicrobial resistance and the Iraq wars: armed conflict as an underinvestigated pathway with growing significance - PMC. Accessed April 11, 2023. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9933488/

  33. Ikuta KS, Swetschinski LR, Aguilar GR, et al. Global mortality associated with 33 bacterial pathogens in 2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet. 2022;400(10369):2221–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02185-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Azour A, Al-Bayssari C, Dagher TN, Fajloun F, Fajloun M, Rolain JM. Clonal dissemination of plasmid-mediated carbapenem and colistin resistance in refugees living in overcrowded camps in North Lebanon. Antibiotics. 2021;10(12):1478. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10121478.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Osman M, Rafei R, Ismail MB, et al. Antimicrobial resistance in the protracted Syrian conflict: halting a war in the war. Future Microbiol. 2021;16(11):825–45. https://doi.org/10.2217/fmb-2021-0040.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Shallal A, Lahoud C, Zervos M, Matar M. Antibiotic stewardship in disaster situations: lessons learned in Lebanon. Antibiotics. 2022;11(5):560. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11050560.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Kim B, Kim JH, Lee Y. Virulence factors associated with Escherichia coli bacteremia and urinary tract infection. Ann Lab Med. 2022;42(2):203–12. https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2022.42.2.203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Al-Mir H, Osman M, Drapeau A, Hamze M, Madec JY, Haenni M. Spread of ESC-, carbapenem- and colistin-resistant Escherichia coli clones and plasmids within and between food workers in Lebanon. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021;76(12):3135–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkab327.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Bandy A, Almaeen AH. Pathogenic spectrum of blood stream infections and resistance pattern in gram-negative bacteria from Aljouf region of Saudi Arabia. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(6):e0233704. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233704.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Bayraktar B, Pelit S, Bulut ME, Aktaş E. Trend in antibiotic resistance of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia Coli and Klebsiella Pneumoniae bloodstream infections. Med Bull Sisli Etfal Hosp. 2019;53(1):70–5. https://doi.org/10.14744/SEMB.2018.60352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Al-Jedai AH, Almogbel Y, Eljaaly K, et al. Restriction on antimicrobial dispensing without prescription on a national level: impact on the overall antimicrobial utilization in the community pharmacies in Saudi Arabia. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(7):e0271188. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271188.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Isler B, Keske Ş, Aksoy M, et al. Antibiotic overconsumption and resistance in Turkey. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019;25(6):651–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2019.02.024.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Soares Moraesde L, Gomes Magalhaes GL, Material Soncini JG, Pelisson M, Eches Perugini MR, Vespero EC. High mortality from carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infection. Microb Pathog. 2022;167:105519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2022.105519.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Schweizer C, Bischoff P, Bender J, et al. Plasmid-mediated transmission of kpc-2 carbapenemase in enterobacteriaceae in critically Ill patients. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:276. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00276.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Pitout JDD, Nordmann P, Poirel L. Carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae, a key pathogen set for global nosocomial dominance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59(10):5873–84. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01019-15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Quillici MCB, Resende DS, Gonçalves IR, et al. Gram-negative bacilli bacteremia: a 7 year retrospective study in a referral Brazilian tertiary-care teaching hospital. J Med Microbiol. 2021;70(1):001277. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.001277.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Karaiskos I, Giamarellou H. Multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant gram-negative pathogens: current and emerging therapeutic approaches. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2014;15(10):1351–70. https://doi.org/10.1517/14656566.2014.914172.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Fusco A, Savio V, Stelitano D, Baroni A, Donnarumma G. The intestinal biofilm of pseudomonas aeruginosa and staphylococcus aureus is inhibited by antimicrobial peptides HBD-2 and HBD-3. Appl Sci. 2021;11(14):6595. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11146595.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Sligl WI, Dragan T, Smith SW. Nosocomial gram-negative bacteremia in intensive care: epidemiology, antimicrobial susceptibilities, and outcomes. Int J Infect Dis. 2015;37:129–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2015.06.024.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Di Carlo P, Serra N, Lo Sauro S, et al. Epidemiology and pattern of resistance of gram-negative bacteria isolated from blood samples in hospitalized patients: a single center retrospective analysis from Southern Italy. Antibiotics. 2021;10(11):1402. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10111402.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Dandachi I, Chaddad A, Hanna J, Matta J, Daoud Z. Understanding the epidemiology of multi-drug resistant gram-negative Bacilli in the middle east using a one health approach. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:1941. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01941.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Nordmann P, Poirel L. Epidemiology and diagnostics of carbapenem resistance in gram-negative bacteria. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2019;69(Suppl 7):S521–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciz824.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Kajihara T, Yahara K, Hirabayashi A, Shibayama K, Sugai M. Japan nosocomial infections surveillance (JANIS): current status, international collaboration, and future directions for a comprehensive antimicrobial resistance surveillance system. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2021;74(2):87–96. https://doi.org/10.7883/yoken.JJID.2020.499.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Xu A, Zheng B, Xu YC, Huang ZG, Zhong NS, Zhuo C. National epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant and extensively drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria isolated from blood samples in China in 2013. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22:S1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Theuretzbacher U. Global antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative pathogens and clinical need. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2017;39:106–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2017.10.028.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Rodríguez-Martínez JM, Poirel L, Nordmann P. Molecular epidemiology and mechanisms of carbapenem resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53(11):4783–8. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00574-09.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Pang Z, Raudonis R, Glick BR, Lin TJ, Cheng Z. Antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: mechanisms and alternative therapeutic strategies. Biotechnol Adv. 2019;37(1):177–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.11.013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Khedr A, Mathew BM, Mushtaq H, et al. Pseudomonas infection reduction in the ICU: a successful multidisciplinary quality improvement project. Infez Med. 2022;30(4):577–86. https://doi.org/10.53854/liim-3004-13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Oliver A, Mulet X, López-Causapé C, Juan C. The increasing threat of Pseudomonas aeruginosa high-risk clones. Drug Resist Updat. 2015;21–22:41–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drup.2015.08.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Aguilar-Rodea P, Zúñiga G, Rodríguez-Espino BA, et al. Identification of extensive drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains: new clone ST1725 and high-risk clone ST233. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(3):e0172882. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172882.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Timane H. Phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of clinical Pseudomonas Aeruginosa isolates. Beirut: Lebanese American University; 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Harb CP. Genome-wide antibiotic resistance and virulence profiling of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa isolated from clinical samples in Lebanon. Beirut: Lebanese American University; 2017.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  63. Fernández L, Hancock REW. Adaptive and mutational resistance: role of porins and efflux pumps in drug resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2012;25(4):661–81. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00043-12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Researchers discover how Acinetobacter baumannii can survive on hospital surfaces without water. News-Medical.net. Published May 2, 2022. Accessed April 11, 2023. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20220502/Researchers-discover-how-Acinetobacter-baumannii-can-survive-on-hospital-surfaces-without-water.aspx

  65. Cronin K, Silkaitis C, Mikolajczak A, Bardowski L, Giannopoulos G. Developing an infection prevention program by leveraging the APIC competency model. Am J Infect Control. 2022;50(3):355–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2021.10.034.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Lowe H, Woodd S, Lange IL, Janjanin S, Barnet J, Graham W. Challenges and opportunities for infection prevention and control in hospitals in conflict-affected settings: a qualitative study. Confl Health. 2021;15(1):94. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-021-00428-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Chen CT, Wang YC, Kuo SC, et al. Community-acquired bloodstream infections caused by Acinetobacter baumannii: a matched case-control study. J Microbiol Immunol Infect Wei Mian Yu Gan Ran Za Zhi. 2018;51(5):629–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2017.02.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Lee NY, Chang TC, Wu CJ, et al. Clinical manifestations, antimicrobial therapy, and prognostic factors of monomicrobial Acinetobacter baumannii complex bacteremia. J Infect. 2010;61(3):219–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2010.07.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Smith AR, Vowles M, Horth RZ, et al. Infection control response to an outbreak of OXA-23 carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in a skilled nursing facility in Utah. Am J Infect Control. 2021;49(6):792–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2020.11.012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Liou ML, Chen KH, Yeh HL, Lai CY, Chen CH. Persistent nasal carriers of Acinetobacter baumannii in long-term-care facilities. Am J Infect Control. 2017;45(7):723–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2017.02.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Holmes CL, Anderson MT, Mobley HLT, Bachman MA. Pathogenesis of gram-negative bacteremia. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2021;34(2):e00234-e320. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00234-20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Huh K, Chung DR, Ha YE, et al. Impact of difficult-to-treat resistance in gram-negative bacteremia on mortality: retrospective analysis of nationwide surveillance data. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71(9):e487–96. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa084.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Walters MS, Bulens S, Hancock EB, et al. Surveillance for carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa at five United States Sites—2015. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofw172.214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Eckardt P, Canavan K, Guran R, et al. Containment of a carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii complex outbreak in a COVID-19 intensive care unit. Am J Infect Control. 2022;50(5):477–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2022.02.022.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Antimicrobial resistance in the EU/EEA (EARS-Net) - Annual epidemiological report for 2021. Published November 17, 2022. Accessed April 11, 2023. https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/surveillance-antimicrobial-resistance-europe-2021

  76. Al-Hasan MN. Gram-negative bloodstream infection: implications of antimicrobial resistance on clinical outcomes and therapy. Antibiotics. 2020;9(12):922. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9120922.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Zhang Y, Li Y, Zeng J, et al. Risk factors for mortality of inpatients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia in China: impact of resistance profile in the mortality. Infect Drug Resist. 2020;13:4115–23. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S268744.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Wilson GM, Suda KJ, Fitzpatrick MA, et al. Risk factors associated with carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae positive cultures in a cohort of US veterans. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;73(8):1370–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciab415.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Díaz Santos E, Mora Jiménez C, del Río-Carbajo L, Vidal-Cortés P. Treatment of severe multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. Med Intensiva Engl Ed. 2022;46(9):508–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medine.2022.06.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Zhou R, Fang X, Zhang J, et al. Impact of carbapenem resistance on mortality in patients infected with Enterobacteriaceae: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2021;11(12):e054971. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054971.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Taye ZY, Bakry MM, Bahari N. Risk factors and 30-day mortality for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infection, a case control study. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;101:8–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.09.061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Mortensen VH, Søgaard M, Mygind LH, Wolkewitz M, Kristensen B, Schønheyder HC. Incidence and mortality of hospital-acquired bacteraemia: a population-based cohort study applying a multi-state model approach. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2022;28(6):879.e9-879.e15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2021.12.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Urinary tract infection (UTI) - Symptoms and causes. Mayo Clinic. Accessed April 11, 2023. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/urinary-tract-infection/symptoms-causes/syc-20353447

  84. Abernethy JK, Johnson AP, Guy R, Hinton N, Sheridan EA, Hope RJ. Thirty day all-cause mortality in patients with Escherichia coli bacteraemia in England. Clin Microbiol Infect Off Publ Eur Soc Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015;21(3):251.e1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2015.01.001.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Vivo A, Fitzpatrick MA, Suda KJ, et al. Epidemiology and outcomes associated with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Infect Dis. 2022;22(1):491. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07436-w.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Appaneal HJ, Lopes VV, LaPlante KL, Caffrey AR. Treatment, clinical outcomes, and predictors of mortality among a national cohort of admitted patients with Acinetobacter baumannii infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022;66(3):e01975-e2021. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.01975-21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Moghnieh R, Siblani L, Ghadban D, et al. Extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in a Lebanese intensive care unit: risk factors for acquisition and determination of a colonization score. J Hosp Infect. 2016;92(1):47–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2015.10.007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Ezzeddine TZ, Ghssein G. Antibiotic misuse during the COVID-19 pandemic in Lebanon: a cross-sectional study. COVID. 2024;4(7):921–9. https://doi.org/10.3390/covid4070064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Chaaban T, Ezzeddine Z, Ghssein G. Antibiotic misuse during the COVID-19 pandemic in Lebanon: a cross-sectional study. COVID. 2024;4(7):921–9. https://doi.org/10.3390/covid4070064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

Lebanese American University, Beirut, Lebanon.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceived and designed the study and experiments: JN, HA, JM, TH, YJ, EA, AM, RA, RAA, DA, AB, MM, RA, ST, HEA, JEM, RM, AJRM, RH. Performed the experiments: JN, HA, JM, TH, YJ, EA, AM, RA, RAA, DA, AB, MM, RA, ST, HEA, JEM, RM. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JN, HA, JM, TH, YJ, EA, AM, RA, RAA, DA, AB, MM, RA, ST, HEA, JEM, WA, RM. Wrote the paper: JN, HA, JM, TH, YJ, EA, AM, RA, RAA, DA, AB, MM, RA, ST, HEA, JEM, RM. All authors reviewed the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rola Husni.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Lebanese American University Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved the study. As this study exclusively involved the analysis of pre-existing, anonymised records and did not include any direct human intervention or contact, it was exempt from the requirement for ethical approval typically necessary for research involving human subjects. In addition, the study's methodology did not involve any interaction with patients, nor did it influence patient care or treatment outcomes. As such, the informed consent requirement was irrelevant to our research framework.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nasr, J., Abdessamad, H., Mina, J. et al. The epidemiology of gram-negative bacteremia in Lebanon: a study in four hospitals. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 23, 90 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12941-024-00740-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12941-024-00740-0

Keywords