Skip to main content

Differences of virulence factors, and antimicrobial susceptibility according to phylogenetic group in uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains isolated from Korean patients

Abstract

Background

Escherichia coli is among the most common uropathogens. Increased antibiotic resistance in Gram negative bacilli is global concern. Alternative therapeutic options including vaccines against uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) have been developed. In this study, we compared the genotypic characteristics and antimicrobial susceptibility of UPEC according to phylogenetic groups.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of pyelonephritis patients with UPEC between February 2015 and June 2018. The study was conducted at a medical center in Korea. We compared the clinical and genotypic characteristics of UPEC according to phylogenetic groups. The phylogenetic groups and 29 virulence factors were identified using multiplex polymerase chain reaction.

Results

Phylogenetic group analysis revealed that most uropathogenic E. coli belonged to groups B2 and D: B2 (276, 77.7%), D (62, 17.5%), B1 (12, 3.4%), and A (5, 1.4%). Among the virulence factors, fyuA, fimH, traT, iutA, papG allele II, and papC were the most frequently observed. Phylogenetic group B2 was more closely related to virulence factors, including fimH, sfa/focED, focG, hlyA, cnf1, fyuA, and PAI, than group D. Groups B2 and D showed similar clinical presentations and complications. Group B2 had mostly healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance. Group D mostly had community-acquired infections. The K1 serotype was prevalent in group B2, and K5 was the most prevalent in group D.

Conclusions

Phylogenetic group B2 had more proportions and types of virulence factors than group D. Group B2 showed a high presentation of virulence factors related to adhesions and toxins. An increased presentation of antimicrobial resistance and healthcare-associated infections was also noted. Considering the genetic characteristics of UPEC, alternative therapeutic options targeting frequent virulence factors might be considered in addition to antibiotics.

Background

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the most common bacterial infections worldwide [1]. Among the uropathogens, uropathogenic Escherichia coli is the most predominant, causing up to 95% of community-acquired UTIs and 50% of healthcare-associated UTIs [2,3,4]. The clinical spectrum of UTI ranges from asymptomatic bacteriuria to cystitis, pyelonephritis, and prostatitis, and septic shock [5]. Clinical manifestations of UTI may differ depending on the underlying disease, preceding factors, and infecting bacteria [6, 7]. These manifestations can be influenced by bacterial pathogenicity [8]. In-hospital mortality is more dependent on uropathogens [4].

Increasing number of cases of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacilli, and decreased efficacy of broad-spectrum antibiotics are global concerns [9, 10]. Ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftolozane/tazobactam, new alternative antibiotics of gram-negative bacilli, have been approved for clinical use; however, antimicrobial resistance to such antibiotics was reported even before the use of such antibiotics [11, 12]. Efforts are being made globally to develop alternative treatments or preventive methods. In addition to antibiotics, immunomodulatory agents, probiotics, and bacteriophages have been proposed as alternative therapeutic options for UTIs [13, 14]. Also, vaccines for uropathogenic E. coli is being developed to prevent recurrent UTI [15].

Uropathogenic E. coli have many virulence factors or properties, including adhesins, toxins, iron acquisition, and immune evasion that enable them to invade, colonize, and survive in the urinary tract [16]. Bacterial adhesion to uroepithelium is a crucial step of development of UTI [17]. The uropathogenic E. coli vaccine conducted up to the phase I study was ExPEC4V, and four types of E. coli O antigen were targeted [18]. Vaccines under development are targeting the virulence factors widely distributed in uropathogenic E. coli [16, 18,19,20,21]. Most vaccines for uropathogenic E. coli primarily target adhesion molecules, iutA and fyuA [19, 22]. E. coli can be categorized into four major groups, A, B1, B2, and D [23]. Among uropathogenic E. coli, phylogenetic group B2 is the most abundant, and the distributions vary from 33 to 80%. Phylogenetic group D was reported to account for about 10–30% [24,25,26,27,28]. The distribution of virulence factors may differ depending on the phylogenetic groups [20, 24]. Therefore, the analysis of virulence factors according to phylogenetic group B2 and D, which account for majority of uropathogenic E. coli cases, is important as basic data.

In this study, we compared virulence factors and antimicrobial susceptibility for the phylogenetic groups B2 and D and determined whether differences exist in clinical manifestations between the two groups. Additionally, the clinical characteristics and predisposing factors for the two groups were examined.

Methods

Study subjects

Patients who visited Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center with uropathogenic E. coli UTI from February 2015 to June 2018 were categorized into phylogenetic group A, B1, B2, or D. Phylogenetic group B2 or D, which account for a large proportion of uropathogenic E. coli, were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups according to phylogenetic group B2 and D. UTI was defined as a quantitative culture of ≥ 105 CFU/mL for E. coli isolated from midstream urine or that collected using a catheter, and the presence of urinary symptoms such as urgency, high frequency of urination, and dysuria. Diagnostic criteria for upper UTI included fever, flank pain, urinary symptoms, and/or tenderness of the costovertebral angle. Patients aged < 18 years or with polymicrobial infections were excluded, along with patients transferred to other hospitals during their treatment period. If the causative bacterium of a patient with UTI was E. coli, it was defined as uropathogenic E. coli. E. coli isolates from the blood, urine, or pus were collected, and only one isolate per patient was examined. The categories of infection were further divided into community-acquired, healthcare-associated, and nosocomial infections. Community-acquired infections were defined as those in which symptoms occurred within 48 h after visiting the hospital. However, patients with community-acquired infections and healthcare-associated risk factors were categorized under healthcare-associated infections. Healthcare-associated risk factors included hospitalization within 90 days, hemodialysis, intravenous medication in outpatient clinics, or residency in long-term care facilities. Nosocomial infections were defined as those in which symptoms occurred 48 h after hospital admission. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center (File No. 2020-02-003). The requirement for written informed consent was waived by the committee because of the retrospective nature of the study and the use of identifiable specimens. Medical records were reviewed retrospectively.

Study design

Data collection

Medical records, including underlying diseases, predisposing factors, antibiotics used within last 3 months, previous hospitalization, antimicrobial susceptibility, clinical features, current antibiotics being administered, and treatment outcomes, were retrospectively analyzed. Obstructive UTI was defined as UTI due to urinary tract obstruction such as one of the following: benign prostate hyperplasia, uterine prolapse, or malignancy. Urinary tract stones were not regarded as obstructive UTI and were classified as a predisposing factor. Severe UTI was defined as UTI combined with multiorgan failure or hypotension and complicated UTI as UTI with predisposing factors for persistent and relapsing infections, such as urinary tract stones, foreign bodies (for example, indwelling urinary catheters or other drainage devices), or obstructions. The short-term treatment outcome was determined after 72 h of empirical antibiotic treatment based on persistent fever and acute kidney injury. Persistent fever was defined as fever persisting over 72 h. Acute kidney injury was defined as an increase in serum creatinine level by > 0.3 mg/dL within 48 h, increase in serum creatinine level to > 1.5 times baseline within 7 days or increase in urine volume < 0.5 mL/kg/h for 6 h. The long-term outcome was determined by infection-related 30-day mortality and relapsed UTI within 3 months. Infection-related 30-day mortality was defined as death due to uropathogenic E. coli UTI or complications of infection within 30 days. McCabe-Jackson score was used as the criteria to predict the survival of patients with gram-negative bacteremia based on the level of the underlying diseases, which were classified as rapidly fatal disease, ultimately fatal disease, and nonfatal underlying disease [29].

Phylogenetic groups

Phylogenetic groups of the E. coli isolates were determined using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based method developed by Doumith et al. [1]. E. coli were categorized into one of the four main phylogenetic groups—A, B1, B2, and D—using four phylogenetic group markers—gadA, chuA, yjaA, and TSPE4.C2. The groups were determined according to the different combinations of the four amplicons. Crude deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) was prepared by lysis of colonies in 500 μL of sterile distilled water at 100 °C for 15 min, followed by centrifugation. The lysis supernatant was used for the polymerase chain reaction. The polymerase chain reaction conditions were as follows: an initial activation at 94 °C for 4 min; then, 30 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 65 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 30 s; and finally, extension at 72 °C for 5 min [23]. The primers used in this study are listed in Table 1.

Table 1 Primers used for phylogenetic groups in this study

Virulence genes

Virulence genes were detected using a multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay developed by Johnson and Stell [2]. This involved five primer pools, with 29 primers listed in order of decreasing amplicon size (bp) within each pool as follows: pool 1: PAI, papA, fimH, kpsMT III, papEF, and ibeA; pool 2: fyuA, bmaE, sfa/focDE, iutA, papG allele III, and K1; pool 3: hlyA, rfc, nfaE, papG allele I, kpsMT II, and papC; pool 4: gafD, cvaC, cdtB, focG, traT, and papG allele II; and pool 5: papG allele I, papG alleles II and III, afa/draBC, cnf1, sfas, and K5. The reaction was conducted with an initial activation at 95 °C for 12 min; followed by 25 cycles of denaturation (94 °C, 30 s), annealing (63 °C, 30 s), and extension (68 °C, 3 min); and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The amplicons were electrophoresed in 2% agarose gels, stained with ethidium bromide, and destained with distilled water [30]. The primers used in this study are listed in Table 2.

Table 2 Primers used for virulence factors used in this study

Antibiotic resistance and extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-disk diffusion test

Clinical specimens, such as blood, urine, and pus, were collected for microbial identification. E. coli was isolated using a Vitek system (BioMerieux, Lyon, France). Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles were determined by interpreting the breakpoints recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guideline of 2016 [31]. ESBL production was detected using automated methodology, namely, the Phoenix GN Combo Panels 448541, which were used to inoculate and incubate bacteria according to the manufacturer’s recommendations [32]. Disk diffusion test was also performed to double check the ESBL-producing strains. Disk diffusion tests were performed in cases of resistance to cefotaxime or ceftazidime, twice for each specimen, and interpreted according to the 2020 CLSI guidelines, using Mueller-Hinton agar. Thirty microgram disks containing ceftazidime and ceftriaxone and 30/10 μg disks containing cefotaxime/clavulanate or ceftazidime/clavulanate were used (BD BBLTM Sensi-DiscTM Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test Discs, BD Diagnostic Systems, Sparks, Maryland, U.S.A) [33].

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software (version 21.0; SPSS Inc., IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Categories were compared using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. For continuous variables, the normal distribution was calculated using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. The Mann–Whitney U test and independent t-test were performed for data that followed non-normal and normal distributions, respectively. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05.

Results

Basic characteristics of the study group

Phylogenetic group analysis revealed that most uropathogenic E. coli belonged to groups B2 and D: B2 (276, 77.75%), D (62, 17.46%), B1 (12, 3.38%), and A (5, 1.41%). The clinical characteristics of phylogenetic group A, B1, B2, and D were briefly summarized in Table 3. Among the 4 phylogenetic groups, we compared group B2 and D in this study.

Table 3 Baseline characteristics of uropathogenic Escherichia coli infection according to phylogenetic group

In group B2, 276 patients were included; 57 (20.7%) were men, and the mean age was 69.43 years. In group D, 62 patients were included; 4 (6.5%) were men, and the mean age was 69.16 years. The proportion of male patients was significantly higher in the group B2 than in other groups (P = 0.009). For the underlying diseases, diabetes mellitus (DM) was more frequently observed in group D (51.6%) than in group B2 (36.6%) (P = 0.029). No significant differences with respect to underlying diseases were observed between the two groups, except for DM. The McCabe-Jackson score indicated no significant differences between the two groups. Obstructive uropathy and previous use of urinary catheters were more frequently observed in group B2 than in other groups, but without significant difference. Complicated UTI was more frequently observed in group B2 than in other groups (P = 0.009). Bacteremic UTI and severe UTIs did not differ significantly between the two groups; besides, analysis of UTI categories revealed no significant difference in the proportions of renal abscess, acute prostatitis, and prostatic abscess. However, analysis of infection categories revealed that the prevalence of community-acquired and healthcare-associated infections were significantly higher in groups D and B2, respectively, than in other groups (Table 4).

Table 4 Baseline characteristics and clinical manifestations of uropathogenic Escherichia coli infection according to phylogenetic group

Comparison of virulence factors between phylogenetic groups B2 and D

FimH and fyuA were the most common virulence factors in both groups. Adhesion molecules were identified in both groups, and their distribution was similar. FimH (99.6% vs. 90.3%, P < 0.001), sfa/focED (17.0% vs. 0.0%, P < 0.001), and focG (12.3% vs. 3.2%, P = 0.036) were more common in phylogenetic group B2 than in D. Phylogenetic group B2 was the most closely related to virulence factors associated with adhesion, toxins, iron metabolism, and PAI. Group B2 had higher levels of toxin-associated virulence: hlyA (phylogenetic group B2 = 33.3% vs. D = 6.5%, P < 0.001), cnf1 (39.9% vs. 0.0%, P < 0.001), and cvaC (8.7% vs. 0.0%, P = 0.011); and iron metabolism-associated virulence factors: fyuA (99.6% vs. 93.5%, P = 0.004); and PAI (88.8% vs. 19.4%, P < 0.001) than group D. With regard to protection molecules, no significant differences were observed between the two groups. The K1 serotype was prevalent in the phylogenetic group B2, whereas K5 was widespread in group D (Table 5).

Table 5 Virulence factors of uropathogenic Escherichia coli classified by phylogenetic group

Comparison of antibiotic resistance, empirical antibiotics, and antibiotic adequacy

The rates of resistance to ciprofloxacin, cefotaxime, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole were 50.5%, 45.1%, and 37.1% in group B2 and 22.6%, 29.0%, and 48.4% in group D (P < 0.001; P < 0.001; and P = 0.100, without significance difference). The proportions of ESBL-producing E. coli in Phoenix GN Combo Panels were 44.0% and 27.4% in groups B and D, respectively (P = 0.016): in the double-disk diffusion test, the proportions of ESBL-producing E. coli were 27.2% and 17.7% in groups B2 and D, respectively (P = 0.123) (Table 6). Among ESBL-producing E. coli, resistance rates to ciprofloxacin, piperacillin/tazobactam, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole were 87.6%, 14.0%, and 56.2% in group B2 and 47.1%, 11.8%, and 58.8% in group D (P < 0.001; P = 0.999; and P = 0.838, without significance difference). For both groups, the most commonly used empirical antibiotic was ceftriaxone. Eighty-four (66.7%) and 48 cases (77.4%) in groups B2 and D, respectively, were evaluated to have used concordant initial antibiotics.

Table 6 Antibiotic resistance of uropathogenic Escherichia coli classified by phylogenetic group

Comparison of treatment outcomes

In early outcomes, 22.8% of cases had persistent fever and 17.0% experienced acute kidney injury during the hospital stay for group B2; for D, 22.6% and 17.7% of cases experienced persistent fever and acute kidney injury, respectively. Differences in persistent fever and acute kidney injury were insignificant between the two groups. Duration of hospital stay, 30-day mortalities, and infection-related 30-day mortality were 14.90 days, 1.8%, and 0.7% in group B2 and 12.71 days, 1.6%, and 0.0% in group D (without significant difference; P = 0.999 and P = 0.999). Six and one patient died in groups B2 and D, respectively. After they were diagnosed with UTI, the median period from diagnosis to death in group B2 was 9.5 days (interquartile range 7.0–25.75 days), and in group D, a patient died on day 3. Within 3 months, UTI events relapsed in 7.6% and 8.1% of B2 and D members, respectively, which were not significantly different (Table 7).

Table 7 Outcomes of uropathogenic Escherichia coli infection classified by phylogenetic group

Discussion

In this study, the phylogenetic groups B2 and D exhibited different characteristics. Phylogenetic group B2 had more virulence factors, especially higher presentation of adhesion-related (S fimbriae, F fimbriae), toxin-related (hemolysin A, cytotoxic necrotizing factor 1), and iron metabolism-related virulence factors (fyuA), than group D. Greater antimicrobial resistance and healthcare-associated infection was also noted in group B2 than in group D. Phylogenetic group D was associated with community-acquired UTI and exhibited a lower association with virulence and predisposing factors than group B. No significant differences in clinical manifestations and treatment outcomes between the phylogenetic groups B2 and D occurred.

Pathogenic strains of E. coli have been classified by the identification of O, K, and H antigens [16]. A phylogenetic study revealed that E. coli can be separated into four major groups: A, B1, B2, and D [23] and are classified into three main groups according to genetic and clinical criteria: commensal, intestinal pathogenic, and extraintestinal pathogenic strains [16]. Among the extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli, some strains such as uropathogenic E. coli could survive in the gut and colonize the periurethral area, resulting in UTIs. The uropathogenic E. coli, which are known as the virulent strains, belong to the phylogenetic group B2 or D, and the less virulent strains mainly belong to A or B1 and are commensal strains [30].

The phylogenetic group of uropathogenic E. coli mainly comprised B2 group, but the distributions and proportions of phylogenetic groups and virulence factors vary based on the country where the study was conducted and study settings. In Italy, phylogenetic group B1 was the most prevalent in both community-acquired acute pyelonephritis and recurrent cystitis in females. The distribution and proportion of phylogenetic groups of acute pyelonephritis by uropathogenic E. coli were as follows: group B1, 68.7%; group A, 27.8%; and group D, 11.1%. Toxin-associated and siderophore-associated virulence factors were frequently observed in patients with recurrent cystitis [34]. In a study of community-acquired UTIs in Iran, phylogenetic group B2 was most frequently detected. The phylogenetic groups were as follows: group B2, 67.3%; group D, 21.4%; group A, 6.5%; and group B1, 4.8% [26]. In a study of community-acquired UTIs in Korea, phylogenetic group B2 was the most frequently detected, followed by groups D and A [24]. Previous reports were comparative studies of phylogenetic groups in community-acquired UTI. In Mexico, the phylogenetic groups of outpatient UTI were compared, and B2 (51.0%) was the most common, followed by A (13.4%), B1 (10.3%), and D (9.8%) in that order [27]. A Turkish study evaluated the distribution of phylogenetic groups in community-acquired UTI and nosocomial UTI, including cystitis and pyelonephritis. Phylogenetic group B2 was the most common in both community-acquired UTI and nosocomial UTI [25]. In a study of UTI in Mongolia, the proportion of phylogenetic groups was as follows: 33.8% B2, 28.4% D, 19.6% A, and 18.2% B1 [28]. In our study, we included patients with acute pyelonephritis who needed hospitalization, including cases of community-acquired, healthcare-associated, and nosocomial infections. The distributions of category of infection in this study may have influenced the phylogenetic groups. Analysis of phylogenetic groups including healthcare-associated UTI and nosocomial UTI of uropathogenic E. coli has been rare. Like the results of phylogenetic group analysis of community-acquired UTI in Korea, in this study phylogenetic group B2 was the most common in community-acquired acute pyelonephritis (APN), healthcare-associated APN and nosocomial APN [24]. In addition, recurrent UTI accounted for 11.6% in phylogenetic group B2 and 9.7% in group D, which should be considered when setting the vaccine target.

Uropathogenic E. coli have virulence factors, such as adhesion molecules, toxins, iron acquisition, immune evasion, and protectins [35]. In this study, virulence factors related to adhesion, iron metabolism, and protection were identified in both phylogenetic groups B2 and D. FimH, an adhesion molecule-associated virulence factor and fyuA, an iron metabolism-related virulence factor were the most and second most frequently detected virulence factors. The virulence factors that exhibited differences in distributions between the two groups were type I fimbriae; focG, sfa/focED in adhesion molecules; hlyA, cnf1 in toxins; fyuA in iron metabolism; and PAI. Adhesion molecules, such as type I fimbriae, play an important role in the attachment of E. coli to the mucosal epithelium, initiation of biofilm formation, and persistence in the bladder [17]. In a comparative study of UTIs with and without bacteremia in Sweden, adhesion molecules such as papG (P fimbriae) were more frequently observed in bacteremic UTI than in non-bacteremic UTI [36]. In a study of UTI at outpatient clinics, risk factor analysis of virulence factors affecting phylogenetic groups revealed that strains with papC and sfa genes were associated with the phylogenetic group B2 [26]. In addition, biofilm formation in E. coli was observed in strains harboring adhesion-associated virulence genes [37]. Toxin-related virulence factors are important for mediating bacterial invasion and for the dissemination and persistence of bacteria in the bladder [38,39,40]. HlyA is needed for initial bacterial invasion, and cnf1 is needed for bacteria dissemination and persistence [16, 39,40,41]. In a UTI-infected mouse model, hlyA accelerated bacteremia to fulminant sepsis [41]. HlyA-expressing uropathogenic E. coli activated caspase-independent necroptosis, but not caspase-mediated apoptotic cell death, and the products released from damaged cells by necroptosis induced proinflammatory response in macrophages [39]. In cnf1- and hlyA-expressing uropathogenic E. coli, higher urinary levels of proinflammatory cytokines were detected than in pathogens not expressing such virulence factors [40]. Iron uptake systems and siderophores facilitate iron scavenging in the environment [16]. In a study of E. coli bacteremia in Spain, strains expressing fyuA were associated with increased mortality during hospital stay [42]. FyuA causes invasion of bacteria into the bloodstream from the urinary tract and is associated with highly pathogenic strains [19, 42]. Various vaccines are being developed according to the mechanisms of virulence factors, mainly targeting adhesion molecules and iron metabolism [19, 22]. Vaccines related to toxins have not yet achieved significant results [13].

The phylogenetic group B2 has been associated with high antimicrobial resistance rates [26, 43]; this may have been influenced by a combination of several factors [44]. Several studies have reported that biofilm formation is associated with a high antibiotic resistance rate [34, 45]. Multiple virulence factors, such as α-hemolysin, lipopolysaccharides, proteases, adhesins, aerobactin, and fimbriae significantly affect biofilm formation [16]. The phylogenetic group B2 was associated with adhesion molecules and biofilm formation to a greater degree than other phylogenetic groups [45]. Drug resistance in uropathogenic E. coli strains is more likely caused by biofilm formation, and the biofilms have potential roles in recurrent infections and antibiotic resistance [34, 45, 46]. Several studies have reported virulence factors associated with the antimicrobial resistance of uropathogenic E. coli [25, 26, 34, 47]. PAI is also associated with antimicrobial resistance [26]. In a study of symptomatic UTIs in outpatients in Iran, hlyA, malX, and hlyA were revealed as risk factors among virulence factors affecting antimicrobial resistance to ciprofloxacin and ceftriaxone [34]. Another study of UTIs including cystitis and pyelonephritis in Turkey showed that afa/draC and iha were the virulence factors associated with antimicrobial resistance [25]. In phylogenetic group D, among underlying diseases, diabetes mellitus was more common than in phylogenetic group B, and the frequency of bacteremia was also higher. Dysregulated immune pathways in diabetes mellitus contribute to the impairment of host responses in sepsis. Diabetic patients were more likely to develop acute kidney injury [48]. Although the strains of phylogenetic group B were more virulent than the strains of phylogenetic group D, there was no difference in clinical outcomes between the two groups, possibly due to differences in the frequency of underlying diseases, especially diabetes mellitus. Further research will be needed to determine whether there are other factors besides the underlying disease that are not significantly different from the clinical outcomes of phylogenetic groups B2 and D.

There are several limitations to this study. First, this study was retrospective; therefore, we had to rely on the medical records, and it was difficult to evaluate urinary function and identify the subjective urinary symptoms in all patients. Second, we acknowledge that the patients included in this study were at a tertiary hospital, and their condition might have been more severe than that of patients in a primary medical center. Despite these limitations, we found differences in the virulence factors, antimicrobial susceptibility, and clinical presentations of uropathogenic E. coli according to the phylogenetic group.

Conclusion

In conclusion, in cases of pyelonephritis with uropathogenic E. coli, we observed differences in the virulence factors and antimicrobial resistance rates between phylogenetic groups B2 and D. Further studies will be needed to elucidate the virulence factors of uropathogenic E. coli according to phylogenetic group and host interaction. As differences in genetic and phenotypic characteristics occur based on strains, various therapeutic options targeting virulence factors may be considered along with antibiotics.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset of the current study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Abbreviations

UPEC:

Uropathogenic Escherichia coli

UTI:

Urinary tract infection

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

DNA:

Deoxyribonucleic acid

ESBL:

Extended spectrum beta-lactamase

CLSI:

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute

DM:

Diabetes mellitus

APN:

Acute pyelonephritis

min:

Minute

References

  1. Flores-Mireles AL, Walker JN, Caparon M, Hultgren SJ. Urinary tract infections: epidemiology, mechanisms of infection and treatment options. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2015;13:269–84.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Kashef N, Djavid GE, Shahbazi S. Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of community-acquired uropathogens in Tehran. Iran J Infect Dev Ctries. 2010;4:202–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kahlmeter G, Poulsen HO. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli from community-acquired urinary tract infections in Europe: the ECO.SENS study revisited. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2012;39:45–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Simmering JE, Tang F, Cavanaugh JE, Polgreen LA, Polgreen PM. The increase in hospitalizations for urinary tract infections and the associated costs in the United States, 1998–2011. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2017;4:281.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Foxman B. Epidemiology of urinary tract infections: incidence, morbidity, and economic costs. Dis Mon. 2003;49:53–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tan CW, Chlebicki MP. Urinary tract infections in adults. Singap Med J. 2016;57:485–90.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Storme O, Tiran Saucedo J, Garcia-Mora A, Dehesa-Davila M, Naber KG. Risk factors and predisposing conditions for urinary tract infection. Ther Adv Urol. 2019;11:1756287218814382.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Nielubowicz GR, Mobley HL. Host-pathogen interactions in urinary tract infection. Nat Rev Urol. 2010;7:430–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gashaw M, Berhane M, Bekele S, Kibru G, Teshager L, Yilma Y, Ahmed Y, Fentahun N, Assefa H, Wieser A, Gudina EK, Ali S. Emergence of high drug resistant bacterial isolates from patients with health care associated infections at Jimma University medical center: a cross sectional study. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2018;7:138.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ismail B, Shafei MN, Harun A, Ali S, Omar M, Deris ZZ. Predictors of polymyxin B treatment failure in Gram-negative healthcare-associated infections among critically ill patients. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2018;51:763–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang P, Shi Q, Hu H, Hong B, Wu X, Du X, Akova M, Yu Y. Emergence of ceftazidime/avibactam resistance in carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in China. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020;26(124):e1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yin D, Wu S, Yang Y, Shi Q, Dong D, Zhu D, Hu F, China Antimicrobial Surveillance Network Study G. Results from the China Antimicrobial Surveillance Network (CHINET) in 2017 of the in vitro activities of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Ceftolozane-Tazobactam against clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019;63.

  13. Loubet P, Ranfaing J, Dinh A, Dunyach-Remy C, Bernard L, Bruyere F, Lavigne JP, Sotto A. Alternative therapeutic options to antibiotics for the treatment of urinary tract infections. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:1509.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Wagenlehner FM, Naber KG. A step further in a vaccine for Escherichia coli. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19:565–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Brumbaugh AR, Mobley HL. Preventing urinary tract infection: progress toward an effective Escherichia coli vaccine. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2012;11:663–76.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Mainil J. Escherichia coli virulence factors. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2013;152:2–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mulvey MA, Lopez-Boado YS, Wilson CL, Roth R, Parks WC, Heuser J, Hultgren SJ. Induction and evasion of host defenses by type 1-piliated uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Science. 1998;282:1494–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Huttner A, Gambillara V. The development and early clinical testing of the ExPEC4V conjugate vaccine against uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018;24:1046–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Brumbaugh AR, Smith SN, Subashchandrabose S, Himpsl SD, Hazen TH, Rasko DA, Mobley HL. Blocking yersiniabactin import attenuates extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli in cystitis and pyelonephritis and represents a novel target to prevent urinary tract infection. Infect Immun. 2015;83:1443–50.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Agarwal J, Srivastava S, Singh M. Pathogenomics of uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2012;30:141–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tarchouna M, Ferjani A, Ben-Selma W, Boukadida J. Distribution of uropathogenic virulence genes in Escherichia coli isolated from patients with urinary tract infection. Int J Infect Dis. 2013;17:e450–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hasanzadeh S, Habibi M, Shokrgozar MA, Ahangari Cohan R, Ahmadi K, Asadi Karam MR, Bouzari S. In silico analysis and in vivo assessment of a novel epitope-based vaccine candidate against uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Sci Rep. 2020;10:16258.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Doumith M, Day MJ, Hope R, Wain J, Woodford N. Improved multiplex PCR strategy for rapid assignment of the four major Escherichia coli phylogenetic groups. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50:3108–10.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee JH, Subhadra B, Son YJ, Kim DH, Park HS, Kim JM, Koo SH, Oh MH, Kim HJ, Choi CH. Phylogenetic group distributions, virulence factors and antimicrobial resistance properties of uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains isolated from patients with urinary tract infections in South Korea. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2016;62:84–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Er DK, Dundar D, Uzuner H, Osmani A. Relationship between phylogenetic groups, antibiotic resistance and patient characteristics in terms of adhesin genes in cystitis and pyelonephritis isolates of Escherichia coli. Microb Pathog. 2015;89:188–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yazdanpour Z, Tadjrobehkar O, Shahkhah M. Significant association between genes encoding virulence factors with antibiotic resistance and phylogenetic groups in community acquired uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolates. BMC Microbiol. 2020;20:241.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Paniagua-Contreras GL, Monroy-Perez E, Bautista A, Reyes R, Vicente A, Vaca-Paniagua F, Diaz CE, Martinez S, Dominguez P, Garcia LR, Uribe-Garcia A, Vaca S. Multiple antibiotic resistances and virulence markers of uropathogenic Escherichia coli from Mexico. Pathog Glob Health. 2018;112:415–20.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Munkhdelger Y, Gunregjav N, Dorjpurev A, Juniichiro N, Sarantuya J. Detection of virulence genes, phylogenetic group and antibiotic resistance of uropathogenic Escherichia coli in Mongolia. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2017;11:51–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Waisbren BA, Arena J. Shock associated with bacteremia due to gram-negative bacilli. Autopsy findings. Arch Intern Med. 1965;116:336–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Johnson JR, Stell AL. Extended virulence genotypes of Escherichia coli strains from patients with urosepsis in relation to phylogeny and host compromise. J Infect Dis. 2000;181:261–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Satlin MJ, Lewis JS, Weinstein MP, Patel J, Humphries RM, Kahlmeter G, Giske CG, Turnidge J. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute and European Committee on antimicrobial susceptibility testing position statements on polymyxin b and colistin clinical breakpoints. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71:e523–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wiegand I, Geiss HK, Mack D, Sturenburg E, Seifert H. Detection of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases among Enterobacteriaceae by use of semiautomated microbiology systems and manual detection procedures. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:1167–74.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Anonymous. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 30th ed. CLSI supplement M100. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. 2020.

  34. Pompilio A, Crocetta V, Savini V, Petrelli D, Di Nicola M, Bucco S, Amoroso L, Bonomini M, Di Bonaventura G. Phylogenetic relationships, biofilm formation, motility, antibiotic resistance and extended virulence genotypes among Escherichia coli strains from women with community-onset primitive acute pyelonephritis. PLoS ONE. 2018;13: e0196260.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Jaureguy F, Carbonnelle E, Bonacorsi S, Clec’h C, Casassus P, Bingen E, Picard B, Nassif X, Lortholary O. Host and bacterial determinants of initial severity and outcome of Escherichia coli sepsis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007;13:854–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Otto G, Magnusson M, Svensson M, Braconier J, Svanborg C. Pap genotype and P fimbrial expression in Escherichia coli causing bacteremic and nonbacteremic febrile urinary tract infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32:1523–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Surgers L, Boyd A, Girard PM, Arlet G, Decre D. Biofilm formation by ESBL-producing strains of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Int J Med Microbiol. 2019;309:13–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Garcia TA, Ventura CL, Smith MA, Merrell DS, O’Brien AD. Cytotoxic necrotizing factor 1 and hemolysin from uropathogenic Escherichia coli elicit different host responses in the murine bladder. Infect Immun. 2013;81:99–109.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Lu Y, Rafiq A, Zhang Z, Aslani F, Fijak M, Lei T, Wang M, Kumar S, Klug J, Bergmann M, Chakraborty T, Meinhardt A, Bhushan S. Uropathogenic Escherichia coli virulence factor hemolysin A causes programmed cell necrosis by altering mitochondrial dynamics. FASEB J. 2018;32:4107–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Real JM, Munro P, Buisson-Touati C, Lemichez E, Boquet P, Landraud L. Specificity of immunomodulator secretion in urinary samples in response to infection by alpha-hemolysin and CNF1 bearing uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Cytokine. 2007;37:22–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Johnsen N, Hamilton ADM, Greve AS, Christensen MG, Therkildsen JR, Wehmoller J, Skals M, Praetorius HA. Alpha-haemolysin production, as a single factor, causes fulminant sepsis in a model of Escherichia coli-induced bacteraemia. Cell Microbiol. 2019;21: e13017.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Mora-Rillo M, Fernandez-Romero N, Navarro-San Francisco C, Diez-Sebastian J, Romero-Gomez MP, Fernandez FA, Lopez JRA, Mingorance J. Impact of virulence genes on sepsis severity and survival in Escherichia coli bacteremia. Virulence. 2015;6:93–100.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Mittal S, Sharma M, Chaudhary U. Biofilm and multidrug resistance in uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Pathog Glob Health. 2015;109:26–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Calhau V, Domingues S, Ribeiro G, Mendonca N, Da Silva GJ. Interplay between pathogenicity island carriage, resistance profile and plasmid acquisition in uropathogenic Escherichia coli. J Med Microbiol. 2015;64:828–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Javed S, Mirani ZA, Pirzada ZA. Phylogenetic group B2 expressed significant biofilm formation among drug resistant uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Libyan J Med. 2021;16:1845444.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Tewawong N, Kowaboot S, Pimainog Y, Watanagul N, Thongmee T, Poovorawan Y. Distribution of phylogenetic groups, adhesin genes, biofilm formation, and antimicrobial resistance of uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from hospitalized patients in Thailand. PeerJ. 2020;8: e10453.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Karam MRA, Habibi M, Bouzari S. Relationships between virulence factors and antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli isolated from urinary tract infections and commensal isolates in Tehran, Iran. Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2018;9:217–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Costantini E, Carlin M, Porta M, Brizzi MF. Type 2 diabetes mellitus and sepsis: state of the art, certainties and missing evidence. Acta Diabetol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-021-01728-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Eun-Sil Park for data entry and completion.

Funding

This work was supported by a research grant from Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center in 2018.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization and data curation: HMR. Laboratory experiment and methodology: HMR, KHA. Formal analysis: HMR, LJY. Writing—review and editing: HMR, LJY, KHA. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyun ah Kim.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center (File No. 2020-02-003). The requirement for written informed consent was waived by the committee because of the retrospective nature of the study and the use of identifiable specimens.

Consent for publication

No applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hyun, M., Lee, J.Y. & Kim, H. Differences of virulence factors, and antimicrobial susceptibility according to phylogenetic group in uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains isolated from Korean patients. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 20, 77 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12941-021-00481-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12941-021-00481-4

Keywords

  • Urinary tract infection
  • Escherichia coli
  • Phylogenetic group
  • Virulence factor
  • Antimicrobial susceptibility