Open Access

Characteristics of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii strains isolated in Geneva during colonization or infection

  • Abdessalam Cherkaoui1Email author,
  • Stéphane Emonet1,
  • Gesuele Renzi1 and
  • Jacques Schrenzel1, 2
Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials201514:42

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12941-015-0103-3

Received: 26 March 2015

Accepted: 26 August 2015

Published: 11 September 2015

Abstract

This study determined the antibiotic susceptibility profile and genetic mechanisms of β-lactam resistance in 27 clinical strains of Acinetobacter baumannii isolated at the University Hospitals of Geneva, Switzerland. The antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using Etest and the disc diffusion method in accordance with CLSI guidelines. All of the strains were defined as multi-drug resistant (MDR) and were susceptible to colistin and moderately susceptible to tigecycline. Uniplex PCR assays were used to detect the following β-lactamase genes: four class D carbapenem-hydrolysing oxacillinases (blaOXA-51, blaOXA-23, blaOXA-24 and blaOXA-58), four class B metallo-β-lactamases genes (blaIMP, blaVIM, blaSPM and blaNDM) and two class A carbapenemases (blaKPC and blaGES). All of the strains were positive for blaOXA-51 (intrinsic resistance), 14/27 strains carried blaOXA-23, 2/27 strains carried a blaOXA-24-like gene, and 4/27 strains had a blaOXA-58 gene. blaGES-11 was found in three strains, and NDM-1-harbouring strains were identified in three patients. All of the A. baumannii isolates were typed by rep-PCR (DiversiLab) and excluded any clonality. Altogether, this analysis suggests a very high genetic diversity of imported MDR A. baumannii.

Keywords

Multi-drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii β-lactamase genes PCR DiversiLab rep-PCR

Background

Acinetobacter baumannii, a Gram-negative opportunistic coccobacilli, has emerged globally in healthcare institutions because it is hard to eradicate, most likely because it is resistant to desiccation and to ultraviolet and chemical sanitizers [1]. A. baumannii displays numerous intrinsic and acquired drug-resistance mechanisms. Of the multidrug-resistant organisms, the highly resistant Acinetobacter spp. isolates deserve special mention. These organisms can be resistant to all of the currently available antimicrobial agents or remain susceptible only to older, potentially more toxic agents, such as polymyxins, leaving limited and suboptimal options for treatment [2]. Carbapenem- and colistin-resistant A. baumannii infections were recently reported in two Sicilian hospitals [3]. Acinetobacter spp. may develop resistance to carbapenems through various mechanisms, including class B and D carbapenemase production, decreased permeability, altered penicillin-binding proteins, and even in some cases the overexpression of efflux pumps [4, 5]. Carbapenem resistance in Acinetobacter species is most commonly caused by the production of OXA-type carbapenemases and metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) [6, 7]. The OXA-type carbapenemases comprise four broad groups: blaOXA-23-like, blaOXA-40-like, blaOXA-58-like and an intrinsic blaOXA-51-like [810]. The OXA-51-like β-lactamases are intrinsic to A. baumannii and have therefore been used as a method of species identification [8, 11]. The MBLs require a zinc ion for their activity, which is inhibited by metal chelators, such as EDTA, and thiol-based compounds but not by sulbactam, tazobactam or clavulanic acid. Among the multiple types of MBL genes described throughout the world, the blaIMP and blaVIM types are the most common [9]. The genes responsible for MBL production may be chromosomal or plasmidic, and the latter pose a threat of horizontal transfer among Gram-negative bacteria [12]. To date, infections associated with A. baumannii New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase-1 (NDM-1)-positive strains have been reported in several countries, including Switzerland [13, 14]. The genes encoding NDM-1 are carried on a plasmid, thus promoting the spread of resistance among Gram-negative organisms, most likely by horizontal gene transfer [15, 16]. An NDM-2 variant (Pro-to-Ala substitution at position 28) was recently described [17]. This allele was first found in a multidrug-resistant A. baumannii strain isolated from a German patient previously hospitalised in Egypt and subsequently isolated in Israel [12, 17, 18].

Despite the implementation of infection control measures, A. baumannii remains an important problem in many healthcare institutions around the world. Several studies have reported high rates of faecal carriage of Acinetobacter, making the digestive tract a potential reservoir for nosocomial infections and outbreaks caused by multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter strains [19, 20]. To control the dissemination of these organisms, rectal swabs are routinely collected from admitted patients based on their recent travel history or hospitalization in foreign countries. The infection control policies that are implemented at the institution where this study was performed request the screening of admitted patients based on their recent travel history or hospitalization in foreign countries. Rectal swab specimens (e-Swab, Copan, Brescia, Italy) from patients fulfilling these criteria were screened for multi-resistant A. baumannii using CHROMagar ESBL (Becton, Dickinson, Allschwil, Switzerland) and MacConkey plates (bioMérieux, Geneva, Switzerland) with imipenem, meropenem, and ertapenem disks (MacD) [21]. Suspected colonies were sub-cultured on sheep blood agar for identification (MALDI Biotyper 3.0, Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) and full antimicrobial susceptibility testing according to CLSI criteria. Multidrug resistance is defined as resistance to at least two different classes of antibiotics [22].

The aim of the present study was to investigate the β-lactam resistance mechanisms involved in a collection of multidrug-resistant A. baumannii strains isolated at Geneva University Hospitals, Switzerland.

Methods

Strains and growth conditions

The study included 27 non-duplicate multidrug-resistant A. baumannii strains recovered from clinical specimens. Most of the isolates were obtained from rectal swabs of colonised patients during routine screening, whereas a minority of the clinical specimens comprised samples of urine, exudative skin specimens, and lower respiratory tract secretions (Table 1). All of the strains were stored at −80 °C in skim milk with 15 % glycerol. The A. baumannii strains were grown on Columbia blood agar at 37 °C with 5 % CO2, and their identification was confirmed by MALDI-TOF/MS [23].
Table 1

Antimicrobial susceptibility of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates collected at Geneva University, Switzerland (n = 27)

Strain ID

Age, years

Gender

Origin

Sample type

E-test / MIC (mg/L)

Carbapenemase

IMI

MER

TIG

COL

NDM-1

GES-11

OXA-23

OXA-24

OXA-58

1

66

male

Switzerland

skin swab

128

64

6

0.19

  

+

  

2

50

male

Pakistan

rectal swab

48

48

3

0.094

  

+

  

3

35

male

Libya

rectal swab

64

48

4

0.19

 

+

+

  

4

76

male

Switzerland

urine

64

64

1.5

0.094

  

+

  

5

66

male

Switzerland

rectal swab

64

48

4

0.19

+

 

+

  

6

40

female

Sudan

rectal swab

128

64

3

0.19

   

+

 

7

72

male

Switzerland

rectal swab

192

64

3

0.064

  

+

  

8

2

male

ND

rectal swab

64

64

6

0.19

  

+

  

9

78

male

Thailand

wound swab

128

192

3

0.125

  

+

  

10

72

male

ND

urine

32

12

3

0.094

    

+

11

68

male

Switzerland

rectal swab

64

192

6

0.25

     

12

20

male

Syria

rectal swab

128

256

2

0.19

   

+

 

13

79

male

Switzerland

rectal swab

192

192

4

0.19

  

+

  

14

27

female

Egypt

rectal swab

64

48

3

0.19

  

+

  

15

62

male

Roumania

rectal swab

64

48

3

0.19

    

+

16

35

male

Libya

blood

48

64

16

0.19

  

+

  

17

27

male

Switzerland

respiratory sample

24

3

4

0.19

    

+

18

41

male

Kosovo

skin swab

192

24

3

0.19

    

+

19

80

male

Switzerland

wound swab

64

192

3

0.094

  

+

  

20

ND

male

Libya

wound swab

12

64

1

0.25

     

21

64

male

Libya

rectal swab

12

24

0.25

0.094

 

+

   

22

77

female

Switzerland

rectal swab

192

192

3

0.38

     

23

62

male

Switzerland

wound swab

256

256

3

0.25

     

24

48

male

Switzerland

rectal swab

256

256

4

0.25

  

+

  

25

71

male

England

skin swab

6

32

4

0.25

 

+

   

26

43

male

Egypt

rectal swab

24

32

3

0.5

+

 

+

  

27

24

male

Egypt

rectal swab

256

64

4

0.38

+

    
    

MIC 50

64

64

3

0.19

     
    

MIC 90

192

192

6

0.25

     

ND, not determined; IMI, imipenem; MER, meropenem; TIG, tigecycline; COL, colistin

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

The susceptibility to various classes of antibiotics was determined by Etest (bioMérieux SA, Geneva, Switzerland) and the disc diffusion method in accordance with CLSI guidelines. The antibiotics tested were amikacin (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg) and piperacillin-tazobactam (100/10 μg). The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of imipenem, meropenem, tigecycline, and colistin were determined using the Etest method. The interpretation breakpoints were based on published data from the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). The colistin and tigecycline MICs were interpreted using the European Clinical Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) guidelines (Acinetobacter breakpoints for colistin and Enterobacteriaceae breakpoints for tigecycline).

Detection of carbapenem resistance genes by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)

The DNA from an overnight culture on Columbia blood agar was extracted using a MagNA Pure LC instrument (Roche, Rotkreuz, Switzerland) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The final elution volume was 100 μl, and 5 µl of the DNA extract was used for each PCR analysis. Uniplex PCR assays were used to detect the following β-lactamase genes: four carbapenem-hydrolysing oxacillinases (blaOXA-51, blaOXA-23, blaOXA-24 and blaOXA-58), four metallo-β-lactamases genes (blaIMP, blaVIM, blaSPM and blaNDM), blaKPC, and blaGES. The primers used for PCR amplification of the carbapenemase genes are listed in Table 2.
Table 2

Primers used in the amplification of selected carbapenemase genes

Name

Nucleotide sequence (5′ → 3′)

Product size (bp)

Location

References

OXA-23-like

F- GATCGGATTGGAGAACCAGA

501

blaOXA-23

[31]

R- ATTTCTGACCGCATTTCCAT

OXA-24-like

F- GGTTAGTTGGCCCCCTTAAA

246

blaOXA-24

[31]

R- AGTTGAGCGAAAAGGGGATT

OXA-51-like

F- TAATGCTTTGATCGGCCTTG

353

blaOXA-51

[31]

R- TGGATTGCACTTCATCTTGG

OXA-58-like

F- AAGTATTGGGGCTTGTGCTG

599

blaOXA-58

[31]

R- CCCCTCTGCGCTCTACATAC

IMPa

F- GGAATAGAGTGGCTTAAYTCTC

232

blaIMP

[32]

R- GGTTTAAYAAAACAACCACC

VIM

F- GATGGTGTTTGGTCGCATA

390

blaVIM

[32]

R- CGAATGCGCAGCACCAG

SPM

F- AAAATCTGGGTACGCAAACG

271

blaSPM

[32]

R- ACATTATCCGCTGGAACAGG

NDM

F- GGTTTGGCGATCTGGTTTTC

621

blaNDM

[32]

R- CGGAATGGCTCATCACGATC

GES

F-ATGCGCTTCATTCACGCAC

863

blaGES

[33]

R-CTATTTGTCCGTGCTCAGGA

GES

F- CGGTTTCTAGCATCGGGACACAT

263

blaGES

[34]

R- CCGCCATAGAGGACTTTAGCMACAG

Probe: Quasar 705-CGACCTCAGAGATACAACTACGCCTATTGC-BHQ2

NDM-1

F- ATTAGCCGCTGCATTGAT

154

blaNDM

[35]

R- CATGTCGAGATAGGAAGTG

Probe: FAM-CTG[+ C]CA [+ G]AC [+ A]TT [+ C]GG TGC-TAMRA

KPC

F- GATACCACGTTCCGTCTGG

246

blaKPC

[36]

R- GCAGGTTCCGGTTTTGTCTC

Probe: FAM-AGCGGCAGCAGTTTGTTGATTG-3′–BHQ1

aY = C or T

Molecular typing methods

The DNA was extracted as described above and amplified using the DiversiLab Acinetobacter kit (bioMérieux, La Balme-les-Grottes, France) for DNA fingerprinting according to the manufacturer’s instructions. PCR was run on a preheated thermal cycler using the parameters recommended by the manufacturer. The kit-specific positive and negative controls were run with each reaction set to validate the amplification. The rep-PCR products were detected, and the amplicons were separated using microfluidics lab-on-a-chip technology and analysed using the DiversiLab system. Further analysis was performed with the web-based DiversiLab software (version 3.4) using the band-based modified Kullback–Leibler distance for the calculation of the percent similarities. The manufacturer provides guidelines for strain-level discrimination: strains with greater than 97 % similarity are considered indistinguishable (no differences in fingerprints), strains with greater than 95 % similarity are considered similar (1- to 2-band differences in fingerprints), and strains with less than 95 % similarity are considered different. In this study, the optimal cut-off for clustering was 95 %.

Results and discussion

Antimicrobial susceptibility

All of the isolates analysed in this study were resistant to amikacin, ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime, and piperacillin-tazobactam. The MIC of imipenem ranged from 6 to 256 mg/L, and the MIC of meropenem ranged from 3 to 256 mg/L. The MIC50 and MIC90 values for imipenem and meropenem were 64 and 192 mg/L, respectively. All of the tested isolates were susceptible to colistin. The MIC of colistin ranged from 0.064 to 0.5 mg/L, and the MIC50 and MIC90 values for colistin were 0.19 and 0.25 mg/L, respectively. The MIC of tigecycline ranged from 0.25 to 16 mg/L, whereas the MIC50 and MIC90 values for tigecycline were 3 and 6 mg/L, respectively. Susceptibility to tigecycline was observed in two (7.4 %) of the 27 A. baumannii isolates.

Bacterial isolates, species identification and molecular analysis

Carbapenem resistance in A. baumannii is most often associated with class D β-lactamases (OXA-23-like, OXA-40-like and OXA-58-like) and MBLs. OXA-type carbapenemases are predominant in A. baumannii, particularly in worldwide outbreaks of OXA-23 [24]. The molecular analysis of the isolates tested in this study revealed that 14 strains (51.8 %) carried the blaOXA-23-like gene and that two strains carried a blaOXA-24-like gene. All of the strains had a blaOXA-51-like gene, and four strains had a blaOXA-58 gene. In this study, the OXA-58 isolates presented lower MIC values for meropenem than OXA-23-like-positive isolates, which systematically exhibited higher MIC values (Table 1). The isolates with non-acquired OXA genes displayed a marked variation and included some carbapenem-resistant genes. Naturally occurring OXA carbapenemases, such as OXA-51-like enzymes (e.g., OXA 64-66, OXA 68-71, OXA 78-80, OXA-82, OXA-86, OXA-92 and OXA104-112), have been identified in A. baumannii isolates worldwide. In addition, strains producing OXA-58 derivatives have been found in isolates recovered from Italy, Belgium, France, Greece, Iran, the United States and Argentina [25]. OXA-23, OXA-58 and OXA-51 have been reported in Turkey [25, 26]. All of the strains investigated in this study had an intrinsic blaOXA-51-like gene, supporting the use of this resistance gene as a surrogate for the identification of a strain as A. baumannii [27]. Recently, the presence of Ambler class A GES (Guiana extended-spectrum) β-lactamases has also been reported in A. baumannii and can confer a high level of resistance to carbapenems [8]. blaGES genes have been reported in several countries in Europe, Asia, South America and South Africa [8]. In addition, several GES-1 mutants, such as GES-11, GES-12, GES-14, and GES-22, have been detected in A. baumannii [8]. In the present study, blaGES-11 was detected in three strains, one of which also carried a blaOXA-23-like gene (Table 1). The most important characteristic of the GES family of enzymes is their ability to evolve into carbapenemases. GES and OXA-type enzymes are jointly responsible for the high carbapenem-resistance levels observed in the tested strains. The emergence of NDM-1-producing Acinetobacter spp. has been recently reported in many countries, such as India, Israel, Egypt, Germany, Spain, Switzerland, the United Arab Emirates and China [13, 28, 29]. Interestingly, blaNDM-1 has been shown to be a chimeric gene constructed by the fusion of the aminoglycoside-resistance gene aphA6 with a mannose-binding lectin (MBL) gene, an event that most likely occurred in Acinetobacter spp., indicating that Acinetobacter spp. are the likely origin of this gene [30]. A. baumannii is the most common NDM-1-producing Acinetobacter spp., and the blaNDM-1 gene is mostly chromosomal [13, 16]. In this study, NDM-1-harbouring strains were identified in three patients, and two of these originated from Egypt. These isolates have been found to carry mixed carbapenemase genes (blaOXA-23 with blaNDM-1), yielding very broad-spectrum antibiotic resistance profiles. These isolates are susceptible only to colistin. Taking into account the relationship between North African countries and many European countries, it is possible that the spread of NDM-1 carbapenemases may occur rapidly, mostly through A. baumannii rather than Enterobacteriaceae because A. baumannii may become markedly more difficult to eradicate [28]. blaKPC was not detected in any of the 27 isolates. The emergence and coexistence of these major resistance mechanisms seriously limit therapeutic options, raising concerns regarding their transmission to other organisms. It is important to highlight the fact that most of the multidrug-resistant isolates analysed in this study were derived from intestinal colonization and that this—mostly unrecognized—carriage in hospitalized patients may constitute a reservoir of A. baumannii strains that are not susceptible to carbapenem.

The genomic pattern of all of the isolates revealed a high degree of variability. Neither a dendrogram nor a computer-generated image of rep-PCR banding patterns showed clustering between the three oxacillinase genes (OXA-23-like, OXA-24-like and OXA-58; Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Results of the DiversiLab typing analysis of isolates from patients infected/colonised with multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii strains from Geneva University Hospitals, Switzerland (n = 27)

Conclusion

In recent years, A. baumannii has emerged as one of the most challenging pathogens responsible for healthcare-associated infections. Despite being less frequently identified in A. baumannii than OXA-type carbapenemases, MBLs exhibit significantly more potent hydrolytic activities against carbapenems. Interestingly, the results of this study provide evidence that NDM-encoding genes may be widespread in A. baumannii and that further molecular surveys will be necessary to more carefully evaluate their distribution in this species. The routine implementation of simple and inexpensive screening methods to detect carbapenemase production in microbiology laboratories is therefore crucial for the optimal treatment of patients infected with carbapenemase-producing pathogens and for controlling the spread of resistance.

Declarations

Authors’ contribution

AC: performed the disk diffusion and Etest assays, carried out the molecular genetic studies, sequence alignment and drafted the manuscript. SE: participated in drafting the manuscript. GR: carried out the molecular genetic studies and participated in the sequence alignment. JS: supervised the research and participated in drafting the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Compliance with ethical guidelines

Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Bacteriology Lab, Division of Laboratory Medicine, Department of Genetics and Laboratory Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals
(2)
Genomic Research Laboratory, Service of Infectious Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals

References

  1. Yamamoto M, Nagao M, Matsumura Y, Matsushima A, Ito Y, Takakura S, Ichiyama S. Interspecies dissemination of a novel class 1 integron carrying blaIMP-19 among Acinetobacter species in Japan. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66(11):2480–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Villalon P, Valdezate S, Medina-Pascual MJ, Carrasco G, Vindel A, Saez-Nieto JA. Epidemiology of the Acinetobacter-derived cephalosporinase, carbapenem-hydrolysing oxacillinase and metallo-beta-lactamase genes, and of common insertion sequences, in epidemic clones of Acinetobacter baumannii from Spain. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013;68(3):550–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Agodi A, Voulgari E, Barchitta M, Quattrocchi A, Bellocchi P, Poulou A, Santangelo C, Castiglione G, Giaquinta L, Romeo MA, Vrioni G, Tsakris A. Spread of a carbapenem- and colistin-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii ST2 clonal strain causing outbreaks in two Sicilian hospitals. J Hosp Infect. 2014;86(4):260–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Heritier C, Poirel L, Lambert T, Nordmann P. Contribution of acquired carbapenem-hydrolyzing oxacillinases to carbapenem resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49(8):3198–202.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Quale J, Bratu S, Landman D, Heddurshetti R. Molecular epidemiology and mechanisms of carbapenem resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii endemic in New York City. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2003;37(2):214–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Amudhan MS, Sekar U, Kamalanathan A, Balaraman S. bla(IMP) and bla(VIM) mediated carbapenem resistance in Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter species in India. J Infect Develop Ctries. 2012;6(11):757–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Thomson JM, Bonomo RA. The threat of antibiotic resistance in Gram-negative pathogenic bacteria: beta-lactams in peril! Curr Opin Microbiol. 2005;8(5):518–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cicek AC, Saral A, Iraz M, Ceylan A, Duzgun AO, Peleg AY, Sandalli C. OXA- and GES-type beta-lactamases predominate in extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from a Turkish University Hospital. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20(5):410–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Tsakris A, Ikonomidis A, Pournaras S, Tzouvelekis LS, Sofianou D, Legakis NJ, Maniatis AN. VIM-1 metallo-beta-lactamase in Acinetobacter baumannii. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12(6):981–3.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kusradze I, Diene SM, Goderdzishvili M, Rolain JM. Molecular detection of OXA carbapenemase genes in multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from Iraq and Georgia. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2011;38(2):164–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Lee YT, Kuo SC, Chiang MC, Yang SP, Chen CP, Chen TL, Fung CP. Emergence of carbapenem-resistant non-baumannii species of Acinetobacter harboring a blaOXA-51-like gene that is intrinsic to A. baumannii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56(2):1124–7.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ghazawi A, Sonnevend A, Bonnin RA, Poirel L, Nordmann P, Hashmey R, Rizvi TA, Bh M, Pal T. NDM-2 carbapenemase-producing Acinetobacter baumannii in the United Arab Emirates. Clin Microbiol Infect Off Publ Eur Soc Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;18(2):E34–6.Google Scholar
  13. Poirel L, Bonnin RA, Boulanger A, Schrenzel J, Kaase M, Nordmann P. Tn125-related acquisition of blaNDM-like genes in Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56(2):1087–9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Abbas M, Cherkaoui A, Fankhauser C, Schrenzel J, Harbarth S. Epidemiology and clinical implications of carbapenemase-producing bacteria in Switzerland. Revue Medicale Suisse. 2012;8(338):882–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Chen Y, Zhou Z, Jiang Y, Yu Y. Emergence of NDM-1-producing Acinetobacter baumannii in China. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66(6):1255–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Pfeifer Y, Wilharm G, Zander E, Wichelhaus TA, Gottig S, Hunfeld KP, Seifert H, Witte W, Higgins PG. Molecular characterization of blaNDM-1 in an Acinetobacter baumannii strain isolated in Germany in 2007. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66(9):1998–2001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kaase M, Nordmann P, Wichelhaus TA, Gatermann SG, Bonnin RA, Poirel L. NDM-2 carbapenemase in Acinetobacter baumannii from Egypt. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66(6):1260–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Espinal P, Fugazza G, Lopez Y, Kasma M, Lerman Y, Malhotra-Kumar S, Goossens H, Carmeli Y, Vila J. Dissemination of an NDM-2-producing Acinetobacter baumannii clone in an Israeli rehabilitation center. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55(11):5396–8.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Doi Y, Onuoha EO, Adams-Haduch JM, Pakstis DL, McGaha TL, Werner CA, Parker BN, Brooks MM, Shutt KA, Pasculle AW, Muto CA, Harrison LH. Screening for Acinetobacter baumannii colonization by use of sponges. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49(1):154–8.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Corbella X, Pujol M, Ayats J, Sendra M, Ardanuy C, Dominguez MA, Linares J, Ariza J, Gudiol F. Relevance of digestive tract colonization in the epidemiology of nosocomial infections due to multiresistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 1996;23(2):329–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Adler A, Navon-Venezia S, Moran-Gilad J, Marcos E, Schwartz D, Carmeli Y. Laboratory and clinical evaluation of screening agar plates for detection of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae from surveillance rectal swabs. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49(6):2239–42.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, Carmeli Y, Falagas ME, Giske CG, Harbarth S, Hindler JF, Kahlmeter G, Olsson-Liljequist B, Paterson DL, Rice LB, Stelling J, Struelens MJ, Vatopoulos A, Weber JT, Monnet DL. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2012;18(3):268–81.Google Scholar
  23. Cherkaoui A, Hibbs J, Emonet S, Tangomo M, Girard M, Francois P, Schrenzel J. Comparison of two matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry methods with conventional phenotypic identification for routine identification of bacteria to the species level. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48(4):1169–75.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Adams-Haduch JM, Paterson DL, Sidjabat HE, Pasculle AW, Potoski BA, Muto CA, Harrison LH, Doi Y. Genetic basis of multidrug resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates at a tertiary medical center in Pennsylvania. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52(11):3837–43.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Nowak P, Paluchowska P, Budak A. Distribution of blaOXA genes among carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii nosocomial strains in Poland. New Microbiol. 2012;35(3):317–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Peleg AY, Seifert H, Paterson DL. Acinetobacter baumannii: emergence of a successful pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2008;21(3):538–82.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Turton JF, Woodford N, Glover J, Yarde S, Kaufmann ME, Pitt TL. Identification of Acinetobacter baumannii by detection of the blaOXA-51-like carbapenemase gene intrinsic to this species. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(8):2974–6.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Decousser JW, Jansen C, Nordmann P, Emirian A, Bonnin RA, Anais L, Merle JC, Poirel L. Outbreak of NDM-1-producing Acinetobacter baumannii in France, January to May 2013. Eurosurveillance. 2013;18(31). doi:https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES2013.18.31.20547
  29. Yang J, Chen Y, Jia X, Luo Y, Song Q, Zhao W, Wang Y, Liu H, Zheng D, Xia Y, Yu R, Han X, Jiang G, Zhou Y, Zhou W, Hu X, Liang L, Han L. Dissemination and characterization of NDM-1-producing Acinetobacter pittii in an intensive care unit in China. Clin Microbiol Infect Off Publ Eur Soc Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;18(12):E506–13.Google Scholar
  30. Toleman MA, Spencer J, Jones L, Walsh TR. blaNDM-1 is a chimera likely constructed in Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56(5):2773–6.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Woodford N, Ellington MJ, Coelho JM, Turton JF, Ward ME, Brown S, Amyes SG, Livermore DM. Multiplex PCR for genes encoding prevalent OXA carbapenemases in Acinetobacter spp. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2006;27(4):351–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Poirel L, Walsh TR, Cuvillier V, Nordmann P. Multiplex PCR for detection of acquired carbapenemase genes. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011;70(1):119–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Cicek AC, Saral A, Iraz M, Ceylan A, Duzgun AO, Peleg AY, Sandalli C. OXA- and GES-type beta-lactamases predominate in extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from a Turkish University Hospital. Clin Microbiol Infect Off Publ Eur Soc Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;20(5):410–5.Google Scholar
  34. Swayne RL, Ludlam HA, Shet VG, Woodford N, Curran MD. Real-time TaqMan PCR for rapid detection of genes encoding five types of non-metallo- (class A and D) carbapenemases in Enterobacteriaceae. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2011;38(1):35–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Naas T, Ergani A, Carrer A, Nordmann P. Real-time PCR for detection of NDM-1 carbapenemase genes from spiked stool samples. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55(9):4038–43.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Hindiyeh M, Smollen G, Grossman Z, Ram D, Davidson Y, Mileguir F, Vax M, Ben David D, Tal I, Rahav G, Shamiss A, Mendelson E, Keller N. Rapid detection of blaKPC carbapenemase genes by real-time PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46(9):2879–83.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Cherkaoui et al. 2015

Advertisement