Skip to main content
Download PDF

The importance of heteroresistance and efflux pumps in bedaquiline-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Iran

Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials volume 23, Article number: 36 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Tuberculosis (TB) continues to pose a threat to communities worldwide and remains a significant public health issue in several countries. We assessed the role of heteroresistance and efflux pumps in bedaquiline (BDQ)-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates.

Methods

Nineteen clinical isolates were included in the study, of which fifteen isolates were classified as MDR or XDR, while four isolates were fully susceptible. To evaluate BDQ heteroresistance, the Microplate Alamar Blue Assay (MABA) method was employed. For screening mixed infections, MIRU-VNTR was performed on clinical isolates. Mutations in the atpE and Rv0678 genes were determined based on next-generation sequencing data. Additionally, real-time PCR was applied to assess the expression of efflux pump genes in the absence and presence of verapamil (VP).

Results

All 15 drug-resistant isolates displayed resistance to BDQ. Among the 19 total isolates, 21.05% (4/19) exhibited a heteroresistance pattern to BDQ. None of the isolates carried a mutation of the atpE and Rv0678 genes associated with BDQ resistance. Regarding the MIRU-VNTR analysis, most isolates (94.73%) showed the Beijing genotype. Fifteen (78.9%) isolates showed a significant reduction in BDQ MIC after VP treatment. The efflux pump genes of Rv0676c, Rv1258c, Rv1410c, Rv1634, Rv1819, Rv2459, Rv2846, and Rv3065 were overexpressed in the presence of BDQ.

Conclusions

Our results clearly demonstrated the crucial role of heteroresistance and efflux pumps in BDQ resistance. Additionally, we established a direct link between the Rv0676c gene and BDQ resistance. The inclusion of VP significantly reduced the MIC of BDQ in both drug-susceptible and drug-resistant clinical isolates.

Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB) is one of the main ten main global causes of mortality, remaining a significant public health concern in numerous countries [1]. The rise in drug-resistant TB, particularly pre-extensively drug-resistant TB (pre-XDR-TB), multidrug-resistant (MDR-TB), and XDR-TB, poses a critical threat to global TB control. MDR-TB is resistant against at least two key first-line drugs (isoniazid and rifampicin), pre-XDR-TB is resistant to both these drugs as well as fluoroquinolones, and XDR-TB is MDR-TB which exhibit resistance against any fluoroquinolone as well as at least one additional Group A drug (moxifloxacin, levofloxacin, linezolid and bedaquiline) [2].

Bedaquiline (BDQ), an oral diarylquinoline drug, has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat drug-resistant TB, the first new drug in after 40 years. It exhibits bactericidal anti-TB activity by targeting mycobacterial ATP synthase [3]. Resistance to BDQ is associated with specific genes, such as the atpE gene encoding F1/F0-ATPase synthase, which accounts for 30% of BDQ-resistant clinical isolates due to mutations in the C subunit of the enzyme. Another resistance gene, Rv0678, regulates the MmpS5-MmpL5 efflux pump’s expression [4].

Infections with mixed strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis can lead to false-negative results in drug resistance testing, affecting drug susceptibility testing (DST) accuracy [5]. Mixed infections can also promote the spread of drug-resistant strains and increase treatment failure rates [6]. Epidemiological and phylogenetic studies have reported an accepted MIRU-VNTR genotyping system with 24 and 15 locus sets, enabling the identification of mixed infections based on Variable Numbers of Tandem Repeats (VNTRs) of Mycobacterial Interspersed Repetitive Units (MIRUs) [7]. The 24-locus MIRU-VNTR is the gold standard for M. tuberculosis phylogenetic analysis [8].

Heteroresistant strains of M. tuberculosis consist of a mixture of susceptible and resistant subpopulations in clinical samples. Heteroresistance is considered a preliminary stage of total resistance, allowing bacteria to exploit growth opportunities even in the presence of antibiotics [9]. Efflux pumps in M. tuberculosis include major facilitator superfamily (MFS), proteobacterial antimicrobial compound efflux (PACE), multi-drug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE), Small Multidrug Resistance (SMR), ATP-binding cassette (ABC), and resistance-nodulation-division (RND) types [10].

We investigated the genotypic and phenotypic mechanisms of BDQ drug resistance in drug-resistant strains isolated from patients referred to the Mycobacteriology and Pulmonary Research Department, Pasteur Institute, Iran, between 2015 and 2021. The investigation involved determining the phenotypic and genotypic antibiotic resistance of MDR strains, assessing the effect of polyclonal infections, presence of heteroresistance to BDQ, and evaluating the role of efflux pumps as a resistance mechanism against BDQ.

Methods

Bacterial strains

In this study, a total of 19 clinical isolates were employed, out of which 15 were classified as MDR, or XDR, while the remaining four isolates were fully susceptible. The isolates examined in this study were isolated from patients who had no history of using BDQ. Throughout the tests, the H37Rv (ATCC 27294) strain served as the reference strain. All of these isolates were collected between 2015 and 2021 from the Department of Mycobacteriology and Pulmonary Research, Pasteur Institute, Iran. To ensure ethical compliance, the Pasteur Institute Ethics Committee conducted thorough reviews of the study (Ethics approval number: IR.PII.REC.1399.055). Moreover, participants signed written informed consent.

Detection of Bedaquiline Heteroresistance

At first, each of the samples was cultured in the Lowenstein-Johnson medium, then after the growth, 3 distinct colonies from each sample were subcultured individually in the Lowenstein-Johnson medium to expand further growth. BDQ was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The objective of this subculturing process was to assess BDQ resistance using the Microplate Alamar Blue Assay (MABA) method. Alamar Blue was purchased from AbD Serotec (Oxford, UK).

DNA extraction and genotyping

At first, the colonies grown on the LJ medium were transferred into a microcentrifuge tube and DNA was extracted by the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method [11]. For screening of mixed infection, MIRU-VNTR was done on isolates, revealing the polyclonal infection. Regarding MIRU-VNTRs, amplification of all 24 loci was done using the corresponding primers [12]. For each locus, deionized water and M. tuberculosis H37Rv DNA were added respectively as negative and positive controls. Separation of amplicons was done electrophoretically on 1.8% agarose gels, by a 100-bp DNA ladder as a size marker. Mixed infection was considered present when the specimen contained over one amplicon at two or more loci. All standard precautions were followed to avoid laboratory cross-contamination. The MIRU-VNTR results were analyzed by MIRU–VNTR plus [13].

Sequencing of Rv0678 and atpE genes

After extracting the DNA of the isolates by the CTAB method, the mutation of the atpE and Rv0678 genes was determined by next-generation sequencing as we described previously [14]. Briefly, libraries were loaded onto an Illumina NextSeq 500 instrument for a paired-end 2 × 151-bp run. The generated reads were mapped to the M. tuberculosis H37Rv genome (GenBank accession no. NC_000962.3) using the alignment software Burrow-Wheeler Aligner (BWA). Subsequently, mappings were refined with the toolkits Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK), sambamba, and SAMtools.

Determination of MICs and Verapamil (VP) effectiveness

The microplate Alamar Blue assay (MABA) was performed to determine the MICs for clinical isolates. Briefly, 100 µl of 7H9 medium was added to each well of 96-well polystyrene microtitre plates, except the peripheral wells, which were dispensed with 250 µl of sterilized water to prevent evaporation during incubation. Two-fold serial dilutions of BDQ (ranging from 64 to 0.0156 µg/ml) were prepared in the wells. The turbidity of each suspension was adjusted to a McFarland standard of 1.0 (3 × 10 8 CFU/ml). 100 µl of M. tuberculosis inoculum was added to the wells. Each microplate contained a positive control well containing the bacterial suspension and a negative control well containing each antibiotic and culture medium. The plates were sealed and covered with a plastic bag and incubated at 37 °C for 7 days. After 7 days 50 µl of a mixture of 0.02% resazurin sodium salt (Sigma, USA) solution and Tween 80 were added to each well and again incubated overnight at 37 °C. A color change from blue to pink was considered as positive growth and the MIC was defined as the lowest drug concentration that prevented the color change. Each drug concentration was tested in triplicate, and all assays were performed twice to ensure accuracy. Isolates with BDQ MICs < 0.25 µg/mL were classified as vulnerable against BDQ [15]. The impact of VP as an efflux pump inhibitor (EPI), on the MIC of BDQ was investigated in this study [16]. VP was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St.Louis, MO, USA). For this purpose, the wells were filled with two-fold serial dilutions of BDQ both in the presence and absence of 64 µg/mL of VP. A previous study had already established 64 µg/mL as the optimal concentration for verapamil [17].

Analysis of gene expression of drug efflux pumps

M. tuberculosis isolates underwent culturing in Middlebrook 7H9 broth (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo., USA) with albumin-dextrose-catalase (ADC) supplement (Becton Dickinson, Oxford, UK), for the 15 MDR /XDR and 4 fully susceptible isolates for the total bacterial RNA extraction. These cultures were added with BDQ and BDQ + VP at sub-inhibitory levels (half of the MIC), followed by incubation at 37 °C for 7 days, and collection for RNA extraction. The TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies Corp., Carlsbad, USA) extracted the total bacterial RNA as per the manufacturer’s instructions. A nanophotometer assessed the integrity and quality of total RNA. Following treatment with DNase I (Invitrogen), RNA (1 µg) underwent cDNA synthesis as instructed (PrimeScript™ 1st strand cDNA Synthesis Kit, TAKARA). Quantitative reverse transcription PCR was done in a 20-µl system composed of 10 µl of 2X mixture, complementary DNA template (100 ng), SYBR Green, and 5 pmol of each primer set (Table 1) [18, 19]. The qPCR was performed on Rotor-Gene 6000 (Corbett Research Pty Ltd., Sydney, Australia). SecA was used as a housekeeping gene for normalization. The 2−ΔΔCT method RNA calculated the relative quantification of gene expression in BDQ-induced strains in relation to the non-induced strain. In comparison with the non-induced control, an expression equal to one showed the same expression levels, an expression equal to or 4-fold increase, and an expression equal to or 4-fold decrease [20].

Table 1 Primers used in Real-Time PCR for the EP gene regulation study in Mtb
Full size table

Statistical analysis

The allelic table by Supply et al. was used to determine the number of repeats at each locus and clustering assessment was performed by the online tool at http://www.MIRU-VNTRplus.org [12]. SPSS 23 was used for data analysis. Descriptive analysis was performed by percentage, frequency, mean, figures, tables, etc. The Hunter Gaston discriminatory index illustrated the discriminatory power of 24 loci MIRU-VNTR [21].

The 2−ΔΔCT method was applied to calculate the relative quantification of target gene regulation. Data analysis and drawing figures were performed through one-way ANOVA tests by GraphPad Prism 7. A p-value < 0.05 was regarded as significant.

Results

Despite the absence of mixed infection, there was a notable presence of high heteroresistance in the BDQ-resistant isolates

The study included a total of 19 selected isolates, comprising 4 fully susceptible isolates and 15 isolates with varying degrees of drug resistance (MDR/XDR). The proportional method, using Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) medium supplemented with Isoniazid (INH) at 0.2 mg/liter, Rifampicin (RIF) at 40 mg/liter, Ethambutol (EMB) at 2 mg/liter, Kanamycin (KAN) at 20 mg/liter, Ofloxacin (OFX) at 4 mg/liter, Capreomycin (CAP) at 20 mg/liter, and Streptomycin (STR) at 4 mg/liter. Resistance was determined by bacterial growth equal to or exceeding 1% compared to growth in a drug-free Löwenstein-Jensen (LJ) medium used as a negative control for background growth. Based on the proportional antibiogram test results, all 15 drug-resistant isolates displayed resistance to INH, RIF, EMB, and BDQ. The resistance levels to KAN, OFX, CAP, and STR were found to be 46.6%, 53.3%, 80%, and 86.6%, respectively. Among the 4 fully susceptible isolates, 2 isolates (50%) were sensitive to BDQ. The fully susceptible isolates demonstrated sensitivity to all first- and second-line drugs tested. The MABA method was utilized to determine the MIC of BDQ for each strain on its three separate colonies. Among the 15 resistant isolates and 4 fully susceptible isolates, 21.05% (4/19) exhibited a heteroresistance pattern to BDQ, as shown in Table 2. Notably, none of the pan-susceptible or MDR/XDR isolates carried a mutation of the atpE and Rv0678 genes associated with BDQ resistance.

Table 2 BDQ susceptibility profile, Heteroresistance, MIC findings and genotype in the studied isolates
Full size table

Regarding the MIRU-VNTR analysis, most isolates (94.73%) showed the Beijing genotype, with the exception of PII-21, which had the NEW-1 genotype, as shown in Table 3. Despite the similar genotypes (no mixed infection) observed in most cases, some strains and their separate colonies (1, 2, and 3) displayed a different BDQ resistance pattern (21.05%) (Table 2).

Table 3 Results of MIRU-VNTR of the 15 resistance isolates and 4 fully susceptible isolates
Full size table

Efflux pumps have an important role in BDQ resistance

In this study, all 15 MDR isolates demonstrated resistance to BDQ, with MICs of 0.5 to 8 µg/mL. However, when the combination of BDQ and VP was tested, the MICs ranged from 0.007 to 8 µg/mL. The four sensitive isolates displayed MICs against BDQ ranging from 0.125 to 1 µg/mL. Table 4 presents the data on MICs and the effect of VP treatment. This indicates a significant decrease in MICs against BDQ when combined with VP. Among the 15 MDR/XDR isolates, nine isolates exhibited at least a gene overexpressed (four-fold induction) under BDQ stress. Two isolates (PII-31 and PII-28) among the MDR/XDR isolates showed overexpression of five efflux pump genes under BDQ stress (p < 0.05). Additionally, ten isolates under BDQ + VP stress displayed four-fold down-regulation in at least one of the eight evaluated genes (p < 0.05). In contrast, among the four fully susceptible isolates, PII-8 and PII-10 did not show induction in any of the eight efflux pump genes under BDQ stress. However, two fully susceptible isolates exhibited overexpression of either the Rv0676C or Rv3065 gene (p < 0.05). Furthermore, three isolates showed more than four-fold down-regulation of Rv0676c and Rv1410c under BDQ + VP stress (p < 0.05). Also, in PII-10 and PII-11 isolates showed down-regulation of Rv1258c, Rv1634, Rv1819, Rv2459 and Rv2846 under BDQ + VP stress (Table 5).

Table 4 MIC results, Drug susceptibility profile, efflux pump expression and VP treatment, in 15 MDR and XDR isolates
Full size table
Table 5 MIC results, Drug susceptibility profile, efflux pump expression and VP treatment, in 4 fully susceptible isolates
Full size table

These findings shed light on the complex interactions between BDQ resistance and efflux pump and may have implications for understanding drug resistance mechanisms and potential treatment strategies.

Discussion

Gaining a comprehensive understanding of drug resistance mechanisms in M. tuberculosis is crucial to improving treatment efficacy and shorten treatment duration [20]. Previous studies have reported the development of MDR and specific heteroresistance in clinical isolates [22]. Heteroresistance is considered the initial step towards transitioning from a susceptible state to MDR, and all forms of resistance contribute to treatment failure. In the current study, out of the 15 resistant isolates and fully susceptible isolates, 21.05% (4/19) exhibited BDQ heteroresistance patterns. In a study by Nimmo et al., which investigated the diversity of drug resistance in M. tuberculosis during treatment, six out of ten isolates displayed a heteroresistance pattern to BDQ based on genotype analysis [23]. The heteroresistance rate of 21.05% observed in this study aligns closely with findings reported by Faye et al. [24]. Furthermore, Kargarpour et al. reported a heteroresistance rate of 45.71% among 35 patients with mixed infections [5]. These findings highlight the prevalence of heteroresistance and its significance in the context of MDR/XDR-TB treatment. Understanding the underlying mechanisms and factors contributing to heteroresistance is crucial for enhancing treatment strategies and combating drug-resistant tuberculosis effectively.

In our study, all of the heteroresistant isolates belonged to the Beijing genotype, which is also-known as lineage 2 of M. tuberculosis. The Beijing family is one of the most common genotypes worldwide and is associated with immune evasion and antibiotic resistance, contributing to rapid bacterial growth, spread, and transmission. This family of M. tuberculosis is considered more contagious than other lineages [25]. In our study, despite having the same genotypes in most cases, different patterns of antibiotic resistance were observed in some strains and individual colonies. The discovery of heteroresistance in isolates without mixed infections suggests that drug resistance mechanisms are not solely reliant on the presence of different strains but can also arise through other genetic or phenotypic changes within a single strain. Understanding the factors contributing to heteroresistance, regardless of mixed infections, can provide valuable insights into the emergence, spread, and management of drug-resistant TB. This study investigated the absence or presence of mutation in the atpE and Rv0678 genes, critical genes associated with BDQ resistance. Interestingly, all clinically reported mutations were found within the Rv0678 gene [26]. None of the studied isolates in our research harbored the mutations in the atpE and Rv0678 genes. Although drug resistance is primarily attributed to mutations causing modifications in drug targets, it has become evident that multidrug efflux systems can also play a significant role in M. tuberculosis [27]. At the phenotypic level, our study evaluated the impact of the efflux pump inhibitor, VP, on the reduction of BDQ MIC in MDR and XDR isolates. Encouragingly, VP had a notable effect in reducing BDQ resistance in 80% of these isolates, a finding consistent with previous study [10]. At the RNA level, we analyzed the expression levels of eight genes that encode potential drug efflux transporters under VP efflux inhibition and drug stress. Rv0676c showed the highest expression level among the 15 MDR and XDR isolates, with overexpression detected in 40% of these isolates under BDQ stress (p < 0.05). However, VP-treated MDR and XDR isolates exhibited significant down-regulation of the Rv0676c efflux gene, indicating the role of VP in suppressing efflux pump activity (p < 0.05). In fully susceptible isolates, Rv0676c and Rv1410c demonstrated the most substantial down-regulation than other genes, suggesting their involvement in drug resistance. This aligns with the findings of Song et al., who showed a potent role of Rv0676c in drug resistance, particularly against BDQ [28].

High-level expression of the gene in the MFS (Rv1410c), occurred in three of the MDR and XDR isolates under BDQ stress. Additionally, the efflux pump Rv1410c was down-regulated under VP + BDQ stress in five isolates. Also, we showed that none of the fully susceptible isolates overexpressed Rv1410c; while this efflux pump showed down-regulation due to by 3/4 VP-treated fully susceptible isolates (p < 0.05). Unlike our results, Laws et al. declared that Rv1410c was overexpressed in the MDR isolates due to INH and RIF stress [10]. In the presence of VP, PII10 and PII11 isolates reduced the MIC of BDQ which showed the down-regulated of efflux genes Rv1258c, Rv1634, Rv1819, Rv2846, and Rv2459 in response to VP-treated isolates. In a similar study, Li et al. showed higher expression levels of some efflux pump genes in MDR isolates compared to fully susceptible isolates and that differences in expression could be useful in the diagnosis and treatment of drug-resistant TB [29]. The PII33 and PII15 isolates showed the up-regulation of the efflux gene Rv1258c and down-regulation following VP treatment (p < 0.05). In a similar study, Ramón-García et al. declared the significant effect of the Rv1258c efflux pump on aminoglycosides, tetracycline, rifampicin and clofazimine in M. tuberculosis [30]. The PII-22, PII-3, and PII-35 isolates exhibited down-regulation of the efflux gene Rv1634 in the presence of VP (p < 0.05). Similarly, Viveiros et al. showed that the resistant phenotype was by VP compound known to inhibit efflux pump [31]. Another MFS family efflux transporter, EfpA (Rv2846c), was overexpressed in XDR and MDR isolates (PII-28 and PII-33) under BDQ stress and down-regulation of this gene in the presence of VP (p < 0.05). Similar to our findings, Li et al. reported that EfpA was overexpressed in the MDR isolates due to INH and RIF stress [29]. Rv2459 (jef A), another MFS family efflux transporter, was down-regulated in XDR and MDR isolates (PII-22 and PII-26) under BDQ stress. Rahul et al. reported the increased expression of jefA (Rv2459) leading to increased resistance against EMB and INH in M. tuberculosis [27]. Rv1819c is one of the members of ABC transporters whose activity can be associated with tuberculosis treatment failure [32]. The PII-21, PII-22, and PII-31 isolates showed down-regulation of the efflux gene Rv1819c in the presence of VP (p < 0.05). Gupta et al. revealed that VP supplementation significantly reduced the MIC of BDQ in drug-susceptible and drug-resistant clinical isolates. VP decreased the MIC of BDQ by 8- to 16-fold for all isolates tested [33]. We found that the Mmr efflux transporter (Rv3065) was overexpressed in three MDR and XDR isolates (i.e., PII-28, PII-20, and PII-31) in response to BDQ (p < 0.05). The BDQ MIC in the PII-28 isolate was decreased by 133-fold using VP; this efflux pump was among the genes down-regulated after receiving VP.

Conclusions

Our findings clearly demonstrated the crucial role of the efflux pump in BDQ resistance. Additionally, a direct link was established between the Rv0676c gene and BDQ resistance (p < 0.05). The inclusion of VP significantly reduced the MIC of BDQ in both drug-susceptible and drug-resistant clinical isolates. However, despite VP being approved by the FDA as an EPI, its potential as an anti-TB drug requires more investigation. Interestingly, this study also revealed varying BDQ resistances (heteroresistance) within the same genotypes, necessitating the use of molecular techniques like whole genome sequencing for more comprehensive analysis. Failure to detect such strains can severely impact the treatment of TB patients.

Data availability

Data supporting this paper are included in the article.

Abbreviations

EMB:

Ethambutol

ABC:

ATP-binding cassette

ADC:

Albumin-dextrose-catalase

BDQ:

Bedaquiline

CTAB:

Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide

CAP:

Capreomycin

DST:

Drug susceptibility testing

MDR:

Multidrug-resistant

INH:

Isoniazid

KAN:

Kanamycin

MABA:

Microplate alamar blue assay

MIRU-VNTR:

Mycobacterial Interspersed Repetitive Units- Variable Numbers of Tandem Repeats

OFX:

Ofloxacin

MFS:

Major facilitator superfamily

MATE:

Multidrug and toxic compound extrusion

MIC:

Minimum inhibitory concentration

PACE:

Proteobacterial antimicrobial compound efflux

RND:

Resistance-nodulation-division

RIF:

Rifampicin

SMR:

Small multidrug resistance

VP:

Verapamil

XDR:

Extensively drug-resistant

STR:

Streptomycin

FDA:

Food and Drug Administration

References

  1. Meskini M, Madadi N, Ahmadi K, Vaziri F, Fateh A, Siadat SD. Tuberculosis prevention, diagnosis, and treatment financial profile during 2006–2021: PART A. Cost Eff Resource Allocation. 2023;21(1):68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Organization WH. WHO announces updated definitions of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. WHO: Geneva, Switzerland.; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Courbon GM, Palme PR, Mann L, Richter A, Imming P, Rubinstein JL. Mechanism of mycobacterial ATP synthase inhibition by squaramides and second generation diarylquinolines. EMBO J. 2023;42(15):e113687.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Preiss L, Langer JD, Yildiz Ö, Eckhardt-Strelau L, Guillemont JE, Koul A, Meier T. Structure of the mycobacterial ATP synthase fo rotor ring in complex with the anti-TB drug bedaquiline. Sci Adv. 2015;1(4):e1500106.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Kargarpour Kamakoli M, Sadegh HR, Farmanfarmaei G, Masoumi M, Fateh A, Javadi G, Rahimi Jamnani F, Vaziri F, Siadat SD. Evaluation of the impact of polyclonal infection and heteroresistance on treatment of tuberculosis patients. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):41410.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. McIvor A, Koornhof H, Kana BD. Relapse, re-infection and mixed infections in tuberculosis disease. Pathogens Disease. 2017;75(3):ftx020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gauthier M, Bidault F, Mosnier A, Bablishvili N, Tukvadze N, Somphavong S, Paboriboune P, Ocheretina O, Pape JW, Paranhos-Baccala G. High-throughput mycobacterial interspersed repetitive-unit–variable-number tandem-repeat genotyping for Mycobacterium tuberculosis epidemiological studies. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53(2):498–503.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Jagielski T, Van Ingen J, Rastogi N, Dziadek J, Mazur PK, Bielecki J. Current methods in the molecular typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and other mycobacteria. BioMed research international. 2014; 2014.

  9. Zhang X, Zhao B, Liu L, Zhu Y, Zhao Y, Jin Q. Subpopulation analysis of heteroresistance to fluoroquinolone in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Beijing, China. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50(4):1471–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Laws M, Jin P, Rahman KM. Efflux pumps in Mycobacterium tuberculosis and their inhibition to tackle antimicrobial resistance. Trends Microbiol. 2022;30(1):57–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang C, Ouyang Q, Zhou X, Huang Y, Zeng Y, Deng L, Lin D, Zheng W. In vitro activity of tetracycline analogs against multidrug-resistant and extensive drug resistance clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Tuberculosis. 2023;140:102336.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Supply P, Allix C, Lesjean S, Cardoso-Oelemann M, Rüsch-Gerdes S, Willery E, Savine E, de Haas P, van Deutekom H, Roring S. Proposal for standardization of optimized mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit-variable-number tandem repeat typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(12):4498–510.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Allix-Béguec C, Harmsen D, Weniger T, Supply P, Niemann S. Evaluation and strategy for use of MIRU-VNTR plus, a multifunctional database for online analysis of genotyping data and phylogenetic identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46(8):2692–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Vaziri F, Kohl TA, Ghajavand H, Kargarpour Kamakoli M, Merker M, Hadifar S, Khanipour S, Fateh A, Masoumi M, Siadat SD. Genetic diversity of multi-and extensively drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates in the capital of Iran, revealed by whole-genome sequencing. J Clin Microbiol. 2019;57(1):01477–18. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Brigden G, Hewison C, Varaine F. New developments in the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis: clinical utility of bedaquiline and delamanid. Infect drug Resist. 2015;8:367–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Leonard B, Coronel J, Siedner M, Grandjean L, Caviedes L, Navarro P, Gilman RH, Moore DA. Inter-and intra-assay reproducibility of microplate Alamar blue assay results for isoniazid, rifampicin, ethambutol, streptomycin, ciprofloxacin, and capreomycin drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46(10):3526–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Li G, Zhang J, Guo Q, Wei J, Jiang Y, Zhao X, Zhao LL, Liu Z, Lu J, Wan K. Study of efflux pump gene expression in rifampicin-monoresistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates. J Antibiot. 2015;68(7):431–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Garima K, Pathak R, Tandon R, Rathor N, Sinha R, Bose M, Varma-Basil M. Differential expression of efflux pump genes of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in response to varied subinhibitory concentrations of antituberculosis agents. Tuberc (Edinb Scotl). 2015;95(2):155–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Canezin PH, Caleffi-Ferracioli KR, Scodro RBL, Siqueira VLD, Pavan FR, Barros ILE, Cardoso RF. Intramacrophage Mycobacterium tuberculosis efflux pump gene regulation after rifampicin and verapamil exposure. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018;73(7):1770–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ghajavand H, Kargarpour Kamakoli M, Khanipour S, Pourazar Dizaji S, Masoumi M, Rahimi Jamnani F, Fateh A, Yaseri M, Siadat SD, Vaziri F. Scrutinizing the drug resistance mechanism of multi- and extensively-drug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis: mutations versus efflux pumps. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019;8:70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Hunter PR, Gaston MA. Numerical index of the discriminatory ability of typing systems: an application of Simpson’s index of diversity. J Clin Microbiol. 1988;26(11):2465–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Ye M, Yuan W, Molaeipour L, Azizian K, Ahmadi A, Kouhsari E. Antibiotic heteroresistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2021;20(1):73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Nimmo C, Brien K, Millard J, Grant AD, Padayatchi N, Pym AS, O’Donnell M, Goldstein R, Breuer J, Balloux F. Dynamics of within-host Mycobacterium tuberculosis diversity and heteroresistance during treatment. EBioMedicine. 2020; 55.

  24. Faye LM, Hosu MC, Sineke N, Vasaikar S, Dippenaar A, Oostvogels S, Warren RM, Apalata T. Detection of mutations and genotyping of drug-resistant Mycobacterium Tuberculosis strains isolated from patients in Rural Eastern Cape Province. 2023.

  25. Karmakar M, Trauer JM, Ascher DB, Denholm JT. Hyper transmission of Beijing lineage Mycobacterium tuberculosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Infect. 2019;79(6):572–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nimmo C, Millard J, Faulkner V, Monteserin J, Pugh H, Johnson EO. Evolution of Mycobacterium tuberculosis drug resistance in the genomic era. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;12:954074.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Rahul P, Zeeshan F, Saif H. Efflux pumps in drug resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a panoramic view. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2014;3(8):528–46.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Song L, Wu X. Development of efflux pump inhibitors in antituberculosis therapy. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2016;47(6):421–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Li G, Zhang J, Guo Q, Jiang Y, Wei J, Zhao L-l, Zhao X, Lu J, Wan K. Efflux pump gene expression in multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(2):e0119013.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Ramón-García S, Mick V, Dainese E, Martín C, Thompson CJ, De Rossi E, Manganelli R, Aínsa JA. Functional and genetic characterization of the tap efflux pump in Mycobacterium bovis BCG. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56(4):2074–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Viveiros M, Martins M, Rodrigues L, Machado D, Couto I, Ainsa J, Amaral L. Inhibitors of mycobacterial efflux pumps as potential boosters for anti-tubercular drugs. Expert Rev anti-infective Therapy. 2012;10(9):983–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Domenech P, Kobayashi H, LeVier K, Walker GC, Barry IIICE. BacA, an ABC transporter involved in maintenance of chronic murine infections with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Bacteriol. 2009;191(2):477–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Gupta S, Cohen KA, Winglee K, Maiga M, Diarra B, Bishai WR. Efflux inhibition with verapamil potentiates bedaquiline in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(1):574–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the staff of the Department of Mycobacteriology and Pulmonary Research of the Pasteur Institute Iran for their help in this project.

Funding

This research is supported by a Ph.D. scholarship (project no. B-9638) and a grant from the student research committee of the Pasteur Institute Iran. These funding agencies have no role in data collection and analysis, study design, publication decisions, or manuscript preparation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mycobacteriology and Pulmonary Research, Pasteur Institute of Iran, No. 358, 12th Farvardin Ave., Jomhoori St, Tehran, 1316943551, Iran

    Nahid Madadi-Goli, Kamal Ahmadi, Mansour Kargarpour Kamakoli, Sharareh Khanipour, Shahin Pourazar Dizaji, Seyed Davar Siadat, Abolfazl Fateh & Farzam Vaziri

  2. Microbiology Research Center (MRC), Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran

    Nahid Madadi-Goli, Kamal Ahmadi, Mansour Kargarpour Kamakoli, Sharareh Khanipour, Shahin Pourazar Dizaji, Seyed Davar Siadat, Abolfazl Fateh & Farzam Vaziri

  3. Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran

    Kamal Ahmadi & Mohsen Azizi

  4. Student Research Committee, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran

    Nahid Madadi-Goli & Kamal Ahmadi

  5. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Mahshid Nasehi

  6. Center for Communicable Diseases Control, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran

    Mahshid Nasehi

Authors
  1. Nahid Madadi-Goli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kamal Ahmadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mansour Kargarpour Kamakoli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mohsen Azizi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sharareh Khanipour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Shahin Pourazar Dizaji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Mahshid Nasehi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Seyed Davar Siadat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Abolfazl Fateh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Farzam Vaziri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

FV supervised the project. FV, MN, SDS, and AF designed the project. NM-G, KA, and FV wrote the manuscript. NM-G, KA, MKK, SK, and SP performed the work in the laboratory. NM-G and MA performed the statistical analysis. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Abolfazl Fateh or Farzam Vaziri.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical reviews and approval of informed consent was provided by the Ethical Committee, Pasteur Institute, Iran.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Madadi-Goli, N., Ahmadi, K., Kamakoli, M.K. et al. The importance of heteroresistance and efflux pumps in bedaquiline-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Iran. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 23, 36 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12941-024-00694-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12941-024-00694-3

Keywords

Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials

ISSN: 1476-0711

Contact us