Skip to main content
Download PDF

Hospitalization and colonization by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the surgical department of 03 health facilities in the Ndé division, West-Cameroon

Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials volume 20, Article number: 48 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Commensal flora colonization during hospitalization by bacteria is the first step for nosocomial infections while antibiotic resistance reduces therapeutic options. In aim to control this phenomenon, we initiated this study to describe the impact of hospitalization on colonization by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the surgical department of 03 health facilities in the Ndé division, West-Cameroon.

Methods

This study was carried out on patients admitted for surgery in 03 health facilities of the Ndé division, West-Cameroon (District Hospital of Bangangté, Protestant Hospital of Bangwa and Cliniques Universitaires des Montagnes). After obtaining ethical clearance and authorizations, nasal swabs were performed at admission and discharge, with the aim of isolating bacteria and performing their antibiotic susceptibility tests. Informations on each participant's antibiotic therapy were recorded. Laboratory investigations were carried out according to standard protocols (CASFM, 2019).

Results

The most commonly used antibiotics were β-lactams. A total of 104 nasal swabs were performed on 52 patients who agreed to participate to the study. From the analysis, 110 (57 at admission versus 53 at discharge) Staphylococcus isolates were obtained. Overall, susceptibility testing showed that antibiotic resistance rates were higher at discharge than at admission; with significant differences between the susceptibility profiles obtained at admission and discharge for β-lactams and not significant for fluoroquinolones and aminoglycosides. Globally, frequency of nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at discharge 16 (30.77%) was significantly higher than at admission 07 (13.46%) with Chi-2 = 4.52 and p = 0.0335.

Conclusion

The high rates of antibiotic resistance of bacteria isolated at discharge compared to those isolated at admission obtained in the present investigation, highlights the important role that hospitalization plays in the selection and dissemination of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and colonization by these bacteria in health structures of Ndé division. As a result, further investigations to find the factors that promote this phenomenon should be carried out.

Background

Staphylococcus aureus are Gram-positive cocci bacteria found on the surfaces of our environment, as well as on the skin and mucous membranes (nasal mucosa) of humans [1, 2]. Mutualist bacteria in humans, they can be pathogenic when the balance is disrupted. Indeed, in presence of a decrease of immunity/injury, these bacteria can cause a multitude of diseases (sepsis, impetigo, endocarditis etc….) more or less severe, while antibiotic resistance reduces therapeutic options. Methicillin resistance was observed in Staphylococcus aureus strains in health facilities around 1961 after introduction of this antibiotic, reflecting the role of health facilities in the selection and dissemination of antibiotic-resistant infectious agents [3]. methicillin-resistant Staphylococccus aureus isolates can resist to almost all β-lactams [3].

Studies on bacterial resistance in hospitals, more specifically on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates, have highlighted the acquisition of multi-resistant bacteria during hospital stay and the harmful consequences of colonization and infections by these multi-resistant bacteria on patient’s lives [4,5,6]. Thus justifying the inclusion of the fight against bacterial resistance to antibiotics in global programs (Global Health Security Agenda, One Health) [7, 8]. Also, several studies carried out throughout the world, in West-Cameroon and more precisely in hospitals of Ndé division have shown that the hospital environment (mainly in surgery) is conducive to the selection and dissemination of multi-resistant bacteria on one hand and to the exchange of genetic material between the bacteria in this environment and those in the human body on the other hand [9,10,11,12,13].

Management with antibiotics would become increasingly difficult with emergence of multi-resistant bacteria such as MRSA. Data useful for understanding this phenomenon of growing antibiotic resistance that threatens patient care are scarce around the world and particularly in developing countries where resources (human and financial) for research are limited. However, it’s imperative to understand the evolution of this phenomenon in order to address the morbidity and mortality due to infections by antibiotic-resistant bacteria. It’s in this context and with the aim of making a modest contribution to global programs (Global Health Security Agenda, One Health) focused on the fight against antibiotic resistance that this work was initiated in order to study the impact of hospitalization on MRSA-colonization among patients interned in the surgical department of 03 health care settings in the Ndé division. The results of this investigation will guide patient's antibiotic therapy (Probabilistic antibiotic therapy) at admission and during hospitalization, and will provide a basis for implementing and evaluating strategies and policies to reduce the proportion of antibiotic-resistant bacteria among patients during their hospital stays and thus limit nosocomial infections. This will be done with a view to reduce the emergence of multi-resistant strains in hospitals and their spread from hospitals to the community.

Materials and methods

Study site, populations and sampling

This repeated cross-sectional study was conducted from February to May 2019 among patients of surgical departement from admission to discharge in three health facilities of Ndé division, West-Cameroon (District Hospital of Bangangté, Protestant Hospital of Bangwa and Cliniques Universitaires des Montagnes). When all administrative and ethical requirements were met, Clinical data and nasal samples were collected among patients whose consent was given. Clinical data (sex, age, type of surgery, antibiotics administered) were recorded with the help of the attending physicians during hospitalization, while samples were collected at admission and discharge. Nasal swabs were performed by streaking both anterior nares with sterile moistened cotton swabs among patients whose consent was given. Nasal swabs were placed in labelled tubes containing heart-brain broth, stored in an icebox (4–8 °C) and transported without delay to the laboratory of microbiology of Cliniques Universitaires des Montagnes (CUM) for processing.

Microbiological analysis

Bacterial isolation and identification

After seeding specimens on selective culture media (manitol salt agar), we incubated to 37 °C during 18–24 h. Isolation and identification of Staphylococcus aureus isolates were based on cultural characteristics, Gram staining, catalase test, coagulase test and DNase test after performing sub-culture on nutrient agar.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

The susceptibility testing of bacterial isolates against antibiotics was performed by the disk diffusion method (Kirby-Bauer method) on Mueller–Hinton agar according to standard procedures recommended by “Comité d’Antibiogramme de la Société Française de Microbiologie (CASFM 2019)” [14]. After sub-culture on nutrient agar (during 24 h at 37 °C) of a colony isolated on selective media (Manitol Salt Agar), pure culture bacteria obtained has been used to perform a suspension in 0.9% saline with density equal to 0.5 McFarland as recommended by CASFM 2019. The choice of antibiotics was based on those commonly used in the surgical department (after a survey among doctors in the health facilities) and according to the guidelines (CASFM 2019). A total of 10 antibiotics have been used: cefoxitin (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), gentamicin (15 μg), norfloxacin (5 μg), penicillin G (10 μg), oxacillin (1 μg), erythromycin (15 μg), clindamycin (2 μg), fusidic acid (10 μg) and co-trimoxazole (1.25/23.75 μg). Interpretations of antibiotic susceptibility results were performed according to the guidelines (CASFM 2019). Reference strains Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 were used for quality control.

Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Phenotypic methods based on susceptibility of oxacillin (1 µg) and cefoxitin (30 µg) had been used for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates. These were concurrently performed with susceptibility testing of each isolate. Reference strains S. aureus ATCC 700699 and ATCC 25923 were used as a positive and negative control, respectively.

Data analysis

The data collected in current investigation were recorded in Microsoft Excel 2016 software and analyzed with StatView5 software. Descriptive analysis were carried out on the study variables, which included computation of addition and frequencies. The chi-square test was used to compare the susceptibility profiles and frequency of methicillin-resistanct Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates obtained at admission and discharge. The analysis were performed using 95% as confidence interval and 5% as degree of significance.

Results

Characteristics of study participants

During this survey carried out from February to May 2019, 52 patients of chirurgical department were recruited. Age of the latter ranged from 5 to 79 years with a mean of 40.77 years. Days of hospitalization were between 3 and 22 with a mean of 7.58. Characteristics of participants were summarized and presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Participant’s characteristics
Full size table

From Table 1, it appears globally that men represented 3/4 of the participants, visceral surgery 3/4 of chirurgical types, β-lactams and nitro-5-imidazoles were the most antibiotics families administered with proportions approximately equal to 4/5 and macrolides were the least administered with 1/50.

Distribution of bacterial isolates

From admission to discharge, 104 samples were recorded. Analysis of these samples outcome that 110 Staphylococcus isolates were obtained (57 at admission and 53 at discharge). Distribution of Staphylococcus isolates is presented in Table 2.

Table 2 Distribution of Bacteria isolates
Full size table

Outcome illustrated in Table 2 show a variation between bacteria obtained at admission and those obtained at discharge. Indeed, isolate’s proportion of Staphylococcus aureus at discharge 25(47.17%) was greater than admission 16(28.07%).

Antibiotic susceptibility profiles

The susceptibility profile of bacteria isolated at admission and discharge were huddled in Table 3.

Table 3 Antibiotic susceptibility profiles of bacteria isolated
Full size table

Overall, Table 3 highlights that resistance rates obtained at discharge were higher than those obtained at admission. Significant and insignificant differences between the susceptibility profiles of isolates obtained at admission and discharge were observed.

Significant differences (p < 0.0001) were observed for β-lactams: cefoxitin, oxacillin and penicillin G in favour of a higher proportion of resistance to these antibiotics at discharge than at admission, resulting in resistance proportions respectively 4 times, 3 times and 2 times higher at discharge. In contrast, insignificant differences were mainly observed for fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin with p = 0.0624, p = 0.0749 respectively) and cotrimoxazole (p = 0.9878).

Nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

A systematic screening of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was performed during the interpretive reading of the antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Overall 07 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates were obtained at admission versus 16 at discharge. Nasal-carriage distribution of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by patients are presented in Table 4.

Table 4 Nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Full size table

From Table 4, it appears that the proportion of nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at discharge 16(30.77%) was significantly higher than at admission 07(13.46%) with Chi-2 = 4.52 and p = 0.0335.

Discussion

The aim of this work, conducted between February and May 2019, was to evaluate the impact of hospitalization on colonization by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among patients interned in the surgical department of a few health facilities in Ndé division.

The majority of patients were male (3/4). This could be justified by the fact that they are the most regularly involved in hazardous activities, requiring great physical effort and therefore more frequently victims of accidents of all kinds. These activities expose them to accidents that can only be remedied by invasive acts such as surgery. This view is shared by the proportion of visceral interventions for hernias. Other causes that are not clear from this work but which are most probably at the origin of internalizations in surgical departments include road accidents and those associated with other high-risk professions.

Data analysis indicated that more than 80% of the most commonly administered antibiotics to patients were nitro-5-imidazoles and β-lactams. Several reasons could explain this rate of use: 1. these antibiotics have a wide spectrum of action on several bacterial types, have good tissue diffusion and are the most available and accessible in hospital pharmacies; 2. the less frequent adverse reactions (toxicity) to their administration encourage their choice in the management of patients during prophylaxis and anti-infectious therapy [15, 16]. This development is further supported in the present work by the rates of use of other antibiotics (macrolide), which are certainly lower in relation to their relatively limited spectrum of Gram-positive bacteria and high toxicity [15].

Different frequencies were recorded for Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus at admission and discharge. 16 (28.07%) Staphylococcus aureus isolates were obtained at admission versus 25 (47.17%) at discharge. This result could be justified, at least in part, by a deselection of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus in favour of Staphylococcus aureus. But the mechanisms and conditions conducive to this selection are far from being clarified in the present work.

From the study of susceptibility profiles of isolates to the antibiotics used and more specifically to methicillin (highlighted in the present work using oxacillin and cefoxitin), it appears that resistance rates recorded at discharge were higher than those observed at admission. Indeed, proportion of nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at discharge 16 (30.77%) was significantly higher than at admission 07(13.46%) with p = 0.0335. This result could be justified by the mobility of genetic factors, favoured both by the selection pressure imposed by broad spectrum antibacterial agents and the flexibility of the bacterial genome. These same factors could explain the multiple resistances regularly reported [9, 10] in accordance with the results of this study [9, 10, 12, 17,18,19,20].

Between admission and discharge, significant differences (p < 0.0001) concerning susceptibility profiles had been observed for antibiotics belonging to the β-lactams family (cefoxitin, oxacillin and penicillin G). This significant difference was in favour of a 4 times, 3 times and 2 times respectively higher resistance at discharge. This result could be justified by the direct effect of the use of antibiotics belonging to the β-lactams family (most commonly used antibiotics) in the selection and expression of resistance genes such as the mec A gene, which codes for methicillin resistance and induces resistance to practically all antibiotics in the β-lactams family. [1, 20,21,22,23].

These resistances are an alert as to the difficulty that would exist in managing a resistant infection and the need to use an antibiotic susceptibility test for therapeutic choice (personalization of management) with the antibiotics available and accessible in the target hospital settings in this work.

This result could be justified at least in part by a flaw in the respect of hygiene rules and the importance of the selection and dissemination of multi-resistant bacteria in the hospital environment.

Emergence and dissemination of bacteria resistant to antibiotics in hospitals as demonstrated in this investigation is an indirect indicator of the increasing additional cost to the patient. Given the standard of living and purchasing power, this evolution of resistance would be seen as a factor aggravating poverty through prolonged hospital stay and the cost of care. Taking into account the susceptibility profile at the patient's entry could be a major asset for drug management using antibiotics.

Conclusion

At the end of our investigation, the aim was to evaluate the impact of hospitalization on colonization by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among patients interned in the surgical department of 03 care settings in the Ndé division. From this, it appears that the rates of antibiotic resistance of Staphylococcus isolates obtained at discharge were globally higher (mainly with regard to antibiotics belonging to the β-lactams family, the most used family) than those obtained at admission and that colonization by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus was more important at discharge than at admission. Thus, this work must be considered as an alarm bell with regard to the emergence and spread of resistant bacteria in Ndé division in hospital and hospitals to the community. As a result, further investigations to find the factors that promote this phenomenon should be carried out.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

ATCC:

American Type Culture Collection

CASFM:

Comité de l’Antibiogramme de la Société Française de Microbiologie

Chi-2 :

Chi-square test

MRSA:

Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

References

  1. Willems RJL, Hanage WP, Bessen DE, Feil EJ. Population biology of Gram-positive pathogens: high-risk clones for dissemination of antibiotic resistance. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2011;35(5):872–900.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kamga HG, Tchuedji YLGN, Mbamyah EL, Djiraibe J, Betbeui AC, Noubom M, et al. Nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in intensive care units of two university hospitals in Cameroon. Microbiol Res J Int. 2020;30(4):26–33.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Moellering JRC. MRSA: the first half century. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67(1):4–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Adel EM, Kawtar Z, Loubna AS, Ahmed TO, Mustapha B. The clinical and epidemiological risk factors of infections due to multi-drug resistant bacteria in an adult intensive care unit of University Hospital Center in Marrakesh-Morocco. J Infect Public Health. 2019;1876(0341):1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barcudi D, Sosa EJ, Lamberghini R, Garnero A, Tosoroni D, Decca L, et al. MRSA dynamic circulation between the community and the hospital setting: New insights from a cohort study. J Infect. 2019;163(4453):1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Senok A, Somily AM, Nassar R, Garaween G, Sing GK, Müller E, et al. Emergence of novel methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains in a tertiary care facility in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Infect Drug Resist. 2019;12(1):2739–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Toner E, Adalja A, Gronvall GK, Cicero A, Inglesby TV. Antimicrobial resistance is a global health emergency. Heal Secur. 2015;13(3):153–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Queenan K, Häsler B, Rushton J. A one health approach to antimicrobial resistance surveillance: is there a business case for it? Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2016;48(4):422–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Louokdom JS, Kwetche PRF, Kouamouo J, Kengne AL, Gamwo DS, Tchoukoua SH, et al. High antibiotic resistance in Bacteria from a healthcare setting: case in the surgery department of the regional Hospital of Bafoussam, West-Cameroon. J Chem Biol Phys Sci. 2016;6(4):1297–307.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Noumi DPN, Kwetche PRF, Kouamouo J, Louokdom JS, Gamwo DS, Kengne TAL, et al. Bacillus spp. and Staphylococcus spp.: potential reservoirs of resistance traits in a healthcare facility? J Chem Bio Phy Sci. 2017;7(1):37–48.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tchoukoua SH, Fotsing KPR, Njonga TF, Gamwo DS, Nankam NWL, Yawat DAM, et al. Observance of guilinses todepartment mitigating the risk of hospital acquired infections in a university teaching hospital: preliminary findings from a pilot study todepartment healthcare quality improvement. World J Adv Healthc Res. 2018;2(4):204–12.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ngassam RFT, Tantse M, Kwetche PRF, Noumi DPN, Kouamouo J, Louokdom JS, et al. Multicenter study on antibiotic susceptibility/resistance trends in the western region of Cameroon. Int J Biol Chem Sci. 2017;11(1):131–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fotsing KPR, Nankam NWL, Christelle DN, Yawat DAM, Gamwo DS, Louokdom JS, et al. Specimens and gram-negative bacteria etiologies of infectious diseases in a semi-urban area in West-Cameroon : a twelve-month rundown of infection screening in the medical school teaching hospital. World J Pharm Life Sci. 2018;4(2):188–94.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Comité de L’Antibiogramme de la Société Française de Microbiologie. Recommandations. Paris: Société Française de Microbiologie; 2019.

  15. Courvalin P, Leclercq R. Antibiogramme, 3e éd. Paris : Editions Eska; 2012.

  16. Ahoyo AT, Baba-Moussa L, Anago AE, Avogbe P, Missihoun TD, Loko F, et al. Incidence d’infections liées à Escherichia coli producteur de bêta lactamase à spectre élargi au Centre hospitalier départemental du Zou et Collines au Bénin. Med Mal Infect. 2007;37(11):746–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Andremont A. Commensal flora may play key role in spreading antibiotic resistance. ASM News. 2003;69(12):601–7.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chouikha I, Charrier L, Filali S, Derbise A, Carniel E. Insights into the infective properties of YpfΦ, the Yersinia pestis filamentous phage. Virology. 2010;407(1):43–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Martínez JL, Baquero F. Emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance: setting a parameter space. Ups J Med Sci. 2014;119(2):68–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tchapdie NRF, Tantse M, Fotsing KPR, Noukele NDP, Kouamouo J, Simo LJ, et al. Multicenter study on antibiotic susceptibility/resistance trends in the western region of Cameroon. Int J Biol Chem Sci. 2017;11(1):131–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rice LB. Antimicrobial resistance in gram-positive bacteria. Am J Infect Control. 2006;34(5):11–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hamdad F, Donda F, Laurans G, Canarelli B, Rousseau F, Biendo M, et al. Performances des différentes méthodes de détection de la résistance à l’oxacilline de souches atypiques de Staphylococcus aureus. Pathol Biol. 2006;2006(54):447–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Huang SS, Datta R, Platt R. Risk of acquiring antibiotic-resistant bacteria from prior room occupants. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(18):1945–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Serge Maturin Lelorel Nguekap and Joseph Kwoamou Sebdja for the invaluable support provided along this survey. “They are also highly indebted to the Association pour l’Education et le Développement” (AED) for the literature resources and laboratory equipments.

Funding

The authors declare that they did not receive any funding or grants to support their research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Medical Biology, Higher Institute of Health Sciences, Université Des Montagnes, Bangangté, Cameroon

    William Lelorel Nguekap Nankam, Pierre René Fotsing Kwetche, Gildas Boris Tazemda-Kuitsouc & Golda Joyce Djeutsa Chouna

  2. Laboratory of Microbiology, Université Des Montagnes Teaching Hospital, Bangangté, Cameroon

    William Lelorel Nguekap Nankam, Pierre René Fotsing Kwetche & Golda Joyce Djeutsa Chouna

  3. School of Pharmacy, Higher Institute of Health Sciences, Université Des Montagnes, Bangangté, Cameroon

    Pierre René Fotsing Kwetche & Jean Michel Tekam

  4. School of Human Medicine, Higher Institute of Health Sciences, Université Des Montagnes, Bangangté, Cameroon

    Pierre René Fotsing Kwetche & Gildas Boris Tazemda-Kuitsouc

  5. Réseau Des Hygiénistes du Cameroun, Bangangté, Cameroon

    Gildas Boris Tazemda-Kuitsouc

Authors
  1. William Lelorel Nguekap Nankam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pierre René Fotsing Kwetche
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gildas Boris Tazemda-Kuitsouc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Golda Joyce Djeutsa Chouna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jean Michel Tekam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors were involved in study design, data collection, analysis and interpretation of the data, as well manuscript writing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William Lelorel Nguekap Nankam.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Institutional Committee of Ethics of Université des Montagnes under reference number: Ref: 2019/236/UdM/PR/CIE. The authorizations of the health facilities directors were also obtained with informed written and signed consent was obtained from study participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nankam, W.L.N., Kwetche, P.R.F., Tazemda-Kuitsouc, G.B. et al. Hospitalization and colonization by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the surgical department of 03 health facilities in the Ndé division, West-Cameroon. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 20, 48 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12941-021-00451-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12941-021-00451-w

Keywords

  • Hospitalization
  • Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus
  • Surgical patients

Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials

ISSN: 1476-0711

Contact us