Skip to main content
Download PDF

Predominance of international clone 2 multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates in Thailand: a nationwide study

Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials volume 20, Article number: 19 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Acinetobacter baumannii has emerged as one of the common multidrug resistance pathogens causing hospital-acquired infections. This study was conducted to elucidate the distribution of antimicrobial resistance genes in the bacterial population in Thailand. Multidrug-resistant A. baumannii (MDR A. baumannii) isolates were characterized phenotypically, and the molecular epidemiology of clinical isolates in 11 tertiary hospitals was investigated at a country-wide level.

Methods

A total of 135 nonrepetitive MDR A. baumannii isolates collected from tertiary care hospitals across 5 regions of Thailand were examined for antibiotic susceptibility, resistance genes, and sequence types. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) was performed to characterize the spread of regional lineages.

Results

ST2 belonging to IC2 was the most dominant sequence type in Thailand (65.19%), and to a lesser extent, there was also evidence of the spread of ST164 (10.37%), ST129 (3.70%), ST16 (2.96%), ST98 (2.96%), ST25 (2.96%), ST215 (2.22%), ST338 (1.48%), and ST745 (1.48%). The novel sequence types ST1551, ST1552, ST1553, and ST1557 were also identified in this study. Among these, the blaoxa-23 gene was by far the most widespread in MDR A. baumannii, while the blaoxa-24/40 and blaoxa-58 genes appeared to be less dominant in this region. The results demonstrated that the predominant class D carbapenemase was blaOXA-23, followed by the class B carbapenemase blaNDM-like, while the mcr-1 gene was not observed in any isolate. Most of the MDR A. baumannii isolates were resistant to ceftazidime (99.23%), gentamicin (91.85%), amikacin (82.96%), and ciprofloxacin (97.78%), while all of them were resistant to carbapenems. The results suggested that colistin could still be effective against MDR A. baumannii in this region.

Conclusion

This is the first molecular epidemiological analysis of MDR A. baumannii clinical isolates at the national level in Thailand to date. Studies on the clonal relatedness of MDR A. baumannii isolates could generate useful data to understand the local epidemiology and international comparisons of nosocomial outbreaks.

Background

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has emerged as a silent health threat over the last two decades. It has been estimated that AMR could be the major cause of mortality worldwide by 2050 [1]. Among antimicrobial-resistant bacteria, Acinetobacter baumannii is a prominent member of the notorious “ESKAPE” group of pathogens, along with Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter species [2]. The most common infections caused by A. baumannii are related to nosocomial infections, including ventilation-associated pneumonia, skin and soft tissue infections, and bloodstream infections [3, 4]. This organism is well known for its remarkable ability to resist almost all available antibiotics due to its capability of adapting and acquiring resistance genes. Moreover, A. baumannii is frequently found to be resistant to a class of last-resort antibiotics, carbapenems, and these strains are known as carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAB). Colistin, an alternative antibiotic, has shown some promising activity against resistant A. baumannii. Unfortunately, an increase in the colistin resistance rate has been reported worldwide, along with reports on multidrug-resistant (MDR) and pandrug-resistant (PDR) A. baumannii [5]. In Thailand, A. baumannii was described as strongly associated with multidrug or carbapenem resistance and has caused nosocomial outbreaks. The presence of MDR A. baumannii has been reported in all regions of Thailand since 2000 [6]. According to the annual national antibiogram report 2019, the National Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Center, Thailand (NARST), A. baumannii complex isolates showed less than 50% susceptibility rates with almost all the currently used antibiotics except colistin [7]. In addition, PDR A. baumannii has emerged in regional hospitals in Thailand [8,9,10].

Molecular techniques have been applied to monitor the epidemiology and evolution of drug-resistant bacteria. Popular techniques include whole-genome sequencing (WGS), multilocus sequence typing (MLST), and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) [5]. PFGE is recognized as the standard method even in this era of sequence-based methods, while WGS is the best method that can provide much information. However, both WGS and PFGE are quite laborious and require specific equipment that is available in only some laboratories. Therefore, MLST is now widely referred to as an additional tool for global epidemiological research that allows the recognition of epidemics and virulence of A. baumannii clones and the monitoring of their spread at both the national and international levels. The molecular epidemiology of A. baumannii has been extensively studied in outbreaks of infection in many countries worldwide. However, little is known about the clonality and genetic relatedness of MDR A. baumannii isolates in Thailand. There were some sporadic reports that focused on a few hospitals in the region. To date, two systemic MLST schemes, namely, the Oxford scheme developed by Bartual et al. and the alternative Pasteur MLST scheme, are now well recognized and acknowledged [11, 12]. These two schemes compare seven housekeeping genes and have three genes in common, namely, cpn60, gltA, and recA. Gaiarsa et al. compared those two schemes and proposed that the Pasteur scheme was more appropriate for population biology and epidemiology studies of A. baumannii and related species [13]. Therefore, the Pasteur MLST scheme was referenced in the present study to elucidate the epidemiology of MDR A. baumannii in a nationwide study across Thailand. Moreover, the antimicrobial resistance profiles contributing to drugs frequently used in Thailand for MDR A. baumannii infections were phenotypically and genetically characterized.

Materials and methods

Bacterial collection

A. baumannii clinical isolates were collected during 2016–2017 from 11 hospitals in 5 regions of Thailand, including the capital city, central region, northern region, southern region, and northeastern region. Bacteria were preliminarily identified as the genus Acinetobacter by microbiological and biochemical methods. All the isolates were genotypically confirmed as A. baumannii by the presence of the blaoxa-51-like gene [14]. The antibiotic susceptibility profiles of A. baumannii in this study were determined by the broth microdilution method according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines [15]. MDR A. baumannii in this study was defined as nonsusceptible to at least 1 agent in at least 3 antimicrobial categories, including aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, carbapenems, cephalosporins, folate pathway inhibitors, penicillins, beta-lactamase inhibitors, tetracyclines, and polymyxins [16]. The samples were stored as glycerol stocks at -80 °C until use.

Detection of antibiotic resistance genes

The specific primers and PCR conditions for ndm-type and blaOXA-type carbapenemase detection were used as previously published (Table 1) [17, 18]. E. coli ATCC BAA 2469 was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection, USA, and used as a positive control for ndm-type carbapenemase. The blaoxa-51-like gene, an intrinsic enzyme marker, was used as a marker for the identification of A. baumannii according to the study by [14].

Table 1 Listed of primers used in this study
Full size table

The mcr-1 gene from the PubMed database was used as a template to design a set of primers (Table 1). Total genomic DNA of MDR A. baumannii was used as a template for the PCR (10 × buffer, 0.2 mM dNTPs, 1 U of DNA polymerase, 0.2 mM each primer, and 2 mM MgCl2). The PCR conditions were as follows: 3 min of initial denaturation at 95 °C, followed by 30 cycles of 30 s of denaturation at 95 °C, 30 s of annealing at 61 °C, and 30 s of elongation at 72 °C and a final elongation at 72 °C for 5 min. The PCR products were analyzed by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis, dyed with ethidium bromide and visualized under a UV transilluminator. E. coli NCTC 13846 was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection, USA, and used as a positive control.

Multilocus sequence typing (MLST)

All MDR A. baumannii isolates was identified by MLST as described by Diancourt et al. [12]. The MLST profiles were analyzed by using the MLST Pasteur scheme (https://pubmlst.org/abaumannii/). Briefly, total genomic DNA of MDR A. baumannii was extracted by the Gentra Puregene Yeast/Bact. Kit (Qiagen, Germany). Seven housekeeping genes (cpn60, fusA, gltA, pyrG, recA, rplB and rpoD) were amplified by PCR with the recommended conditions and primers (Table 1) using a T100 Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad, USA). PCR products were sequenced by Bio Basic Inc., Singapore. All DNA sequences were searched for exactly matched locus numbers. Sequence types (STs) were determined by combination of each locus number of each gene.

A new allele number was assigned when the gene was not exactly matched with the existing locus number. PCR products of new loci were amplified and submitted for sequencing to confirm the sequence. New STs were assigned when no STs existed for the combination of all exactly matched loci. All the new alleles and STs information is available at https://pubmlst.org/organisms/ acinetobacter-baumannii [19].

Clonal complex analysis using GOeBURST

All STs of MDR A. baumannii isolates were further analyzed for the clonal complex using Phyloviz 2.0. The program is available at http://www.phyloviz.net/ [20]. A group of STs sharing at least five alleles (DLVs) were allocated to the same clonal complex. All STs in this study were analyzed for MLST relevance with full MSTs.

Results

Antimicrobial resistance pattern of MDR A. baumannii clinical isolates

A total of 135 nonrepetitive isolates were collected and confirmed to be MDR A. baumannii by phenotypic and genotypic methods. The vast majority (109/135, 80.74%) of the isolates were recovered from sputa. The remaining isolates were from pus (14/135, 10.37%), urine (7/135, 5.19%), tissue (3/135, 2.22%), and respiratory tract secretions (2/135, 1.48%) (Fig. 1a). The Acinetobacter isolates were phenotypically identified by microbiological and biochemical methods. The molecular detection of the blaoxa-51-like gene revealed a 353-bp band in all clinical isolates, which preliminarily confirmed the identity of the clinical isolates as A. baumannii. All clinical isolates were subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing with the drugs currently used for A. baumannii treatment. Most of the clinical isolates were resistant to ceftazidime (134/135, 99.23%), gentamicin (124/135, 91.85%), amikacin (112/135, 82.96%), ciprofloxacin (132/135, 97.78%), or colistin (20/135, 14.81%), while all the isolates were resistant to carbapenems (imipenem, meropenem, and doripenem). Interestingly, all the isolates showed high resistance to all three carbapenem antibiotics, except two isolates that were still susceptible to both imipenem and meropenem. Notably, 17 out of 135 isolates were resistant to all eight tested antibiotics (Fig. 1b).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Antimicrobial resistance profile of MDR A. baumannii. a Sources of specimen. b Antibiotic resistance rates. IMP imipenem, MEM meropenem, DOR doripenem, CTZ ceftazidime, GEN gentamicin, AMK amikacin, CIP ciprofloxacin, COL colistin

Full size image

Occurrence of antimicrobial resistance genes in MDR A. baumannii

One of the most important carbapenem resistance mechanisms is the production of class D β-lactamases (e.g., oxacillinase; OXA). This study demonstrated that a majority of the class D β-lactamases among MDR A. baumannii isolates in Thailand were blaoxa-23-like (125/135, 92.59%), followed by blaoxa-24-like (20/135, 14.81%), and only two isolates carried the blaoxa-58-like gene (1.48%). Notably, MDR A. baumannii isolates carrying blaoxa-24-like or blaoxa-58-like genes also carried the blaoxa-23-like gene, indicating the presence of three OXA carbapenemase-encoding genes (including the intrinsic blaoxa-51-like gene) in these isolates, while A. baumannii ATCC 19606, a standard control strain, exhibited only the intrinsic blaoxa-51-like gene (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Occurrence of antimicrobial resistance genes among MDR A. baumannii. The graphical chart represents the number of antimicrobial genes detected by PCR among all clinical isolates. The majority of class D β-lactamases was blaOXA-23 followed by blaOXA-24 and blaOXA-58 carbapenemases. Some isolates also carry blaNDM-type carbapenemases. The overlapped circle represents double or triple existence of the genes

Full size image

In addition, 6 isolates of MDR A. baumannii were found to harbor NDM-type carbapenemases collected from two distinct regional hospitals. With an occurrence rate of 4.44%, the data revealed the limited spread of ndm-harboring A. baumannii isolates in Thailand. Further investigation was performed because colistin is one of the most commonly used drugs in Thailand. Fortunately, the mcr-1 gene was not detected in any MDR A. baumannii isolates in this study. Although colistin resistance phenotypically appeared in some isolates (14.07%), no association with the genotypic presence of the mcr gene was identified.

MLST profile analysis

In the present study, extensive efforts were made to genetically characterize MDR A. baumannii for epidemiological investigation in Thailand. According to the Pasteur MLST scheme, the ST2 or International clone 2 was identified as a dominant clone, with 65.19% (88/135) abundance in this region (Fig. 3a). Another major clone was ST164 (14/135, 10.37%), and other recognized clones were ST129 (5/135, 3.70%), ST16 (4/135, 2.96%), ST98 (4/135, 2.96%), ST25 (4/135, 2.96%), ST215 (3/135, 2.22%), ST338 (2/135, 1.48%), and ST745 (2/135, 1.48%). The remaining five genotypes (e.g., ST768, ST126, ST1160, ST1250, and ST1253) were also identified. Moreover, four new STs of A. baumannii, namely, ST1551 (ID5087; MTC0480), ST1552 (ID5088; MTC0904), ST1553 (ID5089; MTC0146) and ST1557 (ID 5104; MTC0709), were discovered in this study. Notably, an MDR A. baumannii isolate belonging to ST1553 carried the new allele of the fusA gene, which was identified and assigned a new locus number. The newly discovered STs have been deposited in the Acinetobacter MLST database.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Multi locus sequence typing population analysis. a Graph summary of STs in Thailand. b The sequence type distribution in each regions of Thailand

Full size image

Further analysis of the geographic distribution demonstrated different patterns of genetic variants by region (Fig. 3b). ST2 was found to be a dominant clone in all regions of Thailand with varied distribution percentages. The highest percentage of ST2 (80.56%) was observed in the northern region. There were some variations in the ST clones with the second highest percentages between regions. ST129 was ranked second in the capital city, while ST25 and ST215 were ranked second in the northern and southern regions, respectively. In the central and northeastern regions, the second most distributed ST clone was ST164.

eBURST analysis was performed to assign each ST to the respective clonal complex. The majority of the isolates exhibited a relatively close evolutionary relationship in the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 4). Only one major clonal complex belonging to clonal complex 2 (CC2) was highly prevalent in Thailand. There was no evidence of CC1 being present in this region.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Clonal complex analysis by eBURST. a The eBURST analysis showing clonal complexes of MDR A. baumannii. Each square signifies the sequence type. The size of each square represents number of isolates, with larger sizes corresponding to higher frequency of occurrence. b Relationships among the STs found in this study. Each square signifies to one sequence type. Square size increases correspondingly to the number of isolates of each ST. Each line indicates that the connected squares share the similar alleles. Distance between squares and the numbers are related to the number of allelic mismatches among the corresponding STs

Full size image

Discussion

A. baumannii is one of the most common emerging nosocomial pathogens, causing significant concern globally. Generally, carbapenems, with the exception of ertapenem, have been the drug of choice for the empirical therapy of A. baumannii infections [21]. However, the emergence of CRAB and MDR A. baumannii at high frequency in many intensive care units has led to therapeutic failure. Although there is no optimal regimen for elimination of highly resistant A. baumannii, colistin is currently recommended for the treatment of serious infections. Other drugs, such as tigecycline and sulbactam, have been reported, but combination therapy is preferable [22]. In this study, all MDR A. baumannii isolates were highly resistant to almost all the tested drugs widely used in this region except colistin. The results suggested that colistin could still be used effectively to treat MDR A. baumannii infections in Thailand. This study will also raise awareness regarding the monitoring of antibiotic usage with limited resources.

To date, the emergence of carbapenem resistance among MDR A. baumannii has been progressively increasing globally. It was clearly demonstrated in this study that the rate of resistance to carbapenems, including imipenem, meropenem, and doripenem, was extremely high (> 90%) among MDR A. baumannii. One of the most important carbapenem resistance mechanisms is the production of class D β-lactamases (oxacillinase; OXA). This group of enzymes can hydrolyze oxacillin and third-generation cephalosporins but possesses weak activity against carbapenems [23]. This study demonstrated that the presence of the blaoxa-23 gene was closely correlated with carbapenem resistance, and this gene was predominantly carried in MDR A. baumannii isolates. Of these genes, the blaoxa-23 gene was by far the most widespread in MDR A. baumannii, while the blaoxa-24/40 and blaoxa-58 genes appeared to be less dominant in this region. The prevalence of the blaoxa-23-like gene was found to be relatively high worldwide [5, 24, 25]. Thirapanmethee et al. also reported that the OXA-23-like gene was the most common carbapenemase gene among CRAB clinical isolates in Thailand (68.31%) [26]. In addition, many new enzyme variants of OXA-24/40-like carbapenemases have been reported, including OXA-72. In fact, the blaoxa-72 gene was first identified in an A. baumannii isolate from Thailand in 2004. Since then, this variant has disseminated in healthcare settings and environments around the world, especially Asia and Southeast Europe, which could be of interest for further investigation [27,28,29,30].

Gram-negative pathogens carrying NDM-type beta-lactamases have been discovered worldwide, with high occurrence in India and China [31]. The presence of blaNDM-1 demonstrates a pattern of resistance to all beta-lactam agents except monobactams. In Thailand, NDM-type carbapenemase was first detected in Gram-negative pathogens in 2012 [32]. A. baumannii carrying NDM-type carbapenemase was later identified in 2018 from the 2013–2014 specimen collection [33]. In the present study, only 4.44% of MDR A. baumannii isolates were found to harbor ndm-type carbapenemases, and these isolates were collected from two distinct regional hospitals, indicating the limited distribution of this gene type in Thailand.

Colistin is an antibiotic that is highly recommended for use against drug-resistant bacteria. Mobile colistin resistance (MCR-1) was discovered in Escherichia coli in 2015 [34]. Since then, many mcr gene families (mcr-1, -2, -3, -4, -5, -6, -7, -8, -9) have been sporadically reported in Gram-negative bacteria [34,35,36,37,38]. This gene family was also recognized as the latest threat in the antibiotic era since the mcr gene was found on transferable plasmids. Fortunately, the mcr-1 gene was not detected in any MDR A. baumannii isolates in this study. Although colistin resistance phenotypically appeared in some isolates (14.07%), no association with the genotypic presence of the mcr gene was identified. This could be explained by other colistin resistance mechanisms reported in MDR A. baumannii, namely, loss of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) production and mutation of the PmrAB system [39].

To date, a total of 1395 STs have been submitted to the Acinetobacter MLST database [40]. In the present study, extensive efforts were made to genetically characterize MDR A. baumannii by MLST analysis for epidemiological investigation in Thailand. MLST has been extensively utilized for genotyping bacteria and allows this genetic information to be placed in a global context. According to the Pasteur MLST scheme, the ST2 or International clone 2 was found to be a dominant clone in all regions of Thailand. A total of 18 ST genotypes played a crucial role in nosocomial infection and spread in Thailand. Moreover, four new STs of A. baumannii (ST1551, ST1552, ST1553, and ST1557) were discovered in this study. ST2 has circulated intensively in the rest of the world, including Thailand, as indicated in this study [41, 42]. ST164, ST129, ST25, and ST215 were the common STs in our local settings, as each of them was found in different regions of Thailand. In 2006, a single ST2 isolate obtained from patients hospitalized in intensive care units in Thailand was identified [25]. According to the Acinetobacter MLST database, some Thai ST2 clones and an ST215 A. baumannii clone have been present in the database since 2010, indicating local distribution over time [36]. Our previous work demonstrated that most carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates (CRAB) in Thailand were ST2 clones, but some belonged to ST25, ST98, ST129, ST164, ST215, ST338, and ST745 [26]. In Asia, ST2 has been reported as the most prevalent sequence type of CRAB in China and Lebanon [24, 43, 44]. Sequence typing of A. baumannii distributed in Thailand was conducted in a study of 23 samples from a single hospital setting using the Oxford MLST scheme [45]. It was reported that ST195, which belongs to the clonal cluster of IC2, was the dominant clone, followed by ST542. In 2013, the Asian Network for Surveillance of Resistant Pathogens (ANSORP) surveillance study, which randomly selected 30 Thai hospital-associated pneumonia isolates, revealed a high prevalence of ST195, along with some amounts of ST92, ST346, ST88, ST365, ST395, ST208, ST398, and ST399 [46]. However, our study focused on the clonal relatedness of MDR A. baumannii using the Pasteur MLST scheme. ST2 classified in IC2 was identified as a dominant clone among MDR A. baumannii. Other major clones were incomparable with the previous study since the difference scheme of MLST was assigned.

eBURST analysis was used to analyze the MLST data to determine the evolutionary relationships among the isolates. According to the eBURST analysis, most MDR A. baumannii isolates belonged to major clonal complex 2 (CC2), indicating a single dominant lineage in Thailand. Although CC1 and CC2 have been identified as the key clonal lineages globally, no isolates belonging to CC1 were detected in this study. CC2 was by far the most abundant A. baumannii clone, with a broad international distribution over many continents [26, 47,48,49,50]. CC2 in the Pasteur scheme corresponds to CC92 in the Oxford scheme and international clone II, as previously identified [42]. The majority of MDR A. baumannii clones in Thailand belonged to the dominant clonal complex 2, which was similar to the results for other neighboring countries in this region. Tada et al. suggested that ST2 MDR A. baumannii isolates were mainly spreading in medical settings in Myanmar [48]. In Malaysia, most of the isolates were grouped under CC92 in the Oxford scheme comparable to CC2 in the Pasteur scheme [51]. Schultz et al. reported that the majority of the CRAB isolates causing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in Vietnamese ICUs during 2009–2012 were oxa23-positive global clone GC2 [52].

Conclusion

In summary, our study reported the relative prevalence of MDR A. baumannii isolates that were genetically diverse, belonging to 18 distinct STs. The majority of the MLST genotyped isolates in this study fell into one of seven genotypes within a single clonal complex known as IC2. The predominance of IC2 in Thailand was consistent with the high distribution of this clone worldwide. Notably, four new MLST genotypes were discovered in Thailand. The predominant class D carbapenemase was blaOXA-23-like, followed by the class B carbapenemase blaNDM-like. Fortunately, none of the MDR A. baumannii isolates carried the mcr-1 gene. The present study population was unique and represented the nationwide characterized collection of MDR A. baumannii isolates in Thailand reported to date. The data provide knowledge for the evolutionary study and international comparisons of nosocomial outbreaks in the future (Additional file 1).

Abbreviations

AMR:

Antimicrobial resistance

WGS:

Whole genome sequencing

MLST:

Multilocus sequence typing

PFGE:

Pulse field gel electrophoresis

IMP:

Imipenem

MER:

Meropenem

DOR:

Doripenem

CTZ:

Ceftazidime

GEN:

Gentamicin

AMK:

Amikacin

CIP:

Ciprofloxacin

COL:

Colistin

bla :

Beta-lactamase

NDM:

New delhi metallo-beta-lactamase

MCR:

Mobilized colistin resistance

OXA:

Oxacillinase

MDR:

Multidrug resistant

PDR:

Pan-drug resistant

CRAB:

Carbapenem resistant-Acinetobacter baumannii

ST:

Sequence type

IC:

International clone

CC:

Clonal complex

GC:

Global clone

References

  1. O'Neill J. Review on antimicrobial resistance: Tackling a crisis for the health and wealth of nations. London: Review on antimicrobial resistance. 2014. https://amr-review.org/sites/default/files/160518_Final%20paper_with%20cover.pdf

  2. Mulani MS, Kamble EE, Kumkar SN, Tawre MS, Pardesi KR. Emerging strategies to combat ESKAPE pathogens in the era of antimicrobial resistance: a review. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:539. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00539.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Tosi M, Roa E, De Biasi S, Munari E, Venturelli S, Coloretti I, Biagioni E, Cossarizza A, Girardis M. Multidrug resistant bacteria in critically ill patients: a step further antibiotic therapy. J Emerg Crit Care Med. 2018;2:103. https://doi.org/10.21037/jeccm.2018.11.08.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Moubareck CA, Halat DH. Insights into Acinetobacter baumannii: a review of microbiological, virulence, and resistance traits in a threatening nosocomial pathogen. Antibiotics (Basel). 2020;9(3):119. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9030119.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Peleg AY, Seifert H, Paterson DL. Acinetobacter baumannii: emergence of a successful pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2008;21(3):538–82. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00058-07.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Dejsirilert S, Tiengrim S, Sawanpanyalert P, Aswapokee N, Malathum K. Antimicrobial resistance of Acinetobacter baumannii: six years of National Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Thailand (NARST) surveillance. J Med Assoc Thai. 2009;92(Suppl4):S34–45 (PMID: 21294501).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. National Institute of Health, Department of Medical Sciences, Thailand. Antibiograms. National Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Center, Thailand (NARST). http://narst.dmsc.moph.go.th/antibiograms.html. Accessed 6 Jan 2021.

  8. Inchai J, Pothirat C, Bumroongkit C, Limsukon A, Khositsakulchai W, Liwsrisakun C. Prognostic factors associated with mortality of drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumanniiventilator-associated pneumonia. J Intensive Care. 2015;3:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-015-0077-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Apisarnthanarak A, Buppunharun W, Tiengrim S, Sawanpanyalert P, Aswapokee N. An overview of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns for gram-negative bacteria from the National Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Thailand (NARST) program from 2000 to 2005. J Med Assoc Thai. 2009;92(Suppl4):S91–4 (PMID: 21298849).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Apisarnthanarak A, Mundy LM. Mortality associated with Pandrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections in Thailand. Am J Infect Control. 2009;37(6):519–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2008.10.024.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bartual SG, Seifert H, Hippler C, Luzon MA, Wisplinghoff H, Rodriquez-Valera F. Development of a multilocus sequence typing scheme for characterization of clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:4382–90. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.43.9.4382-4390.2005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Diancourt L, Passet V, Nemec A, Dijkshoorn L, Brisse S. The population structure of Acinetobacter baumannii: expanding multiresistant clones from an ancestral susceptible genetic pool. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(4):e10034. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010034.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Gaiarsa S, Biffignandi GB, Esposito EP, Castelli M, Jolley KA, Brisse S, Sassera D, Zarrilli R. Comparative analysis of the two Acinetobacter baumannii multilocus sequence typing (MLST) schemes. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:930. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00930.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Turton JF, Woodford N, Glover J, Yarde S, Kaufmann ME, Pitt TL. Identification of Acinetobacter baumannii by detection of the blaOXA-51-like carbapenemase gene intrinsic to this species. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(8):2974–6. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01021-06.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 30th CLSI Document M100. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA; 2016

  16. Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, Carmeli Y, Falagas ME, Giske CG, Harbarth S, Hindler JF, Kahlmeter G, Olsson-Liljequist B, Paterson DL, Rice LB, Stelling J, Struelens MJ, Vatopoulos A, Weber JT, Monnet DL. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: An international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18(3):268–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03570.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Khuntayaporn P, Yamprayoonswat W, Yasawong M, Chomnawang MT. Dissemination of Carbapenem-Resistance among multidrug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa carrying metallo-beta-lactamase genes, including the novel blaIMP-65 gene in Thailand. Infect Chemother. 2019;51(2):107–18. https://doi.org/10.3947/ic.2019.51.2.107.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Poirel L, Walsh TR, Cuvillier V, Nordmann P. Multiplex PCR for detection of acquired carbapenemase genes. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011;70:119–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2010.12.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jolley KA, Bray JE, Maiden MCJ. Open-access bacterial population genomics: BIGSdb software, the PubMLST.org website and their applications. Wellcome Open Res. 2018;3:124. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14826.1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Francisco AP, Bugalho M, Ramirez M, Carriço JA. Global optimal eBURST analysis of multilocus typing data using a graphic matroid approach. BMC Bioinform. 2009;10:152. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-152.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Garnacho-Montero J, Dimopoulos G, Poulakou G, Akova M, Cisneros JM, Waele JD, Petrosillo N, Seifert H, Timsit JF, Vila J, Zahar JR, Bassetti M. Task force on management and prevention of Acinetobacter baumannii infections in the ICU. Intens Care Med. 2015;41:2057–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-015-4079-4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Weinberg SE, Villedieu A, Bagdasarian N, Karah N, Teare L, Elamin WF. Control and management of multidrug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: A review of the evidence and proposal of novel approaches. Infect Prev Pract. 2020;2(3):100077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infpip.2020.100077.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Lin MF, Lan CY. Antimicrobial resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii: from bench to bedside. World J Clin Cases. 2014;2:787–814. https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v2.i12.787.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhao Y, Hu K, Zhang J, Guo Y, Fan X, Wang Y, Mensah SD, Zhang X. Outbreak of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii carrying the carbapenemase OXA-23 in ICU of the eastern Heilongjiang Province. China BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19:452. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4073-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mugnier PD, Poirel L, Naas T, Nordmann P. Worldwide dissemination of the blaOXA-23 carbapenemase gene of Acinetobacter baumannii. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16:35–40. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1601.090852T.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Thirapanmethee K, Srisiri-a-nun T, Houngsaitong J, Montakantikul P, Khuntayaporn P, Chomnawang MT. Prevalence of OXA-type β-lactamase genes among carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates in Thailand. Antibiotics (Basel). 2020;9:864. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9120864.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen Y, Yang Y, Liu L, Qiu G, Han X, Tian S, Zhao J, Chen F, Grundmann H, Li H, Sun J, Han L. High prevalence and clonal dissemination of OXA-72-producing Acinetobacter baumannii in a Chinese hospital: a cross sectional study. BMC Infect Dis. 2018;18:491. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-018-3359-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Goic-Barisic I, Kovacic A, Medic D, Jakovac S, Petrovic T, Tonkic M, Novak A, Rubic Z, Radic M, Milosavljević B, Hrenovic J. Endemicity of OXA-23 and OXA-72 in clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii from three neighbouring countries in Southeast Europe. J Appl Genet. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13353-021-00612-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dortet L, Bonnin RA, Bernabeu S, Escaut L, Vittecoq D, Girlich D, Imanci D, Fortineau N, Naas T. First occurrence of OXA-72-producing Acinetobacter baumannii in Serbia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60(10):5724–30. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01016-16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Tada T, Miyoshi-Akiyama T, Shimada K, Shimojima M, Kirikae T. Dissemination of 16S rRNA methylase ArmA-producing Acinetobacter baumannii and emergence of OXA-72 carbapenemase coproducers in Japan. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(5):2916–20. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01212-13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Dortet L, Poirel L, Nordmann P. Worldwide dissemination of the NDM-type carbapenemases in Gram-negative bacteria. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:249856. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/249856.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Rimrang B, Chanawong A, Lulitanond A, Wilailuckana C, Charoensri N, Sribenjalux P, Phumsrikaew W, Wonglakorn L, Kerdsin A, Chetchotisakd P. Emergence of NDM-1- and IMP-14a-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Thailand. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67(11):2626–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dks267.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Leungtongkam U, Thummeepak R, Wongprachan S, Thongsuk P, Kitti T, Ketwong K, Runcharoen C, Chantratita N, Sitthisak S. Dissemination of blaOXA-23, blaOXA-, blaOXA-58, and blaNDM-1 genes of Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from four tertiary hospitals in Thailand. Microb Drug Resist. 2018;24(1):55–62. https://doi.org/10.1089/mdr.2016.0248.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Liu YY, Wang Y, Walsh TR, Yi LX, Zhang R, Spencer J, Doi Y, Tian G, Dong B, Huang X, Yu LF, Gu D, Ren H, Chen X, Lu L, He D, Zhou H, Liang Z, Liu JH, Shen J. Emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mechanism MCR-1 in animals and human beings in China: a microbiological and molecular biological study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(2):161–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00424-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Xavier BB, Lammens C, Ruhal R, Kumar-Singh S, Butaye P, Goossens H, Malhotra-Kumar S. Identification of a novel plasmid-mediated colistin-resistance gene, mcr-2, in Escherichia coli, Belgium, June 2016. Euro Surveill. 2016;21:30280. https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2016.21.27.30280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Yin W, Li H, Shen Y, Liu Z, Wang S, Shen Z, Zhang R, Walsh TR, Shen J, Wang Y. Novel plasmid-mediated colistin resistance gene mcr-3 in Escherichia coli. MBio. 2017;8:e00543-e617. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00543-17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Borowiak M, Fischer J, Hammer JA, Hendriksen RS, Szabo I, Malorny B. Identification of a novel transposon-associated phosphoethanolamine transferase gene, mcr-5, conferring colistin resistance in d-tartrate fermenting Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Paratyphi B. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72:3317–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkx327.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wang X, Wang Y, Zhou Y, Li J, Yin W, Wang S, Zhang S, Shen J, Shen Z, Wang Y. Emergence of a novel mobile colistin resistance gene, mcr-8, in NDM-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2018;7:122. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41426-018-0124-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Cai Y, Chai D, Wang R, Liang B, Bai N. Colistin resistance of Acinetobacter baumannii: clinical reports, mechanisms and antimicrobial strategies. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67:1607–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dks084.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. The Public databases for molecular typing and microbial genome diversity (PubMLST). https://pubmlst.org/organisms/acinetobacter-baumannii. Accessed 6 Jan 2021.

  41. Karah N, Sundsfjord A, Towner K, Samuelsen O. Insights into the global molecular epidemiology of carbapenem non-susceptible clones of Acinetobacter baumannii. Drug Resist Updat. 2012;15:237–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drup.2012.06.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Dijkshoorn L, Aucken H, Gerner-Smidt P, Janssen P, Kaufmann ME, Garaizar J, Ursing J, Pitt TL. Comparison of outbreak and nonoutbreak Acinetobacter baumannii strains by genotypic and phenotypic methods. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34:1519–25. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.34.6.1519-1525.1996.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Nawfal Dagher T, Al-Bayssari C, Chabou S, Antar N, Diene SM, Azar E, Rolain JM. Investigation of multidrug-resistant ST2 Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from Saint George hospital in Lebanon. BMC Microbiol. 2019;19(1):29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-019-1401-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Chang Y, Luan G, Xu Y, Wang Y, Shen M, Zhang C, Zheng W, Huang J, Yang J, Jia X, Ling B. Characterization of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates in a Chinese teaching hospital. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:910. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00910.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Singkham-In U, Chatsuwan T. In vitro activities of carbapenems in combination with amikacin, colistin, or fosfomycin against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018;91(2):169–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2018.01.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Kim DH, Choi JY, Kim HW, Kim SH, Chung DR, Peck KR, Thamlikitkul V, So TM, Yasin RMD, Hsueh PR, Carlos CC, Hsu LY, Buntaran L, Lalitha MK, Song JH, Ko KS. Spread of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii global clone 2 in Asia and abaR-type resistance islands. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57(11):5239–46. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00633-13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Loraine J, Heinz E, Soontarach R, Blackwell GA, Stabler RA, Voravuthikunchai SP, Srimanote P, Kiratisin P, Thomson NR, Taylor PW. Genomic and phenotypic analyses of Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from three tertiary care hospitals in Thailand. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:548. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00548.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Tada T, Uchida H, Hishinuma T, Watanabe S, Tohya M, Kuwahara-Arai K, Mya S, Zan KN, Kirikae T, Tin HH. Molecular epidemiology of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from hospitals in Myanmar. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2020;22:122–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2020.02.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Villalón P, Ortega M, Sáez-Nieto JA, Carrasco G, Medina-Pascual MJ, Garrido N, Valdezate S. Dynamics of a sporadic nosocomial Acinetobacter calcoaceticus—Acinetobacter baumannii complex population. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:593. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00593.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Jiang M, Liu L, Ma Y, Zhang Z, Li N, Zhang F, Zhao S. Molecular epidemiology of multi-drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolated in Shandong. China Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1687. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01687.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Rao M, Rashid F, Shukor S, Hashim R, Ahmad N. Detection of antimicrobial resistance genes associated with carbapenem resistance from the whole-genome sequence of Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from Malaysia. Can J Infect Dis Med. 2020;2020:5021064. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5021064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Schultz MB, Pham Thanh D, Tran Do Hoan N, Wick RR, Ingle DJ, Hawkey J, Edwards DJ, Kenyon JJ, Phu Huong Lan N, Campbell JI, Thwaites G, Thi Khanh Nhu N, Hall RM, Fournier-Level A, Baker S, Holt KE. Repeated local emergence of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in a single hospital ward. Microb Genom. 2016;2:e000050. doi: https://doi.org/10.1099/mgen.0.000050.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank staffs in the Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University for technical support and suggestion on this work. The authors also thank all staffs at the hospital sites. Their support and collaboration are gratefully acknowledged.

Funding

This work was supported by the Thailand Research Fund [Grant number BRG6080004] and Mahidol University, Thailand.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, 447 Sri Ayudthya Rd, Rajathevi, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand

    Piyatip Khuntayaporn, Pohnvipa Kanathum, Krit Thirapanmethee & Mullika Traidej Chomnawang

  2. Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, 447 Sri Ayudthya Rd, Rajathevi, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand

    Jantana Houngsaitong & Preecha Montakantikul

Authors
  1. Piyatip Khuntayaporn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pohnvipa Kanathum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jantana Houngsaitong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Preecha Montakantikul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Krit Thirapanmethee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mullika Traidej Chomnawang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

PKh contributed to methodology, investigation, software and data curator, writing—original draft. PK contributed to methodology and investigation. PM and JH provided resources and data analysis. KT contributed to supervision, methodology, and investigation. MTC contributed to conceptualization, methodology, supervision, writing—review and editing, and funding acquisition.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mullika Traidej Chomnawang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Ethical Review Committee, Faculty of Dentistry and Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University (MU-DT/PY-IRB 2016/008.0404).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khuntayaporn, P., Kanathum, P., Houngsaitong, J. et al. Predominance of international clone 2 multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates in Thailand: a nationwide study. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 20, 19 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12941-021-00424-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12941-021-00424-z

Keywords

Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials

ISSN: 1476-0711

Contact us