Laboratory-based surveillance of current antimicrobial resistance patterns and trends among Staphylococcus aureus: 2005 status in the United States
© Styers et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
Received: 26 September 2005
Accepted: 09 February 2006
Published: 09 February 2006
The virulence, antimicrobial resistance, and prevalence of S. aureus underscores the need for up-to-date and extensive insights regarding antimicrobial susceptibility trends. One approach to meet this need is analysis of clinical laboratory – based surveillance data.
Data from The Surveillance Network-USA (TSN), an electronic surveillance network that collects microbiology data from 300 clinical microbiology laboratories across the United States, were used as the source for analysis that included prevalence of S. aureus in clinical specimens, MRSA and multi-drug resistance phenotype rates and trends according to patient location, geographic distributions, and specimen source.
S. aureus was the most prevalent species isolated from inpatient specimens (18.7% of all bacterial isolates) and the second most prevalent (14.7%) from outpatient specimens. In March 2005 MRSA rates were 59.2%, 55%, and 47.9% for strains from non-ICU inpatients, ICU, and outpatients, respectively. This trend was noted in all nine US Bureau of Census regions and multi-drug resistance phenotypes (resistance to ≥ 3 non-beta-lactams) was common among both inpatient MRSA (59.9%) and outpatient MRSA (40.8%). Greater than 90% of multi-drug resistant MRSA were susceptible to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, linezolid, and vancomycin.
Prevalence of MRSA among both inpatient and outpatient specimens continues to increase with multi-drug resistance as a common phenotype. Continued emergence of outpatient MRSA that exhibit multi-drug resistant phenotypes has important implications for developing and evolving outpatient treatment guidelines.
Staphylococcus aureus exhibits three problematic features that, taken together, are not found among most other clinically relevant bacteria. This species is capable of expressing a variety of virulence factors and thus is almost always considered medically relevant when encountered in clinical specimens; the organism continues to demonstrate the ability to develop and expand resistance to include a broad array of antimicrobial classes, and S. aureus is a prominent pathogen in both the hospital and the community settings [1, 2]. This combination of characteristics underscores the need to monitor and report S. aureus trends and patterns in a timely and thorough manner, especially with regard to antimicrobial susceptibility profiles and the clinical settings in which the organism is encountered.
To gain more extensive insights regarding recent antimicrobial trends among S. aureus, analysis of strain data obtained from geographically and demographically diverse patient populations in the United States is necessary. One approach that can provide key information in this regard involves the application of laboratory – based surveillance. Analysis of microbiology data generated in support of patient care by clinical laboratories across the United States has been used in the past to provide perspective on a variety of antimicrobial resistance trends among key bacterial pathogens [3–6]. Further, Fridkin et al  have reported that laboratory derived antimicrobial data can provide reliable perspectives on resistance rates among patients with hospital – acquired infections. Therefore, to help meet the need for current and broad-based information regarding S. aureus trends, data obtained through The Surveillance Network-USA (TSN) were analyzed for resistance trends overall and in both the inpatient and outpatient settings.
The Surveillance Network (TSN) was the data source used for this investigation and analysis. TSN is an electronic database of strain specific, qualitative and quantitative antimicrobial susceptibility test data reported by clinical laboratories in North America that has been used extensively in the past to evaluate various trends regarding antimicrobial susceptibility [3–6]. At the time of this analysis TSN contained more than 105 million susceptibility test results overall that were gathered from 300 USA hospitals distributed across the United States. In addition to antimicrobial susceptibility profiles other query parameters that may be used individually or in any combination for analysis of antimicrobial susceptibility data include organism identification, national and regional geography (i.e. the nine regions of the US Census Bureau), institution demographics (type, number of beds), patient demographics (age, gender, and location), and specimen source.
This study focused specifically on S. aureus and used TSN data collected from 1998 to March 2005. The overall prevalence of S. aureus isolated from inpatient and outpatient specimens was calculated by using all organism groups and species isolated from each patient group as the denominator. MRSA rates for the study period were examined overall and according to three patient location categories as designated by each laboratory's information system (outpatient, inpatient [non-ICU], and ICU). The outpatient designation indicates that the specimen submitted for culture was obtained from patients seen in an outpatient setting. For all patient locations three categories of clinical specimen source were analyzed and included lower respiratory tract, skin and soft tissue (included wounds), and blood. Multi-drug resistance for MRSA was defined as resistance to three or more agents among ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, clindamycin, gentamicin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, linezolid, and vancomycin. Only strains tested simultaneously against all of these agents were included in the multi-drug resistance analysis of prevalence and distribution of resistance phenotypes.
MRSA rates among inpatients and outpatients by specimen sourcea
Lower Respiratory Tract
Skin and Soft Tissue
Multi-drug resistance (MDR)a rates among MRSA from inpatients and outpatients by specimen sourceb
Lower Respiratory Tract
Skin and Soft Tissue
Distribution of resistance phenotypesa among inpatient and outpatient MRSAb
Susceptible to all other agents
Cipro, Eryth, Clinda
Cipro, Eryth, Gent
Cipro, Eryth, SXT
Cipro, Gent, SXT
Eryth, Clinda, Gent
Cipro, Clinda, Gent
Eryth, Clinda, SXT
Eryth, Gent, SXT
Cipro, Clinda, SXT
Cipro, Eryth, Lin
Cipro, Eryth, Clinda, Gent
Cipro, Eryth, Clinda, SXT
Cipro, Eryth, Gent, SXT
Eryth, Clinda, Gent, SXT
Cipro, Clinda, Gent, SXT
Cipro, Eryth, Clinda, Gent, SXT
The most common resistance phenotypes among inpatient MRSA were multi-drug resistance to ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, and clindamycin (47.6%), double drug resistance to ciprofloxacin and erythromycin (18%), single drug resistance to erythromycin (13.7%), and multi-drug resistance to ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, clindamycin, and gentamicin (8.3%) (Table 3). Among outpatient MRSA single drug resistance to erythromycin (27.8%) was the most common phenotype followed by multi-drug resistance to ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, and clindamycin (32.8%), and dual resistance to ciprofloxacin and erythromycin (20.2%). In all, 11.4% (n = 1,179) of inpatient MRSA were resistant to four or more non-beta-lactam agents and 2.4% (n = 247) were resistant to five agents. In comparison, 6.8% (n = 295) of outpatient MRSA were resistant to four or more non-beta-lactams and 1.5% (n = 63) were resistant to five agents.
Antibiograms of multi-drug resistanta MRSA from inpatients and outpatientsb
Inpatient (n = 6,183)
Outpatient (n = 1,757)
Discussion and conclusion
This analysis of data obtained through clinical laboratory based surveillance has demonstrated that S. aureus continues to be solidly positioned as a leading bacterial pathogen encountered in both inpatient and outpatient clinical settings and has continued to substantially outdistance other gram-positive organisms in this regard. Because most clinical microbiology protocols call for S. aureus to be "worked-up" and reported regardless of the amount of organisms present, or the type of specimen, there is a likelihood that the reporting frequency based on laboratory data is higher than the actual frequency of infections caused by this organism. Nonetheless, the same bias plays a role for many other reported bacterial species so that the position of S. aureus as the leading gram-positive organism, and its frequency relative to other species, is likely quite reflective of actual infection rates as well. The high prevalence of S. aureus reported here for both the inpatient and outpatient environments was consistent with recent descriptions and discussion regarding the changing epidemiology of this organism [1, 2].
The high prevalence of S. aureus in both settings underscores the need for analysis of antimicrobial resistance trends according to patient location so that variations in antimicrobial resistance trends among strains from patients seen in the different clinical settings can be evaluated. Although previous surveillance initiatives that included S. aureus have involved isolates from both outpatients and inpatients, they examined strains collected prior to 2002 and a thorough comparison of the resistance rates and phenotypes according to patient location were not reported [8, 9]. In this current study antimicrobial data from geographically, demographically, and clinically diverse settings, collected via The Surveillance Network, were analyzed to provide a clearer and current perspective on the resistance profiles currently present among S. aureus in the United States.
The data provided in Figure 3 demonstrated that MRSA rates continue to be on the rise among both inpatients and outpatients, and this trend appeared to be pervasive throughout all regions of the United States (Figure 4). Rising rates of MRSA in the hospital environment were reported from studies done in previous years and data presented here indicate that the increasing rates have continued into 2005 [7, 10–12]. The relatively lower increase in MRSA observed here among ICU S. aureus is consistent with the most recent report from the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report . Although the rate increase may be relatively lower than before, the overall prevalence of MRSA in the ICU remains high (55%).
In addition to the issue of increasing MRSA rates among inpatients, the recognized emergence of MRSA beyond the hospital or healthcare setting into the community has raised another substantial public health concern about S. aureus [2, 13–17]. Based on this current laboratory – based surveillance study the concern is much warranted as outpatient MRSA rates have continued to increase to the extent that as of 2005 the overall MRSA rate in this population was 47.9% (Figure 3). Further, the data in Table 1 indicated that MRSA are commonly isolated from all types of outpatient specimens, including blood.
MRSA that are encountered in the community (outpatient settings) arise either as a result of acquisition of the mec gene complex by susceptible S. aureus strains (so-called de novo community MRSA), or by person-to-person carriage of hospital strains into the community [2, 18]. No phenotypic or genotypic criteria have been firmly established to definitively specify a strain as being from one or the other origin; this requires rigorous and diligent epidemiological analysis. However, de novo MRSA have generally been characterized as being susceptible to most non-beta-lactam agents (other than erythromycin) while those that have spread from the hospital setting into the community often exhibit the multi-drug resistant phenotype that is characteristic of most hospital-based strains [2, 13, 18, 19].
The significant contrast in MRSA resistance phenotypes that may exist depending on the origin of a community strain (i.e. hospital or de novo) can confound empiric therapeutic decisions when patients suspected of being infected with S. aureus are initially evaluated in the outpatient setting. While the rates of multi-drug resistant phenotypes among inpatient MRSA were higher than those among outpatient MRSA, multi-drug resistance was a common feature among the community outpatient population (Table 2). In addition, there was substantial overlap in phenotypes between inpatient and outpatient MRSA (Table 3). These findings, based on data from across the USA collected since 1998, indicate that strains of hospital origin constitute the majority of MRSA encountered in the outpatient setting. This is consistent with the local findings reported by Charlebois et al.  in which a substantial proportion of outpatient MRSA had resistance profiles comparable to those of the hospital-based strains. Their analysis led the authors to suggest that most of the community MRSA strains from the area studied around San Francisco were likely descendants of hospital origin. Further, a previous study we conducted also strongly suggested that community MRSA frequently emerge from the local hospital populations .
For multi-drug resistant inpatient and outpatient MRSA alike there are relatively few agents that maintained high levels of activity (Table 4). This situation combined with the propensity of certain community clones to exhibit substantial virulence with elaboration of toxins such as Panton-Valentine Leuckocidin (PVL) raises concern about future therapeutic guidelines for S. aureus infections encountered in the outpatient settings [20–22].
The most common multi-drug resistant phenotype encountered would preclude the use of all current beta-lactams, clindamycin, macrolides, and fluoroquinolones against outpatient MRSA. Although clindamycin is frequently considered for infections in this setting, over 30% of outpatient MRSA were resistant. The agents that consistently demonstrated high levels of activity against outpatient MRSA, including strains exhibiting the multi-drug resistant phenotype, were trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, linezolid, and vancomycin. No resistance to either vancomycin or linezolid was encountered among outpatient MRSA, including multi-drug resistant strains. Therefore, while there have been reports of resistance to these two agents, resistance remains sporadic and extremely rare [1, 23]. Because resistance to either vancomycin or linezolid is extremely rare among all S. aureus, use of either agent is not likely to lead to expansion of multi-drug resistant clones as could result from use of the other agents to which S. aureus populations have already developed resistance. However, with regard to vancomycin, the lack of an oral formulation with absorption introduces a limitation as an option for the management of outpatient MRSA infections. Linezolid has exhibited successful activity relative to vancomycin for MRSA and is available as an oral formulation [24–26].
The continued increase in MRSA rates among inpatient specimens coupled with the emergence of MRSA in the community (outpatient) setting has involved strains that frequently exhibit multiple drug resistance. For some time these resistance phenotypes have been an issue for the management of inpatients. Now current trends indicate there are important implications for establishing outpatient management and treatment guidelines for staphylococcal infections. Given this trend, health care institutions should consider analyzing their local S. aureus antibiograms according to outpatient and inpatient populations in order to discern the prevalent phenotypes physicians are likely to encounter in each setting. Finally, if the current trend continues, the development of new anti-MRSA agents for multi-drug resistant strains will have to consider the need for both community and hospital use.
This study was funded by Pfizer Inc, Pfizer Global Pharmaceuticals, New York, New York.
- Deresinski S: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: an evolutionary, epidemiologic, and therapeutic odyssey. Clin Infect Dis. 2005, 40: 562-573. 10.1086/427701View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chambers HF: The changing epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus?. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001, 7: 178-82.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sahm DF, Marsilio MK, Piazza G: Antimicrobial resistance in key bloodstream bacterial isolates: electronic surveillance with The Surveillance Network Database – USA. Clin Infect Dis. 1999, 29: 259-63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jones ME, Mayfield DC, Thornsberry C, Karlowsky JA, Sahm DF, Peterson D: Prevalence of oxacillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus among inpatients and outpatients in the United States during 2000. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002, 46: 3104-5. 10.1128/AAC.46.9.3104-3105.2002PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Karlowsky JA, Draghi DC, Jones ME, Thornsberry C, Friedland IR, Sahm DF: Surveillance for antimicrobial susceptibility among clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii from hospitalized patients in the United States, 1998 to 2001. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003, 47: 1681-88. 10.1128/AAC.47.5.1681-1688.2003PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Flamm RK, Weaver MK, Thornsberry C, Jones ME, Karlowsky JA, Sahm DF: Factors associated with relative rates of antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates tested in clinical laboratories in the United States from 1999 to 2002. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004, 48: 2431-6. 10.1128/AAC.48.7.2431-2436.2004PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fridkin SK, Edwards JR, Tenover FC: Antimicrobial resistance prevalence rates in hospital antibiograms reflect prevalence rates among pathogens associated with hospital-acquired infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2001, 33: 324-30. 10.1086/321893View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Critchley IA, Blosser-Middleton RS, Jones ME, Thornsberry C, Sahm DF, Karlowsky JA: Baseline study to determine in vitro activities of daptomycin against gram-positive pathogens isolated in the United States in 2000–2001. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003, 47: 1689-1693. 10.1128/AAC.47.5.1689-1693.2003PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Diekema DJ, Pfaller MA, Schmitz FJ: Survey of infections due to Staphylococcus species: frequency of occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility of isolates collected in the United States, Canada, Latin America, Europe, and the Western Pacific Region for the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 1997–1999. Clin Infect Dis. 2001, 32 (Suppl 2): S114-S132. 10.1086/320184View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Edmond MB, Wallace SE, McClish DK, Pfaller MA, Jones RN, Wenzel RP: Nosocomial bloodstream infections in United States hospitals: a three-year analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 1999, 29: 239-44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fridkin SK, Steward CD, Edwards JR: Surveillance of antimicrobial use and antimicrobial resistance in United States hospitals: project ICARE phase 2. Clin Infect Dis. 1999, 29: 245-52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- , : National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, data summary from January 1992 through June issued August 2003. Am J Infect Control. 2003, 31: 481-98. 10.1016/j.ajic.2003.09.002View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Eguia JM, Chambers HF: Community-acquired methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus: epidemiology and potential virulence factors. Curr Infect Dis Reports. 2003, 5: 459-66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mongkolrattanothai K, Boyle S, Kahana MD, Daum RS: Severe Staphylococcus aureus infections caused by clonally related community-acquired methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant isolates. Clin Infect Dis. 2003, 37: 1050-58. 10.1086/378277View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Naimi TS, LeDell KH, Como-Sabetti K: Comparison of community- and health care-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. JAMA. 2003, 290: 2976-84. 10.1001/jama.290.22.2976View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Said-Salim B, Mathema B, Kreiswirth BN: Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: an emerging pathogen. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2003, 24: 451-55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stemper ME, Shukla SK, Reed KD: Emergence and spread of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in rural Wisconsin, 1989 to 1999. J Clin Microbiol. 2004, 42: 5673-80. 10.1128/JCM.42.12.5673-5680.2004PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Charlebois ED, Perdreau-Remington F, Kreiswirth B: Origins of community strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Infect Dis. 2004, 39: 47-54. 10.1086/421090PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tacconelli E, Venkataraman L, De Girolami PC, D'Agata EM: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia diagnosed at hospital admission: distinguishing between community-acquired versus healthcare-associated strains. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004, 53: 474-9. 10.1093/jac/dkh107View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Francis JS, Doherty MC, Lopatin U: Severe community-onset pneumonia in healthy adults caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carrying the Panoton-Valentine leuckocidin genes. Clin Infect Dis. 2005, 40: 100-107. 10.1086/427148View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lina G, Piemont Y, Godail-Gamot F: Involvement of Panton-Valentine Leukocidin-producing Staphylococcus aureus in primary skin infections and pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis. 1999, 29: 1128-32. 10.1086/313461View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vandenesch F, Naimi T, Enright MC: Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carrying Panton-Valentine Leukocidin genes: worldwide emergence. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003, 9: 978-84.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Meka VG, Gold HS: Antimicrobial resistance to linezolid. Clin Infect Dis. 2004, 39: 1010-15. 10.1086/423841View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stevens DL, Herr D, Lampiris H: Linezolid versus vancomycin for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2002, 34: 1481-90. 10.1086/340353View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wargo KA, Eiland EH: Appropriate antimicrobial therapy for community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carrying the Panton-Valentine Leukocidin genes. Clin Infect Dis. 2005, 40: 1376-8. 10.1086/429509View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wilcox M, Nathwani D, Dryden M: Linezolid compared with teicoplanin for the treatment of suspected or proven gram-positive infections. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004, 53: 335-44. 10.1093/jac/dkh088View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.