Open Access

Recurrent pneumococcal meningitis in a splenectomised HIV-infected patient

  • Philippe C Morand1, 2Email author,
  • Veronique Veuillez3,
  • Claire Poyart1, 4,
  • Eric Abachin1,
  • Gilles Quesne1,
  • Bertrand Dupont5,
  • Patrick Berche1 and
  • Jean-Paul Viard5
Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials20032:9

https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-0711-2-9

Received: 06 October 2003

Accepted: 07 November 2003

Published: 07 November 2003

Abstract

Background

Streptococcus pneumoniae is a major cause of human disease, especially in pre-school children and elderly people, as well as in special risk groups such as asplenic, antibody deficient patients, or presenting disruption of natural barriers. The occurrence of pneumococcal disease has increased with the onset of the HIV epidemic and the emergence of drug-resistance.

Case presentation

We report the case of an HIV-1-infected patient who experienced three episodes of recurrent pneumococcal meningitis over a 4-year period, despite chemoprophylaxis and capsular vaccination.

Conclusions

Efficacy of anti-pneumococcal chemoprophylaxis and vaccination in HIV-infected patients are discussed in the light of this particular case.

Background

Streptococcus pneumoniae is a Gram-positive, encapsulated bacterium that is a major human pathogen, predominantly in young children and elderly people, as well as in patients presenting with asplenia, sickle cell disease, and inherited or acquired immunodeficiencies [1]. In industrialized countries, where vaccination against Haemophilus influenzae type b is widespread, S. pneumoniae has become a major cause of bacterial meningitis, together with Neisseria meningitidis, and bacterial meningitis is now a disease predominantly of adults rather than of infants and children [2, 3]. In the developing world, bacterial meningitis remains a major problem, with increased incidence and mortality compared to more developed countries [4, 5]. With the onset of the HIV pandemic and the worldwide emergence of drug-resistant pneumococci, the incidence of invasive pneumococcal infection has increased in adults as well as children [69], and pneumococcal vaccine was recommended in the USPHS/IDSA guidelines for the management of HIV-infected patients. We report the case of an HIV-infected patient who experienced three episodes of recurrent pneumococcal meningitis over a 4-year period, despite anti-pneumococcal vaccination and chemoprophylaxis.

Case presentation

A 29 year-old patient was found to be HIV-1-infected through investigations for an idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura in 1989. After unsuccessful medical treatments, splenectomy was performed and anti-pneumococcal chemoprophylaxis (phenoxymethylpenicillin, 2 MU/day) was carried out until 1996. Meanwhile, a series of HIV-related infections occurred: Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in 1993, herpetic esophagitis, herpetic anorectal lesions and cutaneous Kaposi's sarcoma in 1995, CMV retinitis, Mycobacterium avium complex infection, facial molluscum contagiosum and catheter-borne septicaemias due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Since the rifabutin anti-M. avium treatment would also be efficient against pneumococcal infections, the specific anti-pneumococcal prophylaxis was stopped in 1996. After several lines of mononucleoside therapy, a combination of stavudine, lamivudine and nelfinavir was started in 1997, the biological efficacy of which allowed the interruption of the prophylactic ganciclovir treatment in December 1998, and that of cotrimoxazole in March 1999.

The first episode of pneumococcal meningitis (Table 1) occurred in 1998, and was successfully treated with the association of cefotaxime (12 g/day, 17 days) and vancomycin (3 g/day, 12 days). The pneumococcal strain isolated from the CSF belonged to serotype 23F and exhibited a decreased susceptibility to penicillin (Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) = 1.0 μg/ml), and was resistant to erythromycin and clindamycin. A bilateral maxillary sinusitis diagnosed a few weeks before was considered as the likely portal of entry. No specific anti-pneumococcal prophylaxis, which had been stopped two years earlier, was prescribed at that time.
Table 1

Biological characteristics of the three meningitic episodes

 

Episode 1 (March 1998)

Episode 2 (May 2000)

Episode 3 (January 2001)

CSF characteristics

Glucose: not detectable

Glucose: 1 mM

Glucose: 0.4 mM

 

Proteins: 3.2 g/l

Proteins: 2.9 g/l

Proteins: 2.2 g/l

 

Leucocytes: 670/mm3 (96%PMN)

Leucocytes: 2100/mm3 (51%PMN)

Leucocytes: 8100/mm3 (85%PMN)

 

Positive culture with S. pneumoniae 23F

Positive culture with S. pneumoniae 23F

Positive culture with S. pneumoniae 23F

Beta-lactam

penicillin G: 1.0

penicillin G: 1.0

penicillin G: 2.0

susceptibility

amoxicillin: 0.75

amoxicillin: 0.75

amoxicillin: 0.75

MICs (μg/ml)

ceftriaxone: 0.75

ceftriaxone: 0.75

ceftriaxone: 0.75

CD4 (1O6 cells/l – %)

325 – 13

1103 – 21

1185 – 20

Viral load (copies/ml – Log10)

280 – 2.5

1300 – 3.1

2000 – 3.3

Two and a half years later, in 2000, a second meningitic episode occurred. Blood and CSF cultures yielded the presence of a serotype 23F pneumococcal strain, with identical antibiotic susceptibility to that of the first episode (Table 1). The patient was successfully treated using ceftriaxone (2 g/day) and vancomycin (2 g/day). Although no pneumococcal carriage or distant focal infection could be detected, chemoprophylaxis was reintroduced (phenoxymethylpenicillin, 3 MU/day). Furthermore, the patient received the 23-valent capsular pneumococcal vaccine (Pasteur Vaccins, Lyon, France).

Six months later, the patient was admitted in intensive care unit for meningitis. Culture of the CSF showed the presence of a serotype 23F S. pneumoniae that was resistant to penicillin (MIC = 2 μg/ml), but susceptible to ceftriaxone (MIC 0,75 μg/l). Successful treatment was obtained using ceftriaxone (6 g/day) and vancomycin (2 g/day) for 15 days. Radiology imaging of the mastoids and of the skull did not show any abnormal sign, and neither pneumococcal carriage nor concomitant infection could be detected. Radio-isotopic imaging disclosed no breach of the meninges. After antibiotic treatment was successfully completed, an anti-pneumococcal chemoprophylaxy was decided (amoxicillin 2 g/day), as well as conjugate anti-pneumococcal vaccination (Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, Philadelphia, PA, USA). The patient was monitored and has done well more than two years after this third episode.

Analysis by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) of Sma I-restricted genomic DNA of the first and the third isolates revealed that the restriction profiles were not distinguishable from each other, and were different from those obtained with unrelated pneumococcal strains from our collection (data not shown). Unfortunately, it was not possible to include the isolate responsible for the second episode in the PFGE study.

Together with the fact that the three pneumococcal isolates were of serotype 23F, PFGE analysis strongly suggests that both isolates belong to the same clone. Moreover, the three strains exhibited the same antibiotic resistance patterns, apart from an increased MIC to penicillin in the third isolate (Table 1). Therefore, it is very likely that the three meningitic episodes were caused by the same pneumococcal strain, and that successive curative and prophylactic antibiotic treatments led to the selection of derivatives with decreased susceptibility to penicillin G.

Conclusions

In this case, the occurrence of three episodes of pneumococcal meningitis over a 4-year period highlights the controversial efficacy of vaccination and antibiotic prophylaxis in HIV-1-infected patients. Recurrent meningitis is a rare disease that is often associated with cranial injuries, and S. pneumoniae is responsible for more than half of the recurrent purulent bacterial meningoencephalitis [10]. The first episode was probably due to the bilateral maxillary sinusitis, as was already reported [11]. Furthermore, the infection with HIV-1 and the splenectomy were also shown to be additional risk factors [1214, 7]. However, at the time of anti-pneumococcal vaccination and before the third episode occurred, the patient had CD4+ cell count greater than 500 cells/μl, which was reported to decrease the risk of pneumococcal disease [7].

The patient was not receiving anti-pneumococcal chemoprophylaxis when the first and second episodes occurred. However, when the third episode occurred, the patient had been subjected to 23-valent capsular vaccination and was receiving chemoprophylaxis, as well as a biologically efficient antiretroviral treatment. Although the patient's compliance to the treatment could not be thoroughly assessed, this case highlights the uncertain efficacy of chemoprophylaxis [15], and differs from other previously reported cases in immunocompetent patients, where capsular vaccination and ampicillin prophylaxis were shown to reduce the recurrence rate of pneumococcal meningitis [16].

This observation also highlights the controversial effect of pneumococcal vaccination in HIV-infected patients. Some authors consider that potential benefit of capsular vaccination is greater than risk [17, 18, 7], and anti-pneumococcal capsular vaccination figures among the USPHS/IDSA recommended guidelines for the management of HIV-infected patients. However, other works have shown that 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccination may be poorly effective in HIV-1-infected adults, especially among African-American persons and people in Uganda [1822], and other reports suggested that it might be more cost-effective to concentrate efforts on anti-retroviral therapy [23]. Efficacy of vaccination in HIV-1-infected patients receiving HAART (Highly Active Anti-Retroviral Therapy) is poorly documented, but recent reports showed that pneumococcal capsular polysaccharide vaccination in such patients induces a qualitative change in antibody response compared with non-HAART-treated patients [24]. This involves an increased VH3-positive antibody response, which had been shown to be present in vaccine response of HIV-uninfected patients. Taken together, recommendations for use of non-conjugated pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccines in HIV-infected people should be re-assessed, particularly in the identification of sub-groups most likely to benefit from the vaccine [25].

The patient experienced no other recurrence of pneumococcal infection more than two years after vaccination with the conjugated heptavalent capsular vaccine. As well as the non-conjugated 23-valent capsular vaccine, this new generation of vaccine also covers serotype 23F, and was described to possibly interrupt the transmission of antibiotic-resistant S. pneumoniae among children [26]. Administration of conjugated vaccines in HIV-infected patients was reported to be safe, and to have no peculiar effect on viral load [27, 28]. Furthermore, vaccination regimens that include pneumococcal conjugate vaccines lead to higher antibody concentration and greater functional antibody activity [27]. A trial of a 9-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine recently showed a potential efficacy in HIV-infected children, and suggest that such an approach should be investigated in HIV-infected adults [29]. However, further studies are needed to evaluate if conjugated capsular vaccines should be introduced in the systematic care of HIV-1-infected patients.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Written consent was obtained from the patient for publication of study.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Laboratoire de Microbiologie; Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades
(2)
Max-Planck-Institut für Infektionsbiologie; Abt. Molekulare Biologie, Campus Charité-Mitte
(3)
Service des Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales; Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades
(4)
Laboratoire de Bactériologie; Faculté de Médecine Cochin
(5)
Service des Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales; Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades

References

  1. Obaro SK, Monteil MA, Henderson DC: The pneumococcal problem. Bmj. 1996, 312: 1521-1525.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Schuchat A, Robinson K, Wenger JD, Harrison LH, Farley M, Reingold AL, Lefkowitz L, Perkins BA: Bacterial meningitis in the United States in 1995. Active Surveillance Team. N Engl J Med. 1997, 337: 970-976. 10.1056/NEJM199710023371404View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Koedel U, Scheld WM, Pfister HW: Pathogenesis and pathophysiology of pneumococcal meningitis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2002, 2: 721-736. 10.1016/S1473-3099(02)00450-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Gordon SB, Walsh AL, Chaponda M, Gordon MA, Soko D, Mbwvinji M, Molyneux ME, Read RC: Bacterial meningitis in Malawian adults: pneumococcal disease is common, severe, and seasonal. Clin Infect Dis. 2000, 31: 53-57. 10.1086/313910View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Molyneux EM, Walsh AL, Forsyth H, Tembo M, Mwenechanya J, Kayira K, Bwanaisa L, Njobvu A, Rogerson S, Malenga G: Dexamethasone treatment in childhood bacterial meningitis in Malawi: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002, 360: 211-218. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09458-8View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Karstaedt AS, Khoosal M, Crewe-Brown HH: Pneumococcal bacteremia in adults in Soweto, South Africa, during the course of a decade. Clin Infect Dis. 2001, 33: 610-614. 10.1086/322589View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dworkin MS, Ward JW, Hanson DL, Jones JL, Kaplan JE: Pneumococcal disease among human immunodeficiency virus-infected persons: incidence, risk factors, and impact of vaccination. Clin Infect Dis. 2001, 32: 794-800. 10.1086/319218View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Madhi SA, Madhi A, Petersen K, Khoosal M, Klugman KP: Impact of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection on the epidemiology and outcome of bacterial meningitis in South African children. Int J Infect Dis. 2001, 5: 119-125. 10.1016/S1201-9712(01)90085-2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gordon SB, Chaponda M, Walsh AL, Whitty CJ, Gordon MA, Machili CE, Gilks CF, Boeree MJ, Kampondeni S, Read RC, Molyneux ME: Pneumococcal disease in HIV-infected Malawian adults: acute mortality and long-term survival. Aids. 2002, 16: 1409-1417. 10.1097/00002030-200207050-00013View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Janeczko J, Pogorzelska E, Lipowski D, Przyjalkowski W, Rzadkiewicz E: [Recurrent purulent bacterial meningoencephalitis]. Przegl Epidemiol. 2001, 55: 443-449.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hosoglu S, Ayaz C, Ceviz A, Cumen B, Geyik MF, Kokoglu OF: Recurrent bacterial meningitis: a 6-year experience in adult patients. J Infect. 1997, 35: 55-62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Almirante B, Saballs M, Ribera E, Pigrau C, Gavalda J, Gasser I, Pahissa A: Favorable prognosis of purulent meningitis in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Clin Infect Dis. 1998, 27: 176-180.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gerwig M, Wittkamper A, Liebetrau U, Petrovici JN: [Recurrent pneumococcal meningitis after splenectomy]. Nervenarzt. 1994, 65: 722-724.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Jones N, Huebner R, Khoosal M, Crewe-Brown H, Klugman K: The impact of HIV on Streptococcus pneumoniae bacteraemia in a South African population. Aids. 1998, 12: 2177-2184. 10.1097/00002030-199816000-00013View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Chadwick PR, Keaney MG, Jones RA: Meningitis due to penicillin resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae occurring in a patient on long term ampicillin prophylaxis. J Infect. 1993, 27: 277-279.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hristea A, Chiotan M, Tudose M, Mihalcu F: The combined value of chemoprophylaxis and pneumococcal vaccine in the prevention of recurrent pneumococcal meningitis. J Infect. 1997, 34: 265-267.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Schneider RF, Rosen MJ: Pneumococcal infections in HIV-infected adults. Semin Respir Infect. 1999, 14: 237-242.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Breiman RF, Keller DW, Phelan MA, Sniadack DH, Stephens DS, Rimland D, Farley MM, Schuchat A, Reingold AL: Evaluation of effectiveness of the 23-valent pneumococcal capsular polysaccharide vaccine for HIV-infected patients. Arch Intern Med. 2000, 160: 2633-2638. 10.1001/archinte.160.17.2633View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. French N, Nakiyingi J, Carpenter LM, Lugada E, Watera C, Moi K, Moore M, Antvelink D, Mulder D, Janoff EN, Whitworth J, Gilks CF: 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine in HIV-1-infected Ugandan adults: double-blind, randomised and placebo controlled trial. Lancet. 2000, 355: 2106-2111. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02377-1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Dieye TN, Simonart T, Sow PS, Farber CM: 23-valent pneumococcal vaccination and HIV. Lancet. 2000, 356: 1027-View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Spoulou V, Theodoridou M, Papaevangelou VG, Mostrou GI, Ioannidis JP: 23-valent pneumococcal vaccination and HIV. Lancet. 2000, 356: 1027-1028.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Fedson DS, Watson M: Pneumococcal vaccine and HIV-1 infection. Lancet. 2000, 356: 1272-1273.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Pierce AB, Hoy JF: Is the recommendation for pneumococcal vaccination of HIV patients evidence based?. J Clin Virol. 2001, 22: 255-261. 10.1016/S1386-6532(01)00197-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Subramaniam KS, Segal R, Lyles RH, Rodriguez-Barradas MC, Pirofski LA: Qualitative change in antibody responses of human immunodeficiency virus-infected individuals to pneumococcal capsular polysaccharide vaccination associated with highly active antiretroviral therapy. J Infect Dis. 2003, 187: 758-768. 10.1086/368331View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Whitney CG, Schaffner W, Butler JC: Rethinking recommendations for use of pneumococcal vaccines in adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2001, 33: 662-675. 10.1086/322676View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Klugman KP: Efficacy of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines and their effect on carriage and antimicrobial resistance. Lancet Infect Dis. 2001, 1: 85-91. 10.1016/S1473-3099(01)00063-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Feikin DR, Elie CM, Goetz MB, Lennox JL, Carlone GM, Romero-Steiner S, Holder PF, O'Brien WA, Whitney CG, Butler JC, Breiman RF: Randomized trial of the quantitative and functional antibody responses to a 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine and/or 23-valent polysaccharide vaccine among HIV-infected adults. Vaccine. 2001, 20: 545-553. 10.1016/S0264-410X(01)00347-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Goetz MB, Feikin DR, Lennox JL, O'Brien WA, Elie CM, Butler JC, Breiman RF: Viral load response to a pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, polysaccharide vaccine or placebo among HIV-infected patients. Aids. 2002, 16: 1421-1423. 10.1097/00002030-200207050-00015View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Klugman KP, Madhi SA, Huebner RE, Kohberger R, Mbelle N, Pierce N: A trial of a 9-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in children with and those without HIV infection. N Engl J Med. 2003, 349: 1341-1348. 10.1056/NEJMoa035060View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Morand et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2003

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.

Advertisement