Open Access

Exploring internal features of 16S rRNA gene for identification of clinically relevant species of the genus Streptococcus

Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials201110:28

https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-0711-10-28

Received: 30 March 2011

Accepted: 25 June 2011

Published: 25 June 2011

Abstract

Background

Streptococcus is an economically important genus as a number of species belonging to this genus are human and animal pathogens. The genus has been divided into different groups based on 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity. The variability observed among the members of these groups is low and it is difficult to distinguish them. The present study was taken up to explore 16S rRNA gene sequence to develop methods that can be used for preliminary identification and can supplement the existing methods for identification of clinically-relevant isolates of the genus Streptococcus.

Methods

16S rRNA gene sequences belonging to the isolates of S. dysgalactiae, S. equi, S. pyogenes, S. agalactiae, S. bovis, S. gallolyticus, S. mutans, S. sobrinus, S. mitis, S. pneumoniae, S. thermophilus and S. anginosus were analyzed with the purpose to define genetic variability within each species to generate a phylogenetic framework, to identify species-specific signatures and in-silico restriction enzyme analysis.

Results

The framework based analysis was used to segregate Streptococcus spp. previously identified upto genus level. This segregation was validated using species-specific signatures and in-silico restriction enzyme analysis. 43 uncharacterized Streptococcus spp. could be identified using this approach.

Conclusions

The markers generated exploring 16S rRNA gene sequences provided useful tool that can be further used for identification of different species of the genus Streptococcus.

Keywords

phylogenetic framework signature sequences genetic heterogeneity

Background

The genus Streptococcus consists of spherical Gram positive bacteria belonging to the class Bacilli and the order Lactobacillales[1]. The group is large and comprises of numerous clinically significant species which are responsible for wide variety of infections in human and animals. Streptococcus of different groups are known to cause human diseases, some species being highly virulent and responsible for major diseases. Species like S. pyogenes, S. agalactiae and S. pneumoniae are important as they cause serious acute infections in man, but several other species are also involved in a number of diseases like infective endocarditis, abscesses and other pathological conditions [2]. Various species of Streptococcus are known to be associated with infections of cattles, pigs, horses, sheeps, birds, aquatic mammals and fishes [3]. The genus has undergone considerable taxonomic revisions and has been divided into different groups (pyogenic, anginosus, mitis, mutans, salivarius, bovis) based on 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity [4].

Since many species belonging to the genus Streptococcus are associated with various pathological conditions, different protocols have been used for their identification. Still precise identification of these species is laborious. Clinical laboratories use serological grouping by Lancefield, haemolytic reactions and phenotypic tests for identification of various Streptococcus isolates. However, these Lancefield groups are not species-specific [5, 6] and haemolytic activity differs within species and depends on incubation procedures. Strains within a given species may differ for a common trait [7, 8] and even the same strain may exhibit biochemical variability [9, 10].

Various alternatives have been employed for identification of Streptococcus isolates. These include DNA hybridization [1114]; rDNA restriction analysis [1517]; use of 16S-23S rRNA interspacer region [1821], D-alanyl-D-alanine ligase gene (ddl gene) [22]; autolysin gene (lytA) [23]; dextranase (dex) [24]; heat shock protein (groESL) [25, 26]; RNA subunit of endoribonuclease P (rnpB) [27]; the elongation factor Tu (tuf) [28]; gyrase A (gyrA) and topoisomerase subunit C (parC) [29]; sequence analysis of small subunit rRNA [30]; manganese-dependent superoxide dismutase gene (sodA) [31, 32]; recombination and repair protein (recN) [33]; tDNA PCR fragment length polymorphism [34, 35] and use of multilocus sequencing typing loci [36, 37].

16S rRNA gene sequencing has proved to be one of the most powerful tools for the classification of microorganisms [38] and has been used for identification of clinically relevant microbes [39, 40]. Therefore, molecular tools based on 16S rRNA gene can be developed and used for identification. However it is also true that the correct identification of bacterial species may not be based on the nucleotide sequence of a single gene. Multilocus Sequence Analysis (MLSA) of several house-keeping genes has to be performed. But from practical standpoint there is need for a simplified approach for preliminary identification of a species, particularly under the conditions if the amount of isolated DNA is not enough for MLSA or it does not react with a complete set of typing primers. The current work considers the possibility to use 16S rRNA sequences for this purpose and is useful for practical applications.Thus the present study aims to explore internal features of 16S rRNA gene for preliminary identification of a species that can supplement the existing methods for identification. These methods include construction of phylogenetic framework, identification of species-specific signatures and restriction enzyme analysis.

Methods

Sequence data

16S rRNA gene sequences belonging to the genus Streptococcus from RDP database http://rdp.cme.msu.edu/[41] were analysed in the present study. These included the sequences with relatively high number of identified organisms (86 sequences belonging to isolates of S. dysgalactiae, 61 to S. equi, 61 to S. pyogenes, 29 to S.agalactiae, 31 S. bovis-equinus (S. bovis and S. equinus are considered to be a single species [42]), 76 to S. gallolyticus, 102 to S. mutans, 23 to S.sobrinus, 28 to S. mitis, 41 to S. pneumoniae, 73 to S. thermophilus, 32 to S. anginosus) and 63 sequences of uncharacterized species identified only upto genus level. The sequences belonging to twelve sets of Streptococcus species occurring with higher frequency were used as the master species set for generating a phylogenetic framework, species-specific signatures and restriction enzyme analysis.

Phylogenetic Analyses

For phylogenetic analyses, the sequences were aligned using multiple alignment program CLUSTAL_X [43]. Evolutionary distances between all the sequences were calculated with DNADIST of the PHYLIP 3.6 package [44]. The program NEIGHBOR was used to draw neighbor joining [45] tree with Jukes and Cantor correction [46]. Statistical testing of the trees was done using SEQBOOT by resampling the dataset 1000 times. The trees were viewed through TreeView Version 1.6.6 [47]. For each of these 12 Streptococcus species data sets, sequences that formed a single cluster were aligned and a consensus was obtained by using JALVIEW sequence editor [48]. The sequence close to consensus from each group was chosen as a representative for that particular group. Based on this, a reference set of 63 sequences was selected to define the range of genetic variability present in each of the Streptococcus species.

Specific Signatures

Signatures were identified in each of the species data set using online MEME program [49]. Sequences of 12 Streptococcus species data sets were submitted groupwise in MEME program Version 4.6.1 http://meme.sdsc.edu/meme4_6_1/cgi-bin/meme.cgi. In order to obtain maximum number of motifs the default setting was modified from 3 motifs to 20 motifs. The default value of motif widths was also modified and re-set between 25 and 50. Each of the 20 signatures was checked for its frequency of occurrence among a particular Streptococcus sp. The signatures which did not appear in other Streptococcus spp. were considered as unique. BLAST search against NCBI database http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ was carried out for these signatures to check their uniqueness.

Restriction enzyme analysis

Eleven Type II Restriction enzymes (Table 1) were considered for these analyses. Restriction Mapper Version 3 http://restrictionmapper.org/ was used to obtain the restriction pattern of the 12 Streptococcus species data sets employed for construction of phylogenetic framework. These restriction patterns were analyzed and a consensus pattern was determined for each species.
Table 1

Restriction enzymes used in the present study

S.No.

Restriction enzyme

Cut site

1.

Alu I

AG CT

2.

Bam HI

G GATCC

3.

Bfa I

C TAG

4.

Eco RI

G AATTC

5.

Hae III

GG CC

6.

Hha I

GCG C

7.

Hind III

A AGCTT

8.

Msp I

C CGG

9.

Rsa I

GT AC

10.

Sau 3AI

GATC

11.

Sma I

CCC GGG

Cluster analysis for restriction profile

For cluster analyses MVSP (Multi Variate Statistical Package, Kovach Computing Services) version 3.13p was used. Dendrograms were constructed using the restriction patterns generated by different restriction enzymes for 12 framework species. The dendrograms show the utility of these enzymes in distinguishing different strains.

Results

In the present study, 16S rRNA gene sequences belonging to 12 different species from the genus Streptococcus were analyzed with the aim to construct phylogenetic framework, identification of species-specific signatures and restriction enzyme analysis.

Phylogenetic framework

Phylogenetic tree (Additional file 1: Fig. S1) based on 61 sequences of S. pyogenes revealed 8 clusters. 8 sequences representing these 8 clusters were chosen. These sequences could represent genetic heterogeneity present within this species. Similarly, sequences from other Streptococcus spp. were analysed for genetic heterogeneity present within them (Additional file 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12: Fig. S2-S12). Different representative sequences were choosen from each species that could provide information regarding the range of genetic variability present within each species (Table 2). 63 such representative sequences were selected for framework construction (Figure 1). Strains of all the species were clearly segregated except for S. pneumoniae and S. mitis suggesting a high level of similarity between strains of these two species, making their identification difficult solely on the basis of 16S rRNA gene.
Table 2

Sequences used for generating phylogenetic framework.

Species

No. of sequences used

No. of clusters obtained

No. of representative sequences

Accession number of representative sequences

S. dysgalactiae

86

5

5

AB002487, EU660339, AB002511, AB159678, EU075068

S. equi

61

5

5

EF406002, FM204883, EF406019, AB002516T, AJ605748T

S. pyogenes

61

8

8

FJ798740, FJ662832, FJ662840, AB002521, AE004092, FJ662845, CP000003, EU660342

S. agalactiae

29

4

5

AF459432, AB023574, AF015927, AB175037T, X59032

S. bovis-equinus

31

3

3

AF104109, AJ305257, DQ148956

S. gallolyticus

76

5

5

AF104114, EU163502, EU163482, EU163499, AF459431

S. mutans

102

6

6

DQ677759, DQ677739, DQ677777, AE014133, AF139600, DQ677743,

S. sobrinus

23

4

4

AB294731, DQ677789, DQ677790, DQ677798

S. mitis

28

7

9

AF003929T, AJ295853, EU200182, AM157440, DQ232533, AM157420, AY281076, AB002520, AY281078

S. pneumoniae

41

3

4

AE008386, CP001015, AJ617796, AY525795

S. thermophilus

73

3

4

EF990662, X68418T, EU419603, FJ749326

S. anginosus

32

5

5

AY986762, AF145239, AF104678T, AY986764, DQ232517

Total

643

59

63

 

Type strains are denoted by "T" as superscript.

Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree based on 63 representative 16S rRNA gene sequences from 12 Streptococcus species. The tree was constructed by neighbour-joining method with Jukes and Cantor correction. The numbers at node represent bootstrap values (based on 1000 resampling). The accession numbers are shown in parenthesis.

The framework generated was then used to check if uncharacterized Streptococcus spp. can be classified among the framework species (Figure 2). Out of 63 sequences previously identified upto genus level, 43 were found to segregate with 7 Streptococcus framework species, supported by high bootstrap values. Among these 43 sequences, 3 segregated with S. anginosus, 21 with S. mitis, 6 with S. pneumoniae and S. gallolyticus each, 5 with S. bovis-equinus, 1 with S. dysgalactiae and S. thermophilus each (Figure 2). No strains could be segregated with S. mutans, S. pyogenes, S. equi, S. agalactiae and S. sobrinus. The framework based segregation was further validated by checking for the presence of species-specific signatures and restriction analysis.
Figure 2

Phylogenetic tree of 63 framework sequences (bold values) and uncharacterized Streptococcus spp. The tree was constructed by neighbour-joining method with Jukes and Cantor correction. The numbers at node represent bootstrap values (based on 1000 resampling). The accession numbers are shown in parenthesis.

Signature sequences

Out of 20 signatures identified for each of the 12 Streptococcus framework species, only 1-5 unique signatures were found (Table 3) in framework species. The unique signatures were found in: S. mutans: 5; S. dysgalactiae: 3; S. equi, S. sobrinus and S. thermophilus: 2 each; S. gallolyticus, S. agalactiae, S. pyogenes, S. bovis-equinus, S. anginosus and S. pneumoniae: 1 each. These signatures were found to occur with high frequency. Moreover, these signatures were also found to be highly conserved across a particular species showing 98-100% sequence identity but were found to be fragmented in other species. No unique signature could be identified for S. mitis. But S. mitis can still be distinguished from S. pneumoniae using the signature found unique to S. pneumoniae. In S. mitis the signature was found to be substituted at specific positions and thus can distinguish these two species (Table 3). The signature found for S. bovis-equinus was effective in distinguishing it from very closely related species like S. lutetiensis and S. gallolyticus. These signatures were further used to validate the segregation of 43 sequences among 7 different framework species. All 43 sequences were found to contain the signature unique to the particular species thus validating the affiliation of these sequences to a particular species.
Table 3

Unique signature sequences identified for 12 Streptococcus framework spp.

Streptococcus sp.

Unique Signature (Nucleotides)

Frequency of occurance

S. dysgalactiae

AATACA(G)TGCAAGTAGAACGCTGAGGACTGGTGCTTGCACCGGTCCAAGGA (52-101)

77/86

 

TGCATCACTATGAGATGGACCTGCG TTGTATTAGCTAGTTGGTGAGGTAA (223-272)

86/86

 

CATTTAAAAGGTGCAATTGCATCACTATGAGATGGACCTGCG (207-246)

86/86

S. equi

AAGAAGGTTTTCGGATCGTAAAGCTCTGTTGTTAGAGAAGAACAGTGATG (420-469)

61/61

 

AAAGTCCATCATGTGACGGTAACTAACCAGAAAGGGACGGCTAACTACGT (476-525)

61/61

S. pyogenes

AAACGATAGCTAATACCGCATAAGAGAGACTAACGCATGTTAGTAATTTA (172-222)

56/61

S.agalactiae

GCAGTGGCTTAACCATTGTACGCTTTGGAAACTGGAGGACTTGAGTGC (613-660)

29/29

S. bovis

GCNTTTAACNCATGTTAGPuNGCTTGAAPuGPuAGCAA (178-212)

31/31

S. gallolyticus

TCTTGACATCCCGATGCTATTTCTAGAGATAGAAAGTTTCTTCGGAACAT (991-1040)

76/76

S. mutans

AGTAAAAGGCTATGGCTCAACCATAGTGTGCTCTGGAAACTGTCTGACTT (611-660)

102/102

 

ACCTGGGCTACACACGTGCTACAATGGTCGGTACAACGAGTTGCGAGCCG (1222-1271)

102/102

 

ATGATAATTGATTGAAAGATGCAAGCGCATCACTAGTAGATGGACCTGCG (197-246)

102/102

 

ACTAGTAGATGGACCTGCG TTGTATTAGCTAGTTGGTAAGGTAAGAGCTT (228-277)

102/102

 

AACACACTGTGCTTGCACACCGTGTTTTCTTGAGTCGCGAACGGGTGAGT (70-119)

102/102

S.sobrinus

TCACACCACGAGAGTTTGTAACACCCAAAGTCGGTGAGGTAACCATTTAT (1417-1466)

23//23

 

AAGTGGAACGCATTGGTAACACCGGACTTGCTCCAGTGTTACTAATGAGT (54-103)

23/23

S. mitis

TPuPyGCATGACPyANPyTNNNTTPuAAAGGTGCANTTGCAPyCACTANNAGATGGA (228-277)

28/28

S. pneumoniae

TGTTGCATGACATTTPuCTTAAAAGGTGCANNTGCATCACTACCAGATGGA (179-228)

41/41

S. Thermophilus

ACAATGGTTGGTACAACGAGTTGCGAGTCGGTGACGGCGAGCTAATCTCT (1246-1295)

73/73

 

AAGATGGACCTGCGTTGTATTAGCTAGTAGGTGAGGTAATGGCTCACCTA (234-283)

73/73

S. anginosus

ATTTATTGGGCGTAAAGCGAGCGCAGGCGGTTAGAAAAGTCTGAAGT (581-530)

32/32

The signatures were found to 98-100% identical and conserved in a particular species. Py denotes pyrimidine, Pu denoted purine and N denotes any nucleotide. Overlapping signatures are shown in bold.The number in brackets indicate the corresponding position of the signature in 16S rRNA gene.

Restriction enzyme analysis

In-silico restriction enzyme analysis using eleven type II enzymes revealed different patterns. Restriction sites for Alu I, Bfa I, Hae III, Msp I, Rsa I and Sau 3AI occurred with frequency of 3-10 resulting in 4-11 fragments. The sites for enzymes Eco RI, Sma I and Hha I were found in majority of sequences studied but they were found to be less frequent cutters producing single, single and double cuts respectively. These enzymes thus are less informative and serve no purpose. Inspite of low frequency, Bam HI and Hind III can still be used for distinguishing different Streptococcus spp. Bam HI produced single but unique cut in S. thermophilus and can be used to distinguish S. thermophilus isolates. Hind III produces single but unique cut in S. sobrinus and can be used to distinguish S. sobrinus isolates. As can be seen from the dendrograms (Additional file 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18: Fig. S13-S18) different restriction enzymes can be used for identification and distinguishing different isolates. While Alu I was found to distinguish majority of Streptococcus framework species, Msp I produced maximum numbers of cuts and thus proved informative for such analysis. Closely related species like S. dysgalactiae and S. agalactiae can be distinguished using Bfa I, Msp I and Hae III. Similarly, S. gallolyticus and S. bovis can be distinguished using Bfa I and Hae III. Therefore a combination of Alu I, Bfa I, Msp I or Hae III can be used for distinguishing closely related organisms. The sequences segregated with framework species were further validated using in-silicorestriction enzyme analysis. The identified sequences showed unique restriction enzyme pattern close to the nearby framework species (Table 4) again validating the framework based segregation. Thus combining the information from framework, signature sequences and restriction enzyme analysis it was possible to identify 43 sequences (out of 63) upto species level which were previously designated as Streptococcus sp. (Table 4).
Table 4

Streptococcus spp. identified upto species level:

S. No.

Acccession no.

Close framework species

Presence of species-specific signatures

Unique RE pattern

1

EF015474

S. dysgalactiae

Y

S. dysgalactiae (Msp I)

2

AF221604

   
 

DQ471794

   
 

AF298198

S. gallolyticus

Y

S. gallolyticus (Bfa I)

 

AB295598

   
 

AF084834

   
 

AF298197

   

3

AF349932

S. thermophilus

Y

S. thermophilus (Alu I, Hae III Sau 3AI,Bam HI)

4

X78826

   
 

X78825

S. anginosus

Y

S. anginosus (Alu I, Bfa I, Hae III)

 

AY049738

   

5

AF316591

   
 

AF316596

   
 

AF316593

S. pneumonaie

Y

S. pneumonaie (Alu I, Msp I)

 

AF316594

   
 

AF316595

   
 

EF151147

   

6

AF316592

   
 

EF151145

   
 

AF385523

   
 

FJ405281

   
 

AY880050

   
 

AY880051

   
 

AF385526

   
 

AB038371

   
 

EF151150

S. mitis

Y

S. mitis (Alu I, Msp I, Sau 3AI)

 

AY005041

   
 

AF479579

   
 

AY005040

   
 

AY134908

   
 

AY741062

   
 

AY741061

   
 

AJ871182

   
 

AF385525

   
 

AB174792

   
 

AB174791

   
 

AY005047

   
 

AF543289

   

7

AJ937757

S. bovis-equinus

Y

S. bovis-equinus (Bfa I)

 

GQ139522

   
 

AF298199

   
 

FJ611789

   
 

FJ611790

   

Discussion

Streptococcus is a clinically important genus as a number of species belonging to this genus are human and animal pathogens. This genus has undergone considerable taxonomic revisions and has been divided into different groups based on 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity.

The present study aims to explore internal features of 16S rRNA gene sequences of different Streptococcus spp. to develop methods for their identification. A phylogenetic framework was constructed using different representative sequences followed by identification of signature sequences and restriction enzymes analysis. The framework based analysis suggests a high level of genetic heterogeneity present within different Streptococcus spp. Signature sequences specific for each Streptococcus framework sp. were identified. These signature motifs would be simple to use as a supplement to the automated identification process. Restriction analysis has proved to be an important tool to identify newly isolated strains [5052] and can be exploited for describing new species [53]. Multiple restriction enzyme usage is recommended for better resolution. Although it has been documented that closely related species cannot be distinguished solely on the basis of 16S rRNA gene, but exploring the internal features of this gene can be of definite use. Therefore researchers are now looking to explore the unique features of 16S rRNA gene that have not been explored yet [54, 55]. As already described the genus Streptococcus has been divided into different groups based on 16S rRNA gene similarity [4]. The framework species used for these analyses belong to these different groups.

Four framework species- S. pyogenes, S. agalactiae, S. equi and S. dysgalactiae belong to pyogenic group which is the largest group of the genus Streptococcus. S. pyogenes, S. agalactiae, S. equi and S. dysgalactiae can be distinguished on the basis of specific signatures (Table 3) as well as using different restriction enzymes (Additional file 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18: Figures S13-S18).

Two framework species, S. pneumoniae and S. mitis belong to mitis group. Identification of members of mitis group, particularly S. pneumoniae is problematic. Identification of S. pneumoniae isolates is usually done using serological [56, 57] and molecular techniques [5860]. S. pneumoniae isolates can be easily identified using the signature sequence as given in Table 3. We could easily distinguish S. pneumoniae isolates from S. mitis using this signature sequence. Other members of this group (S.mitis and S. oralis) that are almost indistinguishable on the basis of complete 16S rRNA gene sequence can be differentiated using different restriction enzymes. S. mitis can be distinguished from other two species of this group by using enzyme Sau 3AI. S. pneumoniae, S.mitis and S. oralis can be distinguished from each other by exploiting Alu I and Msp I (data not shown for S. oralis).

Framework species S. anginosus belongs to anginosus group. This group consists of only 3 species (S. anginosus, S. intermedius and S. constellatus). Members of anginosus group are also difficult to identify and distinguish. An identification scheme for differentiation of these 3 strains was proposed by Whiley et al.[61] and Whiley and Beighton [62]. Commercial identification systems [63, 64] and molecular methods have been used for identifying and distinguishing these three species [65, 14]. S. anginosus can be easily identified using the signature sequence (Table 3) and use of restriction enzymes. Restriction enzymes Alu I, BfaI, Rsa I and Hae III can be used for distinguishing members of anginosus group efficiently (data not shown for S. intermedius and S. constellatus).

Framework species, S. thermophilus belongs to salivarius group which is closely related to bovis group [66] and consists of only 3 species (S. salivarius, S. vestibularis, S. thermophilus). S. thermophilus can be identified by using unique signature sequence (Table 3).

Two framework species, S. bovis and S. gallolyticus belong to bovis group. Members of bovis group, S. bovis and S. gallolyticus are difficult to identify. Isolates of these two species can be distinguished using the signature specific for S. gallolyticus and S. bovis. Moreover, the use of restriction enzymes Alu I, Bfa I and Hae III can be instrumental in distinguishing them. The signature found for S. bovis was found to be efficient in distinguishing S. bovis from closely related species-S. lutetiensis. These two species are difficult to distinguish solely on the basis of 16S rRNA gene.

Framework species S. mutans and S. sobrinus belong to mutans group. These two species are also difficult to distinguish. Beighton et al. (1991) [8] provided a scheme for identification of S. mutans and S. sobrinus strains. In the present investigations these two can be easily distinguished using species-specific signature and use of restriction enzymes- Alu I, Bfa I, Hae III, Msp I, Rsa I and Sau 3AI.

Conclusions

The species that are difficult to distinguish solely on the basis of 16S rRNA gene sequence can be identified using inner secrets of 16S rRNA gene, the signatures. These signatures can be exploited for quick identification. The aim of phylogenetic framework construction is to define a range of genetic variability within the species and later exploiting this variability for identification of different isolates. Similarly, use of restriction enzymes help in generating markers that can distinguish closely related species. Present study reveals that the framework, use of specific signatures in 16S rRNA gene and pattern generated by different restriction enzymes can be exploited for identification of isolates belonging to the genus Streptococcus. The markers generated in the present study are based on 16S rRNA gene sequence which is conserved and neither subjected to changes due to culture conditions nor exhibit biochemical variability. Thus the scheme proposed can be applied to any isolate. The approach is cost effective and rapid way for identification of various isolates and thus can be used to differentiate isolates that are difficult to distinguish due to very close traits and biochemical features. Additionally the approach is simple for preliminary identification of a species and can supplement existing automated identification processes. But we should keep in mind that this is a simplified procedure and thus it is also important to know the limitations of such simplified approach.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

DL and MV acknowledge research fellowship provided by CSIR.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Zoology, Molecular Biology Laboratory, University of Delhi

References

  1. Ryan KJ, Ray CG:Sherris Medical Microbiology. 2004, McGraw Hill, 4, Google Scholar
  2. Hardie JM, Whiley RA: The genus Streptococcus. The Genera of Lactic Acid Bacteria. Edited by: Wood BJB, Holz-apfel WH. 1995, 2: 55-124. Blackie Academic and Professional, View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Wilson CD, Salt GFH: Streptococci in animal disease. Streptococci. Society for Applied Bacteriology Symposium Series No. 7. Edited by: Skinner FA, Quesnel LB. 1978, 143-156. London, New York, San Francisco: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  4. Kawamura Y, Hou X-G, Sultana F, Miura H, Ezaki T: Determination of 16S rRNA sequences of Streptococcus mitis and Streptococcus gordonii and phylogenetic relationships among members of the genus Streptococcus. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1995, 45: 406-408. 10.1099/00207713-45-2-406View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Farrow JAE, Collins MD: Taxonomic studies on streptococci of serological groups C, G and L and possibly related taxa. Syst Appl Microbiol. 1984, 5: 483-493.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Lawrence J, Yajko DM, Hadley WK: Incidence and characterization of beta-hemolytic Streptococcus milleri and differentiation from S. pyogenes (group A), S. equisimilis (group C), and large-colony group G streptococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1985, 22: 772-777.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Kilian M, Mikkelsen L, Henrichsen J: Taxonomic studies of viridans streptococci: description of Streptococcus gordonii sp. nov. and emended descriptions of Streptococcus sanguis (White and Niven 1946), Streptococcus oralis (Bridge and Sneath 1982), and Streptococcus mitis (Andrewes and Horder 1906). Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1989, 39: 471-484. 10.1099/00207713-39-4-471.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Beighton D, Russell RRB, Whiley RA: A simple biochemical scheme for the differentiation of Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus. Caries Res. 1991, 25: 174-178. 10.1159/000261363View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hillmann JD, Andrews SW, Painter S, Stashenko P: Adaptive changes in a strain of Streptococcus mutans during colonization of the human oral cavity. Microb Ecol Health Dis. 1989, 2: 231-239. 10.3109/08910608909140225.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Tardif G, Sulavik MC, Jones GW, Clewell DB: Spontaneous switching of the sucrose-promoted colony phenotype in Streptococcus sanguis. Infect Immun. 1989, 57: 3945-3948.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Schmidhuber S, Ludwig W, Schleifer KH: Construction of a DNA probe for the specific identification of Streptococcus oralis. J Clin Microbiol. 1988, 26: 1042-1044.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Adnan S, Li N, Miura H, Hashimoto Y, Yamamoto H, Ezaki T: Covalently immobilized DNA plate for luminometric DNA-DNA hybridization to identify viridans streptococci in under 2 hours. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1993, 106: 139-142. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1993.tb05949.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bentley RW, Leigh JA: Development of PCR-based hybridization protocol for identification of streptococcal species. J Clin Microbiol. 1995, 33: 1296-1301.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Jacobs JA, Schot CS, Bunschoten AE, Schouls LM: Rapid species identification of "Streptococcus milleri" strains by line blot hybridization: identification of a distinct 16S rRNA population closely related to Streptococcus constellatus. J Clin Microbiol. 1996, 34: 1717-1721.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Jayarao BM, Dore JJ, Oliver SP: Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of 16S ribosomal DNA of Streptococcus and Enterococcus species of bovine origin. J Clin Microbiol. 1992, 30: 2235-2240.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Rudney JD, Larson CJ: Use of restriction fragment polymorphism analysis of rRNA genes to assign species to unknown clinical isolates of oral viridans streptococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1994, 32: 437-443.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Gillespie BE, Jayarao BM, Oliver SP: Identification of Streptococcus species by randomly amplified polymorphic deoxyribonucleic acid fingerprinting. J Dairy Sci. 1997, 80: 471-476. 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)75959-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Chen CC, Teng LJ, Chang TC: Identification of clinically relevant viridians group streptococci by sequence analysis of the 16S-23S ribosomal DNA spacer region. J Clin Microbiol. 2004, 42: 2651-2657. 10.1128/JCM.42.6.2651-2657.2004View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Nielsen XC, Justesen US, Dargis R, Kemp M, Christensen JJ: Identificatoin of clinically relevant nonhemolytic streptococci on the basis of sequence analysis of 16S-23S intergenic spacer region and partial gdh gene. J Clin Microbiol. 2009, 47: 932-939. 10.1128/JCM.01449-08View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Saruta K, Matsunaga T, Hoshina S, Kono M, Kitahara S, Kanemoto S, Sakai O, Machida K: Rapid identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae by PCR amplification of ribosomal DNA spacer region. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1995, 132: 165-170. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1995.tb07827.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Whiley RA, Duke B, Hardie JM, Hall LMC: Heterogeneity among 16S-23S rRNA intergenic spacers of species within the 'Streptococcus milleri group'. Microbiol. 1995, 141: 1461-1467. 10.1099/13500872-141-6-1461.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Garnier F, Gerbaud G, Courvalin P, Galimand M: Identification of clinically relevant viridans group streptococci to the species level by PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 1997, 35: 2337-2341.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Kawamura Y, Whiley RA, Shu SE, Ezaki T, Hardie JM: Genetic approaches to the identification of the mitis group within the genus Streptococcus. Microbiol. 1999, 145: 2605-2613.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Igarashi T, Ichikawa K, Yamamoto A, Goto N: Identification of mutans streptococcal species by the PCR products of dex genes. J Microbiol Methods. 2001, 46: 99-105. 10.1016/S0167-7012(01)00263-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hung WC, Tsai JC, Hsueh PR, Chia JS, Teng LJ: Species identification of mutans streptococci by groESL gene sequence. J Med Microbiol. 2005, 54: 857-862. 10.1099/jmm.0.46180-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Teng LJ, Hsueh PR, Tsai JC, Chen PW, Hsu JC, Lai HC, Lee CN, Ho SW: groESL sequence determination, phylogenetic analysis and species differentiation for viridians group streptococci. J Clin Microbiol. 2002, 40: 3172-3178. 10.1128/JCM.40.9.3172-3178.2002View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Tapp J, Thollesson M, Herrmann B: Phylogenetic relationships and genotyping of the genus Streptococcus by sequence determination of the RNase P RNA gene, rnpB. Int J Sys Evol Microbiol. 2003, 53: 1861-1871. 10.1099/ijs.0.02639-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Picard FJ, Ke D, Boudreau DK, Boissinot M, Huletsky A, Richard D, Ouellette M, Roy PH, Bergeron MG: Use if tuf sequences for genus specific PCR detection and Phylogenetic analysis of 28 streptococcal species. J Clin Microbiol. 2004, 42: 3686-3695. 10.1128/JCM.42.8.3686-3695.2004View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Kawamura Y, Itoh Y, Mishima N, Ohkusu K, Kasai H, Ezaki T: High genetic similarity of Streptococcus agalactiae and Streptococcus difficilis: S. difficilis Eldar et al. 1995 is a later synonym of S. agalactiae Lehmann and Neumann 1896 (Approved Lists 1980). Int J Syst Evol Microbio. 2005, 55: 961-965. 10.1099/ijs.0.63403-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Bentley RW, Leigh JA, Collins MD: Intrageneric structure of Streptococcus based on comparative analysis of smallsubunit rRNA sequences. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1991, 41: 487-494. 10.1099/00207713-41-4-487View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Poyart C, Quesne G, Coulon S, Berche P, Trieu-Cuot P: Identification of streptococci to species level by sequencing the gene encoding the manganese-dependent superoxide dismutase. J Clin Microbiol. 1998, 36: 41-47.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Poyart C, Quesne G, Trieu-Cuot P: Taxonomic dissection of the Streptococcus bovis group by analysis of manganese-dependent superoxide dismutase gene (sodA) sequences: reclassification of 'Streptococcus infantarius subsp. coli' as Streptococcus lutetiensis sp. nov. and of Streptococcus bovis biotype II.2 as Streptococcus pasteurianus sp.nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2002, 52: 1247-1255. 10.1099/ijs.0.02044-0PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Glazunova OO, Raoult D, Roux V: recN partial gene sequencing: a new tool for identification and phylogeny within the Streptococcus genus. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2010, 60: 2140-2148. 10.1099/ijs.0.018176-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. De Gheldre Y, Vandamme P, Goossens H, Struelens MJ: Identification of clinically relevant viridans streptococci and analysis of transfer DNA intergenic spacer length polymorphism. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1999, 49: 1591-1598. 10.1099/00207713-49-4-1591View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Baele M, Storms V, Haesebrouck F, Devriese LA, Gillis M, Verschraegen G, de Baere T, Vaneechoutte M: Application and evaluation of the interlaboratory reproducibility of tRNA intergenic length polymorphism analysis (tDNA-PCR) for identification of Streptococcus species. J Clin Microbiol. 2001, 39: 1436-1442. 10.1128/JCM.39.4.1436-1442.2001View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Bishop CJ, Aanensen DM, Jordan GE, Kilian M, Hanage WP, Spratt B: Assigning strains to bacterial species via the internet. BMC Biology. 2009, 7: 3- 10.1186/1741-7007-7-3View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Hanage WP, Kaijalainen T, Herva E, Saukkoriipi A, Syrjänen R, Spratt BG: Using multilocus sequence data to define the pneumococcus. J Bacteriol. 2005, 187: 6223-6230. 10.1128/JB.187.17.6223-6230.2005View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Woese CR: Bacterial evolution. Microbiol Rev. 1987, 51: 221-271.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Clarridge JE: Impact of 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis for identification of bacteria on clinical microbiology and infectious diseases. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004, 17: 840-862. 10.1128/CMR.17.4.840-862.2004View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Janda JM, Abbott SL: 16S rRNA gene sequencing for bacterial identification in the diagnostic laboratory:pluses, perils, and pitfalls. J Clin Microbiol. 2007, 45: 2761-2764. 10.1128/JCM.01228-07View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Maidak BL, Cole JR, Lilburn TG, Parker CT, Saxman PR, Stredwick JM, Garrity GM, Li B, Olsen GJ, Pramanik S, Schmidt TM, Tiedje JM: The RDP (Ribosomal Database Project) continues. Nucl Acids Res. 2000, 28: 173-174. 10.1093/nar/28.1.173View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Schlegel L, Grimont F, Ageron E, Grimont PAD, Bouvet A: Reappraisal of the taxonomy of the Streptococcus bovis/Streptococcus equinus complex and related species: description of Streptococcus gallolyticus subsp. gallolyticus subsp. nov., S. gallolyticus subsp. macedonicus subsp. nov. and S. gallolyticus subsp. pasteurianus subsp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2003, 53: 631-645. 10.1099/ijs.0.02361-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG: The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25: 4876-4882. 10.1093/nar/25.24.4876View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Felsenstein J: Phylip (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.57c. 1993, Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle,http://evolution.genetics.washington.edu/phylip.htmlGoogle Scholar
  45. Saitou N, Nei M: The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987, 4: 406-425.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Jukes TH, Cantor CR: Evolution of protein molecules. Mammalian Protein Metabolism. Edited by: Munro HN. 1969, 21-132. New York: Academic PressView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Page RDM: TreeView: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computer. Comput Appl Biosci. 1996, 12: 357-35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Clamp M, Cuff J, Searle SM, Barton GJ: "The Jalview Java Alignment Editor". Bioinformatics. 2004, 20: 426-7. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg430View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Bailey TL, Williams N, Misleh C, Li WW: MEME: discovering and analyzing DNA and protein sequence motifs. Nucleic Acids Res Web Server issue. 2006, W369-W373.Google Scholar
  50. Blanc M, Marilley L, Beffa T, Aragno M: Rapid identification of heterotrophic, thermophilic, spore-forming bacteria isolated from hot composts. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1997, 47: 1246-1248. 10.1099/00207713-47-4-1246View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Heyndrickx M, Vauterin L, Vandamme P, Kersters K, De Vos P: Applicability of combined amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis (ARDRA) patterns in bacterial phylogeny and taxonomy. J Microbiol Methods. 1996, 26: 247-259. 10.1016/0167-7012(96)00916-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Heyndrickx M, Lebbe L, Kersters K, Hoste B, De Wachter R, De Vos P, Forsyth G, Logan NA: Proposal of Virgibacillus proomii sp. nov. and emended description of Virgibacillus pantothenticus (Proom and Knight 1950) Heyndrickx et al. 1998. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1999, 49: 1083-1090. 10.1099/00207713-49-3-1083View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Bradbury JM: International committee on systematic bacteriology, subcommittee on the taxonomy of Mollicutes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2001, 51: 2227-2230. 10.1099/00207713-51-6-2227.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Porwal S, Lal S, Cheema S, Kalia VC: Phylogeny in aid of the present and novel microbial lineages: Diversity in Bacillus. PLoS ONE. 2009, 4: e4438- 10.1371/journal.pone.0004438View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Kalia VC, Mukherjee T, Bhushan A, Joshi J, Shankar P, Huma N: Analysis of the unexplored features of rrs (16S rDNA) of the Genus Clostridium. BMC Genomics. 2011, 12: 18- 10.1186/1471-2164-12-18View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Ortqvist A, Jonsson I, Kalin M, Krook A: Comparison of three methods for detection of pneumococcal antigen in sputum of patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1989, 8: 956-961. 10.1007/BF01967565View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Sorensen UBS: Typing of pneumococcal by using 12 pooled antisera. J Clin Microbiol. 1993, 31: 2097-2100.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Garcia A, Roson B, Perez JL, Verdaguer R, Dorca J, Carratala J, Casanova A, Manresa F, Gudiol F: Usefulness of PCR and antigen latex agglutination tests with samples obtained by transthoracic needle aspiration for diagnosis of pneumococcal pneumonia. J Clin Microbiol. 1999, 37: 709-714.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Beall B, Facklam RR, Jackson DM, Starling HH: Rapid screening for penicillin susceptibility of systemic pneumococcal isolates by restriction enzyme profiles of the pbp2B gene. J Clin Microbiol. 1998, 36: 2359-2362.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Toikka P, Nikkari S, Ruuskanen O, Leinonen M, Mertsola J: Pneumolysin PCR-based diagnosis of invasive pneumococcal infection in children. J Clin Microbiol. 1999, 37: 633-637.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Whiley RA, Fraser H, Hardie JM, Beighton D: Phenotypic differentiation of Streptococcus intermedius, Streptococcus constellatus, and Streptococcus anginosus strains with the "Streptococcus milleri group.". J Clin Microbiol. 1990, 28: 1497-1501.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Whiley RA, Beighton D: Amended descriptions and recognition of Streptococcus constellatus, Streptococcus intermedius, and Streptococcus anginosus as distinct species. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1991, 41: 1-5. 10.1099/00207713-41-1-1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Facklam R: What Happened to the Streptococci: Overview of Taxonomic and Nomenclature Changes. Clinical Microbial Reviews. 2002, 15: 613-630. 10.1128/CMR.15.4.613-630.2002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Von Baum H, Klemme FR, Geiss HK, Sonntag HG: Comparative evaluation of a commercial system for identification of gram positive cocci. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1998, 17: 849-852. 10.1007/s100960050205View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Bartie KL, Wilson MJ, Williams DW, Lewis AO: Macrorestriction fingerprinting of "Streptococcus milleri" group bacteria by pulse-field gel electrophoresis. J Clin Microbiol. 2000, 38: 2141-2149.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Whiley RA, Beighton D: Current classification of the oral streptococci. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 1998, 13: 195-216. 10.1111/j.1399-302X.1998.tb00698.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Lal et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement