Skip to main content

Table 5 Directed antimicrobial agents stratified by type of infection

From: Factors associated to prevalence and treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections: a seven years retrospective study in three tertiary care hospitals

Directed antimicrobial therapy

Number (%) of patients

Infection type

VABP (N = 31)

Bacteremia (N = 22)

cUTI/AP (N = 18)

HABP (N = 16)

SWI (N = 16)

BTI (N = 9)

DWI (N = 7)

SBFI (N = 5)

All (N = 124)

No treatment

2 (6.5%)

1 (4.5%)

1 (5.6%)

1 (6.3%)

3 (18.8%)

1 (11.1%)

1 (14.3%)

0

10 (8.1%)

No Gram-negative coverage

0

0

0

0

1 (6.3%)

0

1 (14.3%)

0

2 (1.6%)

Gram-negative therapy

29 (93.5%)

21 (95.5%)

17 (94.4%)

15 (93.8%)

12 (75.0%)

8 (88.9%)

5 (71.4%)

5 (100%)

112 (90.3%)

 Monotherapy

3 (9.7%)

1 (4.5%)

12 (66.7%)

5 (31.3%)

6 (37.5%)

2 (22.2%)

1 (14.3%)

1 (20.0%)

31 (25.0%)

 Dual therapy

13 (41.9%)

8 (36.4%)

5 (27.8%)

8 (50.0%)

6 (37.5%)

5 (55.6%)

3 (42.9%)

2 (40.0%)

50 (40.3%)

 Three drug combinations

10 (32.3%)

10 (45.5%)

0

2 (12.5%)

0

1 (11.1%)

1 (14.3%)

2 (40.0%)

26 (21.0%)

 Four and more drug combinations

3 (9.7%)

2 (9.1%)

0

0

0

0

0

0

5 (4.0%)

Number active agents

 No active agent

3 (9.7%)

3 (13.6%)

1 (5.6%)

2 (12.5%)

1 (6.3%)

0

1 (14.3%)

0

11 (8.9%)

 One active agent

16 (51.6%)

12 (54.5%)

15 (83.3%)

10 (62.5%)

8 (50.0%)

4 (44.4%)

3 (42.9%)

3 (60.0%)

71 (57.3%)

 Two active agents

9 (29.0%)

4 (18.2%)

1 (5.6%)

3 (18.8%)

3 (18.8%)

4 (44.4%)

1 (14.3%)

2 (40.0%)

27 (21.8%)

 Three active agents

1 (3.2%)

1 (4.5%)

0

0

0

0

0

0

2 (1.6%)

 Four active agents

0

1 (4.5%)

0

0

0

0

0

0

1 (0.8%)

  1. AP acute pyelonephritis, BTI biliary tract infection, cUTI complicated urinary tract infection, DWI deep wound infection, HABP hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia, SBFI sterile body fluids infection, SWI superficial wound infection, VABP ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia