Skip to main content
Download PDF

High prevalence of Mucosa-Associated extended-spectrum β-Lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae among Iranain patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)

Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials volume 22, Article number: 86 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Several pieces of evidence suggest that certain pathobionts belonging to Enterobacterales are associated with the development and progression of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) ESBLs are frequently found in the Enterobacterales members, particularly in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp., and might trigger antibiotic-induced perturbations of the intestinal microbiota and led to more severe disease activity in IBD. Therefore, the severity of IBD could be influenced by ESBL-producing Enterobacterales, and hence, this study aimed to investigate the presence of ESBLs and carbapenemases among mucosa-associated E. coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from colonic biopsies of Iranian patients with IBD.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, E. coli and K. pneumoniae were isolated from inflamed ileum and/or colon tissue of patients with IBD, including Ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD), during colonoscopy. Demographic data and clinical characteristics were recorded, and UC and CD disease activity and extent were evaluated according to the full Mayo score and Crohn’s disease activity index (CDAI), respectively. Phenotypic and molecular detection of ESBL- and carbapenemase-producing E. coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae were carried out. Disease activity and other clinical and microbial features were compared in patients with and without gut colonization with ESBL producers.

Results

A total of 83 IBD patients, including 67 UC and 16 CD, were enrolled in the initial analysis. Intestinal colonization with ESBL-producing E. coli and/or Klebsiella pneumoniae was found in 37 (55.2%) of UC and 9 (56.2%) of DC patients – mostly harbored E. coli containing the blaCTX−M and blaTEM genes. UC patients with intestinal colonization with ESBL-producers had more severe disease compared with patients without colonization. Moreover, 10.2% of tested E. coli and 34.8% of K. pneumoniea were recognized as potential carbapenemase producers.

Conclusion

Intestinal colonization with ESBL producers could arise disease activity in IBD patients. Further large-scale case-control studies should be performed to investigate the possible confounding factors that could contribute to this outcome.

Background

Ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD) are two types of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) that are chronic, progressive, and relapsing immune-mediated gut disorders of unknown etiology [1]. UC characteristically affects the rectum and generally extends proximally along the entire colon and can be classified as proctosigmoiditis, left-sided colitis, or pancolitis [2]. Bloody diarrhoea and tenesmus are the most common symptoms of UC, although it can be accompanied by extraintestinal complications due to intestinal inflammatory activity [3]. By contrast, CD is characterized by transmural inflammation and patchy lesions that are potentially scattered anywhere in the digestive tract leading to fibrosis, stricture, and fistula [4]. CD-related clinical manifestations are heterogeneous, but mainly include chronic abdominal pain, clinical signs of bowel obstruction and/or diarrhea with the passage of blood or mucus, and weight loss [5].

Etiological factors including genetic variances, immune response dysregulation, intestinal microbial alternations, and environmental changes have been described to play critical roles in the pathogenesis of IBD [6]. It has been long believed that the altered host-microbe homeostasis, defined as microbial “dysbiosis”, contributes to the pathogenesis and progression of IBD. Several pieces of evidence suggest that more severe CD and UC activity is associated with the Enterobacterales “blooming” following the disturbed microbiota in the gut [7]. Moreover, antibiotic-induced perturbations of the intestinal microbial community have long been described as a potential trigger for IBD [8].

Extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) are bacterial enzymes that confer resistance to broad-spectrum β-lactam antibiotics including third-generation cephalosporins, and their presence is also frequently associated with resistance to other antimicrobial agents such as fluoroquinolones and aminoglycosides [9, 10]. ESBLs are frequently found in the Enterobacterales members, particularly in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. which are the most common multidrug-resistant microorganisms (MDROs) found in the gut. More importantly, ESBL-related genes can be spread through the intestinal bacteria and enable the propagation of resistance to susceptible commensal strains in the gut. Vaisman et al. previously reported that one-third of hospitalized IBD patients who developed pouchitis were colonized with ESBL-producing Enterobacterales [11]. Moreover, Ananthakrishnan and McGinley found that more than one-quarter of hospitalizations for comprised CD and UC are associated with antibiotic-resistant infections which had four-fold greater mortality [12]. Therefore, the severity of the course of IBD may be influenced by ESBL-producing gut bacteria, and hence, this study aimed to investigate ESBL- and carbapenemases-producing E. coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from colonic biopsies of Iranian patients with IBD.

Methods and materials

Patients and sample collection

This study was carried out under the approval of the Ethical Review Committee of the Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases affiliated with Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (Project No. IR.SBMU.RIGLD.REC.1401.010). Informed consent was obtained from all patients and/or their legal guardians before sample collection. In this cross-sectional study, patients with IBD, including CD or UC, who were referred to Taleghani hospital in Tehran, Iran were enrolled between July 2021 and August 2022. Diagnosis and classification of IBD depended on a combination of clinical, radiological, endoscopic, and pathological features [13]. All biopsy specimens were taken from inflamed tissue from the ileum and/or colon of IBD patients during colonoscopy. Demographic data and clinical characteristics were recorded for all patients through a questionnaire. The disease activity of UC and CD patients was evaluated using Mayo scoring and Crohn’s disease activity index (CDAI), respectively.

Bacterial isolation and identification

Biopsy samples were taken with sterile forceps passed through the colonoscopy, placed in sterile tubes containing brain heart infusion (BHI) broth, and then immediately delivered to the microbiology laboratory of the Foodborne and Waterborne Diseases Research Center, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases. The fresh biopsies were aseptically homogenized and cultured on MacConkey agar followed by overnight incubation at 37◦C in aerobic conditions. Subsequently, suspected lactose fermenting colonies with different colony morphology per sample were selected and subcultured for further bacterial verification. Identification of E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates was performed based on conventional biochemical tests using oxidase, citrate utilization, urease production, methyl red, Voges-Proskauer, motility, and various sugar fermentation tests. Additionally, molecular confirmation was performed by PCR amplification of phoA gene of E. coli and khe gene in K. pneumoniae using specific primers as previously described [14].

Antimicrobial susceptibility determination

Antimicrobial susceptibility of E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates was carried out using the Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion method as recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines [15]. Commercially available antibiotic disks (Mast Co., United Kingdom) used in this study included ampicillin, (10 µg), piperacillin (100 µg), piperacillin-tazobactam (100/10 µg), cefoxitin (30 µg), ceftriaxone (30 µg), cefotaxime (30 µg), ceftazidime (30 µg), cefepime (30 µg), cefixime (30 µg), imipenem (10 µg), ertapenem (10 µg), meropenem (10 µg), aztreonam (30 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), levofloxacin (5 µg), ofloxacin (5 µg), moxifloxacin (5 µg), gatifloxacin (5 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), amikacin (30 µg), kanamycin (30 µg), tobramycin (10 µg), tetracycline (30 µg), and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 µg).

Phenotypic screening for ESBLs and carbapenemase

E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates that showed a reduced zone size to third-generation cephalosporins were selected for ESBL activity screening using the double disc synergy (DDT) following the procedure described by the CLSI. Accordingly, a ceftazidime disc (30 µg) was placed on the inoculated Mueller Hinton agar 15 mm away from the center of the amoxicillin-clavulanic acid disc (20 µg/10 µg). Extension of the zone of inhibition towards amoxicillin-clavulanic acid was interpreted as ESBL producer. Additionally, the Carba NP test, which has been described to be a highly sensitive method for the detection of K. pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) and metallo-beta-lactamase (MBL) [16], was performed to screen carbapenemase producers following the protocol described previously [17].

Molecular detection of plasmid genes associated with ESBLs and carbapenemase

The genomic DNA was isolated from mucosa-associated E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates from IBD patients using QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Molecular detection of ESBLs was performed for the blaTEM, blaSHV, blaCTX−M, blaPER, blaVEB, and blaGES genes using multiplex PCR assays as described previously with slight modifications [18]. Amplification was carried out as follows: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 10 min; 30 cycles of 94 °C for 40 s, 60 °C for 40 s, and 72 °C for 1 min; and a final elongation step at 72 °C for 7 min. To identify carbapenemase encoding genes, multiplex PCR assays were carried out for the amplification of blaIMP, blaVIM, blaNDM, blaSPM, blaDIM, and blaKPC using specific primers as described previously [19]. The PCR products were separated into 1.5% agarose gels and visualized under UV light after the gels were stained with ethidium bromide.

Statistical analysis

All data were assessed using R software (version 4.0.3, The R Foundation for Statistical Computing; Vienna, Austria). The correlation between variables was assessed using Spearman and Pearson’s correlation tests. Logistic regression analysis was applied to determine whether ESBL carriage is independently associated with the severity of IBD, or whether this is simply driven by the more expansive antibiotic treatment history in patients with more severe disease. All P-values were considered significant at a 5% level.

Results

Clinical characteristics and patients demographics

A total of 83 patients with confirmed IBD diagnosis, including 67 (80.7%) with UC and 16 (19.3%) with CD, were enrolled in the study. Based on colonoscopy and pathology findings, about 46.3% of UC patients had proctitis at diagnosis, followed by left-sided colitis (28.3%), backwash ileitis (16.4%), and pancolitis (9%). The majority of CD patients (62.5%) predominantly had ileal involvement, followed by the involvement of both ileum and colon (ileocolonic) (25%) and right-sided colitis (12.5%). Patients with UC had a median Mayo score of 9 (range 3–12) and in patients with CD, the median baseline CDAI was 129 (range 56–348). In this study, a Mayo score of 3 to 5 points indicates mildly active disease, a score of 6 to 9 points indicates moderately active disease, and a score of 10 to 12 points indicates severely active disease in UC patients. Accordingly, a CDAI score of 150–219 has been labeled as a mildly active disease and 220–400 as a moderately active disease in CD patients. No CD patients had severely active disease based on CDAI scoring. About one-third of IBD patients had a history of prior antibiotic therapy with beta-lactams (31.3%) or quinolones (38.5%). Details of the demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 Baseline demographic and characteristics of patients with IBD enrolled in this study
Full size table

Bacterial isolates and antibiotic resistance profiles

In this study, 68 mucosa-associated E. coli (54 from UC and 14 from CD) and 23 mucosa-associated K. pneumoniea (16 from UC and 7 from CD) isolates were recovered from biopsies of IBD patients, in which some patients harbored different strains. As shown in Fig. 1, antimicrobial susceptibility testing revealed that the majority of E. coli and K. pneumoniea isolates were non-susceptible to ampicillin, cefoxitin, cefepime, and trimethoprim, and 56% (51/91) of the isolates considered MDR, including 55.7% (39/70) of UC- and 57.2% (12/21) of CD-associated isolates.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Frequency bar chart illustrating phenotypic antibiotic susceptibility profiles of mucosa-associated E. coli (blue chart) and K. pneumoniea (red chart) isolates from colonic biopsies of patients with IBD.

Abbreviations: AK, amikacin; AMP, ampicillin; ATM, aztreonam; CAZ, ceftazidime; CFM, cefixime; CIP, ciprofloxacin; CPM, cefepime; CRO, ceftriaxone; CTX, cefotaxime; ETP, ertapenem; FOX, cefoxitin; GAT, gatifloxacin; GM, gentamicin; IMI, imipenem; K, kanamycin; LEV, levofloxacin; MEM, meropenem; MFX, moxifloxacin; OF, ofloxacin; PRL, piperacillin; PTZ, piperacillin-tazobactam; TMP, trimethoprim; TOB, tobramycin; TS, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole

Full size image

Characteristics of ESBL- and carbapenemase-producing isolates

Phenotypic screening for ESBLs indicated that 54.4% (37/68) of investigated mucosa-associated E. coli and 69.6% (16/23) of K. pneumoniea isolates showed ESBL activity. Indeed, gut colonization with ESBL-producing E. coli and/or K. pneumoniae strains was found in 55.2% (37/67) of UC and 56.2% (9/16) of DC patients. Moreover, 7.3% (5/68) of tested E. coli and 34.8% (8/23) of K. pneumoniea were recognized as potential carbapenemase producers. Molecular analysis confirmed the presence of blaCTX−M, blaSHV, blaTEM, and blaVEB ESBL genes, in which blaCTX−M and blaTEM were the most prevalent ESBL genes among mucosa-associated E. coli (39.9% and 31.4%) and K. pneumoniea (42.8% and 21.4%), respectively. In addition, unfortunately, carbapenemase-encoding genes blaNDM, blaIMP, and blaKPC were detected in E. coli and K. pneumoniea isolates. Table 2 summarizes the frequency of ESBL- and carbapenemase-associated mobile genetic elements detected in mucosa-associated E. coli and K. pneumoniea isolates from UC and CD patients. Figure 2 shows a schematic illustration that represents the distribution of ESBL-producing E. coli and/or K. pneumoniea isolates, as well as three major related ESBL genes, among patients with IBD according to their disease severity, e.g., CDAI or Mayo scoring. According to Pearson’s correlation coefficient analysis, a significant positive correlation was found between the intestinal carriage of ESBL-producing E. coli and/or K. pneumoniea and the disease severity (based on Mayo scoring) in the patients with UC (P-value = 0.03), indicating more severe patients were more likely to be colonized with ESBL producers (Fig. 3). In addition, there was a significant positive correlation between the presence of ESBL-harboring strains and prior antibiotic therapy with β-lactams and/or quinolones (P-value = 0.01). Additionally, mucosa-associated ESBL- and carbapenemase-producing isolates were more likely to be MDR (P-value = 0.01). Figure 3 is a heatmap representing the correlation between the presence of ESBL-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniea isolates and the clinical and demographic features of patients with IBD enrolled in this study.

Table 2 Frequency of ESBL- and carbapenemase-associated mobile genetic elements among mucosa-associated E. coli and K. pneumoniea isolates from colonic biopsies of patients with IBD.
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Distribution of ESBL-producing E. coli and/or K. pneumoniea isolates and three major related determinants among patients with CD (left) and UC (right) according to their disease severity (e.g., CDAI or Mayo scoring)

Abbreviations: CDAI, Crohn’s disease activity index

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Heatmap illustrating the pairwise correlation between bacterial isolates as well as clinical and demographic features of patients with IBD calculated with Pearson’s correlation. The bigger the circle and the deeper the color represents a higher correlation

Abbreviations: BLs, beta-lactams; CAP+, carbapenemase-producers; ESBL+, ESBL-producers; IST, immunosuppressant therapy with steroids; MDR, multi-drug resistance; MET, metronidazole; NSAIDs, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, PPI, proton-pump inhibitor drugs; QNs, quinolones

Full size image

To determine if carrying ESBL-producer bacteria is linked to the disease severity independently or if it is influenced by a more extensive history of antibiotic treatment in patients with severe disease, we categorized our main outcome variable into two groups: severe disease and non-severe. We then conducted binary logistic regression to examine which input variables are associated with the patient’s outcome. Accordingly, our analysis revealed that ESBL carriage was found to be associated with disease severity among patients with UC (odds ratio (OR) 4.25 [95% CI 2.76 to 5.73], P-value = 0.001), however, there was no significant association between prior antibiotic therapy and disease severity (odds ratio (OR) 1.01 [95% CI 0.26 to 1.75], P-value = 0.02). To enhance comprehension, we have additionally depicted the relationship between the severity of the disease and the carriage of ESBL producers, taking into account the history of long-term antibiotic treatment with beta-lactams, as illustrated in Fig. 4.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Chord-diagram visualizing the correlation between disease severity and ESBL carriage, taking into account the history of antibiotic treatment in patients with UC. Our findings revealed that the severity of the disease was linked to the presence of ESBL producers, regardless of whether UC patients had received long-term antibiotic treatment prior to that

Abbreviations: ESBL+, carriage of ESBL-producers; ESBL-, carriage of ESBL non-producers; PriorCeph+, patients had a history of antibiotic treatment with cephalosporins; PriorCeph-, patients had no history of long-term exposure to cephalosporins previously

Full size image

Discussion

Changes in the gut microbiome with an expansion of certain potentially harmful proteobacteria, particularly pathobiont strains belonging to the Enterobacterales, have been described to be associated with increased disease activity and a higher risk of treatment failure in patients with IBD [20,21,22]. Furthermore, asymptomatically intestinal colonization with ESBL-producing Enterobacterales results not only in the spread of dangerous MDROs and superbugs but also in the favor of the reduction in microbial richness and diversity and the overgrowth of Proteobacteria and Enterobacterales pathobionts, particularly of drug-resistant E. coli and K. pneumoniea strains [23]. Moreover, it has been previously reported that ESBL-producing Enterobacterales carriers may suffer from sub-acute intestinal inflammation leading to gut microbiome dysbiosis [23]. With this in mind and based on the fact that E. coli and K. pneumoniea are the most common ESBL-producing bacteria colonizing the intestinal tract, we hypothesized that patients with IBD colonized intestinally with ESBL-producing isolates may have a more severe disease course. To the best of our knowledge, the prevalence of intestinal colonized ESBL-producing Enterobacterales has never been reported in an Iranian IBD patient population before, while these superbugs have a relatively high prevalence among Iranian population in both healthcare settings and communities [24, 25]. This is the first study to investigate the carriage status of mucosa-associated ESBL-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniea among Iranian patients with IBD.

Notoriously, we found that more than half of IBD patients were intestinally colonized with ESBL-producing E. coli and/or K. pneumoniea, which was five times more frequently than described in the European [26], Canadian [11, 27], and Chinese [27] IBD patient population. Moreover, ESBL producers in our study were significantly associated with the MDR phenotype, which is in accordance with previous reports [28, 29]. As IBD patients have a significantly elevated risk of bacterial infection that is primarily a consequence of the wide use of immunomodulators and increased intestinal permeability [30], the high colonization rate with ESBL-producers and MDROs could potentially enhance overall mortality, morbidity, and economic burden attributable to IBD-related complications. Notably, to our knowledge, this study is the first to report the intestinal carriage of blaNDM, blaKPC, and blaIMP-harboring E. coli and K. pneumoniae among patients with IBD. A matter of concern is that the enrichment of such intestinal pathobionts has been described to be associated with increasing the permeability of the intestinal epithelial barriers and facilitating the translocation of the bacteria to the bloodstream [31, 32], and it may be more considerable in individuals with intestinal barrier dysfunction like IBD patients. The empirical antimicrobial therapy of infections with carbapenemase producers is not precisely addressed by infection disease societies such as the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID), and available treatments are limited with a significant ecological impact and possible toxicity [33, 34]. However, although intestinal carriage of carbapenemase producers may contribute to the development of severe life-threatening infections and increase the risk of comorbidities [35], we could not describe significant risk factors for these infections in carriers with IBD and further research efforts are needed to obtain more conclusive considerations in this regard.

Remarkably, we found that UC patients colonized with ESBL producers tended to have greater disease severity and symptoms than non-carriers. These observations are in accordance with those previously reported by Skujaa et al. [26], in which UC patients with ESBL-producing Enterobacterales gut colonization exhibited worse disease activity. Distinctively, we analyzed our data to determine whether ESBL producers are being selected by the regular and long-term exposure to antimicrobial agents (especially β-lactams) in more severe patients during hospitalization, infectious complications, and surgeries, or whether the colonization with ESBL-producing E. coli and/or K. pneumoniea increases the risk of the overgrowth of either resident or introduced pathobionts. According to our multivariate analysis, ESBL carriage was independently associated with the disease severity in UC patients, and this correlation was not dependent on prior long-term antibiotic treatment in patients with more severe disease. As described previously, antibiotic-resistant Enterobacterales pathobionts ‘blooms’ are associated with more severe intestinal inflammation and colitis [22, 36, 37].

We found a positive correlation between the presence of ESBL-harboring E. coli and/or K. pneumoniea strains and prior antibiotic therapy with β-lactams and/or quinolones. It is a widespread opinion that prior receipt of third-generation cephalosporins is a risk factor for the acquisition of ESBL-producing Enterobacterales [38]. Not surprisingly, most of the IBD patients harboring ESBL producers in this study had a history of long-term antibiotic therapy with third-generation cephalosporins, including cefixime or ceftriaxone. Furthermore, emerging resistance to ciprofloxacin, the antibiotic of choice in complicated IBD cases, has been reported in ESBL-producing Enterobacterales colonizing the gut [39, 40]. Our results provide evidence of ciprofloxacin resistance in more than 70% of ESBL-producing E. coli and/or K. pneumoniea isolates from IBD patients. Accordingly, a high gut colonization rate with ESBL-carrying Enterobacterales, mainly E. coli strains expressing the CTX-M gene, in UC patients was formerly found to be associated with high resistance to ciprofloxacin by Skuja et al. [41]. These observations imply that the relationship between ESBL production and ciprofloxacin resistance in such cases may be due to the interplay between long-term broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy and conditions favoring the appearance of MDROs. An assist conceivable clarification for the co-occurrence of ESBL production with ciprofloxacin resistance is transporting the resistance determinates on the same plasmids [42]. Moreover, It has been documented that ESBL-producing bacteria tend to multiply resistant against other broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents [43].

The role of antimicrobial therapy in IBD is controversial and there is currently insufficient data to recommend antibiotic therapy or not. Based on the role of gut aerobic and anaerobic pathobionts in the progression of IBD, antimicrobial combination therapy appears to be a rational strategy in the management of the primary disease process or its complications. Accordingly, using ciprofloxacin combined with metronidazole is widely accepted for the treatment of colitis and perianal fistula in severe cases of UC and CD. However, on the other hand, there is a considerable risk for intestinal overcolonization with multidrug-resistant pathobionts due to the antibiotic selective pressure in IBD patients during empirical antimicrobial therapy. Dubinsky et al. have recently reported that long-term antibiotic treatment used to alleviate pouchitis in patients with UC could enrich the strains that acquired multidrug resistance loci, including ESBLs [44]. Hence, non-empirical antimicrobial and combined therapies are suggested for severe cases of IBD colonized by resistant strains. In addition, the common use of broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents is not recommended in mild or moderate cases of IBD [45].

Conclusions

In summary, a high prevalence of mucosa-associated ESBL-producing E. coli and/or K. pneumoniea in IBD patients obtained in this study should be taken into consideration in the implementation of antimicrobial selection by gastroenterologists in these patients as well as infection control experts. Moreover, given our data, colonization with ESBL producers could arise disease activity in these patients. Therefore, broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy may be a double-edged sword, and hence, further large-scale randomized clinical trials should be carried out to explore the effect of antibacterial therapy, either individually or combined with other agents or therapies, in the management of IBD. In addition, determining the antibiotic susceptibility of fecal E. coli and/or K. pneumoniea may be useful for selecting appropriate treatments for patients overcolonized by these pathobionts or recognizing therapies that may pose a potential risk.

Data Availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

BHI:

Brain heart infusion

CD:

Crohn’s disease

CDAI:

Crohn’s disease activity index

ESBL:

Extended-spectrum β-lactamase

IBD:

Inflammatory bowel diseases

MDROs:

Multidrug-resistant microorganisms

UC:

Ulcerative colitis

References

  1. Dalal SR, Chang EB. The microbial basis of inflammatory bowel diseases. J Clin Invest. 2014;124(10):4190–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Kobayashi T, Siegmund B, Le Berre C, Wei SC, Ferrante M, Shen B, et al. Ulcerative colitis. Nat Reviews Disease Primers. 2020;6(1):74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ungaro R, Mehandru S, Allen PB, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Colombel JF. Ulcerative colitis. Lancet. 2017;389(10080):1756–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Athanasakos A, Mazioti A, Economopoulos N, Kontopoulou C, Stathis G, Filippiadis D, et al. Inflammatory bowel disease—the role of cross-sectional imaging techniques in the investigation of the small bowel. Insights into Imaging. 2015;6(1):73–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Weiser M, Simon JM, Kochar B, Tovar A, Israel JW, Robinson A, et al. Molecular classification of Crohn’s disease reveals two clinically relevant subtypes. Gut. 2018;67(1):36–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ahluwalia B, Moraes L, Magnusson MK, Öhman L. Immunopathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease and mechanisms of biological therapies. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018;53(4):379–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Khorsand B, Asadzadeh Aghdaei H, Nazemalhosseini-Mojarad E, Nadalian B, Nadalian B, Houri H. Overrepresentation of Enterobacteriaceae and Escherichia coli is the major gut microbiome signature in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis; a comprehensive metagenomic analysis of IBDMDB datasets. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;12.

  8. Sekirov I, Tam NM, Jogova M, Robertson ML, Li Y, Lupp C, et al. Antibiotic-induced perturbations of the intestinal microbiota alter host susceptibility to enteric infection. Infect Immun. 2008;76(10):4726–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Castanheira M, Simner PJ, Bradford PA. Extended-spectrum β-lactamases: an update on their characteristics, epidemiology and detection. JAC-Antimicrobial Resist. 2021;3(3).

  10. Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez B, Rodríguez-Baño J. Current options for the treatment of infections due to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in different groups of patients. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019;25(8):932–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vaisman A, Pivovarov K, McGeer A, Willey B, Borgundvaag B, Porter V, et al. Prevalence and incidence of antimicrobial-resistant organisms among hospitalized inflammatory bowel disease patients. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2013;24(4):e117–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Ananthakrishnan AN, McGinley EL. Infection-related hospitalizations are associated with increased mortality in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. J Crohns Colitis. 2013;7(2):107–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Magro F, Langner C, Driessen A, Ensari A, Geboes K, Mantzaris GJ, et al. European consensus on the histopathology of inflammatory bowel disease. J Crohns Colitis. 2013;7(10):827–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Li P, Zhang D, Li H, Pang J, Guo H, Qiu J. Establishment and application of Multiplex PCR for simultaneously detecting Escherichia coli, Salmonella, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Staphylococcus aureus in Minks. Front Vet Sci. 2020;7:588173.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 30 ed2021.

  16. Nordmann P, Poirel L, Dortet L. Rapid detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18(9):1503–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Pasteran F, Tijet N, Melano RG, Corso A. Simplified protocol for Carba NP Test for enhanced detection of Carbapenemase Producers directly from bacterial cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53(12):3908–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Dallenne C, Da Costa A, Decré D, Favier C, Arlet G. Development of a set of multiplex PCR assays for the detection of genes encoding important β-lactamases in Enterobacteriaceae. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65(3):490–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Trung NT, Hien TT, Huyen TT, Quyen DT, Binh MT, Hoan PQ, et al. Simple multiplex PCR assays to detect common pathogens and associated genes encoding for acquired extended spectrum betalactamases (ESBL) or carbapenemases from surgical site specimens in Vietnam. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2015;14:23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Olbjørn C, Cvancarova Småstuen M, Thiis-Evensen E, Nakstad B, Vatn MH, Jahnsen J, et al. Fecal microbiota profiles in treatment-naïve pediatric inflammatory bowel disease - associations with disease phenotype, treatment, and outcome. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2019;12:37–49.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Morgan XC, Tickle TL, Sokol H, Gevers D, Devaney KL, Ward DV, et al. Dysfunction of the intestinal microbiome in inflammatory bowel disease and treatment. Genome Biol. 2012;13(9):R79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Mukhopadhya I, Hansen R, El-Omar EM, Hold GL. IBD-what role do Proteobacteria play? Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;9(4):219–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Piewngam P, Quiñones M, Thirakittiwatthana W, Yungyuen T, Otto M, Kiratisin P. Composition of the intestinal microbiota in extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae carriers and non-carriers in Thailand. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2019;53(4):435–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Beigverdi R, Jabalameli L, Jabalameli F, Emaneini M. Prevalence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae: first systematic review and meta-analysis from Iran. J Global Antimicrob Resist. 2019;18:12–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Aghamohammad S, Nikbin VS, Badmasti F, Shahcheraghi F. High heterogeneity of fecal carriage extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing E. coli isolated from iranian community and clinical settings. BMC Infect Dis. 2022;22(1):318.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Skuja V, Derovs A, Pekarska K, Rudzite D, Lavrinovica E, Piekuse L, et al. Gut colonization with extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae may increase disease activity in biologic-naive outpatients with ulcerative colitis: an interim analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;30(1):92–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Leung W, Malhi G, Willey BM, McGeer AJ, Borgundvaag B, Thanabalan R, et al. Prevalence and predictors of MRSA, ESBL, and VRE colonization in the ambulatory IBD population. J Crohns Colitis. 2012;6(7):743–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Roberts LW, Hoi LT, Khokhar FA, Hoa NT, Giang TV, Bui C, et al. Genomic characterisation of multidrug-resistant < em > Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and < em > Acinetobacter baumannii in two intensive care units in Hanoi, Viet Nam: a prospective observational cohort study. The Lancet Microbe. 2022;3(11):e857–e66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ibrahim DR, Dodd CER, Stekel DJ, Meshioye RT, Diggle M, Lister M et al. Multidrug-resistant ESBL-Producing E. coli in Clinical samples from the UK. Antibiot (Basel). 2023;12(1).

  30. Gruszecka J, Filip R. Are hospitalized patients with inflammatory bowel disease at increased risk of invasive bacterial infections? Results from POLIBD 3-year cohort study. Gut Pathog. 2021;13(1):12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Joseph L, Merciecca T, Forestier C, Balestrino D, Miquel S. From Klebsiella pneumoniae colonization to dissemination: an overview of studies implementing murine models. Microorganisms. 2021;9(6):1282.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Thänert R, Thänert A, Ou J, Bajinting A, Burnham C-AD, Engelstad HJ, et al. Antibiotic-driven intestinal dysbiosis in pediatric short bowel syndrome is associated with persistently altered microbiome functions and gut-derived bloodstream infections. Gut Microbes. 2021;13(1):1940792.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Tamma PD, Aitken SL, Bonomo RA, Mathers AJ, van Duin D, Clancy C. Infectious diseases society of america antimicrobial resistant treatment guidance: gram-negative bacterial infections. Practice. 2020;6(8).

  34. Doi Y. Treatment Options for Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;69(Supplement7):565–S75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yuan W, Xu J, Guo L, Chen Y, Gu J, Zhang H, et al. Clinical risk factors and microbiological and intestinal characteristics of carbapenemase-producing < i > Enterobacteriaceae colonization and subsequent infection. Microbiol Spectr. 2022;10(6):e01906–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Garrett WS, Gallini CA, Yatsunenko T, Michaud M, DuBois A, Delaney ML, et al. Enterobacteriaceae act in concert with the gut microbiota to induce spontaneous and maternally transmitted colitis. Cell Host Microbe. 2010;8(3):292–300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Chandra H, Sharma KK, Tuovinen OH, Sun X, Shukla P. Pathobionts: mechanisms of survival, expansion, and interaction with host with a focus on Clostridioides difficile. Gut Microbes. 2021;13(1):1979882.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Paterson DL, Bonomo RA. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases: a clinical update. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005;18(4):657–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Tolun V, Küçükbasmaci Ö, Törümküney-Akbulut D, Çatal Ç, Anğ-Küçüker M, Auğ Ö. Relationship between ciprofloxacin resistance and extended-spectrum β-lactamase production in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae strains. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004;10(1):72–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lübbert C, Straube L, Stein C, Makarewicz O, Schubert S, Mössner J, et al. Colonization with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in international travelers returning to Germany. Int J Med Microbiol. 2015;305(1):148–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Skuja V, Pekarska K, Straume Z, Rudzīte D, Lavrinoviča E, Piekuse L, et al. P783 ciprofloxacin resistance in ESBL producing enterobacteriaceae colonizing the gut in IBD patients. J Crohn’s Colitis. 2017;11(suppl1):481–S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Paterson DL, Mulazimoglu L, Casellas JM, Ko WC, Goossens H, Von Gottberg A, et al. Epidemiology of ciprofloxacin resistance and its relationship to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase production in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates causing bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;30(3):473–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Buchek G, Mende K, Telu K, Kaiser S, Fraser J, Mitra I et al. Travel-associated multidrug-resistant organism acquisition and risk factors among US military personnel. J Travel Med. 2021;28(3).

  44. Dubinsky V, Reshef L, Bar N, Keizer D, Golan N, Rabinowitz K, et al. Predominantly antibiotic-resistant intestinal microbiome persists in patients with Pouchitis who respond to antibiotic therapy. Gastroenterology. 2020;158(3):610–24e13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Wang SL, Wang ZR, Yang CQ. Meta-analysis of broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy in patients with active inflammatory bowel disease. Exp Ther Med. 2012;4(6):1051–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Taleghani Hospital Endoscopy Department for their cooperation and support in conducting this study. We are grateful to the member Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. The authors also really appreciate Professor Mohammad Reza Zali and Dr. Abbas Yadegar for their support.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases affiliated with Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (No. IR.SBMU.RIGLD.REC.1401.010).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Foodborne and Waterborne Diseases Research Center, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Ayda Afshari Kharaghani, Azin Afshari Kharaghani & Hamidreza Houri

  2. Department of Microbiology, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran

    Ayda Afshari Kharaghani, Naser Harzandi & Azin Afshari Kharaghani

  3. Gastroenterology and Liver Disease Research Center, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Babak Khorsand

  4. Non-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran

    Mohsen Rajabnia

  5. Foodborne and Waterborne Diseases Research Center, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Shahid Arabi Ave., Yemen St, Velenjak, Tehran, Iran

    Hamidreza Houri

Authors
  1. Ayda Afshari Kharaghani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Naser Harzandi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Babak Khorsand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mohsen Rajabnia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Azin Afshari Kharaghani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hamidreza Houri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

H.H. and N.H. have contributed to the conception and design of the work, conceived the project, obtained funding, critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content, and approved the submitted version. AY.A. and AZ.A. have contributed to the development of methodology and collection and interpretation of data. B.K. was involved in data analysis, interpretation of data, and drafting of the article. M.R. contributed to the colonoscopy procedures and provided clinical consultations. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript and authorship.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hamidreza Houri.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Ethical Review Committee of the Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases (RIGLD) at Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kharaghani, A.A., Harzandi, N., Khorsand, B. et al. High prevalence of Mucosa-Associated extended-spectrum β-Lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae among Iranain patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 22, 86 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12941-023-00630-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12941-023-00630-x

Keywords

Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials

ISSN: 1476-0711

Contact us