Skip to main content

Table 4 Empiric antimicrobial agents stratified by type of infection

From: Factors associated to prevalence and treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections: a seven years retrospective study in three tertiary care hospitals

Empiric antimicrobial therapy

Number (%) of patients

Infection type

VABP (N = 31)

Bacteremia (N = 22)

cUTI/AP (N = 18)

HABP (N = 16)

SWI (N = 16)

BTI (N = 9)

DWI (N = 7)

SBFI (N = 5)

All (N = 124)

No treatment

0

1 (4.5%)

4 (22.2%)

1 (6.3%)

3 (18.8%)

2 (22.2%)

1 (14.3%)

0

12 (9.7%)

No Gram-negative coverage

0

0

1 (5.6%)

0

1 (6.3%)

0

0

0

2 (1.6%)

Gram-negative therapy

31 (100%)

21 (%)

13 (72.2%)

15 (93.8%)

12 (75%)

7 (77.8%)

6 (85.7%)

5 (100%)

110 (88.7%)

 Monotherapy

13 (41.9%)

10 (45.5%)

12 (66.7%)

8 (50.0%)

11 (68.8%)

2 (22.2%)

4 (57.1%)

3 (60.0%)

63 (50.8%)

 Dual therapy

9 (29.0%)

8 (36.4%)

1 (5.6%)

5 (31.3%)

1 (6.25%)

4 (44.4%)

2 (28.6%)

2 (40.0%)

32 (25.8%)

 Three drug combinations

6 (19.4%)

2 (9.1%)

0

2 (12.5%)

0

1 (11.1%)

0

0

11 (8.9%)

 Four and more drug combinations

3 (9.7%)

1 (4.5%)

0

0

0

0

0

0

4 (3.2%)

Number active agents

 No active agent

20 (64.5%)

15 (68.2%)

7 (38.9%)

13 (81.3%)

6 (37.5%)

5 (55.6%)

5 (71.4%)

4 (80.0%)

75 (60.5%)

 One active agent

9 (29.0%)

5 (22.7%)

6 (33.3%)

2 (12.5%)

6 (37.5%)

2 (22.2%)

1 (14.3%)

1 (20.0%)

32 (25.8%)

 Two active agents

2 (6.45%)

1 (4.5%)

0

0

0

0

0

0

3 (2.4%)

  1. AP acute pyelonephritis, BTI biliary tract infection, cUTI complicated urinary tract infection, DWI deep wound infection, HABP hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia, SBFI sterile body fluids infection, SWI superficial wound infection, VABP ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia