Table 4 Antimicrobial resistance pattern of E. coli isolates from meat samples of different livestock species
Number of antibiotic classes (number of isolates; %) | AMR pattern | Number of isolates (%) |
|---|---|---|
No resistance | 3 (4.7) | |
 One (n = 13; 20.6%) | AMP | 10 (15.9) |
E | 1 (1.6) | |
TE | 1 (1.6) | |
C | 1 (1.6) | |
 Two (n = 19; 30.2%) | AMP*C | 1 (1.6) |
AMP*S | 1 (1.6) | |
AMP*Sxt | 1 (1.6) | |
AMP*TE | 4 (6.3) | |
E*AMP | 6 (9.5) | |
E*S | 1 (1.6) | |
E*TE | 3 (4.8) | |
TE*Sxt | 1 (1.6) | |
 Three (n = 11; 17.5%) | AMP*Sxt*C | 1 (1.6) |
AMP*TE*C | 1 (1.6) | |
AMP*TE*Sxt | 3 (4.8) | |
E*AMP*S | 1 (1.6) | |
E*AMP*Sxt | 1 (1.6) | |
S*Sxt*C | 1 (1.6) | |
S*TE*Sxt | 3 (4.8) | |
 Four (n = 9; 14.3%) | AMP*S*TE*C | 1 (1.6) |
AMP*S*TE*Sxt | 1 (1.6) | |
E*AMP*GN*S | 3 (4.8) | |
E*AMP*S*TE | 2 (3.4) | |
E*AMP*Sxt*C | 1 (1.6) | |
E*AMP*TE*C | 1 (1.6) | |
 Five (n = 7; 11.1%) | AMP*S*TE*Sxt*C | 2 (3.4) |
E*AMP*S*TE*Sxt | 2 (3.4) | |
E*S*TE*Sxt*C | 3 (4.8) | |
 Six (n = 2; 3.2%) | E*AMP*S*TE*Sxt*C | 2 (3.4) |