Table 4 Comparison of the MIC values obtained by using the SLOMYCO Sensititre® panel and the agar dilution methods for 46 M. marinum isolates
Antimicrobial agents | No. of results within log2 concentration difference of | % essential agreement (confidence interval) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
>−2 | −2 | −1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | >2 | ||
Amikacin | 0 | 11 | 34 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 76.1 (70–87) |
Ciprofloxacin | 0 | 1 | 32 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 98 (87–100) |
Clarithromycin | 4 | 3 | 23 | 15 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 85 (70.5–93.2) |
Doxycycline | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 12 | 1 | 72 (56.3–83.5) |
Ethambutol | 12 | 19 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33 (20–48.1) |
Ethionamide | 36 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.2 (0.1–13) |
Isoniazid | 0 | 6 | 27 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 87 (73–95) |
Linezolid | 0 | 0 | 10 | 20 | 15 | 1 | 0 | 98 (87–100) |
Moxifloxacin | 0 | 4 | 20 | 18 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 91.3 (87–100) |
Rifabutin | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 11 | 0 | 76.1 (61–87) |
Rifampin | 0 | 11 | 20 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 76.1 (61–87) |
Streptomycin | 2 | 17 | 22 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 59 (43.3–72.7) |
Sulfamethoxazole | 2 | 10 | 15 | 13 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 70 (54.1–82) |
Trimethoprim | 3 | 9 | 26 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 74 (59–85.2) |