Skip to main content

Table 3 Rates of susceptibility and resistance in important categories of pathogens isolated in patients with secondary peritonitis

From: Spectrum adequacy of antibiotic regimens for secondary peritonitis: a retrospective analysis in intermediate and intensive care unit patients

 

E. coli

Non-E. coli enterobacteriaceae

Enterococcus spp.

Candida spp.

n

%S

%R

n

%S

%R

n

%S

%R

n

%S

%R

SAM

 c.a.

41

63.4

36.6

36

61.1

38.9

36

66.7

30.6

   

 p.op.

66

48.5

51.5

68

44.1

55.9

98

65.3

35.7

   

TZP

 c.a.

41

78.0

9.8

36

91.7

2.8

a

     

 p.op.

66

60.6

19.7

68

61.8

23.5

      

CXM

 c.a.

41

87.8

12.2

36

66.7

33.3

      

 p.op.

66

75.8

24.2

67

55.2

44.8

      

CTX

 c.a.

41

95.1

0

36

94.4

5.6

      

 p.op.

66

84.8

6.1

69

72.5

23.2

      

ETP

 c.a.

41

100

0

36

97.2

2.8

      

 p.op.

66

100

0

66

92.4

7.6

      

MEM

 c.a.

41

100

0

36

100

0

a

     

 p.op.

66

100

0

69

100

0

      

CIP

 c.a.

41

82.9

14.6

36

97.2

2.8

      

 p.op.

66

72.7

22.7

69

97.1

1.4

      

GEN

 c.a.

41

97.6

2.4

36

97.2

2.8

      

 p.op.

66

92.4

7.6

69

97.1

2.9

      

TGC

 c.a.

41

95.1

2.4

36

58.3

33.3

36

100

0

   

 p.op.

66

100

0

69

55.1

30.4

98

100

0

   

VAN

 c.a.

      

36

94.4

5.6

   

 p.op.

      

97

88.7

11.3

   

LZD

 c.a.

      

36

97.2

2.8

   

 p.op.

      

98

99.0

1.0

   

FLC

 c.a.

         

21

76.2

4.8

 p.op.

         

37

56.8

10.8

  1. missing to 100 % intermediate susceptibility
  2. n number of tested isolates,  %S susceptible,  %R resistant
  3. aSusceptibility of Enterococcus spp. against TZP and MEM was assumed to be identical to that against SAM, which was inferred from that against ampicillin