Hospital-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (HA-MRSA) in Italy
© Campanile et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
- Received: 20 March 2009
- Accepted: 24 June 2009
- Published: 24 June 2009
The aim of our study was to trace the dynamic changes of hospital-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (HA-MRSA) lineages in Italy, comparing the genotypic backgrounds of contemporary isolates over a period of 17 years, with those of a sample of early MRSA strains from 1980.
In total, 301 non-repetitive MRSA clinical isolates, recovered from 19 Italian hospitals between 1990 and 2007 were selected and analyzed for their antibiotic resistance, typed by PFGE and SCCmec, grouped into clonal-types and further characterized using Multi Locus Sequence Typing (MLST). A sample of fifteen early MRSA strains from 1980 was also used for comparison.
The most interesting feature was the recent increase of ST228-MRSA-I (formerly the Italian clone; PFGE E) over the period 2000–2007 (57%), when compared to the period 1990–1999 (29%), and its stability to date, associated with a decrease of the highly epidemic ST247-MRSA-IA (formerly the Iberian clone; PFGE A), (23% from 1990 to 1999, 6% from 2000 to 2007). ST1-MRSA-I (1 out of 2 strains carrying ccr A2B2), ST8-MRSA-I (4 strains), ST15-MRSA-I (1 out of 4 carrying ccr A2B2) and ST30-MRSA-I (2 out of 5 carrying no ccr AB-types and ccr C) were the predominant earliest STs among the MRSA strains in 1980.
A temporal shift in the susceptibility levels to glycopeptides was observed: strains with vancomycin MIC of ≥ 2 mg/L increased from 19.4% to 35.5%.
In conclusion, we describe the alternation of MRSA clones that occurred in hospitals from 1990 to 2007 and the increase of the glycopeptide MIC levels, reflecting a worldwide trend. We document the detection of ST1, ST8, ST15 and ST30 in the 1980 isolates; we hypothesize their possible latency and their appearance as the current CA-MRSA clones.
- SCCmec Type
Among EU countries, Italy, together with Spain, Greece, Portugal, and Great Britain, has a high frequency of isolation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in hospitals. After an initial and continuous increase between 1994 and 2001 , the annual reports from EARSS (1999–2007) described the isolation of MRSA from bloodstream infections in 1999 as 40%, but, unlike the trend in other European countries such as Great Britain or Greece, a constant small average decrement was registered in the 2001–2007 period, reaching an average value of 33.7% in 2007 http://www.earss.rivm.nl.
These data are only partially representative of the Italian nosocomial MRSA prevalence. MRSA is responsible for various infections and considerable variations between institutions and wards, often in the same geographical areas, exist, demonstrating that MRSA prevalence, in some settings, significantly exceeds previous estimates , sometimes accounting for approximately 40–60% of all hospital acquired strains [2–5]. There could be many explanations for these differences: infection control measures, antibiotic prophylaxis and treatments used in each ward/hospital and, not less important, the clonal and often epidemic nature of these microrganisms. Certain strains can be found worldwide yet only few clones are responsible for most MRSA infections [1, 6, 7].
Analysis of more than 3,000 isolates from Southern Europe, the United States, and South America, showed that nearly 70% of them belonged to five major pandemic clones, namely the Iberian (ST 247-MRSA-IA), Brazilian (ST239-MRSA-IIIA), Hungarian (ST239-MRSA-III), New York/Japan (ST5-MRSA-II), and Pediatric (ST5-MRSA-IV) clones . Dominant and minor lineages constitute the S.aureus population . Each lineage is remarkably distinct and isolates of the same lineage, but from diverse geographical locations or from different periods, can be remarkably similar (except for their mobile genetic element – MGE – contents that account for 10–20% of the S.aureus chromosome) [10, 11]. Evolution of lineages happened independently by different mechanisms  and MGEs encoding virulence and resistance genes can move into and out of strains.
In recent years, the widespread use of antibiotics has undoubtedly accelerated the evolution of S.aureus, and led to the emergence of strains that have systematically acquired multiple resistance genes [1, 13]. With the current emergence of multi-drug resistant isolates in hospitals on the one hand  and the dramatically increased incidence of hyper-virulent community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) on the other [15, 16], MRSA has been able to evolve rapidly and create new clinical problems.
A greater understanding of how the bacteria have evolved in any geographical area can help us to rapidly identify new outbreak strains and even prevent emergence and diffusion of more resistant clones .
There have been only few studies reporting the dynamics of MRSA over long periods of time [18–23]. In almost all these studies, despite the worldwide predominance of a few MRSA clones, the authors demonstrated local strain diversity and reported that predominant MRSA strains seemed to change over time and emerging clones were appearing or replacing the oldest.
The aim of our study was to trace the dynamics of genotypic changes and the shifts in the levels of susceptibility to antibiotics, including glycopeptides, of MRSA lineages in Italy, comparing the genotypic backgrounds of contemporary isolates with those of a sample of early MRSA strains from 1980. The study also provides a complete overview of predominant and sporadic MRSA strains in our country, over a period of 17 years, from two surveillances projects (1990–1998 and 2000 – 2007).
Three hundred and one MRSA clinical isolates, recovered from 19 Italian hospitals between 1990 and 2007 were selected from two Staphylococcus aureus collections, which were sent to our laboratory during previous multi-centre studies. The first collection (called A throughout the text) of 160 strains was selected as non-repetitive isolates representative of the different parts of Italy from among 426 methicillin-resistant S.aureus (MRSA) strains isolated in the period 1990–1999 . The second group of 141 strains (called B), were isolated in the period 2000–2007, and were selected with the same criteria described above, from among approximately 1,000 different S.aureus isolates .
Both groups of isolates were from various clinical specimens and in particular, group A: 37% of cases from lower respiratory tract specimens, 29% from blood cultures (7% associated to a CVC), 1% from cerebrospinal fluid, and 31% from SSSIs. Group B isolates were almost comparable, with a greater percentage only for lower respiratory tract specimens (53%), 19% from blood cultures, 3% from cerebrospinal fluid and 25% from SSSIs.
A sample of fifteen early MRSA strains from 1980 was used for comparison .
All isolates were re-identified at the species level by catalase test, S. aureus agglutination test (STAPHYLASE TEST; Oxoid Ltd. Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK) and biochemical tests (API-Staph system; bio Mérieux SA, Marcy-l'Etoile, France). All strains were stored at -80°C until use. Methicillin-resistance was evaluated by disk diffusion method, and correlated to the presence of the mec A gene (see below).
The distribution of strains throughout Italy was, in both projects, approximately 20% from hospitals in Northern Italy, 35% from the center, and 45% from Southern Italy.
In vitro susceptibility testing of antibiotics
The antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of the 301 MRSA strains to the main classes of antibiotics were determined by using the Kirby-Bauer method, according to CLSI guidelines . The MRSA isolates were tested against a panel of 9 antimicrobial agents as follows: oxacillin-1 μg, ciprofloxacin-5 μg, chloramphenicol-30 μg, gentamicin-10 μg, erythromycin-15 μg, clindamycin-2 μg, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-25 μg, rifampin-5 μg and tetracycline-30 μg.
In vitro susceptibility testing for vancomycin, teicoplanin, quinupristin/dalfopristin, linezolid, tigecycline and daptomycin was further performed by the broth microdilution method to determine the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs), following the CLSI guidelines . All antibiotics were kindly provided, as standard reference powders, by the following manufacturers: daptomycin from Novartis (Basel, CH); linezolid from Pfizer (Groton, CT, USA); quinupristin/dalfopristin and teicoplanin from Aventis (West Malling, UK). Vancomycin was from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO, USA).
MICs were determined using Muller-Hinton broth (Oxoid, Milan, Italy), and for daptomycin tests the broth was supplemented to yield a final concentration of 50 mg/L calcium. S. aureus ATCC 29213 was used as quality control. Results were read after incubation at 37°C for 18–24 h. Susceptibility to daptomycin was defined as a MIC value of ≤ 1 mg/L; CLSI guideline MIC breakpoints were used for all the other antibiotics tested .
Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE)
Genomic DNA was prepared in agarose plugs as previously described . DNA was digested with 20 U of Sma I (BioLabs, New England, USA) at 30°C overnight. PFGE was carried out in a CHEF-DR II apparatus; (Bio-Rad, CA, USA). Macrorestriction fragments were separated on 1% (wt/vol) ultra pure agarose gels (Sigma Aldrich, S.Louis, MO, USA) at 6 V/cm for 21 h at 14°C, with pulse times of 5 s – 35 s, to separate Sma I patterns. Lambda DNA concatemers (New England BioLabs, Beverly, MA, USA) were used as molecular size markers.
Similarities among macrorestriction patterns were previously identified according to established criteria  in each of the three time frames. The comparison of similarities among groups for a long-term evaluation was performed by using the type strain of each PFGE profile of each time frame as internal standard.
PCR and SCCmec typing
Genomic DNA was extracted from all bacterial cultures and used as a template for amplification. All isolates were screened for the presence of the mec A gene. PCR experiments were carried out following procedures previously published . PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis on 1% agarose gels (Sigma Aldrich, Saint Louis Mo, USA).
The amplification procedure for the detection of the Panton-Valentine Leukocidin (PVL) was performed as previously published .
The SCCmec cassettes were first determined by a multiplex-PCR protocol previously described, and assigned to the corresponding types . Furthermore, the results were confirmed by different multiplex-PCR protocols, focusing on the mec gene complex and the ccr gene complex .
All strains were grouped into clonal groups on the bases of their antibiotype, PFGE profile and SCCmec type, and representative isolates of the main PFGE sub-types A, B and E were further characterized by Multi Locus Sequence Typing (MLST), while all the other strains belonging to PFGE C, G, sporadic clones and 1980 strains were sequenced.
The clones were typed following the current nomenclature (ST-MRSA-SCCmec), except in those contexts in which maintaining the old nomenclature is necessary to understand the diversity existing in each MLST profile.
The sequences of the seven housekeeping genes used for MLST, corresponding to the allelic profile arc C-aro E-glp-gmk-pta-tpi-yqi L, were obtained by comparing the sequences obtained with those in the MLST database http://mlst.zoo.ox.ac.uk. All STs described in the study were deposited on the MLST website and were compared with the major international S. aureus STs published.
Glycopeptide MIC trends over the 17 years were assessed using non-parametric methods. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were performed and significance was defined as P < 0.001.
Description of MRSA clones
The majority of MRSA clones in Italy, in agreement with the results of a previous study on strains isolated in 1990, belonged to six major clones: ST8-MRSA-I, ST247-MRSA-IA, ST239-MRSA-IIIA, ST228-MRSA-I, ST247-MRSA-I/IA and ST22-MRSA-IV and several minor clones. All these strains were previously typed by PFGE analysis (together with Cla I/mec A and Cla I/Tn554 and SCCmec), and grouped in six MRSA clones previously known as Archaic and Iberian (PFGE profile A, including, in both periods of time, 32 closely related sub-types), Brazilian (PFGE profile B, with 6 sub-types), Italian (PFGE profile E, with 10 sub-types), Rome (PFGE profile C) and Gentamicin-Susceptible (PFGE profile G).
Another international clone, ST239-MRSA-IIIA, found to be resistant to cotrimoxazole, appeared in our hospitals around 1994 (9%), together with the local clone ST247-MRSA-I/IA, showing different phenotypic and genotypic features (erythromycin and clindamycin susceptibility; PFGE C), named Rome clone to differentiate it from the Iberian one. It appeared at the same time as ST239-MRSA-IIIA, but it has only been detected sporadically to date.
In 2000, we saw the decrease of ST247-IA (6% of isolates), the increase of ST228-I (57%), but also the re-appearance of ST8 (UK EMRSA-2/-6) carrying the SCCmec IV (7% of strains) instead of the SCCmec I, characteristic of the period between 1985–1990 (data not shown). Besides the major international clones, the isolation of a gentamicin-susceptible one, ST22-MRSA-IV, was detected in some hospitals, reaching 14% of isolates.
The lukF-PV and lukS-PV genes were detected in three CA-MRSA strains, belonging to ST8 and ST30, carrying SCCmec IV, and ST88, carrying SCCmec V.
The original and current nomenclature and molecular characteristics of each clone are shown in Figure 1b.
The group of strains isolated in 1980 was included for comparison (15 strains); ST8-MRSA-I (4 strains), remaining 11 strains belonged to ST1-MRSA-I (2 strains), ST15-MRSA-I (4 strains) and ST30-MRSA-I (5 strains), while of these 11 only 4 strains carried a variant of SCCmec type I. In particular those belonging to ST1-MRSA-Ilike (1 strain) and ST15-MRSA-Ilike (1 strain) carried ccr A2B2 recombinases instead of ccr A1B1, while ST30-MRSA-Ilike (2 strains) did not carry any recombinases genes (figure 1c). SCCmec multiplex PCR assays did not show any difference between the common type I (pls, mec A and dcs loci) and the variant. Recombinases multiplex PCR and LONG-PCR experiments in those strains carrying ccr A2B2recombinases, revealed a unusual fragment, of about 9 Kb, from the pls gene (cif F, primer up) to ccr A2B2 (ccr B2, primer dw).
Figure 1c also graphically represents the alternation of diverse clones over the 27 year time frame. Considering the strains isolated in 1980, it can be seen that, with the only exception of ST8, all the other clones disappeared from hospitals. In our results, this clone, i.e. the early ST8-MRSA-I (variable PFGE profiles), underwent a sort of evolution passing from an ST8-MRSA-I (PFGE A, with 3 sub-types) to the MDR ST247-MRSA-IA (PFGE A, with 28 sub-types) and back again to a more susceptible clone i.e the ST8-MRSA-IV (PFGE A, 1 sub-type) isolated in 2007. A characteristic of the clones at the end of period A and the beginning of period B is their multi-drug resistance, while the majority of period B saw a reduction in the number of these clones and a tendency towards susceptibility with the appearance of ST8-MRSA-IV and ST22-MRSA-IV – reflecting what was found in 1980, and indicating a possible future clinical change.
Antibiotic-resistance (%) of various antibiotics against 301 MRSA strains, compared with a sample of Italian isolates from 1980.
MRSA isolated in 1980 (15)
MRSA isolated in 1990–1999 (period A) (160)
MRSA isolated in 2000–2007 (period B) (141)
Number of MRSA strains with glycopeptide MICs of ≤ 0.5, 1, and ≥ 2 mg/L in ST247-MRSA-IA, ST239-MRSA-IIIA and ST228-MRSA-I isolated in periods A and B
ST247-MRSA-IA, ST239-MRSA-IIIA and ST228-MRSA-I clones° 1990–1999 – period A (98)
ST247-MRSA-IA, ST239-MRSA-IIIA and ST228-MRSA-I clones° 2000–2007 – period B (93)
Interestingly, this MIC creep was related to the parallel increase in the isolation of the MDR ST228-MRSA-I clone, in period B.
We studied 2 collections of MRSA strains identified over a 17-year period in Italy (periods A and B). These strains are representative of isolates collected during this time and published in two Italian surveys [24, 25]. The results were compared with those obtained from a group of Italian MRSA strains isolated in 1980. This report describes the evolution of the major Italian clonal types and the evolution of their resistance to antibiotics. Due to the vast amount of data that we had collected every year, we used representative phenotypes of each year over the two survey periods.
The comparison of these data with those from 1980 gives important and unique insights into long-term MRSA evolution.
The presence of five major clones (ST8-MRSA-I, ST247-MRSA-IA, ST239-MRSA-IIIA, ST228-MRSA-I and ST247-MRSA-I/IA) was previously reported by Mato R. et al. in 1990 . We demonstrate here that the prevalence of predominant clones changed over time and this change might have significant medical consequences, since the new clones often display different antibiotic resistance profiles. We also demonstrate that – during this time – there was a considerable increase in the prevalence of MDR clones, with the Italian one becoming predominant in our country. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the isolation of MRSA strains with a vancomycin MIC ≥ 2 mg/l is more frequent in the nosocomial-acquired strains of the B period, and that this shift is also present for teicoplanin.
Epidemiological evolution of MRSA clones
All major circulating clones in Italy belonged to the 4 most common genetic background types (ST8, ST247, ST239, and ST228) and they have also been reported, for a long time, as main isolates from studies of HA-MRSA all around the world. Among these clones, ST228 was prevalently found in Europe and was first isolated in 1995 in South-Germany, Slovenia, Austria, and Italy [33, 34]. This clone still represents, in our country, the most common HA-MRSA clone, it is not related to any other national clones, and its genetic background closely correlates with those of several S.aureus including MSSA, MRSA, and VISA, all belonging to the clonal complex 5 (CC5), confirming the role of horizontal transfer of mec A among different ancestral lineages, originating from a well adapted MSSA strain. In our country, this clone doubled its prevalence during the study period, accounting for more than half of the MRSA strains isolated in period B.
The evolutionary history of clones belonging to CC8 (ST8-MRSA-I, ST247-MRSA-IA, ST247-MRSA-I and IA, and ST8-MRSA-IV) is more complex. The acquisition of diverse SCCmec elements and/or other genetic elements, likely occurred in several occasions in this genetic background . The few CC8 1980 clones in our study, shared SCCmec cassettes similar to SCCmec type I, probably their precursors.
During period A, we documented the evolution of the ST8-MRSA-I towards a more resistant phenotype, acquiring and integrating different genetic elements, in particular the plasmid pUB110 (carrying kanamycin and neomycin resistance genes) into the SCCmec region, giving the original type I cassette a more complex organization (SCCmec IA), and two copies of Tn554 (carrying erythromycin and spectinomycin resistance determinants) integrated in the genome. This clone, although being more resistant to antibiotics, maintained the same PFGE profile A (with diverse sub-types), and belongs to ST247, a single locus variant of ST8.
ST239-MRSA-IIIA had a short history in Italy, probably because it had come from other countries . This clone is poorly represented in both periods A and B.
Period A was also characterized by the emergence of a local clone (Rome clone) possessing the same ST247 of the more diffused Iberian one, but with two different important characteristics: i) a different PFGE profile; ii) a predisposition to low level susceptibility to vancomycin, producing an hVISA phenotype . The replacement of ST247 in recent years (period B) in our country has also involved this clone, which is now scarcely represented.
The decline, during period B, of ST247-MRSA-IA is documented in this study. Recent reports have shown that this clone was replaced by other pandemic clones [23, 35–38]. The replacement of ST247-MRSA-IA might suggest that it had lost its epidemic potential during the last decade.
Also during period B, in which ST228-MRSA-I consolidated its presence and ST247 decreased, there was the re-appearance of ST8, carrying a different SCCmec type IV, that resembles the ancient one, being less resistant to antibiotics. In fact, the recent appearance of this clone is of interest, because it maintained a profile of antibiotic-susceptibility.
Finally, in the last two years of period B, different MRSA strains such as the gentamicin-susceptible ST22-MRSA-IV strain, appeared in different wards in some Italian hospitals. This appearance was accompanied, in the community, by the isolation of hyper-virulent, pvl-positive MRSA strains, belonging to ST8-MRSA-IV, ST30-MRSA-IV and ST88-MRSA-V, which we documented in Italy [15, 39].
Evolution of antibiotic-resistance
The multi-drug resistant phenotype is a particular characteristic of the methicillin-resistant S.aureus strains, almost related to the global presence and spread of MDR clones [14, 40]. The homogeneous insusceptibility to all beta-lactams, characteristic of methicillin-resistant strains, together with the continuous accumulation and organization of many resistance genes, has made this species particularly difficult to treat. This diffused antibiotic-resistance is true for many classes of antibiotics such as aminoglycosides, macrolides, lincosamides, and fluoroquinolones, which, as demonstrated in this paper on contemporary isolates, appeared to maintain a low level of activity against MRSA. A notable exception seems to be the increased level of susceptibility to gentamicin found in MRSA isolated in period B, mainly due to the appearance, in our hospitals, of a gentamicin-susceptible clone, belonging to ST22.
The percentage of resistance to tetracycline, rifampin and cotrimoxazole, increased in period A, but decreased in period B: in this case the different antibiotic susceptibility patterns are linked to the epidemiologic change and replacement of clones with specific markers of resistance. In our study, the decrease in resistance to these three drugs is due to the replacement of the rifampin resistant ST247-MRSA-IA, ST239-MRSA-IIIA and ST247-MRSA-I/IA with the tetracycline susceptible ST228-MRSA-I .
The trend of susceptibility to the most used anti-MRSA drugs, as evaluated in our study, demonstrated that no resistance to vancomycin, teicoplanin, daptomycin, linezolid and quinupristin/dalfopristin was observed in the time frame of the study. Among these drugs, only daptomycin has recently been approved and marketed, explaining the substantial stability of the MIC50 and MIC90 over time. On the contrary, the evaluation of the MICs of the population of MRSA demonstrated something comparable to that observed for other classes of drugs: the strains isolated in period B, in which MDR clones were replaced by others with different resistance make-ups, show a distribution toward the lowest MIC concentrations. The same can be observed for quinupristin/dalfopristin.
Although reports of linezolid resistance in S.aureus are increasing [41, 42] data on MIC creep are infrequent (Golan Y et al, Abstract from the 46th ICAAC, San Francisco CA 2006; Abs C2-1157 p. 127). In our study, changes in distribution of susceptibility for linezolid are comparable in the two periods, demonstrating a one dilution increase in MIC only if compared with the susceptibility demonstrated during 1980. This creep towards higher levels of MICs is clear if glycopeptides are considered and mostly related to the increased isolation of the MDR ST228-MRSA-I clone in period B. This slight but continuous increase in the level of susceptibility of vancomycin was reported by many studies all around the world [14, 43, 44], many of them demonstrating a strict correlation between increased MIC values and therapeutic failure in infections sustained by MRSA [43, 45, 46]. The MIC creep phenomenon has produced conflicting results most likely due to the MIC statistics used [47, 48]. Reports from large multicenter studies have not demonstrated changes in vancomycin susceptibilities over time . However, these types of studies are not designed to detect subtle changes in MICs. As reported by other investigators, we demonstrate a statistically significant increase in MRSA vancomycin and teicoplanin MICs over time. The magnitude of this increase was similar in both drugs, but the largest increase was observed for vancomycin, in which strains showing a MIC > 1 mg/L increased from 47 to 78%.
In conclusion, we document here the alternation of multi-drug resistant MRSA clones in the 1990–2007 period, with the establishment of ST228-MRSA-I in our country, with respect to the clones present in 1980. The increase of the glycopeptide MIC levels, reflecting a worldwide trend, was also documented, due to the massive use of these drugs in clinical practice. We detected ST1, ST8, ST15, and ST30 in the 1980 isolates; thus we hypothesize their re- appearance as backgrounds for the current CA-MRSA clones, due to mechanisms as yet unknown.
We thank Antony Bridgewood for his support in the revision of the language.
Part of this work was presented at the 18th ECCMID (European Congress on Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases), Barcelona – April 19–22, 2008 (poster P 1426). This study was supported by the grant n. 2007SCA9RK from the Italian Minister of Universities (MIUR) and by the grant RFPS-2006-9-335466 from the Minister of Health (Ricerca finalizzata- Programma strategico).
- Stefani S, Varaldo PE: Epidemiology of methicillin-resistant staphylococci in Europe. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2003, 9 (12): 1179-86. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2003.00698.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Luzzaro F, Viganò EF, Fossati D, Grossi A, Sala A, Sturla C, Saudelli M, Toniolo A, AMCLI Lombardia Hospital Infectious Study Group : Prevalence and drug susceptibility of pathogens causing bloodstream infections in northern Italy: a two-year study in 16 hospitals. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2002, 21 (12): 849-55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pan A, Carnevale G, Catenazzi P, Colombini P, Crema L, Dolcetti L, Ferrari L, Mondello P, Signorini L, Tinelli C, Roldan EQ, Carosi G: Trends in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections: effect of the MRSA "search and isolate" strategy in a hospital in Italy with hyperendemic MRSA. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2005, 26 (2): 127-33. 10.1086/502515View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Raineri E, Crema L, De Silvestri A, Acquarolo A, Albertario F, Carnevale G, Latronico N, Petrosillo N, Tinelli C, Zoncada A, Pan A: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus control in an intensive care unit: a 10 year analysis. J Hosp Infect. 2007, 67 (4): 308-15. 10.1016/j.jhin.2007.08.013View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rodloff AC, Leclercq R, Debbia EA, Cantón R, Oppenheim BA, Dowzicky MJ: Comparative analysis of antimicrobial susceptibility among organisms from France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK as part of the tigecycline evaluation and surveillance trial. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008, 14 (4): 307-14. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01943.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Robinson DA, Enright MC: Multilocus sequence typing and the evolution of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004, 10 (2): 92-7. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2004.00768.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mato R, Campanile F, Stefani S, Crisóstomo MI, Santagati M, Sanches SI, de Lencastre H: Clonal types and multidrug resistance patterns of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) recovered in Italy during the 1990s. Microb Drug Resist. 2004, 10 (2): 106-13. 10.1089/1076629041310109View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Enright MC, Robinson DA, Randle G, Feil EJ, Grundmann H, Spratt BG: The evolutionary history of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99 (11): 7687-92. 10.1073/pnas.122108599PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Feil EJ, Li BC, Aanensen DM, Hanage WP, Spratt BG: eBURST: inferring patterns of evolutionary descent among clusters of related bacterial genotypes from multilocus sequence typing data. J Bacteriol. 2004, 186 (5): 1518-30. 10.1128/JB.186.5.1518-1530.2004PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Holden MT, Feil EJ, Lindsay JA, Peacock SJ, Day NP, Enright MC, Foster TJ, Moore CE, Hurst L, Atkin R, Barron A, Bason N, Bentley SD, Chillingworth C, Chillingworth T, Churcher C, Clark L, Corton C, Cronin A, Doggett J, Dowd L, Feltwell T, Hance Z, Harris B, Hauser H, Holroyd S, Jagels K, James KD, Lennard N, Line A, Mayes R, Moule S, Mungall K, Ormond D, Quail MA, Rabbinowitsch E, Rutherford K, Sanders M, Sharp S, Simmonds M, Stevens K, Whitehead S, Barrell BG, Spratt BG, Parkhill J: Complete genomes of two clinical Staphylococcus aureus strains: evidence for the rapid evolution of virulence and drug resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101 (26): 9786-91. 10.1073/pnas.0402521101PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Diep BA, Gill SR, Chang RF, Phan TH, Chen JH, Davidson MG, Lin F, Lin J, Carleton HA, Mongodin EF, Sensabaugh GF, Perdreau-Remington F: Complete genome sequence of USA300, an epidemic clone of community-acquired meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet. 2006, 367 (9512): 731-9. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68231-7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lindsay JA, Moore CE, Day NP, Peacock SJ, Witney AA, Stabler RA, Husain SE, Butcher PD, Hinds J: Microarrays reveal that each of the ten dominant lineages of Staphylococcus aureus has a unique combination of surface-associated and regulatory genes. J Bacteriol. 2006, 188 (2): 669-76. 10.1128/JB.188.2.669-676.2006PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hope R, Livermore DM, Brick G, Lillie M, Reynolds R, BSAC Working Parties on Resistance Surveillance : Non-susceptibility trends among staphylococci from bacteraemias in the UK and Ireland, 2001–06. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008, 62 (Suppl 2): ii65-74. 10.1093/jac/dkn353PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sakoulas G, Moellering RC: Increasing antibiotic resistance among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains. Clin Infect Dis. 2008, 46 (Suppl 5): S360-7. 10.1086/533592View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Valentini P, Parisi G, Monaco M, Crea F, Spanu T, Ranno O, Tronci M, Pantosti A: An uncommon presentation for a severe invasive infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clone USA300 in Italy: a case report. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2008, 7: 11- 10.1186/1476-0711-7-11PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stefani S, Bongiorno D, Cafiso V, Campanile F, Crapis M, Cristini F, Sartor A, Scarparo C, Spina D, Viale P: Pathotype and susceptibility profile of a community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain responsible for a case of severe pneumonia. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009, 63 (1): 100-4. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2008.09.012View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Enright MC: The evolution of a resistant pathogen–the case of MRSA. Current opinion in pharmacology. 2003, 3 (5): 474-479. 10.1016/S1471-4892(03)00109-7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rossney AS, Lawrence MJ, Morgan PM, Fitzgibbon MM, Shore A, Coleman DC, Keane CT, O'Connell B: Epidemiological typing of MRSA isolates from blood cultures taken in Irish hospitals participating in the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System (1999–2003). Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006, 25 (2): 79-89. 10.1007/s10096-006-0091-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Conceição T, Aires-de-Sousa M, Füzi M, Tóth A, Pászti J, Ungvári E, van Leeuwen WB, van Belkum A, Grundmann H, de Lencastre H: Replacement of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones in Hungary over time: a 10-year surveillance study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007, 13 (10): 971-9. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01794.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Francois P, Harbarth S, Huyghe A, Renzi G, Bento M, Gervaix A, Pittet D, Schrenzel J: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Geneva, Switzerland, 1993–2005. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008, 14 (2): 304-7. 10.3201/eid1402.070229PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kerttula AM, Lyytikäinen O, Kardén-Lilja M, Ibrahem S, Salmenlinna S, Virolainen A, Vuopio-Varkila J: Nationwide trends in molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Finland, 1997–2004. BMC Infect Dis. 2007, 7: 94- 10.1186/1471-2334-7-94PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vindel A, Trincado P, Gómez E, Cabrera R, Boquete T, Solá C, Valdezate S, Saez-Nieto JA: Prevalence and evolution of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Spanish hospitals between 1996 and 2002. J Clin Microbiol. 2006, 44 (1): 266-70. 10.1128/JCM.44.1.266-270.2006PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Blanc DS, Petignat C, Wenger A, Kuhn G, Vallet Y, Fracheboud D, Trachsel S, Reymond M, Troillet N, Siegrist HH, Oeuvray S, Bes M, Etienne J, Bille J, Francioli P, Zanetti G: Changing molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a small geographic area over an eight-year period. J Clin Microbiol. 2007, 45 (11): 3729-36. 10.1128/JCM.00511-07PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stefani S, Mezzatesta ML, Tempera G, Debbra E, Schito AM, Nicoletti G, Marchére A: Comparative activity of linezolid against staphylococci and enterococci isolated in Italy. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2002, 8 (6): 368-72. 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2002.00429.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nicoletti G, Schito G, Fadda G, Boros S, Nicolosi D, Marchese A, Spanu T, Pantosti A, Monaco M, Rezza G, Cassone A, Garaci E, : Bacterial isolates from severe infections and their antibiotic susceptibility patterns in Italy: a nationwide study in the hospital setting. J Chemother. 2006, 18 (6): 589-602.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Varaldo PE, Cipriani P, Focá A, Geraci C, Giordano A, Madeddu MA, Orsi A, Pompei R, Prenna M, Repetto A: Identification, clinical distribution, and susceptibility to methicillin and 18 additional antibiotics of clinical Staphylococcus isolates: nationwide investigation in Italy. J Clin Microbiol. 1984, 19 (6): 838-43.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Clinical Laboratory Standards, C.L.S.I: Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing – Approved Standard. 2008, Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute: Wayne PA – USA.Google Scholar
- Campanile F, Bongiorno D, Borbone S, Venditti M, Giannella M, Franchi C, Stefani S: Characterization of a variant of the SCCmec element in a bloodstream isolate of Staphylococcus intermedius. Microb Drug Resist. 2007, 13 (1): 7-10. 10.1089/mdr.2006.9991View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tenover FC, Arbeit RD, Goering RV, Mickelsen PA, Murray BE, Persing DH, Swaminathan B: Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed- field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J Clin Microbiol. 1995, 33 (9): 2233-2239.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oliveira DC, de Lencastre H: Multiplex PCR strategy for rapid identification of structural types and variants of the mec element in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002, 46 (7): 2155-61. 10.1128/AAC.46.7.2155-2161.2002PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kondo Y, Ito T, Ma XX, Watanabe S, Kreiswirth BN, Etienne J, Hiramatsu K: Combination of multiplex PCRs for staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type assignment: rapid identification system for mec, ccr, and major differences in junkyard regions. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007, 51 (1): 264-74. 10.1128/AAC.00165-06PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cassone M, Campanile F, Pantosti A, Venditti M, Stefani S: Identification of a variant "Rome clone" of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with decreased susceptibility to vancomycin, responsible for an outbreak in an intensive care unit. Microb Drug Resist. 2004, 10 (1): 43-9. 10.1089/107662904323047790View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Krziwanek K, Luger C, Sammer B, Stumvoll S, Stammler M, Sagel U, Witte W, Mittermayer H: MRSA in Austria–an overview. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008, 14 (3): 250-9. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01896.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Deurenberg RH, Vink C, Kalenic S, Friedrich AW, Bruggeman CA, Stobberingh EE: The molecular evolution of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007, 13 (3): 222-35. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01573.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Amorim ML, Aires de Sousa M, Sanches IS, Sá-Leão R, Cabeda JM, Amorim JM, de Lencastre H: Clonal and antibiotic resistance profiles of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from a Portuguese hospital over time. Microb Drug Resist. 2002, 8 (4): 301-9. 10.1089/10766290260469561View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Teixeira LA, Resende CA, Ormonde LR, Rosenbaum R, Figueiredo AM, de Lencastre H, Tomasz A: Geographic spread of epidemic multiresistant Staphylococcus aureus clone in Brazil. J Clin Microbiol. 1995, 33 (9): 2400-4.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cookson BD, Phillips I: Epidemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1988, 21 (Suppl C): 57-65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pérez-Roth E, Lorenzo-Díaz F, Batista N, Moreno A, Méndez-Alvarez S: Tracking methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones during a 5-year period (1998 to 2002) in a Spanish hospital. J Clin Microbiol. 2004, 42 (10): 4649-56. 10.1128/JCM.42.10.4649-4656.2004PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Monaco M, Antonucci R, Palange P, Venditti M, Pantosti A: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus necrotizing pneumonia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005, 11 (10): 1647-8.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Deurenberg RH, Stobberingh EE: The evolution of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Genet Evol. 2008, 8 (6): 747-63. 10.1016/j.meegid.2008.07.007View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gales AC, Sader HS, Andrade SS, Lutz L, Machado A, Barth AL: Emergence of linezolid-resistant Staphylococcus aureus during treatment of pulmonary infection in a patient with cystic fibrosis. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2006, 27 (4): 300-2. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.11.008View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tsiodras S, Gold HS, Sakoulas G, Eliopoulos GM, Wennersten C, Venkataraman L, Moellering RC, Ferraro MJ: Linezolid resistance in a clinical isolate of Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet. 2001, 358 (9277): 207-8. 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05410-1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Soriano A, Marco F, Martínez JA, Pisos E, Almela M, Dimova VP, Alamo D, Ortega M, Lopez J, Mensa J: Influence of vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration on the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis. 2008, 46 (2): 193-200. 10.1086/524667View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Steinkraus G, White R, Friedrich L: Vancomycin MIC creep in non-vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA), vancomycin-susceptible clinical methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) blood isolates from 2001–05. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007, 60 (4): 788-94. 10.1093/jac/dkm258View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sakoulas G, Gold HS, Cohen RA, Venkataraman L, Moellering RC, Eliopoulos GM: Effects of prolonged vancomycin administration on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in a patient with recurrent bacteraemia. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006, 57 (4): 699-704. 10.1093/jac/dkl030View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sakoulas G, Moise-Broder PA, Schentag J, Forrest A, Moellering RC, Eliopoulos GM: Relationship of MIC and bactericidal activity to efficacy of vancomycin for treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. J Clin Microbiol. 2004, 42 (6): 2398-402. 10.1128/JCM.42.6.2398-2402.2004PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Castanheira M, Jones R, DSader H: Update of the in vitro activity of daptomycin tested against 6710 Gram-positive cocci isolated in North America (2006). Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008, 61 (2): 235-239. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2008.01.016View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Alós JI, García-Cañas A, García-Hierro P, Rodríguez-Salvanés F: Vancomycin MICs did not creep in Staphylococcus aureus isolates from 2002 to 2006 in a setting with low vancomycin usage. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008, 62 (4): 773-5. 10.1093/jac/dkn246View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.