Open Access

Molecular characterization of clinical IMP-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from a Chinese Tertiary Hospital

  • Kaisheng Lai1,
  • Yanning Ma1,
  • Ling Guo1,
  • Jingna An1,
  • Liyan Ye1 and
  • Jiyong Yang1Email author
Contributed equally
Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials201716:42

DOI: 10.1186/s12941-017-0218-9

Received: 21 March 2017

Accepted: 23 May 2017

Published: 19 June 2017

Abstract

Background

IMP-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (IMPKpn) exhibits sporadic prevalence in China. The mechanisms related to the spread of IMPKpn remain unclear.

Methods

Carbapenem non-susceptible K. pneumoniae isolates were collected from our hospital. The genetic relatedness, antimicrobial susceptibility, as well as sequence types (ST) were analyzed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), VITEK 2 AST test Kit, and multilocus sequence typing (MLST), respectively. S1-PFGE, Southern blot analysis and multiple PCR amplification were used for plasmid profiling.

Results

Between October 2009 and June 2016, 25 non-repetitive IMPKpn isolates were identified. PFGE results showed that these isolates belonged to 20 genetically unrelated IMPKpn strains. Diverse STs were identified by MLST. Most strains carried bla IMP-4, followed by bla IMP-1. Four incompatibility types of bla IMP-carrying plasmids were identified, which included A/C (n = 2), B/O (n = 2), L/M (n = 1) and N (n = 14), while type of other one plasmid failed to be determined.

Conclusions

The IMPKpn isolates exhibited sporadic prevalence in our hospital. IncN types of plasmids with various sizes have emerged as the main platform mediating the spread of the bla IMP genes in our hospital.

Keywords

IMP Klebsiella pneumoniae Sequence type

Background

The spread of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae has been a major challenge both for treatment of individual patients and for policies of infection control [1]. IMP-1 is the first identified metallo-β-lactamase conferring carbapenem resistance and was described in 1988 in a Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain in Japan [2]. IMP-type carbapenemases can hydrolyze almost all β-lactams. The popular IMP-type carbapenemases have been widespread in non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter spp., and members of the Enterobacteriaceae family [3]. The bla IMP genes are usually located on large plasmids with different replicon types or incompatibility (Inc) types, such as IncA/C, L/M, N, and HI2, which have been commonly associated with the carriage and transmission of various bla IMP genes [47].

Klebsiella pneumoniae is an important pathogen causing various infections. IMP-producing K. pneumoniae (IMPKpn) isolates have been identified worldwide and caused a few small-scale outbreaks [3, 5, 6, 8, 9]. Up to now, diverse sequence types (ST) of IMPKpn have been reported, including STs 15, 37, 107, 133, 252, 323, 340, 476, 478, 626, 686, 889, 903, 1114 and 1306 [511].

In China, IMP-producing Enterobacteriaceae isolates have been found across the country [3, 6, 7, 921]. Variants of bla IMP have been identified in K. pneumoniae, Escherichia coli and Enterobacter cloacae. Among IMPKpn, IMP-4 is the most commonly encountered isoform in clinical isolates, followed by IMP-8, IMP-26 and IMP-38 [6, 918, 22]. Meanwhile, the IMPKpn isolates exhibit high diversity of sequence type (ST), and IMPKpn STs15, 37, 107, 133, 323, 476, 686, 889, 1114 and 1306 have been recovered [6, 7, 10, 11].

In the present study, a retrospective study of clinical carbapenem-non-susceptible enterobacteriaceae isolates from our hospital was performed. In total, 25 IMPKpn isolates were identified in this study. Phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of these isolates were further analyzed.

Methods

Bacterial isolates

All clinical Enterobacteriaceae isolates were collected from a 4000-bed tertiary-care hospital and were identified by VITEK® MS (bioMérieux SA, Marcy-l’Etoile, France). The isolates exhibiting resistance or intermediate to any one of ertapenem or imipenem or meropenem will be defined as carbapenem non-susceptibility strain, and will be screened for bla IMP by PCR and subsequent amplicon sequencing using the primers IMP-1F: 5′-TGAGCAAGTTATCTGTATTC and IMP-1R: 5′-TTAGTTGCTTGGTTTTGATG [11]. E. coli ATCC 25922 was used as a quality control strain for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. The Salmonella ser. Braenderup strain H9812 was used as a reference standard for pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). No ethical approval was obtained for using the clinical samples, because they were collected during routine bacteriologic analyses in public hospitals, and the data were anonymously analyzed.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

The MICs of clinical commonly used antimicrobial agents (listed in Fig. 1) were measured using VITEK 2 AST-GN09 and AST-GN13 test Kit (bioMérieux, Inc.) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All susceptibility results were interpreted according to the 2017 CLSI performance standards [23].
Fig. 1

Dendrogram of patterns generated by PFGE of IMP-producing K. pneumoniae isolates. The PFGE types, ST, isolating date of the IMPKpn isolates, IMP variants, the size and type of bla IMP-carrying plasmids and the MICs of common-used antimicrobial agents were list in this figure. The frame indicated the characterization of IMP-producing K. pneumoniae isolates causing an outbreak. ST sequence type, CAZ ceftazidime, FEP cefepime, TZP piperacillin–tazobactam, IMP imipenem, MEM meropenem, ETP ertapenem, AK amikacin, CIP ciprofloxacin, UT unable type

PFGE and MLST analyses

PFGE with XbaI was performed for IMPKpn isolates as previously described [24]. MLST was carried out for IMPKpn according to protocols provided on their MLST websites (http://www.pasteur.fr/recherche/genopole/PF8/mlst/Kpneumoniae).

Plasmid and southern blot analyses

A bla NDM probe was generated by labeling the PCR product using the PCR DIG Probe Synthesis Kit (Roche Applied Sciences, Mannheim, Germany). The size and incompatibility types of bla IMP-carrying plasmids were analyzed by the S1-PFGE, Southern blot and multiple PCR as previously described [24, 25]. The whole genomic DNA including the plasmid of the isolates was digested with 20 U of S1 nuclease at 37 °C for 20 min, and separated by PFGE. Then, the DNA fragments were transferred to positively charged nylon membranes (Roche Applied Science). Hybridization was carried out with the DIG Easy Hyb Granules (Roche Applied Sciences), and the detection was performed using the DIG Nucleic Acid Detection Kit (Roche Applied Sciences).

Results

Prevalence and genetic relatedness of IMPKpn

The first IMPKpn isolate in our hospital was identified in October 2009. Since then until June 2016, 25 non-repetitive IMPKpn isolates have been recovered. The source of the IMPKpn isolates included 11 sputum, 6 drainges, 3 bloods, 2 urines, 1 catheter, 1 bile and 1 abscess. The 25 IMPKpn isolates were categorized into 20 PFGE types (type A to T). Type F contained 4 isolates, and types E and H contained 2 isolates, other 16 types contained only 1 isolate (Fig. 1). Isolates with same PFGE type were considered as the same strain. Therefore, a total of 20 IMPKpn strains with no genetic relationship were further analyzed.

Antimicrobial susceptibility

The antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of the isolates were listed in Fig. 1. All isolates presented resistance to ceftazidime, cefepime and piperacillin–tazobactam, and exhibited heterogeneous resistance patterns to carbapenem, amikacin and ciprofloxacin (Fig. 1).

bla IMP variants

PCR and subsequent amplicon sequence alignment revealed that most strains carried bla IMP-4, and several bla IMP gene sequences displayed 100% identity with the published sequence of the bla IMP-1 (for 3 strains), bla IMP-26 (for 1 strains) and bla IMP-38 (for 1 strains) genes, respectively (Fig. 1).

MLST

Among 20 IMPKpn strains, a diversity of STs was identified. Three strains were identified as ST11, two strains were defined as ST629, and 12 strains belonged to independent STs. Three novel STs were identified with the allelic profile 18-71-26-125-115-2-51 (type A strain), 42-22-25-96-115-20-49 (type H strain) and 71-1-1-83-16-121-5 (type O strain), respectively (Fig. 1).

Plasmid analysis

The bla IMP genes were located on plasmids with sizes ranged from approximately 30 to 320 kb (Fig. 1). Four incompatibility types of bla IMP-carrying plasmids including A/C, B/O, L/M and N were identified, whereas type of one plasmid was unable to be determined. In total, 14 IMPKpn strains carried the IncN plasmids with sizes ranging from 30 to 280 kb, while two A/C (120- and 310-kb), two IncB/O (170- and 220-kb) and one IncL/M (55 kb) plasmids were characterized.

Discussion

The worldwide spread of carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae has been a growing clinical problem and threat to public health [1]. In this study, 25 non-duplicated IMPKpn isolates were collected between October 2009 and June 2016. During this period, 8.5% (537 of 6310) of clinical K. pneumoniae isolates exhibited carbapenem-resistant phenotypes, and only 0.19% (25/537) of carbapenem-non-susceptible K. pneumoniae strains produced IMP. Further analysis showed that the majority of carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae was the KPC-2-producing K. pneumoniae, followed by OXA-48- and NDM-producing K. pneumoniae [2426]. Therefore, IMPKpn exhibited sporadic prevalence in our hospital. In China, IMPKpn isolates have been identified across the country, and the main variants are IMP-4 and IMP-8 [3, 6, 7, 921], while IMP-26 and IMP-38 have also been identified [16, 18]. In this study, besides the scattered emergence of IMP-1, IMP-26 and IMP-38, we found that the majority of IMPKpn isolates produced IPM-4 (Fig. 1) which was different from the prevalence of IMP variants that were reported from other Asian regions, where IMP-1 accounted for the majority [3]. Taken together, the source, evolution and dissemination of IMPKpn may be different in different regions.

In this study, PFGE analysis revealed that the majority of IMPKpn isolates belonged to different types, while an outbreak at small scales (type F strain) that covered only four patients was observed (Fig. 1), suggesting that the majority of IMPKpn isolates analyzed in this study were genetically unrelated strains. Meanwhile, most strains exhibited high ST diversity. Only three and two clones of IMPKpn strains belonged to ST11 and ST629, respectively, while other STs were only identified in single strain. Three strains were identified as new clones with novel STs (Fig. 1). Other reports also showed that the STs of IMPKpn are highly dispersed [511], suggesting the clonal diversity of IMPKpn isolates. Thus, the IMPKpn exhibited a significant sporadic prevalence across the world. Under the same medical condition and selective pressure, the KPC-2-producing K. pneumoniae spread throughout our hospital [24]. However, the IMPKpn strains only exhibited low prevalence and small scale of outbreaks at the same time. A study revealed that some biological characteristics, such as cell motility, secretion, DNA repair and modification, may contribute to the rapid spread of KPC-producing K. pneumoniae ST258 and ST11 [27]. Recent genomic analysis of K. pneumoniae has established that the genomic background was closely related to the pathogenicity of K. pneumoniae [28]. Therefore, the virulence characteristics, rather than their drug-resistant phenotype, may be the major driving force responsible for the emergence and widely spread of antibiotic-resistant pathogens. The urgent efforts are needed to reveal the genetic background of these pathogens, as well as its relationship with their pathogenic and transmission abilities, which is the essential first step to design intervention strategies preventing their spread.

In this study, most of the clinical isolates exhibited low-level resistance or even sensitivity to imipenem and meropenem, but high-level resistance to ertapenem (Fig. 1). Similar results have also been reported in other studies from China [9, 13, 14, 16, 20]. These studies showed that the effects of IMP hydrolase on different carbapenems may be diverse, and therefore, the carbapenem-sensitive phenotype does not mean negative for carbapenemase. In most laboratories in China, the production of carbapenemases was not usually detected by modified Hodge test [23] in clinical IMPKpn isolates with carbapenem-sensitive phenotype. The weak hydrolytic ability of IMPs to carbapenems may lead to an underestimation of the prevalence of IMPKpn isolates. It was reported that some IMP variants (such IMP-26) exhibited increased carbapenem-hydrolyzing activity [29]. However, the IMP-26-producing IMPKpn were sensitive to imipenem in this study (Fig. 1). Another study also showed that the IMP-26-producing IMPKpn displayed only low-level resistance to imipenem [14]. Therefore, the production of IMPs was not the only factor responsible for high-level carbapenem resistance, other resistance mechanisms may also confer this process, which include hyperexpression of efflux systems, and loss of the outer membrane channel OprD that allows the entry of carbapenems into the cell [30]. For clinical IMPKpn isolates, it is less clear to what extent the different resistant mechanisms have impact on the carbapenem-resistant phenotype.

Plasmid analysis in this study showed that the majority (13 of 20) of bla IMP-carrying plasmids belonged to IncN. Another study in China found the dissemination of IncN bla IMP-coding plasmids among K. pneumoniae of different genotypes [7]. These results suggested that IncN plasmids have a unique advantage and fitness in the spread of bla IMP genes. However, because most of the IncN plasmids had different sizes in this study (Fig. 1), it was possible that the dissemination of bla IMP genes in our hospital may not mediated by transfer of plasmids but other mechanisms.

The present study has several limitations. First, because this study was retrospective analysis and only limited patient information was available, thus the study focused on the characterization of phenotype and genotype of clinical IMPKpn isolates. Second, the genetic environment of bla IMP genes remained to be characterized in our future study. Another limitation of the study included the absence of analyzing other resistance-related determinants, the outer-membrane permeabilities, and efflux systems of IMPKpn isolates. Further studies are needed to address these limitations.

Notes

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

KL, YM, LG, JA and LY performed the phenotypic and genotypic analysis of clinical isolates. JY designed the study, performed data analysis and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

We give our permission for the above material to appear in the print, online, and licensed versions of Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials.

Funding

This study was supported by the China Mega-Project on Infectious Disease Prevention (Grant No. 2017ZX10103002-002-002).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Microbiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, 301 Hospital

References

  1. van Duin D. Doi Y. The global epidemiology of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Virulence. 2016;11:1–10. doi:10.1080/21505594.2016.1222343.Google Scholar
  2. Watanabe M, Iyobe S, Inoue M, Mitsuhashi S. Transferable imipenem resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991;35(1):147–51.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Zhao WH, Hu ZQ. IMP-type metallo-beta-lactamases in Gram-negative bacilli: distribution, phylogeny, and association with integrons. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2011;37(3):214–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ho PL, Lo WU, Chan J, Cheung YY, Chow KH, Yam WC, Lin CH, Que TL. pIMP-PH114 carrying bla IMP-4 in a Klebsiella pneumoniae strain is closely related to other multidrug-resistant IncA/C2 plasmids. Curr Microbiol. 2014;68(2):227–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Peirano G, Lascols C, Hackel M, Hoban DJ, Pitout JD. Molecular epidemiology of Enterobacteriaceae that produce VIMs and IMPs from the SMART surveillance program. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;78(3):277–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Wang JT, Wu UI, Lauderdale TL, Chen MC, Li SY, Hsu LY, Chang SC. Carbapenem-nonsusceptible Enterobacteriaceae in Taiwan. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(3):e0121668.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Feng W, Zhou D, Wang Q, Luo W, Zhang D, Sun Q, Tong Y, Chen W, Sun F, Xia P. Dissemination of IMP-4-encoding pIMP-HZ1-related plasmids among Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a Chinese teaching hospital. Sci Rep. 2016;6:33419.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Fukigai S, Alba J, Kimura S, Iida T, Nishikura N, Ishii Y, Yamaguchi K. Nosocomial outbreak of genetically related IMP-1 beta-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in a general hospital in Japan. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2007;29(3):306–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Yu F, Ying Q, Chen C, Li T, Ding B, Liu Y, Lu Y, Qin Z, Parsons C, Salgado C, et al. Outbreak of pulmonary infection caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates harbouring blaIMP-4 and blaDHA-1 in a neonatal intensive care unit in China. J Med Microbiol. 2012;61(Pt 7):984–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Wang Y, Cao W, Zhu X, Chen Z, Li L, Zhang B, Wang B, Tian L, Wang F, Liu C, et al. Characterization of a novel Klebsiella pneumoniae sequence type 476 carrying both bla KPC-2 and bla IMP-4. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;31(8):1867–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ho PL, Cheung YY, Wang Y, Lo WU, Lai EL, Chow KH, Cheng VC. Characterization of carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae from a healthcare region in Hong Kong. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;35(3):379–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Yan JJ, Ko WC, Wu JJ. Identification of a plasmid encoding SHV-12, TEM-1, and a variant of IMP-2 metallo-beta-lactamase, IMP-8, from a clinical isolate of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001;45(8):2368–71.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Yang Q, Wang H, Sun H, Chen H, Xu Y, Chen M. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of Enterobacteriaceae with decreased susceptibility to carbapenems: results from large hospital-based surveillance studies in China. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54(1):573–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Xia Y, Liang Z, Su X, Xiong Y. Characterization of carbapenemase genes in Enterobacteriaceae species exhibiting decreased susceptibility to carbapenems in a university hospital in Chongqing, China. Ann Lab Med. 2012;32(4):270–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Chen S, Feng W, Chen J, Liao W, He N, Wang Q, Sun F, Xia P. Spread of carbapenemase-producing enterobacteria in a southwest hospital in China. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2014;13:42.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Jian Z, Li Y, Liu W, Li H, Zhang Y, Gu X, Peng W. Detection of the novel IMP-38 among carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in a university hospital, China. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2014;8(8):1044–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Li H, Zhang J, Liu Y, Zheng R, Chen H, Wang X, Wang Z, Cao B, Wang H. Molecular characteristics of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in China from 2008 to 2011: predominance of KPC-2 enzyme. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;78(1):63–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hu L, Zhong Q, Shang Y, Wang H, Ning C, Li Y, Hang Y, Xiong J, Wang X, Xu Y, et al. The prevalence of carbapenemase genes and plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance determinants in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae from five teaching hospitals in central China. Epidemiol Infect. 2014;142(9):1972–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Wei Z, Yu T, Qi Y, Ji S, Shen P, Yu Y, Chen Y. Coexistence of plasmid-mediated KPC-2 and IMP-4 carbapenemases in isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae from China. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66(11):2670–1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Li B, Xu XH, Zhao ZC, Wang MH, Cao YP. High prevalence of metallo-beta-lactamase among carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in a teaching hospital in China. Can J Microbiol. 2014;60(10):691–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lo WU, Cheung YY, Lai E, Lung D, Que TL, Ho PL. Complete sequence of an IncN plasmid, pIMP-HZ1, carrying blaIMP-4 in a Klebsiella pneumoniae strain associated with medical travel to China. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57(3):1561–2.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Cao XL, Cheng L, Zhang ZF, Ning MZ, Zhou WQ, Zhang K, Shen H. Survey of clinical extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing enterobacter cloacae isolates in a Chinese Tertiary Hospital, 2012–2014. Microb Drug Resist. 2017;23(1):83–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. CLSI. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 27th ed. Wayne: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 950 West Valley Road, Suite 2500; 2017.Google Scholar
  24. Yang J, Ye L, Guo L, Zhao Q, Chen R, Luo Y, Chen Y, Tian S, Zhao J, Shen D, et al. A nosocomial outbreak of KPC-2-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in a Chinese hospital: dissemination of ST11 and emergence of ST37, ST392 and ST395. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013;19(11):E509–15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. An J, Guo L, Zhou L, Ma Y, Luo Y, Tao C, Yang J. NDM-producing Enterobacteriaceae in a Chinese hospital, 2014–2015: identification of NDM-producing Citrobacter werkmanii and acquisition of blaNDM-1-carrying plasmid in vivo in a clinical Escherichia coli isolate. J Med Microbiol. 2016;65(11):1253–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Guo L, An J, Ma Y, Ye L, Luo Y, Tao C, Yang J. Nosocomial outbreak of OXA-48-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in a Chinese hospital: clonal transmission of ST147 and ST383. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(8):e0160754.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Chmelnitsky I, Shklyar M, Hermesh O, Navon-Venezia S, Edgar R, Carmeli Y. Unique genes identified in the epidemic extremely drug-resistant KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae sequence type 258. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013;68(1):74–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Brisse S, Fevre C, Passet V, Issenhuth-Jeanjean S, Tournebize R, Diancourt L, Grimont P. Virulent clones of Klebsiella pneumoniae: identification and evolutionary scenario based on genomic and phenotypic characterization. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(3):e4982.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Tada T, Nhung PH, Miyoshi-Akiyama T, Shimada K, Tsuchiya M, Phuong DM, Anh NQ, Ohmagari N, Kirikae T. Multidrug-resistant sequence type 235 Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates producing IMP-26 with increased carbapenem-hydrolyzing activities in vietnam. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60(11):6853–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Zavascki AP, Carvalhaes CG, Picao RC, Gales AC. Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii: resistance mechanisms and implications for therapy. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2010;8(1):71–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Advertisement